Tentative Board Decisions
Tentative Board decisions are provided for those interested in following
the Board’s deliberations. All of the reported decisions are tentative and may
be changed at future Board meetings.
September 3, 2014 FASB Board Meeting
Financial
Instruments—Impairment. The Board continued redeliberating its December 2012
proposed Accounting Standards Update, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses
(Subtopic 825-15), specifically discussing the following issues: (1) when
an entity should write off a financial asset, (2) how an entity considers
extensions, renewals, and modifications in estimating expected credit losses,
and (3) the appropriate period an entity should consider for estimating expected
credit losses on loan commitments.
When an Entity Should Write Off a
Financial Asset
The Board decided to forgo the writeoff guidance in
the proposed Update and instead retain the existing writeoff principle in GAAP,
which requires an entity to write off financial assets in the period in which
the financial assets are deemed uncollectible. Since the revised credit
impairment approach for debt securities classified as available-for-sale (AFS)
will also include an allowance approach, the Board decided that entities should
also apply this writeoff principle to AFS debt securities.
Consideration of Extensions, Renewals, and Modifications
The
Board affirmed its previous decision that when estimating contractual cash flows
to be collected, an entity should consider expected prepayments, but should only
consider expected extensions, renewals, and modifications when the entity
reasonably expects that it will execute a troubled debt restructuring with the
borrower.
Estimating Expected Credit Losses on Loan Commitments
For the funded portion of loan commitments, the Board decided that
expected credit losses should be estimated in the same manner as for other
loans. That is, an entity should consider all contractual cash flows over the
expected life of the loan. As with other loans, an entity should consider
expected prepayments, but not expected extensions, renewals, or modifications
unless the entity reasonably expects to execute a troubled debt restructuring
with the borrower.
The Board also affirmed its previous decision that the
expected credit losses for unfunded loan commitments should reflect the full
contractual period over which the entity is exposed to credit risk via a present
legal obligation to extend credit, unless unconditionally cancellable by the
issuer.
Disclosure
Framework: Disclosure Review—Fair Value Measurement. The Board discussed
potential changes to fair value measurement disclosure requirements on the basis
of the concepts and decision questions in the proposed FASB Concepts Statement,
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial
Statements.
The Board made no technical decisions.