Exchange Act Form 8-K
Last Update: June 24, 2024
These interpretations replace the Form 8-K interpretations in the
July 1997 Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations, the June 13, 2003
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and the
November 22, 2004 Form 8-K Frequently Asked Questions. Some of the interpretations
included here were originally published in the sources noted above, and have been
revised in some cases. The bracketed date following each interpretation is the
latest date of publication or revision.
Questions and Answers of General Applicability
SECTION 101. FORM 8-K – GENERAL GUIDANCE
Question 101.01
Question: If a triggering event
specified in one of the items of Form 8-K occurs within four business days
before a registrant’s filing of a periodic report, may the registrant
disclose the event in its periodic report rather than a separate Form 8-K?
If so, under what item of the periodic report should the event be disclosed?
Item 5 of Part II of Form 10-Q and Item 9B of Form 10-K appear to be limited
to events that were required to be disclosed during the period covered by
those reports.
Answer: Yes, a triggering event
occurring within four business days before the registrant’s filing of a
periodic report may be disclosed in that periodic report, except for filings
required to be made under Item 4.01 of Form 8-K, Changes in Registrant’s
Certifying Accountant and Item 4.02 of Form 8-K, Non-Reliance on Previously
Issued Financial Statements or a Related Audit Report or Completed Interim
Review. The registrant may disclose triggering events, other than Items 4.01
and 4.02 events, on the periodic report under Item 5 of Part II of Form 10-Q
or Item 9B of Form 10-K, as applicable. All Item 4.01 and Item 4.02 events
must be reported on Form 8-K. Of course, amendments to previously filed
Forms 8-K must be filed on a Form 8-K/A. See also Exchange Act Form 8-K
Question 106.04 regarding the ability to rely on Item 2.02 of Form 8-K.
[April 3, 2008]
Question 101.02
Question: Some items of Form 8-K are
triggered by the specified event occurring in relation to the “registrant”
(such as Items 1.01, 1.02, 2.03, 2.04). Other items of Form 8-K refer also
to majority-owned subsidiaries (such as Item 2.01). Should registrants
interpret all Form 8-K Items as applying the triggering event to the
registrant and subsidiaries, other than items that obviously apply only at
the registrant level, such as changes in directors and principal
officers?
Answer: Yes. Triggering events apply
to registrants and subsidiaries. For example, entry by a subsidiary into a
non-ordinary course definitive agreement that is material to the registrant
is reportable under Item 1.01 and termination of such an agreement is
reportable under Item 1.02. Similarly, Item 2.03 disclosure is triggered by
definitive obligations or off-balance sheet arrangements of the registrant
and/or its subsidiaries that are material to the registrant. [April 2,
2008]
Question 101.03
Question: General Instruction E to
Form 8-K requires that a copy of the report be filed with each exchange
where the registrant’s securities are listed. Does the term “exchange” as
used in the instruction refer only to domestic exchanges?
Answer: Yes. The term “exchange” as
used in the instruction refers only to domestic exchanges and, accordingly,
Form 8-K reports need be furnished only to domestic exchanges. [April 2,
2008]
Question 101.04
Question: If a Form 8-K contains
audited annual financial statements that are a revised version of financial
statements previously filed with the Commission and have been revised to
reflect the effects of certain subsequent events, such as discontinued
operations, a change in reportable segments or a change in accounting
principle, then under Item 601(b)(101)(i) of Regulation S-K, the filer must
submit an interactive data file with the Form 8-K for those revised audited
annual financial statements. Paragraph 6(a) of General Instruction C of Form
6-K contains a similar requirement. Item 601(b)(101)(ii) of Regulation S-K
and Paragraph 6(b) of General Instruction C of Form 6-K permit a filer to
voluntarily submit an interactive data file with a Form 8-K or 6 K,
respectively, under specified conditions. Is a filer permitted to
voluntarily submit an interactive data file with a Form 8-K or 6-K for other
financial statements that may be included in the Form 8-K or 6-K, but for
which an interactive data file is not required to be submitted? For example,
if the Form 6-K contains interim financial statements other than pursuant to
the nine-month updating requirement of Item 8.A.5 of Form 20-F?
Answer: Yes, if the filer otherwise
complies with Item 601(b)(101)(ii) of Regulation S-K and Paragraph 6(b) of
General Instruction C of Form 6-K, as applicable. [Sep. 14, 2009]
Question 101.05
Question: If a filer is required to
submit an interactive data file with a form other than a Form 8-K or 6-K,
may the filer satisfy this requirement by submitting the interactive data
file with a Form 8-K or 6-K?
