Summary of Board decisions are provided for the information and convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board’s deliberations. All of the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written ballot to issue an Accounting Standards Update.
March 2, 2011 FASB Board Meeting
Accounting
for financial instruments: classification and measurement.
Equity Securities
The Board discussed the classification
and measurement of equity securities (other than instruments that can be
redeemed only for a certain amount or that are measured according to the equity
method of accounting). The Board decided that all marketable equity securities
should be measured at fair value with all changes in fair value recognized in
net income.
For nonpublic entities, the Board tentatively decided that a
practicability exception to fair value measurement should be provided for
investments in nonmarketable equity securities. The practicability exception
would permit nonmarketable equity securities to be measured at cost less any
other-than-temporary impairment; upward adjustments in fair value would be
recognized when information about a change in price is observable. Public
entities would be required to measure investments in nonmarketable securities at
fair value with all changes in fair value recognized in net income.
The
Board requested the staff to refine the practicability exception to determine
whether observable information about changes in the price of the security should
include changes based on transactions involving only identical instruments or
whether changes could be based on transactions involving similar securities or
other sources of information about the value of the securities. The Board also
requested the staff to perform additional analysis of whether the scope of the
exception should be:
Financial Liabilities
The Board discussed the classification
and measurement of “plain-vanilla” financial liabilities, such as core deposit
liabilities and an entity’s own debt. The Board decided that these financial
liabilities would be classified and measured using the business strategy
criterion developed for financial assets, which would require financial
liabilities to be measured at fair value with all changes in fair value
recognized in net income or at amortized cost based on the entity’s business
activity for those financial liabilities.
The Board will continue its
discussions on classification and measurement of financial instruments at future
Board meetings. These discussions will include the characteristics of the
instrument criterion, the business strategy criterion, and application of these
criteria to certain financial instruments (for example, hybrid financial
instruments).