SEC Approves Rule Changes to Enhance Municipal Securities 
      Disclosure
      FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2010-85
      
      Washington, D.C., May 26, 2010  The Securities and Exchange 
      Commission today voted unanimously to approve rule changes improving the 
      quality and timeliness of municipal securities disclosure.
      Municipal securities, such as municipal bonds, are exempt from the 
      disclosure requirements of the federal securities laws. As such, the SEC’s 
      statutory authority is limited. The SEC's rule amendments approved today 
      are designed to provide enhanced information to municipal securities 
      investors by further regulating those who underwrite or sell such 
      municipal securities. 
      The measures will strengthen existing requirements for the scope of 
      securities covered, the nature of the events that issuers must disclose, 
      and the time period in which disclosure must be made.
      “These rule changes will enable investors to make more knowledgeable 
      decisions about municipal securities by requiring more timely and relevant 
      information on an ongoing basis,� said SEC Chairman Mary L. 
      Schapiro.  “Although I believe that the SEC's regulatory authority 
      over the municipal securities market should be expanded in order to better 
      protect investors and issuers alike, these measures represent an important 
      improvement within our present statutory authority.�
      The compliance date of the new rules is Dec. 1, 2010.
      # # #
      FACT SHEET
      Background
      Every year, states and local governments raise funds for schools, 
      roads, hospitals and other needs by issuing municipal bonds. In turn, 
      investors receive principal and interest payments, which are often exempt 
      from federal and state income taxes. Maintaining the health of this key 
      component of the capital markets is important to every resident of the 
      United States in addition to the millions of investors in municipal 
      bonds.
      Municipal securities, such as municipal bonds, are exempt from the 
      disclosure requirements of the federal securities laws. The SEC adopted 
      Rule 15c2-12 in 1989, which was designed to foster greater transparency in 
      the municipal securities market, by regulating those who underwrite, or 
      sell, municipal securities. 
      Rule 15c2-12 prohibits brokers, dealers, and municipal securities 
      dealers from purchasing or selling municipal securities unless they 
      reasonably believe that the state or local government issuing the 
      securities has agreed to disclose such things as annual financial 
      statements and notices of certain events, such as payment defaults, rating 
      changes and prepayments.
      The Amended Rule will … 
      
        - Expand the Rule to Cover Additional Municipal Securities  
        When it was first adopted, Rule 15c2-12 specifically did not apply 
        to certain securities commonly known as variable rate demand obligations 
        or VRDOs. Under the amendment, the rule will apply to new issuances of 
        such securities. VRDOs bear interest at a rate that is reset 
        periodically and investors are able to sell them back to the issuer at 
        certain times for their full value.
 
- Improve Disclosure of Tax Risk  The amended rule will 
        specifically include disclosure of events that may adversely affect a 
        bond’s tax exemption, including issuance by the IRS of proposed and 
        final decisions about whether the bond can be taxed.
        
        
- Strengthen and Expand Disclosure of Important Events  Under 
        the existing rule, an underwriter must have a reasonable belief that the 
        state or local government that issued municipal bonds has agreed to 
        provide ongoing, continuing disclosure of certain important 
        events.
 
 The existing rule presently provides that notice of 
        all of the listed events need be made only “if material.� The amended 
        rule will eliminate the need for a materiality determination for the 
        following events: (1) failure to pay principal and interest; (2) 
        unscheduled payments out of debt service reserves reflecting financial 
        difficulties; (3) unscheduled payments by parties backing the bonds, 
        reflecting financial difficulties, or a change in the identity of 
        parties backing the bonds or their failure to perform; (4) defeasances, 
        including situations where the issuer has provided for future payment of 
        all obligations under a bond; and (5) rating changes. A materiality 
        determination would be retained for some events, including, for example, 
        bond calls.
 
 The amendments also increase the number of 
        events to include: (1) tender offers; (2) bankruptcy, insolvency, 
        receivership or similar proceeding; (3) mergers, consolidations, 
        acquisitions, the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the 
        obligated person or their termination, if material; and (4) appointment 
        of a successor or additional trustee or the change of the name of a 
        trustee, if material.
 
- Establish a More Specific Filing Deadline  The amended rule 
        will provide that notices of the events listed in the rule be disclosed 
        in a timely manner not more than 10 business days after the 
        event.
 
 Currently, the rule simply provides for disclosure 
        “in a timely manner.�
 
- Additional Guidance  Over the years, the Commission has set 
        forth interpretations under the antifraud provisions of the federal 
        securities laws to require municipal securities underwriters to have a 
        reasonable basis for recommending any municipal securities. The adopting 
        release reaffirms that, to have a reasonable basis to recommend a 
        security, a municipal underwriter must carefully evaluate the likelihood 
        that a municipality will make the ongoing disclosure called for by the 
        amended rule. The adopting release further states that it is doubtful 
        that an underwriter could form a reasonable basis to recommend a 
        security if the municipality had a history of persistent and material 
        non-disclosure.