|
Action Alert No. 03-51 December 30, 2003
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
OPEN BOARD MEETINGS
Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 9:00 a.m.
- FASB
Staff Position (FSP). The Board will consider comments
received on proposed FSP FAS 106-a, "Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003," and whether to direct
the staff to issue a final FSP. (Estimated 30-minute
discussion.)
- Open discussion. If necessary, the Board will allow
time to discuss minor issues with staff members on technical
projects or administrative matters. Those discussions are held
following regular Board meetings as topics come up.
OPEN EDUCATION SESSION
Wednesday, January 7, 2004, immediately following the Board
meeting
The Board will hold an educational, non-decision-making session
to discuss topics that are anticipated to be discussed at the
January 14, 2004 Board meeting. Those topics will be posted to the
FASB calendar
four days prior to the education session.
BOARD ACTIONS
The Board Actions are provided for the information and
convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board’s
deliberations. All of the conclusions reported are tentative and may
be changed at future Board meetings. Decisions are included in an
Exposure Draft for formal comment only after a formal written
ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often are)
changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the
Board in comment letters, at public hearings, and through other
communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal
written ballot to issue a final Statement or Interpretation.
December 17, 2003 Board Meeting
Revenue
recognition. The Board discussed various concepts-level
issues related to "enforceable" rights and obligations as that term
is utilized in the conceptual model for revenue recognition. The
Board reached the following tentative conclusions:
- The term enforceable refers to legal compulsion for the
counterparties to perform their promises. Enforceable rights and
obligations may be contractual or noncontractual (for example,
rights and obligations that are legally enforceable under the
doctrine of promissory estoppel). Unconditional rights and
obligations that stem from contracts with customers and other
legally enforceable promises might meet the definitions of assets
and liabilities.
- A contract does not have to be worthy of enforcement in order
to give rise to assets and liabilities. (A contract is not worthy
of enforcement if the costs of enforcing it would outweigh the
benefits of doing so.) The assessment of the probability that
contractual rights will contribute to future net cash inflows and
that contractual obligations will result in future net cash
outflows should affect measurement, but not recognition of related
assets and liabilities.
- Contracts that include cancellation and "cancellation-like"
provisions might give rise to assets and liabilities that should
be recognized and measured at fair value. The concepts-level
guidance should include an acknowledgment that measurement
uncertainties might dictate whether assets and liabilities that
arise from contracts with "cancellation-like" provisions should be
recognized.
- Concepts-level guidance should acknowledge that contractual
promises may be expressed or implied. Standards-level guidance
should be provided for implied contractual promises, including
those that may arise as a result of the seller’s history of
providing concessions.
- Concepts-level guidance should address contracts and
contractual rights and obligations. Standards-level guidance
should be provided for what constitutes evidence that a contract
with the customer exists.
- Standards-level guidance should acknowledge that "side
agreements" alter the nature of contractual rights and obligations
and should be viewed as an integral part of the contract for
purposes of analyzing assets and liabilities that arise from
contractual rights and obligations.
Modifications
of Interpretation 46. The Board considered comments received
on the Exposure Draft of the proposed modification of FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, and redeliberated certain proposed modifications. The
staff announced that, in response to requests by constituents, the
final Interpretation will include the complete text of
Interpretation 46 as revised, and will be FASB Interpretation No.
46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised
December 2003), also referred to as Interpretation 46(R).
The Board decided that Interpretation 46(R) would:
- Provide that the condition that would preclude an enterprise
from applying the scope exception for certain entities that are
businesses if that enterprise and/or its related parties
participated significantly in the design or redesign of the entity
should not apply if the entity is a franchisee. The remaining
conditions in this scope exception, adopted by the Board at the
December 10, 2003 Board meeting, apply to a franchisee.
- Provide that an enterprise shall not consolidate a
governmental organization and shall not consolidate a financing
entity established by a governmental organization unless the
financing entity (a) is not a governmental organization and (b) is
used by the business enterprise in a manner similar to a variable
interest entity in an effort to circumvent the provisions of
Interpretation 46(R).
- Provide that a troubled debt restructuring, as defined in
paragraph 2 of FASB Statement No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and
Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings, as amended, shall
be accounted for in accordance with that Statement and is not an
event that requires the reconsideration of whether the entity
involved is a variable interest entity or whether an enterprise
with a variable interest in a variable interest entity is the
primary beneficiary of that entity.
- Provide that an enterprise with an interest in an entity to
which the provisions of Interpretation 46 have not been applied as
of December 24, 2003, shall apply Interpretation 46 or
Interpretation 46(R) to that entity in accordance with the
effective date provisions of Interpretation 46(R) as described in
item 5 below.
