SUMMARY OF BOARD DECISIONS
Summary of Board decisions are provided for the information and
convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board´s deliberations. All of
the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board
meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only
after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often
are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in
comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other
communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written
ballot to issue an Accounting Standards Update.
March 6, 2013 FASB Board Meeting
Insurance
contracts.
The FASB continued its discussions of the
proposed insurance contracts standard. The Board discussed (1) the treatment of
changes in estimated interest crediting and accretion rates, (2) election of the
fair value option, and (3) other miscellaneous issues.
Treatment of
Changes in Estimated Interest Crediting and Accretion Rates
The
Board affirmed its tentative decision from the November 2012 meeting that an
insurer would not be required to disaggregate cash flows of a contract into
those affected by returns from assets and those not affected by returns from
assets when determining discount rates that reflect the characteristics of the
contract´s cash flows. The discount rates for the portfolio´s cash flows should
reflect the extent to which the amount of any estimated cash flows, subject to
insurer discretion, are affected by asset returns.
The Board also decided
the following for insurance contracts that are affected by asset returns:
- Upon any change in expectations of the crediting rate used to measure the
insurance contracts liability, an insurer would:
- Reset the interest accretion rates in a manner that recognizes any
changes in estimated interest crediting and related ultimate expected cash
flows on a level-yield basis over the remaining life of the
contracts
- Recognize in net income the difference between the prior expected cash
flows discounted at the prior interest accretion rates and the revised
expected cash flows discounted at the reset interest accretion
rates.
The degree to which the interest
accretion rates for the portfolio is adjusted would reflect the relative value
of the account balance to be credited and the extent changes in expected
amount to be credited to those account balances are the result of changes in
expected asset returns.
- An insurer would apply the tentative decision on accumulated other
comprehensive income (AOCI) for non-asset-affected cash flows. That means an
insurer would present as part of AOCI the difference between the insurance
contracts liability recorded on the statement of financial position (using the
current discount rate) and the amount the insurance contract liability would
be if it were determined at the interest accretion rates.
Election of the Fair Value Option
Guarantees
and Other Contingencies
The Board decided to eliminate the fair
value option election for guarantees and other contingencies accounted for in
accordance with Topic 460, Guarantees, or contingencies accounted for in
accordance with Topic 450, Contingencies, that will not be within the scope of
the forthcoming proposed insurance contracts guidance.
The Board decided
that the effective date and transition provisions to eliminate the fair value
option for these items would be consistent with the effective date and
transition provisions for the proposed Accounting Standards Update,
Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement
of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.
Rights and
Obligations of Insurance Contracts and Warranties
The Board
decided to eliminate the fair value option in paragraph 825-10-15-4(d) through
(e) related to rights and obligations under an insurance contract and
obligations under a warranty that currently are accounted for under Topic 944,
Financial Services—Insurance, or would be accounted for in accordance with the
forthcoming proposed insurance contracts guidance. The Board decided that the
effective date and transition provisions to eliminate the fair value option for
these items would be consistent with the forthcoming proposed insurance
contracts guidance.
The Board decided to eliminate the fair value option
in paragraph 825-10-15-4(e)) related to rights under a warranty that will be
accounted for in accordance with the guidance in the proposed Update on revenue
recognition. The Board decided that the effective date and transition provisions
to eliminate the fair value option for these items would be consistent with the
guidance in the proposed Update on revenue recognition.
Written
Loan Commitments
The Board decided to eliminate the fair value
option election for written loan commitments in paragraph 825-10-15-4(c). Those
written loan commitments are in the scope of the proposed Update on recognition
and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. The decision to
eliminate the fair value option for written loan commitments in paragraph
825-10-15-4(c) would have the same effective date and transition provisions as
that proposed Update.
Firm Commitments
The
Board tentatively decided to:
- Eliminate the fair value option for firm commitments that would otherwise
not be recognized at inception and that involve only financial instruments in
paragraph 825-10-15-4(b).
- Clarify that the Board´s previous decision to retain and modify the
existing model for forwards and option contracts to purchase securities in the
Certain Contracts on Debt and Equity Securities Subsections of Subtopic
815-10, Derivatives and Hedging—Overall, would extend to physically settled
forward and purchased option contracts (with no intrinsic value at inception)
to purchase or sell loans that do not meet the definition of a derivative in
Topic 815.
The decisions to eliminate the fair value option for firm
commitments in paragraph 825-10-15-4(b) and to extend the model described above
to forward and purchased option contracts to purchase or sell loans would have
the same effective date and transition provisions as the proposed Update on
recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial
liabilities.
Other Miscellaneous Issues
Criteria
to Account for Contracts under the Premium Allocation
Approach
The Board decided to remove the following criterion
that, if met, would preclude an insurer from using the premium allocation
approach.
"Significant judgment is required to allocate the premium to the
insurer's obligation to each reporting period."
Related
Party Guarantees
The Board decided to clarify the language from
the prior Board decision regarding related party guarantees to the
following:
"A guarantee between related parties or entities under common
control when the issuer of the guarantee is also not issuing similar
guarantees to third parties, unless issuance of such guarantees is the
primary business purpose of the issuing
entity."
Accounting for the Excess of the Insurance
Liability Measurement over the Fair Value of the Insurance Contracts in a
Business Combination
The Board decided to record any excess of
the asset and liability balances related to insurance contracts measured in
accordance with the proposed guidance above the fair value of those assets and
liabilities as a loss at the acquisition date.
Whether or Not to
Include Expectations in the Liability for Remaining Coverage under the Premium
Allocation Approach
The Board decided to clarify that for
contracts reported under the premium allocation approach, an insurer would not
include expectations of future changes in coverage (for example, policyholder
cancellations) in the cash flows for purposes of measuring the liability for
remaining coverage or the gross premium receivable.
Recognition
Point for Deferred Annuity Contracts
The Board affirmed previous
decisions about recognition point of insurance contracts and to include
implementation guidance regarding recognition of deferred annuity
contracts.
Treatment of Income Tax Payments and
Receipts
The Board decided to clarify in the implementation
guidance that cash flows excluded from the measurement of the liability would
include income tax payment obligations of the insurer even if the insurance
contract permits the insurer to charge back those amounts to policyholders.
However, any tax obligations that are incurred by the policyholder and in which
the insurer pays those obligations in a fiduciary capacity would be included in
the present value of fulfillment cash flows along with any amounts the insurer
expects to receive from the policyholder related to those tax amounts.
Next Steps
In a future meeting, the Board will discuss
the costs and benefits of the tentative decisions.