American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Last Update: February 26, 2009
These Corporation Finance Interpretations comprise the Division's interpretations
of Section 7001 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “Act”),
which amended Section 111(e) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (the
“EESA”). The bracketed date following each CFI is the latest date of publication or
revision.
Section 7001 of the Act amends EESA Section 111(e) to require any TARP recipient
to “permit a separate shareholder vote to approve
the compensation of executives, as disclosed
pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of
the Commission,” during the period in which any
obligation arising from financial assistance
provided under the TARP remains outstanding. The
Act does not specify an effective date for this
provision. In his letter dated February 20,
2009 to Chairman Schapiro,
Chairman Dodd stated his view that this provision
became effective on February 17, 2009 and applies
to preliminary or definitive proxy statements
(other than definitive proxy statements which
relate to preliminary proxy statements filed on or
before February 17, 2009) filed with the
Commission after February 17, 2009.
Section 7001 of the Act also amends EESA Section 111(e) to require the CEO and
CFO of each TARP recipient to provide a written certification of compliance by the
TARP recipient with the requirements of Section 111(e), as amended. In his February
20, 2009 letter, Chairman Dodd stated that, “As this certification requirement
relates to compliance with executive compensation and corporate governance standards
that have yet to be established by the Secretary of the Treasury, it is my view that
this requirement is not yet effective and therefore CEOs and CFOs will not be
required to certify as to their company's compliance with such standards until they
have been established.”
The Division staff is following the views expressed in Chairman Dodd's letter to Chairman Schapiro.
Question 1
Question: EESA Section 111(e)(1), as amended, is titled
“Annual shareholder approval of executive
compensation” and provides that any proxy or
consent or authorization for “an annual or other
meeting of the shareholders of any TARP recipient”
shall permit a separate shareholder vote on
executive compensation. Is a separate shareholder
vote on executive compensation required for any
meeting other than the annual meeting of
shareholders for which proxies will be solicited
for the election of directors or a special meeting
in lieu of such annual meeting?
Answer: No. [Feb. 24, 2009]
Question 2
Question: EESA Section 111(e)(1), as amended, refers to
the compensation of executives “as disclosed pursuant to the compensation
disclosure rules of the Commission (which disclosure shall include the
compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation tables, and any related
material).” Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide compensation
discussion and analysis under Item 402 of Regulation S-K. If a smaller reporting
company is subject to the Act's say-on-pay provision, must the smaller reporting
company provide compensation discussion and analysis disclosure?
Answer: No. [Feb. 24, 2009]
Question 3
Question: A company that determines to comply with EESA
Section 111(e)(1), as amended, by including its
own proposal to have shareholders approve
executive compensation will be required to file a
preliminary proxy statement pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 14a-6(a). If the company faces special
circumstances and would like to request
acceleration of Rule 14a-6(a)'s ten-day review
period, how should it proceed?
Answer: The company should contact the Assistant
Director of the office that
reviews the company's filings to discuss the
special circumstances the company faces and how
the ten-day review period could be accelerated.
[Feb. 24, 2009]
Question 4
Question: EESA Section 111(e)(1), as amended, states that
the TARP recipient “shall permit a separate
shareholder vote to approve the compensation of
executives.” Does this mean that the TARP
recipient only needs to permit a shareholder vote
if it receives a shareholder proposal on approving
executive compensation?
Answer: No. The statute does not condition the requirement
for a vote on the receipt of a shareholder
proposal on approving executive compensation.
Senator Dodd stated in his letter to Chairman
Schapiro, “The law is intended to require a yearly
vote by shareholders.” [Feb. 26, 2009]
Question 5
Question: Can EESA Section 111(e)(1), as amended, be
satisfied by a TARP recipient if it includes a
shareholder proposal on “say on pay” in its proxy
statement?
Answer: This provision calls for a shareholder vote on
executive compensation as disclosed pursuant to
the Commission's compensation disclosure rules. A
shareholder proposal on “say on pay” that only
asks the company to adopt a policy providing for
annual shareholder votes on executive compensation
in the future would not satisfy this requirement.
The statute instead requires an actual,
non-binding vote by the shareholders to approve
executive compensation. [Feb. 26, 2009]