- Provide the following effective date provisions for a:
- Public Entity That Is Not a Small Business Issuer
(1) A public entity1 (enterprise) that is
not a small business issuer shall apply Interpretation 46(R) to
all entities subject to it no later than the end of the first
reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004 (as of March 31,
2004 for calendar-year enterprises). This effective date
includes those entities to which Interpretation 46 was
previously applied.
(2) However, prior to the required application of
Interpretation 46(R), a public entity (enterprise) that is not a
small business issuer shall apply Interpretation 46 or
Interpretation 46(R) to those entities that are considered to be
special-purpose entities2 no later than as of the end
of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003
(as of December 31, 2003, for calendar-year enterprises).
(3) A public entity (enterprise) that is not a small
business issuer that has applied Interpretation 46 to an entity
prior to the effective date of Interpretation 46(R) shall either
continue to apply Interpretation 46 until the effective date of
Interpretation 46(R) or apply Interpretation 46(R) at an earlier
date.
- Public Entity That Is a Small Business Issuer
(1) A public entity (enterprise) that is a small
business issuer shall apply Interpretation 46(R) to all entities
subject to it no later than the end of the first reporting
period that ends after December 15, 2004 (as of December 31,
2004, for calendar-year enterprises). This effective date
includes those entities to which Interpretation 46 had
previously been applied.
(2) However, prior to the required application of
Interpretation 46(R), a public entity (enterprise) that is a
small business issuer shall apply Interpretation 46 or
Interpretation 46(R) to those entities that are considered to be
special-purpose entities no later than as of the end of the
first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003 (as of
December 31, 2003, for calendar-year enterprises).
(3) A public entity (enterprise) that is a small
business issuer that has applied Interpretation 46 to an entity
prior to the effective date of Interpretation 46(R) shall either
continue to apply Interpretation 46 until the effective date of
Interpretation 46(R) or apply Interpretation 46(R) at an earlier
date.
- Nonpublic Entity
A nonpublic entity3 (enterprise) with an interest
in an entity that is subject to Interpretation 46(R) and that is
created after December 31, 2003, shall apply Interpretation
46(R) to that entity immediately. A nonpublic enterprise shall
apply Interpretation 46(R) to all entities that are subject to
it by the beginning of the first annual period beginning after
December 15, 2004.
- Provide the following transition guidance;
- The effect of adopting Interpretation 46(R) shall be
reported as a cumulative effect of an accounting change.
- Restatement of previously issued financial statements will
be encouraged but not required.
- Incorporate revised guidance on the identification of variable
interests into Appendix B of Interpretation 46(R).
The Board decided not to reexpose Interpretation 46(R) for
further comment and to proceed with the balloting process. The full
text of Interpretation 46(R) has been posted to the FASB
website.
The FASB staff announced that the final FSP FIN 46-8, "Evaluating
Whether as a Group the Holders of the Equity Investment at Risk Lack
the Direct or Indirect Ability to Make Decisions about an Entity's
Activities through Voting Rights or Similar Rights under FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities," will be posted to the FASB website no later than the
end of the day on Friday, December 19, 2003.
_______________________ 1The term
public entity is defined in paragraph 395 of FASB Statement
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The term
small business issuer is defined in SEC Regulation S-B
§228.10(a)(1).
2The term special-purpose
entity refers to an entity that previously would have been
accounted for by applying the guidance in EITF Issues No. 90-15,
“Impact of Nonsubstantive Lessors, Residual Value Guarantees, and
Other Provisions in Leasing Transactions,” No. 96-21,
“Implementation Issues in Accounting for Leasing Transactions
involving Special-Purpose Entities,” and No. 97-1, “Implementation
Issues in Accounting for Lease Transactions, including Those
involving Special-Purpose Entities,” and EITF Topic No. D-14,
“Transactions involving Special-Purpose
Entities.”
Special-purpose entities for this provision are
expected to include any entity whose activities are primarily
related to securitizations or other forms of asset-backed financings
or single-lessee leasing arrangements.
3The term
nonpublic entity is defined in paragraph 395 of Statement
123.
Business
combinations: purchase method procedures (including combinations
between mutual enterprises).
In its project on combinations between mutual enterprises, the
Board decided:
- To provide broadly applicable guidance for determining the
fair value of an acquired business in the absence of observable
prices from transactions in active markets. Additionally, the
Board decided to provide certain guidance specific to measuring
the fair value of an acquired mutual enterprise, in particular,
that benefits to members (for example, the distribution of member
benefits in the form of reduced fees charged for goods or
services) should be considered when measuring fair value.
