SEC Proposes Business Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap
Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2011-137
Washington, D.C., June 29, 2011 – The Securities and Exchange
Commission today voted to propose rules that would impose certain business
conduct standards upon security-based swap dealers and major
security-based swap participants when those parties engage in
security-based swap transactions.
The SEC’s proposed rules stem from Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which authorizes the Commission
to implement a comprehensive framework for regulating the over-the-counter
swaps markets.
“The rules we are proposing would level the playing field in the
security-based swap market by bringing needed transparency to this market
and by seeking to ensure that customers in these transactions are treated
fairly,” said SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro. “The standards we propose are
intended to establish a framework that protects investors and also
promotes efficiency, competition, and capital formation.”
The proposed rules would require security-based swap dealers and major
security-based swap participants to communicate in a fair and balanced
manner and make certain disclosures, including conflicts of interest and
material incentives to potential counterparties. Additional requirements
would be imposed for dealings with special entities, which include
municipalities, pension plans, endowments and similar entities.
Public comments on the SEC’s proposal should be received by Aug. 29,
2011.
# # #
FACT SHEET
Implementing External Business Conduct Standards for
Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap
Participants
Background
In an effort to encourage accountability and transparency, the
Dodd-Frank Act establishes a comprehensive framework for regulating the
over-the-counter swaps markets. Among other things, the Act establishes
business conduct standards for “security-based swap dealers” and “major
security-based swap participants” whenever those entities engage in
security-based swap transactions with counterparties, including those that
are “special entities.”
Special entities are generally defined to include federal agencies,
states and political subdivisions, employee benefit plans as defined under
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), governmental
plans, and endowments.
The Proposal
The proposed rules (15Fh-1 through 15Fh-6 and 15Fk-1) seek to implement
the business conduct requirements described in Section 764 of the
Dodd-Frank Act. Among other things, the proposed rules would require
security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants
to:
- Verify whether a counterparty is an eligible contract participant
and whether it is a special entity.
- Disclose to the counterparty material information about the
security-based swap, including material risks, characteristics,
incentives and conflicts of interest.
- Provide the counterparty with information concerning the daily mark
of the security-based swap.
- Provide the counterparty with information regarding the ability to
require clearing of the security-based swap.
- Communicate with counterparties in a fair and balanced manner based
on principles of fair dealing and good faith.
- Establish a supervisory and compliance infrastructure.
- Designate a chief compliance officer that is required to fulfill the
described duties and provide an annual compliance report.
The proposed rules also would require security-based swap dealers
to:
- Determine that any recommendations they make regarding
security-based swaps are suitable for their counterparties (this
proposal is similar to the FINRA rule regarding suitability, including
institutional suitability).
- Establish, maintain and enforce policies and procedures reasonably
designed to obtain and retain a record of the essential facts concerning
each known counterparty that are necessary to conduct business with such
counterparty.
- Comply with rules designed to prevent “pay-to-play.”
The proposed rules also would define what it means to “act as an
advisor” to a special entity, and would require that a security-based swap
dealer who acts as an advisor to a special entity:
- Act in the “best interests” of the special entity.
- Make reasonable efforts to obtain information that it needs to
determine that the recommendation is in the “best interests” of the
special entity.
In addition, the proposed rules would require security-based swap
dealers and major security-based swap participants acting as
counterparties to special entities to reasonably believe that the
counterparty has an independent representative who meets the following
requirements:
- Has sufficient knowledge to evaluate the transaction and risks.
- Is not subject to a statutory disqualification.
- Is independent of the security-based swap dealer or major
security-based swap participant.
- Undertakes a duty to act in the best interests of the special
entity.
- Makes appropriate disclosures of material information concerning the
security-based swap.
- Provides written representations to the special entity regarding
fair pricing and appropriateness of the security-based swap.
In addition, the independent representative would be subject to
pay-to-play regulations, and if the special entity is an ERISA plan, the
independent representative would be required to be a fiduciary under
ERISA.
Other Regulators
The SEC worked closely with the CFTC in preparing this proposal. The
CFTC also has proposed rules with respect to the external business conduct
standards of swap dealers and major swap participants. See Business
Conduct Standards for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants with
Counterparties, 75 FR 80638 (CFTC Dec. 22, 2010). In preparing this
proposal, the SEC and the CFTC held approximately 30 joint meetings with
interested parties to solicit a variety of views. Commission staff also
has consulted with Department of Labor representatives on this
rulemaking.
What’s Next
The proposal seeks public comment and data on a broad range of issues
relating to the proposed rules, including the costs and benefits
associated with the proposal. Public comments are due Aug. 29, 2011. After
careful review of the comments, the Commission will consider whether to
adopt the proposed rules or modify them.
|