Tentative Board Decisions
Tentative Board decisions are provided for those interested in following
the Board’s deliberations. All of the reported decisions are tentative and may
be changed at future Board meetings.
June 11, 2014 FASB Board Meeting
Disclosure
Framework—Disclosures about Defined Benefit Plans. The Board discussed
potential changes to disclosures that employers provide about defined benefit
plans on the basis of the concepts and decision questions in the recently issued
proposed FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements.
The Board made
no technical decisions.
Accounting
for Financial Instruments—Classification and Measurement. The Board
continued redeliberating the February 2013 proposed Accounting Standards Update,
Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement
of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, specifically discussing the
presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.
Presentation of
Financial Instruments in the Statement of Comprehensive Income
The
Board decided to retain current GAAP on presentation requirements for financial
instruments in the statement of comprehensive income.
Disclosures
about Fair value of Financial Instruments Measured at Amortized
Cost
The Board decided that an entity should only disclose the level
of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurements are
categorized in their entirety (Level 1, 2, or 3). In addition the Board decided
to require the disclosure about fair value of financial assets measured at
amortized cost to be disaggregated into major categories of those
assets.
Additionally, the Board decided to retain the existing Topic 320,
Investments—Debt and Equity Securities, disclosures for sales or transfers of
securities classified as held to maturity.
Disclosure Related to
Available-for-Sale Securities Measured at FV-OCI
The Board decided
to retain the current disclosure requirements in Topic 320 for securities
classified as available for sale.
Disclosure Related to Equity
Investments without Readily Determinable Fair Values
The Board
decided that an entity should disclose the carrying amount of equity investments
without readily determinable fair values, as well as the amount of observable
and unobservable adjustments made to the carrying amount during the reporting
period. The Board decided that an entity would not have to disclose the
information that it considered in reaching the carrying amounts and upward or
downward adjustments resulting from observable price changes.
Next
Steps
The Board will continue to discuss disclosure about the
following items:
- Reclassification of financial assets from one measurement category to
another
- Bifurcated hybrid financial instruments
- Core deposit liabilities.
Accounting
for Financial Instruments—Impairment. The Board discussed the impairment of
financial assets subsequently identified for sale and certain beneficial
interests in securitized financial assets.
Loans Subsequently
Identified for Sale
Topic 310, Receivables, requires an entity to
transfer loans into the held-for-sale classification and carry those loans at
the lower of cost or fair value once it has decided to sell loans not previously
classified as held-for-sale. The Board decided that upon transfer, an entity
should retain the amortized cost basis (excluding the allowance for expected
credit losses) as the loan’s cost basis and recognize a valuation allowance
equal to the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds fair
value.
Debt Securities Subsequently Identified for
Sale
For a debt security subsequently identified for sale, the Board
decided that an entity should adjust its impairment allowance for the debt
security to be equal to the difference between the debt security’s fair value
and its amortized cost basis.
Certain Beneficial Interests in
Securitized Financial Assets
The Board decided that an entity should
measure and recognize an allowance for expected credit losses on purchased or
retained beneficial interests for which there is a significant difference
between contractual and expected cash flows consistent with how an entity should
recognize and measure the allowance for purchased credit-impaired assets. In
addition, changes in expected cash flows due to factors other than credit should
be accreted into interest income over the life of the asset (that is, the
difference between contractual and expected cash flows attributable to credit
would not be included in interest income).