|  | Action Alert No. 06-05February 2, 2006
NOTICE OF MEETINGSOPEN BOARD MEETING(Board 
      meetings are available by audio webcast and telephone.)
 No Board meetings are planned for the week of February 6, 2006. The 
      next scheduled Board meeting is Wednesday, February 15, 2006. OPEN EDUCATION SESSION Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 9:00 a.m. The Board will hold an educational, non-decision-making session to 
      discuss topics that are anticipated to be discussed at the February 15, 
      2006 Board meeting. Those topics will be posted to the FASB calendar four 
      days prior to the education session. BOARD ACTIONS The Board Actions are provided for the information and convenience 
      of constituents who want to follow the Board’s deliberations. All of the 
      conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed at future Board 
      meetings. Decisions are included in an Exposure Draft for formal comment 
      only after a formal written ballot. Decisions in an Exposure Draft may be 
      (and often are) changed in redeliberations based on information provided 
      to the Board in comment letters, at public roundtable discussions, and 
      through other communication channels. Decisions become final only after a 
      formal written ballot to issue a final Statement, Interpretation, or 
      FSP. January 25, 2006 Board Meeting Life 
      settlements. The Board discussed the following two issues on the 
      proposed FSP TB 85-4-a, "Accounting for Life Settlement Contracts by 
      Investors": 
        Whether an entity should be required to disclose actual versus 
        expected mortality
        
        Whether an entity should be required to disclose the averaged 
        expected remaining term of the life settlement contracts.
         The Board decided that: 
        If an entity becomes aware of new or updated information and that 
        information results in an entity’s changing its assumption of the 
        expected remaining term of its individual life settlement contracts, an 
        entity should disclose these changes and the related effects on the 
        financial statements in the notes to the financial statements. The 
        discussion of the changes in the expected remaining term should be both 
        qualitative and quantitative in nature. However, the entity should not 
        be required to update the assumptions used in determining the expected 
        remaining term of individual life settlement contracts at each financial 
        reporting date.
        
        An entity should disclose the following as of the date of the most 
        recent statement of financial position presented for each of the five 
        succeeding fiscal years and thereafter, as well as in the aggregate:
        
         
          Number of life settlement contracts
          
          Carrying value of the life settlement contracts
          
          Face value of the life insurance policies underlying the 
contracts.
           Fair 
      value measurements. The Board discussed issues raised by external 
      reviewers on the October 21, 2005, working draft of a final FASB Statement 
      on fair value measurements, relating to the fair value hierarchy, 
      disclosures, and effective date and transition. The Board clarified the fair value hierarchy as follows: 
        The Board affirmed the guidance within Levels 2–4 but decided to 
        combine those levels, thereby establishing a three-level hierarchy for 
        both measurement and disclosure purposes.
        
        The Board decided to incorporate guidance clarifying that where 
        within the fair value hierarchy the fair value measurement in its 
        entirety falls should be based on the lowest level significant input.
        
        The Board affirmed its previous decision to allow the use of an 
        alternative pricing method (for example, matrix pricing) as a practical 
        expedient to the requirement to use quoted prices for identical assets 
        or liabilities within Level 1, but clarified that the resulting 
        measurement should not be disclosed as a Level 1 measurement. (It is a 
        Level 2 measurement.)
        
        The Board affirmed its previous decision that the cost and/or effort 
        associated with obtaining or otherwise deriving market inputs is not 
        sufficient basis for determining whether to use those inputs to measure 
        fair value. The Board acknowledged that, in some cases, market inputs 
        might not be available. In those cases, entity inputs (inputs reflecting 
        the entity’s internally developed assumptions of market inputs) should 
        be used to measure fair value within Level 5 (new Level 3). 
        However, the fair value measurement objective remains the same. 
        Therefore, entity inputs should be adjusted if information is available 
        that indicates that market participants would use different assumptions.
         The Board reconsidered its previous decision to require disclosure of 
      the percentage of total assets (liabilities) that are remeasured at fair 
      value on a recurring basis. The Board decided not to require that 
      disclosure. The Board plans to discuss other fair value disclosures at a 
      future Board meeting. The Board reconsidered its previous decisions relating to effective 
      date and transition. Specifically: 
        The Board decided that the final Statement should be effective for 
        financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after 
        November 15, 2006, and interim periods within those fiscal years, 
        subject to the timing of the final Statement. However, the Board decided 
        that all of the disclosure requirements of the final Statement should 
        apply in the first interim period in which that Statement is initially 
        applied.
        
