Summary of Board decisions are provided for the information and convenience of constituents who want to follow the Board’s deliberations. All of the conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment only after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be (and often are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided to the Board in comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and through other communication channels. Decisions become final only after a formal written ballot to issue an Accounting Standards Update.
March 2, 2011 FASB Board Meeting
Accounting for financial instruments: classification and measurement.
The Board discussed the classification and measurement of equity securities (other than instruments that can be redeemed only for a certain amount or that are measured according to the equity method of accounting). The Board decided that all marketable equity securities should be measured at fair value with all changes in fair value recognized in net income.
For nonpublic entities, the Board tentatively decided that a practicability exception to fair value measurement should be provided for investments in nonmarketable equity securities. The practicability exception would permit nonmarketable equity securities to be measured at cost less any other-than-temporary impairment; upward adjustments in fair value would be recognized when information about a change in price is observable. Public entities would be required to measure investments in nonmarketable securities at fair value with all changes in fair value recognized in net income.
The Board requested the staff to refine the practicability exception to determine whether observable information about changes in the price of the security should include changes based on transactions involving only identical instruments or whether changes could be based on transactions involving similar securities or other sources of information about the value of the securities. The Board also requested the staff to perform additional analysis of whether the scope of the exception should be:
The Board discussed the classification and measurement of “plain-vanilla” financial liabilities, such as core deposit liabilities and an entity’s own debt. The Board decided that these financial liabilities would be classified and measured using the business strategy criterion developed for financial assets, which would require financial liabilities to be measured at fair value with all changes in fair value recognized in net income or at amortized cost based on the entity’s business activity for those financial liabilities.
The Board will continue its discussions on classification and measurement of financial instruments at future Board meetings. These discussions will include the characteristics of the instrument criterion, the business strategy criterion, and application of these criteria to certain financial instruments (for example, hybrid financial instruments).