Answer: No. If a filer does not submit
an interactive data file with a form as required, the filer must amend the
form to include the interactive data file. [Sep. 14, 2009]
Section 102. Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
Question 102.01
Question: If an agreement that was not
material at the time the registrant entered into it becomes material at a
later date, must the registrant file an Item 1.01 Form 8-K at the time the
agreement becomes material?
Answer: No. If an agreement becomes
material to the registrant but was not material to the registrant when it
entered into, or amended, the agreement, the registrant need not file a Form
8-K under Item 1.01. In any event, the registrant must file the agreement as
an exhibit to the periodic report relating to the reporting period in which
the agreement became material if, at any time during that period, the
agreement was material to the registrant. In this regard, the registrant
would apply the requirements of Item 601 of Regulation S-K to determine if
the agreement must be filed with the periodic report. [April 2, 2008]
Question 102.02
Question: Is a placement agency or
underwriting agreement a material definitive agreement for purposes of Item
1.01? If so, does the requirement to disclose the parties to the agreement
require disclosure of the name of the placement agent or underwriter? Would
such disclosure render the safe harbor from the definition of an “offer”
included in Securities Act Rule 135c not available for the Form 8-K
filing?
Answer: The registrant must determine
whether specific agreements are material using established standards of
materiality and with reference to Instruction 1 to Item 1.01. If the
registrant determines that such an agreement requires filing under Item
1.01, it may, as under Item 3.02, omit the identity of the underwriters from
the disclosure in the Form 8-K to remain within the safe harbor of Rule
135c. [April 2, 2008]
Question 102.03
Question: Must a material definitive
agreement be summarized in the body of the Form 8-K if it is filed as an
exhibit to the Form 8-K?
Answer: Yes. Item 1.01 requires “a
brief description of the material terms and conditions of the agreement or
amendment that are material to the registrant.” Therefore, incorporation by
reference of the actual agreement would not satisfy this disclosure
requirement. In some cases, the agreement may be so brief that it may make
sense to disclose all the terms of the agreement into the body of the Form
8-K. [April 2, 2008]
Question 102.04
Question: A registrant enters into a
business combination agreement, such as a merger agreement, that is
reportable under Item 1.01 of Form 8-K as a material definitive agreement.
What material terms and conditions of the agreement should the registrant
disclose in the Form 8-K?
Answer: Item 1.01 of Form 8-K
requires a brief description of the terms and conditions of the agreement
that are material to the registrant. Although the materiality of a term or
condition of the business combination agreement will ultimately depend on
the particular facts and circumstances, the following terms should generally
be viewed as material and disclosed in the Form 8-K:
- the amount and nature of consideration offered for the business combination (or the method, exchange ratio, or formula for determining the consideration);
- any committed financing arrangements (e.g., PIPE investments), or the need for financing to close the business combination transaction, along with the material terms of such arrangements;
- any material terms regarding the securities ownership or management structure of the combined or surviving company after the closing of the business combination transaction;
- any material conditions to the closing of the transaction; and
- the anticipated timeframes for filing any Securities Act registration statement, proxy or information statement, or tender offer materials, as well as for the closing of the business combination transaction.
The Form 8-K also must include all other material
information that is necessary to make the required disclosure, in light of
the circumstances under which it is made, not misleading. See Exchange Act
Rule 12b-20 and Exchange Act Section 10(b). For example, the registrant
should consider disclosing the following information in the Form 8-K so that
investors can evaluate the business combination agreement with the proper
context:
- if a material term of the agreement has not yet been determined by the parties, the Form 8-K should affirmatively state so; and
- in the case where the registrant is the acquiror, the Form 8-K should briefly describe the nature of the target company’s business, including, at a minimum, whether it has existing operations or has generated revenues, as well as any information disclosed by the target company in announcing the business combination transaction. [March 22, 2022]
Question 102.05
Question: Under the factual
circumstances described in Question 102.04 above, should the registrant file
the material definitive agreement as an exhibit to the Item 1.01 Form
8-K?
Answer: Registrants are encouraged,
as a best practice, to file the agreement as an exhibit to the Item 1.01
Form 8-K. The Commission did not require the material definitive agreement
to be filed as an exhibit to the Item 1.01 Form 8-K due to the registrant’s
need for time to (1) request confidential treatment of sensitive terms of
the agreement and (2) prepare the agreement in the proper EDGAR format. See
Release No. 33-8400 (March 16, 2004).