        The Board affirmed its previous decision that the effect of the 
        change in accounting principle on income before extraordinary items and 
        any affected per-share amounts should be initially applied 
        retrospectively (full retrospective transition approach). However, the 
        Board decided not to require disclosure of the effect of that change in 
        the fiscal year in which the final Statement is initially applied, as 
        previously discussed.
         The Board decided not to issue a final Statement until after it 
      substantially completes redeliberations of related issues raised by 
      respondents to the proposed FSP FAS 133-a, "Accounting for Unrealized 
      Gains (Losses) Relating to Derivative Instruments Measured at Fair Value 
      under Statement 133." Business 
      combinations. The Board discussed a summary of the comment letters 
      received on its Exposure Drafts, Business Combinations, and 
      Consolidated Financial Statements, Including Accounting and Reporting 
      of Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries. A copy of that summary is 
      available on the FASB website. The Board affirmed the project’s objectives 
      and the plans for redeliberations. Servicing of 
      financial assets. The Board discussed two issues related to 
      transition and disclosure requirements identified by external reviewers of 
      a draft of a final FASB Statement on accounting for servicing of financial 
      assets. The Board decided to: 
        Provide transition guidance that requires prospective application of 
        the requirements for initial recognition of servicing assets and 
        servicing liabilities to transactions that occur after the effective 
        date of the final Statement. Specifically, servicing assets and 
        servicing liabilities that had been recognized under current FASB 
        Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of 
        Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, guidance would 
        continue to be recognized subsequent to the effective date of the 
        proposed amendment to Statement 140 but also would be subject to the 
        initial and subsequent measurement guidance of the proposed amendment to 
        Statement 140.
        
        Delete a disclosure requirement that would have required an entity 
        to disclose the direct and indirect impact on income from continuing 
        operations of an election to subsequently measure any class of 
        separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair 
        value in the first fiscal year of such an election.
         FUTURE OPEN MEETINGS The following is a list of open meetings tentatively scheduled through 
      March. Because schedules may change, please check the FASB calendar before 
      finalizing your plans. Revisions to this list since the last issue of 
      Action Alert are highlighted in bold. Wednesday, February 15, 2006—FASB Board MeetingWednesday, February 
      15, 2006—FASB Education Session
 Wednesday, February 22, 2006—FASB Board 
      Meeting
 Wednesday, February 22, 2006—FASB Education 
      Session
 Wednesday, March 1, 2006—FASB Board Meeting
 Wednesday, March 
      1, 2006—FASB Education Session
 Wednesday, March 8, 2006—FASB Board 
      Meeting
 Wednesday, March 8, 2006—FASB Education Session
 Wednesday, 
      March 15, 2006—FASB Board Meeting
 Wednesday, March 15, 2006—p.m., 
      Emerging Issues Task Force Meeting
 Thursday, March 16, 2006—Emerging 
      Issues Task Force Meeting
 Friday, March 17, 2006—FASB Education 
      Session
 Wednesday, March 22, 2006—FASB Board Meeting
 Wednesday, 
      March 22, 2006—FASB Education Session
 Thursday, March 23, 
      2006—Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council Meeting
 Wednesday, 
      March 29, 2006—FASB Board Meeting
 Wednesday, March 29, 2006—FASB 
      Education Session
 
 |  |