SUMMARY OF BOARD DECISIONS
Summary of Board decisions are provided for the information and
convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board´s deliberations. All of
the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board
meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only
after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often
are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in
comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other
communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written
ballot to issue an Accounting Standards Update.
January 31, 2013 FASB Board Meeting
Going
concern. The Board made the following decisions related to an
entity´s going concern assessment and disclosures:
Disclosure
Threshold
The Board decided that management should provide
disclosures when existing events or conditions indicate that it is more
likely than not that the entity may be unable to meet its obligations
within a reasonable period of time from the financial statement date. The
assessment would not consider the mitigating effect of management plans that are
outside the ordinary course of business. Because the assessment is inherently
judgmental, the Board intends more likely than not to be viewed as an
approximate benchmark for starting disclosures and not as a bright-line
threshold. The proposed standard will include example indicators to help
management in assessing the need for disclosures.
Definition of
Outside the Ordinary Course of Business
The Board decided to define
outside the ordinary course of business as follows:
"Management´s
plans that would require actions of a nature, magnitude, or frequency
inconsistent with actions customary in carrying out an entity´s ongoing business
activities shall be considered outside the ordinary course of business.
Management´s plans specifically intended to mitigate concerns about an entity´s
ability to meet its obligations within a reasonable period of time shall be
considered outside the ordinary course of business. In addition, management´s
plans that are not definitive, or are in early stages of implementation, shall
be considered outside the ordinary course of business when assessing the need
for disclosures."
The proposed standard will include examples of
management plans that are outside the ordinary course of
business.
Disclosure Principle
Consistent with the
disclosure considerations outlined in present auditing standards, the proposed
standard would require an entity to disclose sufficient information to enable
users to understand the principal events giving rise to an entity´s potential
inability to meet its obligations, their possible effects, and management´s
plans.
Applicability to Nonpublic Entities
In previous
deliberations, the Board had decided that management would assert in the
financial statements that there is substantial doubt about an entity´s
ability to continue as a going concern when the likelihood of the entity´s
inability to meet its obligations within a reasonable period of time reaches
probable. The Board decided that nonpublic entities would not be required to
make a substantial doubt assertion. Nonpublic entities would still be required
to apply all other provisions and disclosures of the new
model.
Transition and Other Matters
The Board tentatively
decided that an entity would apply the proposed guidance prospectively. The
Board directed the staff to draft a proposed Accounting Standards Update for
vote by written ballot. The proposed Update will have a 90-day comment
period.
Nonpublic
entities: clarification of a fair value disclosure requirement. The
Board affirmed the proposed amendments in the January 7, 2013 proposed
Accounting Standards Update, Financial Instruments (Topic 825): Clarifying
the Scope and Applicability of a Particular Disclosure to Nonpublic Entities.
The amendments will be effective upon issuance. The Board directed the
staff to draft a final Update for vote by written ballot.
FASB
ratification of EITF consensuses and tentative conclusions. The
Board ratified the following consensuses reached at the January 17, 2013 EITF
meeting.
Issue 11-A, "Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative
Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of
Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign
Entity"
When a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a
controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a
nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate
or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity, the parent
should apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative
translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation
adjustment should be released into earnings only if the sale or transfer results
in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in
which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided.
For an equity method
investment that is a foreign entity, the partial sale guidance in Section
830-30-40 still applies. As such, a pro rata portion of the cumulative
translation adjustment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of
such an equity method investment. However, that treatment does not apply to an
equity method investment that is not a foreign entity. In those instances, the
cumulative translation adjustment is released into net income only if the
partial sale represents a complete or substantially complete liquidation of the
foreign entity that contains the equity method investment.
The sale of an
investment in a foreign entity includes both (1) events that result in
the loss of a controlling financial interest in a foreign entity (that is,
irrespective of any retained investment) and (2) events that result in an
acquirer obtaining control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest
immediately before the acquisition date (sometimes also referred to as a step
acquisition). Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be
released into net income upon the occurrence of those events.
No
additional recurring disclosures are required by this Issue.
The
amendments resulting from this Issue are effective prospectively from the
beginning of the fiscal year of adoption for fiscal years (and interim reporting
periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. For nonpublic
entities, the amendments resulting from this Issue are effective prospectively
from the beginning of the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2014,
and interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption from the beginning of
the fiscal year of adoption is permitted.
Issue 12-D, "Accounting
for Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for
Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting
Date"
An entity should measure obligations resulting from joint
and several liability arrangements for which the total amount under the
arrangement is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the following:
- The greater of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay with its
co-obligors and the amount of proceeds received by the reporting entity in
cash from a debt arrangement
- Any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay.
The
following disclosures are required for each liability or each group of similar
liabilities resulting from joint and several liability arrangements:
- The nature of the arrangement, including how the liability arose, the
relationship with other co-obligors, and the terms and conditions of the
arrangement
- The total outstanding amount under the arrangement, which should not be
reduced by the effect of any amounts that may be recoverable from other
entities
- The carrying amount, if any, for the entity's liability and the carrying
amount of a receivable recognized, if any
- The nature of any recourse provisions that would enable recovery from
other entities of the amounts paid, including any limitations on the amounts
that might be recovered
- In the period the liability is initially recognized and measured or in a
period the measurement changes significantly, the corresponding entry and
where it was recorded in the financial statements.
The amendments
resulting from this Issue are effective retrospectively to all prior periods
presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability
arrangements that exist at the beginning of the entity's fiscal year of
adoption. Earlier application is permitted. An entity that changes its
accounting as a result of adopting the amendments resulting from this Issue may
elect to use hindsight for the comparative periods and should disclose that
fact.
The amendments resulting from this Issue are effective for fiscal
years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after December 15,
2013. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2014, and interim and annual periods
thereafter.
The Board also approved the following
consensuses-for-exposure reached at the January 17, 2013 EITF meeting and
decided to expose them for public comment for a period of 60
days.
Issue 13-A, "Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate
(or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting
Purposes"
The Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (OIS) would be
included as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under
Topic 815, in addition to UST and LIBOR.
The consensus-for-exposure does
not require any additional recurring disclosures.
The amendments resulting
from this consensus-for-exposure would be applied on a prospective basis for
qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after
the date of adoption.
Issue 13-C, "Presentation of Unrecognized
Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward or Tax Credit Carryforward
Exists"
An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an
unrecognized tax benefit, would be presented in the statement of financial
position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss
carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, if the unrecognized tax benefit
would, or is available to, reduce the net operating loss carryforward or tax
credit carryfoward under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction. If the
unrecognized tax benefit would not, or is not available to, reduce the net
operating loss carryforward or tax credit carryforward, then the unrecognized
tax benefit would be presented in the statement of financial position as a
liability.
The consensus-for-exposure does not require any additional
recurring disclosures.
The amendments resulting from this
consensus-for-exposure would be applied retrospectively to all periods presented
with earlier application permitted.