Action Alert No. 04-38
September 30, 2004

NOTICE OF MEETINGS

OPEN BOARD MEETINGS
(Board meetings are available by audio webcast and telephone.)

Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 9:00 a.m.

  1. Short-term convergence: phase 1. The Board will redeliberate the remaining issues related to its December 15, 2003 Exposure Draft, Earnings per Share. (Estimated 30-minute discussion.)

  2. Equity-based compensation. The Board will continue redeliberations of its Exposure Draft, Share-Based Payment, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95. The Board plans to address transition issues for public companies. (Estimated 1.5-hour discussion.)

  3. Financial instruments: liabilities and equity. The Board will discuss definitions and the settlement and ownership relationship criteria that might be used to distinguish whether a single component financial instrument should be reported as a liability or in equity (previously referred to as “simple” instruments). (Estimated 60-minute discussion.)

  4. Open discussion. If necessary, the Board will allow time to discuss minor issues with staff members on technical projects or administrative matters. Those discussions are held following regular Board meetings as topics come up.

OPEN EDUCATION SESSION

Wednesday, October 6, 2004, immediately following the Board meeting

The Board will hold an educational, non-decision-making session to discuss topics that are anticipated to be discussed at the October 13, 2004 Board meeting. Those topics will be posted to the FASB calendar four days prior to the education session.

OPEN MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE AICPA PRIVATE COMPANIES PRACTICE SECTION TECHNICAL ISSUES COMMITTEE

Friday, October 8, 2004, 10:00 a.m.

The Board will meet with representatives of the Private Companies Practice Section Technical Issues Committee of the AICPA to discuss matters of mutual interest.

BOARD ACTIONS

The Board Actions are provided for the information and convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board’s deliberations. All of the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written ballot to issue a final Statement or Interpretation.

September 22, 2004 Board Meeting

Equity-based compensation (EBC). The Board continued its redeliberations of the March 2004 FASB Exposure Draft, Share-Based Payment. The Board discussed issues related to the accounting and reporting for the income tax effects of equity-based compensation and made the following decisions:

  1. The Board affirmed its decision to amend the cash flow reporting requirements of FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, as proposed in the Exposure Draft. That is, realized excess tax benefits would be represented as financing cash inflows. The Board decided that tax benefit deficiencies should not be accounted for in the statement of cash flows because they are inherently different from realized excess tax benefits—realized excess tax benefits reduce an enterprise’s obligation to pay income taxes, whereas tax benefit deficiencies have no such effect.

  2. The Board discussed how to account for the income tax consequences of compensation cost from equity-based compensation transactions that is capitalized as part of another asset. The Board concluded that compensation cost based on the grant-date fair value of an at-the-money employee stock option that is a nonqualified stock option under the tax law establishes a deemed tax basis for income tax accounting purposes. That is, the grant-date fair value measurement is an estimate of the tax basis that will apply to the asset upon the option’s exercise (and thus, forms a part of the asset’s deemed tax basis for income tax accounting purposes). The Board also concluded that additional guidance to explain or illustrate the application of that decision in various circumstances was not required.

  3. The Board considered whether deferred tax assets generated from recognized compensation cost of equity-based compensation transactions should be assessed for recoverability based on subsequent changes in the stock price from the grant date and decided not to change Statement 123’s method, which precludes such an assessment.

Qualifying special-purpose entities with isolation of transferred assets. The Board discussed whether to (1) amend the isolation requirement of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and (2) add a requirement that the transferor must agree to pay the transferee any benefits from exercising setoff on transferred assets in order for the transaction to be accounted for as a sale. The Board made the following decisions:

  1. The implementation guidance on isolation should be amended to define isolation in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of a true sale at law and an opinion that the transferred assets would not be included in the estate of the transferor or any consolidated affiliate that is not a special-purpose corporation or other entity designed to make remote the possibility that it would enter bankruptcy or other receivership (nonconsolidation opinion).

  2. Implementation guidance should be added that describes the conditions the Board understands attorneys require to issue a true-sale-at-law opinion and a nonconsolidation opinion under U.S. bankruptcy and receivership law for transfers of financial assets.

  3. The amount of recourse (or guarantee) that can be provided by a transferor that would prevent a transaction from meeting the requirements of a true sale should be left to an attorney’s professional judgment based on the facts and circumstances of the transaction.

  4. A requirement should be put in place that the transferor must agree to pay the transferee any benefits from exercising setoff on transferred assets in order for the transaction to meet the requirements of paragraph 9(c).

Servicing rights. The Board clarified a decision made at its August 4, 2004 meeting that the election to subsequently measure classes of servicing rights at fair value is an irrevocable, one-time election that can be made at any time subsequent to the adoption of the guidance.

The Board decided to retain the disclosures required in paragraph 17(e) of Statement 140 for separately recognized servicing rights subsequently measured at the lower of carrying amount or market (LOCOM).

The Board decided to require the following additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing rights, which will be separately presented for servicing rights subsequently measured at fair value and servicing rights subsequently measured at LOCOM:

  1. A description of the classes of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value or LOCOM, management’s rationale for its decision to subsequently measure those classes of servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value or LOCOM, a description of the risks inherent in the servicing activity, and, if applicable, the instruments used to manage those risks

  2. A roll forward of the balance of each class of servicing rights for each period that operations are presented, including a description of where each source of activity is reported in the statement of income

  3. Servicing fees earned during each period that operations are presented

  4. A description of the valuation techniques used to estimate fair value of the servicing rights

  5. A sensitivity analysis or stress test showing the hypothetical effect on the fair value of each class of the servicing rights of two or more unfavorable variations from the expected levels for each key assumption.

The Board decided that quantitative disclosures relative to the fair value, valuation techniques used to estimate fair value, and sensitivity analysis for risk management activities related to separately recognized servicing rights will be encouraged, but not required.

FUTURE OPEN MEETINGS

The following is a list of open meetings tentatively scheduled through October. All meetings are held in Norwalk, Connecticut, unless otherwise noted. Because schedules may change, please check the FASB calendar before finalizing your plans. Revisions to this list since the last issue of Action Alert are highlighted in bold.

Wednesday, October 13, 2004—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, October 13, 2004—FASB Education Session
Thursday, October 14, 2004—User Advisory Council Meeting, New York City
Friday, October 15, 2004—FASB Insurance Industry Forum
Tuesday, October 19, 2004—Joint FASB/IASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, October 20, 2004—Joint FASB/IASB Board Meeting
Thursday, October 21, 2004—FASB Education Session
Wednesday, October 27, 2004—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, October 27, 2004—FASB Education Session