The Commission, however, recently amended Form 8-K to permit
registrants to redact sensitive terms of a material definitive agreement
without submitting a confidential treatment request. See Instructions 5 and
6 to Item 1.01 of Form 8-K; see also Release No. 33-10618 (March 20, 2019).
The need for confidential treatment generally can no longer be the basis for
declining to file the material definitive agreement as an exhibit to the
Item 1.01 Form 8-K. This is consistent with the Commission’s previous views.
See Release No. 33-8400 (“[W]e encourage companies to file the exhibit with
the Form 8-K when feasible, particularly when no confidential treatment is
requested.”).
Further, absent unusual circumstances, it should generally
be feasible to prepare the agreement in the proper EDGAR format within the
four business day timeframe for filing an Item 1.01 Form 8-K, given
technological advances since 2004 and widespread availability of EDGAR
filing services. Registrants that are unable to prepare the agreement in the
proper EDGAR format and file the agreement as an exhibit should, as a best
practice, provide an explanation in the Form 8-K. [March 22, 2022]
Section 103. Item 1.02 Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement
Question 103.01
Question: A material definitive
agreement has an advance notice provision that requires 180 days advance
notice to terminate. The counterparty delivers to the registrant written
advance notice of termination. Even though the registrant intends to
negotiate with the counterparty and believes in good faith that the
agreement will ultimately not be terminated, is an Item 1.02 Form 8-K
required when the registrant receives the appropriate advance notice of
termination?
Answer: Yes. Although Instruction 1 to
Item 1.02 notes that no disclosure is required solely by reason of that item
during negotiations or discussions regarding termination of a material
definitive agreement unless and until the agreement has been terminated, and
Instruction 2 indicates that no disclosure is required if the registrant
believes in good faith that the material definitive agreement has not been
terminated, Instruction 2 clarifies that, once notice of termination
pursuant to the terms of the agreement has been received, the Form 8-K is
required, notwithstanding the registrant’s continued efforts to negotiate a
continuation of the contract. [April 2, 2008]
Question 103.02
Question: A material definitive
agreement expires automatically on June 30, 200X, but is continued for
successive one-year terms until the next June 30th unless one party sends a
non-renewal notice during a 30-day window period six months before the
automatic renewal — in other words, January. Does non-renewal of this type
of agreement by sending the notice in January trigger Item 1.02
disclosure?
Answer: Yes. The triggering event is
the sending of the notice in January, not the termination of the agreement
on June 30th. However, automatic renewal in accordance with the terms of the
agreement (in other words, when no non-renewal notice is sent) does not
trigger the filing of an Item 1.01 Form 8-K. [April 2, 2008]
Question 103.03
Question: A material definitive
agreement expires on June 30, 200X. It provides that either party may renew
the agreement for another one-year term ending on June 30th if it sends a
renewal notice to the other party during January, and the other party does
not affirmatively reject that notice in February. If neither party sends a
renewal notice during January, which means that the agreement terminates on
June 30th, is an Item 1.02 Form 8-K filing required?
Answer: No. This would be a
termination on the agreement’s stated termination date that does not trigger
an Item 1.02 filing. If one party sends a renewal notice that is not
rejected, an Item 1.01 Form 8-K is required. Such a filing would be
triggered by the passage of the rejection deadline on February 28th, and not
the sending of the renewal notice in January. [April 2, 2008]
Section 104. Item 1.03 Bankruptcy or Receivership
None
Section 104A. Item 1.04 Mine Safety – Reporting of Shutdowns and Patterns of Violations
None
Section 104B. Item 1.05 Material Cybersecurity Incidents.
Question 104B.01
Question: A registrant experiences a
material cybersecurity incident, and requests that the Attorney General
determine that disclosure of the incident on Form 8-K poses a substantial
risk to national security or public safety. The Attorney General declines to
make such determination or does not respond before the Form 8-K otherwise
would be due. What is the deadline for the registrant to file an Item 1.05
Form 8-K disclosing the incident?
