SUMMARY OF BOARD DECISIONS
Summary of Board decisions are provided for the information and
convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board’s deliberations. All of
the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board
meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only
after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often
are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in
comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other
communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written
ballot to issue an Accounting Standards Update.
May 17, 2010 FASB/IASB Joint Board Meeting
Revenue
recognition. The Boards considered:
- Repurchase agreements
- Sales of assets that are not an output of an entity’s ordinary activities.
Repurchase Agreements
The Boards tentatively decided that the
forthcoming Exposure Draft will explain how an entity would determine whether a
buyer obtains control of an asset subject to a repurchase agreement.
- If a buyer has the unconditional right to require the entity to repurchase
the asset (a put option), the buyer obtains control of the asset and the
entity should account for the agreement similarly to the sale of a product
with a right of return.
- If an entity has an unconditional obligation or unconditional right to
repurchase the asset (a forward or a call option), the buyer does not obtain
control of the asset. The entity should account for the repurchase agreement
as:
- A lease in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards
Codification™ Topic 840, Leases, or IAS 17, Leases, if the
entity repurchases the asset for less than the original sales price of the
asset (that is, the buyer pays a net amount of consideration to the entity).
- A financing arrangement if the entity repurchases the asset for more
than the original sales price of the asset (that is, the entity pays a net
amount of consideration to the buyer).
- If the sale and repurchase agreement is a financing arrangement, the
entity should continue to recognize the asset and should recognize a financial
liability for any consideration received from the buyer. The entity should
recognize the difference between the amount of consideration received from the
buyer and the amount of consideration paid to the buyer as interest and, if
applicable, holding costs (for example, insurance).
The FASB
tentatively decided to remove from the Accounting Standards Codification
Subtopic 470-40, Debt— Product Financing Arrangements.
Sales of
Assets That Are Not an Output of an Entity’s Ordinary Activities
The
Boards tentatively decided that an entity should apply the recognition and
measurement principles of the proposed revenue model to contracts for the sale
of the following assets that are not an output of the entity’s ordinary
activities:
- Intangible assets within the scope of Topic 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and
Other, or IAS 38, Intangible Assets
- Property, plant, and equipment within the scope of Topic 360, Property,
Plant, and Equipment, or IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, or
IAS 40, Investment Property.
Consequently, the entity would:
- Derecognize the asset when the buyer obtains control of the asset.
- Recognize at that date a gain or loss equal to the difference between the
transaction price and the carrying amount of the asset. The transaction price
would be limited to amounts that can be reasonably estimated at the date of
transfer.
Next Steps
The Boards plan to publish the Exposure Draft in
June.
Conceptual
framework: objective & qualitative characteristics. The Boards
discussed two issues that arose from the ballot draft on the objective of
financial reporting and the qualitative characteristics chapters. First, they
agreed that materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance rather than a
constraint to be considered in setting financial reporting standards. Second,
they discussed how best to describe the objective of financial reporting. The
Boards directed the staff to prepare a new ballot draft to reflect the results
of the decision about materiality and the discussion of the
objective.
May 18, 2010 FASB/IASB Joint Board
Meeting
Leases.
The Boards discussed:
- Lessor accounting for the performance obligation
- Derecognition approach to lessor accounting.
Lessor Accounting
for the Performance Obligation
The Boards tentatively decided that
under a performance obligation approach to lessor accounting, the lessor has a
single performance obligation to continue to permit the lessee to use the leased
asset over the lease term. That performance obligation would be satisfied, and
revenue recognized, continuously over the lease term.
Derecognition
Approach to Lessor Accounting
The Boards discussed an alternative
approach to lessor accounting, the derecognition approach. The Boards then
discussed two possible models—a full derecognition approach and a partial
derecognition approach.
If the Boards adopt a derecognition approach to
lessor accounting, they tentatively decided to adopt a partial derecognition
approach. Under that approach, the Boards discussed:
- Accounting for residual assets
- Accounting for options.
Accounting for Residual
Assets
The Boards tentatively decided that the residual asset would
be an allocation of the previous carrying amount of the underlying asset. The
residual asset would not be remeasured unless for
impairment.
Accounting for Options
The Boards tentatively
decided that initial measurement of the residual asset recognized by the lessor
would be based on the assessed lease term, that is, the longest possible lease
term that is more likely than not to occur.
Insurance
contracts. [This
topic will be posted as soon as it becomes
available.]
Consolidation.
[This topic will be posted as soon
as it becomes available.]
May 19, 2010
FASB/IASB Joint Board Meeting
Leases.
[This topic will be posted as soon
as it becomes available.]
Insurance
contracts. [This
topic will be posted as soon as it becomes
available.]
Derecognition.
[This topic will be posted as soon
as it becomes available.]