Tentative Board Decisions
Tentative Board decisions are provided for those interested in following
the Board’s deliberations. All of the reported decisions are tentative and may
be changed at future Board meetings.
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
FASB Board Meeting
Credit
losses, hedging, and leases—effective dates for private companies,
not-for-profit organizations, and small public companies. The Board discussed
comments received on its August 2019 proposed
Accounting Standards Update, Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and
Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates, and
whether to proceed to a draft of a final Accounting Standards Update for vote by
written ballot.
The Board affirmed its decisions on amendments to the effective dates
for:
- Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13,
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses
(Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments (Credit
Losses)
- Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-12,
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (Hedging)
- Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842) (Leases).
Credit Losses
The Board decided that
Credit Losses will
be effective for:
- Public
business entities (PBEs) that are SEC
filers, excluding
entities eligible to be smaller reporting companies (SRCs) as currently defined
by the SEC, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. For
calendar-year-end
companies, this will be January 1, 2020. The Board affirmed that the one-time determination
of whether an entity is eligible to be
an SRC will be based on an entity’s most
recent assessment in accordance with SEC regulations as of the date that a
final Update on effective dates is issued (for example, November 20,
2019).
- For all other
entities, the Board decided that Credit
Losses will be
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including
interim periods within those fiscal years.
That decision provides additional implementation
time for entities eligible to be SRCs, PBEs
that are not SEC filers, and entities that are not PBEs (including private
companies, not-for-profit organizations, and
employee benefit plans). For all entities, early
adoption will continue to be allowed; that is, early
adoption is allowed for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years
(that is,
effective January 1, 2019, for calendar-year-end companies).
As a consequential amendment, the Board decided
to align the effective dates of Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04,
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic
350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, with the amended Credit Losses effective
dates.
Hedging
The Board
decided to retain the existing effective date
for Hedging
for PBEs, which is for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal
years,
that is, effective January 1, 2019,
for calendar-year-end companies. The Board decided
to defer the
mandatory effective date for Hedging for all other entities by an additional
year. Therefore, Hedging will be effective for entities other than PBEs for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2020 (effective January 1, 2021, for calendar-year-end
companies), and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2021 (January 1, 2022, for calendar-year-end companies). Early adoption will continue to be
allowed.
Leases
The
Board decided to retain the existing effective date for
Leases for (1) all PBEs,
(2)
not-for-profit conduit bond obligors, and (3) employee benefit plans
that file or furnish financial statements with the SEC. That date is for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those
fiscal years (effective
January 1, 2019,
for calendar-year-end companies). The Board decided
to defer the
mandatory effective date for Leases for all other entities by an additional
year. Therefore, Leases will be effective for all other entities beginning after
December 15, 2020 (January 1, 2021, for calendar-year-end
companies), and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2021 (January 1, 2022 for calendar-year-end companies). Early adoption
will
continue to be allowed.
The Board concluded that it has received
sufficient
information and analysis to make an informed decision on the perceived costs of
the changes and that the expected benefits would justify the expected costs of
the amendments in the Accounting Standards
Update. The
Board directed the staff to draft a
final Accounting Standards
Update for vote by written ballot.
Insurance—effective
date. The Board discussed a summary of comments received on its August 2019
proposed Accounting Standards Update, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic
944): Effective Date.
The Board affirmed its previous decisions on
the effective date of Update 2018-12 on accounting for long-duration insurance
contracts:
- For public business entities that meet the definition of an SEC filer,
excluding entities eligible to be smaller reporting companies, the amendments
in Update 2018-12 should be effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
- For all other entities, the amendments in Update 2018-12 should be
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim
periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2024.
Analysis of Costs and Benefits
The Board
concluded that it has received sufficient information and analysis to make an
informed decision on the topics presented and that the expected benefits of the
amendments would justify the expected costs.
Next
Steps
The Board directed the staff to draft a final Accounting
Standards Update for vote by written ballot.
Hedging—last-of-layer
method. The Board discussed the following topics that were originally
introduced at its August 21, 2019 educational meeting on last-of-layer
hedging.
Multiple-Layer Issues
In allowing an
entity to designate multiple layers (that is, more than one hedging relationship
associated with a closed portfolio of prepayable financial assets or one or more
beneficial interests secured by a portfolio of prepayable financial
instruments), the Board decided that it would:
- Require an entity to dedesignate the entirety of one or more hedging
relationships affected by an actual breach. An actual breach occurs when the
sum of the hedged items associated with a closed portfolio is greater than the
total assets in the closed portfolio in the current period.
- Continue to allow partial dedesignation for anticipated breaches. An
anticipated breach occurs when the sum of the hedged items is not in breach in
the current period but is expected to be in breach in a future period.
- Permit an entity to document at hedge inception a sequence in which
hedging relationships associated with a closed portfolio would be dedesignated
in the case of an actual breach. If an entity does not document a
dedesignation sequence at hedge inception and an actual breach occurs, the
entity would be required to dedesignate all hedging relationships associated
with the closed portfolio.
- Require that all hedging relationships associated with the closed
portfolio be supported by all the assets in the closed portfolio. That is, all
the assets in the closed portfolio must have a contractual maturity date after
the latest partial-term hedge matures, and all financial assets in the closed
portfolio must be prepayable by the earliest hedging relationship’s maturity
date.
The Board also decided dedesignation sequencing would not apply
to anticipated breaches.
Fair Value Hedge Basis Adjustment
Issues
For the existing single-layer last-of-layer hedging
model under current GAAP and the proposed multiple-layer model, the Board
decided that it would:
- Prohibit an entity from allocating the fair value hedge basis adjustment
to the assets in the closed portfolio during an outstanding last-of-layer
hedge.
- Prohibit an entity from considering a last-of-layer fair value hedge basis
adjustment on an outstanding hedge when determining an allowance under the
current expected credit loss model.
- Require a last-of-layer fair value hedge basis adjustment to be presented
as a reconciling item in disclosures required by other areas of GAAP.
- Require an entity to recognize and present the fair value hedge basis
adjustment associated with an actual breach in the income statement based on
how the assets that caused the breach were removed from the closed
portfolio.
Next Steps
The Board directed the staff to
draft a proposed Accounting Standards Update and distribute that staff draft for
external review. Following external review, the staff will present to the Board
any additional issues and an analysis of costs and benefits.