Action Alert No. 05-26
June 30, 2005

NOTICE OF MEETINGS

OPEN BOARD MEETING
(Board meetings are available by audio webcast and telephone.)

Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 9:00 a.m.

  1. Derivative disclosures. The Board will discuss the scope of the project and whether the disclosure guidance should be limited to derivatives accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or expanded to include all financial instruments. (Estimated 30-minute discussion.)

  2. Interpretation of paragraphs 40(b) and 40(c) of Statement 140. The Board will discuss whether to approve the issuance of a proposed FASB Staff Position (FSP) that would clarify that the accounting guidance provided in paragraphs 40(b) and 40(c) of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, relative to the notional amount of passive derivative instruments held by qualifying special-purpose entities (SPEs) is required to be met upon initial establishment of the qualifying SPE only. (Estimated 30-minute discussion.)

  3. Open discussion. If necessary, the Board will allow time to discuss minor issues with staff members on technical projects or administrative matters. Those discussions are held following regular Board meetings as topics come up.

OPEN EDUCATION SESSION

Wednesday, July 6, 2005, following the Board meeting

The Board will hold an educational, non-decision-making session to discuss topics that are anticipated to be discussed at the July 13, 2005 Board meeting. Those topics will be posted to the FASB calendar four days prior to the education session.

BOARD ACTIONS

The Board Actions are provided for the information and convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board’s deliberations. All of the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written ballot to issue a final Statement or Interpretation.

June 22, 2005 Board Meeting

Conceptual framework. The Board continued its deliberations on the joint IASB/FASB conceptual framework project. The Board discussed issues relating to qualitative characteristics of accounting information, including the existing characteristics of comparability and understandability, and potential new characteristics. The Board reached the following conclusions:

  1. Comparability is an important characteristic of decision-useful financial information and should be included in the converged conceptual framework. Comparability—which enables users to identify similarities in and differences between economic phenomena—should be distinguished from consistency—the consistent use of accounting methods. Concerns about comparability or consistency should not preclude reporting information that is of greater relevance, or that more faithfully represents the economic phenomena it purports to represent. If such concerns arise, disclosures can help to compensate for lessened comparability or consistency.

  2. Understandability also is an essential characteristic of decision-useful financial information and should be included in the converged conceptual framework. Information is made more understandable by aggregating, classifying, characterizing, and presenting it clearly and concisely. Whether reported information is sufficiently understandable depends on who is using it. The information in general-purpose external financial reports should be understandable to financial statement users who have a reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities and accounting and a willingness to study the information with reasonable diligence. Relevant information should not be excluded because it is too complex or difficult for some users to understand.

  3. Materiality relates not only to relevance, but also to faithful representation. Materiality should be included in the converged framework as a screen or filter to determine whether information is sufficiently significant to influence the decisions of users in the context of the entity, rather than as a qualitative characteristic of decision-useful financial information.

  4. Transparency, often cited recently as a desirable characteristic of financial information, seems to be difficult to define. In current usage, it appears to encompass some of the qualitative characteristics already included in the framework. Because it would be redundant, transparency should not be added to the converged framework as a separate qualitative characteristic of decision-useful financial information.

  5. Other possible characteristics considered, including credibility, high quality and internal consistency, do not describe attributes of decision-useful financial information that are distinct from other qualitative characteristics. Thus, they should not be added as separate qualitative characteristics in the converged framework.

  6. The converged framework should include information about the types of costs that should be considered in deciding what financial information to provide, as well as criteria to help standard setters decide how to take particular types of costs into account.

  7. The converged framework should include presumptions not only about the capabilities of financial statement users but also about the capabilities of financial statement preparers and auditors.

The IASB separately discussed the same issues and reached similar conclusions. The Boards plan to discuss how the qualitative characteristics relate to one another at meetings in July.

FASB DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE

The following documents are available on the FASB website:

FASB Exposure Draft, Business Combinations, was issued on June 30, 2005. Comments are requested by October 28, 2005.

FASB Exposure Draft, Consolidated Financial Statements, Including Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries, was issued on June 30, 2005. Comments are requested by October 28, 2005.

Final FSP FAS 150-5, “Issuers Accounting under FASB Statement No. 150 for Freestanding Warrants and Other Similar Instruments on Shares That Are Redeemable,” was issued on June 29, 2005.

Proposed FSP FAS 123(R)-a, “Classification of Freestanding Financial Instruments Originally Issued as Employee Compensation,” was issued on June 28, 2005. Comments are requested by July 29, 2005.

FUTURE OPEN MEETINGS

The following is a list of open meetings tentatively scheduled through August. Because schedules may change, please check the FASB calendar before finalizing your plans. Revisions to this list since the last issue of Action Alert are highlighted in bold.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, July 13, 2005—FASB Education Session
Wednesday, July 20, 2005—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, July 20, 2005—FASB Education Session
Monday, July 25, 2005—Liaison Meeting with the Edison Electric Institute
Wednesday, July 27, 2005—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, July 27, 2005—FASB Education Session
Wednesday, August 3, 2005—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, August 3, 2005—FASB Education Session
Friday, August 5, 2005—Liaison Meeting with Financial Managers Society
Wednesday, August 10, 2005—No FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, August 10, 2005—FASB Education Session
Wednesday, August 17, 2005—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, August 17, 2005—FASB Education Session
Wednesday, August 24, 2005—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, August 24, 2005—FASB Education Session
Wednesday, August 31, 2005—FASB Board Meeting
Wednesday, August 31, 2005—FASB Education Session