Tentative Board Decisions
Tentative Board decisions are provided for those interested in following
the Board’s deliberations. All of the reported decisions are tentative and may
be changed at future Board meetings.
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
FASB Board Meeting
Financial
instruments—hedging. The Board discussed the following issues on the
proposed Accounting Standards Update, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities:
- Sweep issues arising from drafting and external review
- Additional transition issues arising from redeliberations and external
review
- Substantive drafting changes to be made to the final Update
- Effective date and early adoption
- Analysis of costs, benefits, and complexities of decisions reached to date
on hedge accounting and permission to ballot a final Accounting Standards
Update.
Sweep Issues Arising from Drafting and External
Review
The Board decided the following:
- To expand the scope of the private company hedge documentation timing
decision to not-for-profit entities (except for not-for-profit entities that
have issued, or are a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded,
listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market).
- To expand the scope of the amortization approach for amounts excluded from
the assessment of effectiveness to hedges of a net investment in a foreign
operation.
Additional Transition Issues Arising from
Redeliberations and External Review
The Board decided the
following:
- An entity is not required to assess similar hedges in a similar manner
when comparing similar hedging relationships executed before and after the
adoption date for any of the following:
- For (1) hedging relationships executed before the adoption date
designated under the shortcut method for which the hedge documentation was
not amended to specify a long-haul method that would be employed if use of
the shortcut method was not or no longer is appropriate and (2) hedging
relationships executed after the adoption date designated under the shortcut
method for which a long-haul method is specified if use of the shortcut
method was not or no longer is appropriate.
- For (1) hedging relationships executed before the adoption date for
which the hedged risk was not amended to a contractually specified component
or a contractually specified interest rate and (2) hedging relationships
executed after the adoption date for which the hedged risk is the
variability in cash flows attributable to changes in a contractually
specified component or a contractually specified interest rate.
- For (1) hedging relationships executed before the adoption date for
which amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recorded in
earnings under a mark-to-market approach and (2) hedging relationships
executed after the adoption date for which amounts excluded from the
assessment of effectiveness are recorded in earnings under an amortization
approach.
- An entity will not be required to assess similar hedges in a similar
manner when an entity assesses effectiveness on a qualitative basis, as
proposed in the proposed Update. Qualitative assessments may be performed on a
hedge-by-hedge basis.
- An entity may elect in transition to transfer financial assets classified
as held-to-maturity that qualify as hedged items under the last of layer
method to the available-for-sale category.
- Cross-currency basis spreads may be excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness for existing fair value hedging relationships as of the date of
adoption.
- Private companies that are not financial institutions and not-for-profit
entities (except for not-for-profit entities that have issued, or are a
conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an
exchange or an over-the-counter market) must make transition elections before
the next set of interim (if applicable) or annual financial statements is
available to be issued. All other entities must make those elections before
the first effectiveness testing date after adoption.
- For fair value hedges of interest rate risk existing as of the date of
adoption for which an entity modifies the measurement of the hedged item to
the benchmark rate component cash flows, an entity may elect to partially
dedesignate a portion of the hedged item and reclassify the basis adjustment
associated with the portion of the dedesignated hedged item to the opening
balance of retained earnings.
Substantive Drafting Changes to Be
Made to the Final Update
The Board decided that no additional
analysis or information was required with regard to the substantive drafting
amendments to be made to the final Update.
Effective Date
The Board decided that the effective date for public business
entities will be for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim
periods within those fiscal years.
The Board also decided that the
effective date for entities other than public business entities will be for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020.
Early
Adoption
The Board decided to permit early adoption in any interim
or annual period upon issuance of the final Update.
Analysis of
Costs, Benefits, and Complexities of Decisions Reached to Date
The
Board decided that it has received sufficient information and analysis to make
an informed decision on the issues presented. The Board also concluded that the
benefits of the amendments justify the related costs.
Permission to
Ballot a Final Accounting Standards Update
The Board directed the
staff to draft a final Accounting Standards Update for vote by written ballot.
Formation of a Transition Resource Group
The Board
decided that a transition resource group was not necessary to address
implementation questions.
Revenue
recognition of grants and contracts by not-for-profit entities. The Board
discussed (1) comments from external reviewers on a draft of the proposed
Accounting Standards Update on clarifying the scope and the accounting guidance
in Topic 958, Not-for-Profit Entities, for contributions received and
contributions made and (2) any remaining issues, including costs and benefits,
and made the following decisions.
The Board decided to remove the phrase
future and uncertain event from the definition of a donor-imposed
condition.
The Board decided that the comment period deadline for the
proposed Update should be 90 days from the issuance date of the proposed Update.
The staff will draft a proposed Accounting Standards Update for vote by
written ballot.