Answer: The registrant must file the
Item 1.05 Form 8-K within four business days of its determination that the
incident is material. Requesting a delay does not change the registrant’s
filing obligation. The registrant may delay providing the Item 1.05 Form 8-K
disclosure only if the Attorney General determines that disclosure would
pose a substantial risk to national security or public safety and notifies
the Commission of such determination in writing before the Form 8-K
otherwise would be due. For further information on the Department of
Justice’s procedures with respect to Item 1.05(c) of Form 8-K, please see
Department of Justice Material Cybersecurity Incident Delay
Determinations, Department of Justice (2023), at https://www.justice.gov/media/1328226/dl?inline
[December 12, 2023]
Question 104B.02
Question: A registrant experiences a
material cybersecurity incident, and requests that the Attorney General
determine that disclosure of the incident on Form 8-K poses a substantial
risk to national security or public safety. The Attorney General makes such
determination and notifies the Commission that disclosure should be delayed
for a time period as provided for in Form 8-K Item 1.05(c). The registrant
subsequently requests that the Attorney General determine that disclosure
should be delayed for an additional time period. The Attorney General
declines to make such determination or does not respond before the
expiration of the current delay period. What is the deadline for the
registrant to file an Item 1.05 Form 8-K disclosing the incident?
Answer: The registrant must file the
Item 1.05 Form 8-K within four business days of the expiration of the delay
period provided by the Attorney General. For further information on the
Department of Justice’s procedures with respect to Item 1.05(c) of Form 8-K,
please see Department of Justice Material Cybersecurity Incident Delay
Determinations, Department of Justice (2023), at https://www.justice.gov/media/1328226/dl?inline
[December 12, 2023]
Question 104B.03
Question: A registrant experiences a
material cybersecurity incident and disclosure of the incident on Form 8-K
is delayed pursuant to Form 8-K Item 1.05(c) for a time period of up to 30
days, as specified by the Attorney General. Subsequently, during the
pendency of the delay period, the Attorney General determines that
disclosure of the incident no longer poses a substantial risk to national
security or public safety. The Attorney General notifies the Commission and
the registrant of this new determination. What is the deadline for the
registrant to file an Item 1.05 Form 8-K disclosing the incident?
Answer: The registrant must file the
Item 1.05 Form 8-K within four business days of the Attorney General’s
notification to the Commission and the registrant that disclosure of the
incident no longer poses a substantial risk to national security or public
safety. See also “Changes in circumstances during a delay period” in
Department of Justice Material Cybersecurity Incident Delay
Determinations, Department of Justice (2023), at https://www.justice.gov/media/1328226/dl?inline
[December 12, 2023]
Question 104B.04
Question: Would the sole fact that a
registrant consults with the Department of Justice regarding the
availability of a delay under Item 1.05(c) necessarily result in the
determination that the incident is material and therefore subject to the
requirements of Item 1.05(a)?
Answer: No. As the Commission stated
in the adopting release, the determination of whether an incident is
material is based on all relevant facts and circumstances surrounding the
incident, including both quantitative and qualitative factors, and should
focus on the traditional notion of materiality as articulated by the Supreme
Court. Furthermore, the requirements of Item 1.05 do not preclude a
registrant from consulting with the Department of Justice, including the
FBI, the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, or any other
law enforcement or national security agency at any point regarding the
incident, including before a materiality assessment is completed. [December
14, 2023]
Question 104B.05
Question: A registrant experiences a
cybersecurity incident involving a ransomware attack. The ransomware attack
results in a disruption in operations or the exfiltration of data. After
discovering the incident but before determining whether the incident is
material, the registrant makes a ransomware payment, and the threat actor that
caused the incident ends the disruption of operations or returns the data. Is
the registrant still required to make a materiality determination regarding the
incident?
Answer: Yes. Item 1.05 of Form 8-K
requires a registrant that experiences a cybersecurity incident to determine
whether that incident is material. The cessation or apparent cessation of the
incident prior to the materiality determination, including as a result of the
registrant making a ransomware payment, does not relieve the registrant of the
requirement to make such materiality determination.
Further, in making the required materiality determination, the
registrant cannot necessarily conclude that the incident is not material simply
because of the prior cessation or apparent cessation of the incident. Instead,
in assessing the materiality of the incident, the registrant should, as the
Commission noted in the adopting release for Item 1.05 of Form 8-K, determine
“if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would
consider it important in making an investment decision, or if it would have
significantly altered the total mix of information made available,”
notwithstanding the fact that the incident may have already been resolved.
