SUMMARY OF BOARD DECISIONS
Summary of Board decisions are provided for the information and
convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board´s deliberations. All of
the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board
meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only
after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often
are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in
comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other
communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written
ballot to issue an Accounting Standards Update.
October 3, 2012 FASB Board Meeting
Accounting
for financial instruments: impairment. The Board discussed
disclosures and related presentation issues related to the Current Expected
Credit Loss (CECL) model.
Disclosures
The Board
tentatively decided to require the following disclosures:
- Expected credit loss calculations (disaggregated at the portfolio
segment level):
- A discussion of the inputs and specific assumptions an entity factors
into its estimate of expected credit loss, including a description of the
reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future that affected their
estimate.
- How the information above is developed and utilized in measuring
expected credit losses.
- Allowance narrative disclosures (disaggregated at the portfolio segment
level):
- A discussion of the changes in credit loss expectations and the reasons
for those changes.
- A discussion of the changes in estimation techniques used and the
reasons for the change.
- Reasons for a significant amount of write-offs.
- Financial asset roll forward (disaggregated at the portfolio segment
level):
- A roll forward of the amortized cost balances of financial assets within
the scope of the impairment model that are classified at amortized cost,
from the beginning of the period to the end of the period.
- A roll forward of the amortized cost balances of financial assets within
the scope of the impairment model that are classified at FV-OCI, from the
beginning of the period to the end of the period.
- Use of the practical expedient for financial assets measured at FV-OCI
(disaggregated at the portfolio segment level):
- The amortized cost balance of assets measured at FV-OCI that apply the
practical expedient to not measure expected credit losses.
- Nonaccrual assets:
- The average recorded investment in nonaccrual debt
instruments.
- The amount of interest income recognized during the period on nonaccrual
debt instruments.
- The amortized cost of debt instruments on nonaccrual status as of the
reporting date.
- The amortized cost of debt instruments on nonaccrual status for which
there are no related expected credit losses as of the reporting date because
the debt instrument is fully collateralized.
- Purchased credit-impaired assets:
- A reconciliation of PCI assets purchased in the current period,
including the purchase price of those assets, the discount attributable to
expected credit losses, the discount attributable to non-credit factors, and
the par value of the assets.
- Collateral disclosures (disaggregated at the class level):
- A discussion of the quality of collateral securing an entity´s financial
assets.
- An explanation of any changes in the quality of collateral, whether
because of a general deterioration, a change in appraisal policies by the
reporting entity, or some other reason.
The Board also
tentatively decided to amend implementation guidance in paragraph 310-10-55-8
that provides information on the credit quality of financial
assets.
Presentation
The Board tentatively decided that
balance sheet and income statement amounts for purchased credit-impaired assets
need not be presented separately from non-PCI assets.
[Revised 10/08/12] Accounting
for financial instruments: classification and
measurement.
Assessment of the Need for a Valuation
Allowance against Deferred Tax Assets Related to Debt Instruments Classified and
Measured at Fair Value though Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI)
The
Board decided that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance
on deferred tax assets related to debt instruments classified and measured at
FVOCI separately from its evaluation of other deferred tax
assets.
Scope Considerations Related to Entities within Specialized
Industries
The Board decided to retain the following
specialized guidance in the relevant industry Topics in FASB Accounting
Standards Codification:
Broker Dealers:
- Initial measurement guidance on (a) fail-to-deliver assets, (b)
fail-to-deliver liabilities, (c) financial-restructuring transactions, and (d)
proprietary trading securities
- Subsequent measurement guidance on (a) securities underlying suspense
accounts, (b) shares that a broker-dealer is firmly committed to purchase but
that have not yet been subscribed to by customers, (c) investments in the form
of equity or financing provided to another entity in connection with
financial-restructuring transactions, and (d) proprietary trading
securities
Investment Companies:
- Subsequent measurement guidance on investments in debt and equity
securities
- Measurement guidance on (a) dividends and interest, (b) investment
securities sold, (c) capital stock sold, and (d) other accounts receivable,
such as receivables from related parties, including expense reimbursement
receivables from affiliates and variation margin on open futures contracts
The Board decided to supersede the following specialized
guidance in the relevant industry Topics in FASB Accounting Standards
Codification. Therefore, such entities would apply the tentative model for
classification and measurement to such instruments:
Depository and
Lending Institutions
- Initial measurement guidance on debt-equity swaps
- Subsequent measurement guidance on (a) debt-equity swaps and (b) short
sales of securities
Mortgage Banks
- Initial measurement guidance on (a) affiliated transactions and (b) loans
held as long-term investments
- Subsequent measurement guidance on (a) loans held for sale and (b)
securitizations of mortgage loans held for sale
The Board also decided
that investment companies and brokers and dealers in securities would not be
allowed to use the proposed practicability exception to fair value measurement
for investments in nonmarketable equity securities.
The Board also
affirmed its previous decision to exempt nonpublic investment companies and
nonpublic brokers and dealers in securities from the requirement to provide the
fair value of financial instruments classified and measured at amortized cost,
either parenthetically on the face of the financial statements or in the notes
to the financial statements.
Presentation and
Disclosure
The Board decided that equity method investments held for
sale would be presented in a separate line item on the face of the statement of
financial position.
The Board agreed to require the following disclosures
in notes to financial statements:
Financial Instruments Measured at
Amortized Cost:
- An entity with financial instruments that are measured at amortized cost
for which fair value information is presented parenthetically on the statement
of financial position would disclose the following about the fair value
information:
- The level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value
measurements are categorized in their entirety (Level 1, 2, or 3).
- For fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy, quantitative information about the significant unobservable
inputs used in the fair value measurement.