- To affirm that its tentative decisions reached for calculating
and recognizing goodwill, which are consistent with those reached
in its project on purchase method procedures for combinations of
business enterprises, should apply to mutual enterprises.
- That the transition and effective date provisions for
combinations between two or more mutual enterprises should be
consistent with all other entities applying the purchase method
procedures decisions. Those provisions would require that the
purchase method procedures decisions be applied to combinations
occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004, and
interim periods within those fiscal years.
- To require that acquiring credit unions apply the provisions
of FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, in making
an assessment about whether the acquired assets include core
deposit intangible assets that meet the requirements for
recognition apart from goodwill.
In its project on purchase method procedures, the Board
decided:
- To require that an acquiring entity disclose the basis (method
used) for determining the fair value of the acquired business for
all business combinations. The methods commonly used are (a) to
estimate the fair value of the acquired enterprise based on the
fair value of the consideration transferred or (b) a market or
income approach for measuring an enterprise.
- Not to expand the scope of the project to include "basket
purchases" of assets (and related liabilities). Instead the Board
directed the staff to focus its efforts on clarifying the
definition of a business.
Fair
value measurement. The Board discussed clarifications to the
fair value hierarchy and other related issues and reached the
following decisions:
- The Board generally agreed that in applying the fair value
hierarchy, an entity should maximize market inputs from active
markets, even if the asset (or liability) being measured is not
exchanged in an active market. Active markets should be
distinguished from other markets based on the frequency with which
assets (or liabilities) are traded without regard to liquidity.
Level 1 and 2 estimates should be determined using quoted prices
in active markets to which an entity has immediate access,
considering the current ("as is") condition and location of the
asset (or liability) being measured. In contrast, level 3
estimates should be determined using multiple valuation techniques
and a combination of market (and other) inputs. The Board
clarified the "upper" and "lower" ends of level 3 by reference to
the extent to which market inputs are used in those techniques.
- The Board decided that the following information should be
disclosed for recognized assets and liabilities measured at fair
value: (a) the fair value amounts recognized in the statement
of financial position, in total and as a percentage of total
assets (and liabilities), (b) how those fair value amounts
were determined; that is, whether using quoted market prices for
identical or similar assets (or liabilities), or other valuation
techniques and, if so, the extent to which observable market
inputs were used in those techniques, and (c) changes in
those fair value amounts reported in earnings (or other
comprehensive income) for the period.
- The Board decided to retain the practicability exceptions to
fair value in existing pronouncements.
FASB MEETINGS AUDIO WEBCAST
NEW FREE SERVICE
Beginning with the January 7, 2004 Board meeting, you will now be
able to monitor FASB meetings by an audio webcast. The service is
provided free of charge. To access the webcast, you will need to go
to the FASB’s homepage to access the link. (This link will not be
available until January 6, 2004.) You must have Windows Media
Player™ installed on your computer to access the webcast. To listen
to a recording of the most recent Board meeting via webcast for
free, go to the FASB’s homepage to access the Board meeting playback
link. The playback will be available until the next Board
meeting.
FASB MEETINGS BY TELEPHONE
NEW LOWER PRICE
Because not everyone will choose to use the webcast to listen to
the FASB meetings, we will continue to offer telephone broadcasting
of meetings, at a lower price. Starting with the January 7, 2004
Board meeting, the telephone access charges will be reduced from the
current $.75 per minute to $.45 per minute. Call 1-800-846-4717 to
monitor the meetings by telephone. To listen by telephone to a
recording of the most recent Board meeting, call 1-800-462-0393 (the
playback will be available until the next Board meeting). For either
of those options, you will be charged $.45 per minute, and VISA,
MasterCard, American Express, or Discover Card is required.
Questions can be directed to 1-800-846-4630.
FASB DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE
The Board recently issued FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003),
Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits, and FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
These documents are available on the FASB website. Printed copies
will be mailed to subscribers on or about January 12, 2004. Copies
also will be available after that date from the FASB Order
Department by calling 1-800-748-0659.
FUTURE OPEN MEETINGS
The following is a list of open meetings tentatively scheduled
through January. Because schedules may change, please check the FASB
calendar
before finalizing your plans. Revisions to this list since the last
issue of Action Alert are highlighted in bold.
Wednesday, January 14, 2004—FASB Board Meeting Wednesday,
January 14, 2004—FASB Education Session Wednesday, January 21,
2004—FASB Board Meeting Wednesday, January 21, 2004—FASB
Education Session Wednesday, January 28, 2004—FASB Board
Meeting Wednesday, January 28, 2004—FASB Education
Session Friday, January 30, 2004—Liaison Meeting with the
American Bar Association
|
|