Tentative Board Decisions
Tentative Board decisions are provided for those interested in following
the Board's deliberations. All of the reported decisions are tentative and may
be changed at future Board meetings.
Wednesday, April 8, 2020
FASB Board Meeting
Effective date considerations due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
disruptions. In response to global
concerns about the effects
that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on stakeholders,
the Board discussed
delaying for
certain
entities the effective dates of:
- Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606)
- Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic
842).
Board DecisionsThe Board decided to add a
project to its technical agenda to amend the effective dates of Topic 606 and
Topic 842 for certain entities as described below.
Additionally, the
Board decided to add a project to its research agenda to evaluate how to reduce
implementation costs related to applying Topic 606 to initial franchise
fees.
Revenue
from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
The Board discussed an
implementation issue in the franchisor industry related to Topic 606. The Board
decided to amend the effective date of Topic 606 for franchisors that are not
public business entities to annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2019, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2020. The Board decided to make the amendment
optional.
Leases (Topic 842)
The Board decided to
amend the effective date of Topic 842 for private companies and private
not-for-profit (NFP) entities to annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2021, and to interim periods within fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2022.
The Board also decided to amend the effective date of
Topic 842 for NFPs that have issued or are conduit bond obligors for securities
that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market
(public NFPs) and which have not yet issued financial statements.
For these
entities, the Board decided to amend the effective date to be fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption will continue to be permitted.
Comment Period of the Proposed Update
The Board decided to
provide a 15-day comment period for the proposed Update.
Next
Steps
The Board directed the staff to draft a proposed Accounting
Standards Update for vote by written ballot.
Other
COVID-19-related discussion. The Board also discussed plans to support
stakeholders as they navigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic relating to
(1) effective dates for significant standards with effective dates of 2022 and
beyond and (2) future standard-setting activities for current project
deliberations. Additionally, the staff provided an update on the following
technical inquiries that are related to the effects of
COVID-19:
Leases
The staff discussed its response to the
question about whether lease concessions related to the effects of COVID-19 are
required to be accounted for in accordance with the lease modification guidance
in Topic 842, Leases (or Topic 840, Leases). The staff will post the
answer to this question as part of a question-and-answer (Q&A) document to
the FASB implementation website in the coming days and stands ready to assist
the Board's stakeholders with any further questions they may have regarding
modification guidance. We will determine the need for any further Q&A
documents at a future date.
Interest Income
The staff
received a technical inquiry regarding the recognition of interest income. For
illustrative purposes that inquiry included a fact pattern whereby an
institution was providing assistance to borrowers impacted by COVID-19. The
institution in the example provided a "loan payment holiday" allowing borrowers
to temporarily stop payments.
Interest Income
The staff
received a technical inquiry regarding the recognition of interest income. For
illustrative purposes that inquiry included a fact pattern whereby an
institution was providing assistance to borrowers impacted by COVID-19. The
institution in the example provided a "loan payment holiday" allowing borrowers
to temporarily stop payments. Interest would not accrue while the loan payment
holiday is in effect. The loan modification in the fact pattern did not
represent a troubled debt restructuring in accordance with Subtopic 310-40,
Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors. Additionally, in
accordance with Subtopic 310-20, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs,
the modification would be accounted for as the continuation of the original
lending arrangement; that is, not as a new lending arrangement—in which case the
modification would not be accounted for as an extinguishment of the original
loan and the recognition of a new loan.
The staff discussed its response
to how the institution should recognize interest income when a payment holiday
is given and interest is not accrued in this scenario. There were two views
expressed in the technical inquiry:
View 1—Upon modification, a new
effective interest rate in accordance with Subtopic 310-20 is determined that
equates the revised remaining cash flows to the carrying amount of the original
debt and is applied prospectively for the remaining term. That is, interest
income is recognized during the payment holiday period.
View 2—Upon
modification, the institution should recognize interest income on the loan in
accordance with the contractual terms. Under this view, the institution would
recognize no interest income during the payment holiday and would resume
recognizing interest income when the payment holiday ends.
The staff
reviewed the submission, accompanying illustrations, and referenced accounting
guidance and believes both views to be appropriate.
Derivatives and
Hedging
In accordance with Subtopic 815-30, Derivatives and
Hedging—Cash Flow Hedges, if cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued, amounts
deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) should remain in AOCI
unless it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur by the end
of the originally specified time period or within a two-month period of time
thereafter. In rare cases, the existence of extenuating circumstances that are
outside the control or influence of the entity may cause the forecasted
transaction to be probable of occurring at a date that is beyond that additional
two-month period. In those cases, amounts deferred in AOCI should remain in AOCI
until the forecasted transaction affects earnings. That is, in those rare cases
an entity should disregard the timing restrictions otherwise applicable to the
forecasted transaction and continue to defer amounts previously recorded in AOCI
until the forecasted transaction affects earnings.
The staff discussed
its response to the following question: when cash flow hedge accounting has been
discontinued, may delays in timing of the forecasted transactions related to
COVID-19 be considered rare cases caused by extenuating circumstances outside
the control or influence of the entity?
The staff responded yes. The
exception in Subtopic 815-30 related to rare cases caused by extenuating
circumstances outside the control or influence of the entity may be applied to
COVID-19-related delays in timing of the forecasted transactions. Consequently,
for de-designated hedges if the forecasted transaction is probable of occurring
after the additional two-month period, the entity may continue to retain amounts
previously recorded in AOCI associated with that forecasted transaction until
that forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, that exception only
applies to situations in which the forecasted transaction remains probable of
occurring. If the entity determines that it is not probable that the forecasted
transaction will occur because of the effects of COVID-19, the exception would
not apply and amounts previously recorded in AOCI should be reclassified into
earnings immediately and disclosed in the entity's interim and annual financial
statements.
The staff continues to monitor this unique and evolving
situation and work with our stakeholders on questions arising and will
communicate with the industry as this situation unfolds, including through
additional statements, technical inquiries, and Q&A documents, as
appropriate.
Fair Value Measurement
The staff recently
received a request to suspend mark-to-market accounting. In that request, the
authors of the letter specifically referenced guidance developed during the
2008-2009 financial crisis. The staff provided a reminder of the orderly
transaction guidance in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, specifically
paragraphs 820-10-35-54C through 54J, which provide guidance for measuring fair
value when the volume or level of activity for an asset or a liability has
significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly. The
staff stands ready to address any interpretive questions with respect to that
guidance.