- For fair value measurements categorized within Level 2 and Level 3 of
the fair value hierarchy, a description of the valuation technique(s) and
the inputs used in the fair value measurement.
- A description of the changes in the method(s) and significant
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments,
including the reason(s) for making the change, if any, during the
period.
- For fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy, a description of the valuation processes used by the reporting
entity (including, for example, how an entity decides its valuation policies
and procedures and analyzes changes in fair value measurements from period
to period).
- An entity that has sold financial assets that were carried at amortized
cost would disclose the following:
- The net carrying amount of the asset(s) sold
- The net gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income for any
derivative that hedged the forecasted acquisition of the amortized cost
security
- The related realized gain or loss on asset(s) sold
- The circumstances leading to the decision to sell the asset(s)
- The amortized cost basis, fair value, and the unrealized gain or loss on
asset(s) subsequently identified for sale
Financial
Assets classified at FVOCI
- An entity with financial assets classified at FVOCI would disclose the
following:
- The amortized cost basis of the assets
- Fair value
- Total gains for financial assets with net gains in accumulated other
comprehensive income
- Total losses for financial assets with net losses in accumulated other
comprehensive income
- An entity that has sold financial assets classified at FVOCI would
disclose:
- The proceeds from sales and the gross realized gains and gross realized
losses that have been recognized in earnings as a result of those
sales
- The amount of the net unrealized holding gain or loss on assets for the
period that has been included in accumulated other comprehensive income and
the amount of gains and losses reclassified out of accumulated other
comprehensive income into earnings for the period
Reclassification of Financial Assets Due to a Change in
Business Model
- For financial assets that have been reclassified because of a change in an
entity´s business model:
- The date of reclassification.
- A detailed explanation of the reason for the change in business model
and a qualitative description of its effect on the entity´s financial
statements.
- The amount reclassified into and out of each category
Other Disclosures
- Entities that apply the practicability exception to fair value measurement
for investments in nonmarketable equity securities would disclose the
following
- The carrying amount of equity securities that the entity concludes are
nonmarketable
- The amount of any impairments and upward and downward adjustments, both
annual and cumulative
- As of the date of the most recent statement of financial position,
additional information (in narrative form) that provides sufficient
information to allow financial statement users to understand the
quantitative disclosures and the information that the entity considered
(both positive and negative) in reaching the carrying amounts and upward or
downward adjustments.
- An entity with nonrecourse financial liabilities would disclose:
- Qualitative information about the relationship between financial assets
and the nonrecourse financial liabilities that will be used to settle them,
and the line items where they are reported.
- The carrying amounts of the financial liabilities and the related
financial assets that will be used to settle the nonrecourse financial
liabilities
- Own credit risk (applicable to financial liabilities for which an entity
has elected the fair value option):
- The amount of change, during the period and cumulatively, in the fair
value of the financial liability that is attributable to changes in the
instrument specific credit risk
- How the gains and losses attributable to changes in instrument specific
credit risk were determined
- If a liability is settled during the period, the amount (if any)
presented in other comprehensive income that was realized in net income at
settlement.
Transfers
and servicing: repurchase agreements and similar transactions. At
previous Board meetings, the Board decided that repurchase agreements and
similar transactions meeting all of the following characteristics would be
accounted for as a secured borrowing:
- The agreement involves a transfer of existing financial assets at its
inception.
- The agreement involves both a right and an obligation to repurchase the
financial assets.
- The initial transfer and forward repurchase agreement involve the same
counterparty.
- The agreement to repurchase the financial assets is entered into
contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the initial
transfer.
- The repurchase price is fixed or readily determinable.
- The financial assets specified under the forward repurchase agreement are
identical to or substantially the same as the financial assets transferred at
inception.
Under these decisions, secured borrowing accounting would
be required for repurchase agreements and similar transactions that would be
settled through repurchase of financial assets that are the same or
substantially the same as those initially transferred or, for agreements in
which the settlement date of the forward purchase agreement coincides with the
maturity date of the transferred financial assets, an amount of cash equal to
the redemption or settlement value of the initially transferred financial assets
(or the difference between that value and the fixed repurchase price).
At
today´s meeting, the Board considered but decided not to expand the six
characteristics above and the requirement to apply secured borrowing accounting
to include other types of transactions.
The Board also decided to
eliminate the current accounting requirements for repurchase financings in Topic
860, Transfers and Servicing (formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 140-3,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing
Transactions). That is, the Board decided that a repurchase agreement or
similar transaction with the six characteristics above would always be accounted
for as a secured borrowing.
Insurance
contracts. The FASB continued its discussions on insurance
contracts by considering the measurement of the aggregate premium for the
insurance component of an insurance contract.
The Board tentatively
decided that an insurer should allocate an amount of consideration to the
insurance component for each period, resulting in premium recognized in the
statement of comprehensive income, equal to the (implicit or explicit) cost of
insurance and other fees charged that period to the policyholder account
balances. That amount may be calculated by deducting from total consideration
the amount, if any, allocated that period to an investment component (and thus
excluded from the premium presented in the statement of comprehensive income).
The amount of consideration allocated to the investment component for each
period may be determinable as follows:
+/- increase (decrease) in the amount of the cash
surrender value (or other account balance the policyholder is entitled to
through lapse, etc.) for the period
+ the amount of surrenders
+
the cash surrender value included in any death benefits paid
- interest
credited
= consideration allocated to the investment
component.
The Board may reconsider this decision at a later date in
connection with the decision yet to be made about the premium recognition
pattern.
Next Steps
The FASB and the IASB will continue
joint discussions in the week beginning October 15, 2012.