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure,
Release Nos. 33-11216; 34-97989 (July 26, 2023) [88 FR 51896, 51917 (Aug. 4,
2023)] (quoting Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano, 563 U.S. 27, 38-40 (2011);
Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 240 (1988); TSC Indus. v. Northway, 426
U.S. 438, 449 (1976)) (internal quotation marks omitted). [June 24, 2024]
Question 104B.06
Question: A registrant experiences a
cybersecurity incident that it determines to be material. That incident involves
a ransomware attack that results in a disruption in operations or the
exfiltration of data and has a material impact or is reasonably likely to have a
material impact on the registrant, including its financial condition and results
of operations. Subsequently, the registrant makes a ransomware payment, and the
threat actor that caused the incident ends the disruption of operations or
returns the data. If the registrant has not reported the incident pursuant to
Item 1.05 of Form 8-K before it made the ransomware payment and the threat actor
has ended the disruption of operations or returned the data before the Form 8-K
Item 1.05 filing deadline, does the registrant still need to disclose the
incident pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K?
Answer: Yes. Because the registrant
experienced a cybersecurity incident that it determined to be material, the
subsequent ransomware payment and cessation or apparent cessation of the
incident does not relieve the registrant of the requirement to report the
incident under Item 1.05 of Form 8-K within four business days after the
registrant determines that it has experienced a material cybersecurity incident.
[June 24, 2024]
Question 104B.07
Question: A registrant experiences a
cybersecurity incident involving a ransomware attack, and the registrant makes a
ransomware payment to the threat actor that caused the incident. The registrant
has an insurance policy that covers cybersecurity incidents and is reimbursed
for all or a substantial portion of the ransomware payment. Is the incident
necessarily not material as a result of the registrant being reimbursed for the
ransomware payment under its insurance policy?
Answer: No. The standard that the
Commission articulated for assessing the materiality of a cybersecurity incident
under Item 1.05 of Form 8-K is set forth in the adopting release for the rule
and is reiterated in Question 104B.05. Further, as the Commission noted in the
adopting release for Item 1.05 of Form 8-K, when assessing the materiality of
cybersecurity incidents, registrants “should take into consideration all
relevant facts and circumstances, which may involve consideration of both
quantitative and qualitative factors” including, for example, “consider[ing]
both the immediate fallout and any longer term effects on its operations,
finances, brand perception, customer relationships, and so on, as part of its
materiality analysis.” Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and
Incident Disclosure, Release Nos. 33-11216; 34-97989 (July 26, 2023) [88 FR
51896, 51917 (Aug. 4, 2023)]. Under the facts described in this question, such
consideration also may include an assessment of the subsequent availability of,
or increase in cost to the registrant of, insurance policies that cover
cybersecurity incidents. [June 24, 2024]
Question 104B.08
Question: A registrant experiences a
cybersecurity incident involving a ransomware attack. Is the size of the
ransomware payment, by itself, determinative as to whether the cybersecurity
incident is material? For example, would a ransomware payment that is small in
size necessarily make the related cybersecurity incident immaterial?
Answer: No. The standard that the
Commission articulated for assessing the materiality of a cybersecurity incident
under Item 1.05 of Form 8-K is set forth in the adopting release for the rule
and reiterated in Question 104B.05. Under that standard, the size of any
ransomware payment demanded or made is only one of the facts and circumstances
that registrants should consider in making its materiality determination
regarding the cybersecurity incident. Further, in the adopting release for Item
1.05 of Form 8-K, the Commission declined “to use a quantifiable trigger for
Item 1.05 because some cybersecurity incidents may be material yet not cross a
particular financial threshold.”
Any ransomware payment made is only one of the various potential
impacts of a cybersecurity incident that a registrant should consider under Item
1.05. As the Commission further stated in Item 1.05’s adopting release:
[T]he material impact of an incident may encompass a range
of harms, some quantitative and others qualitative. A lack of quantifiable
harm does not necessarily mean an incident is not material. For example, an
incident that results in significant reputational harm to a registrant . . .
may not cross a particular quantitative threshold, but it should nonetheless
be reported if the reputational harm is material.
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and
Incident Disclosure, Release Nos. 33-11216; 34-97989 (July 26, 2023) [88
FR 51896, 51906 (Aug. 4, 2023)]. [June 24, 2024]
Question 104B.09
Question: A registrant experiences a
series of cybersecurity incidents involving ransomware attacks over time, either
by a single threat actor or by multiple threat actors. The registrant determines
that each incident, individually, is immaterial. Is disclosure of those
cybersecurity incidents nonetheless required pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form
8-K?
Answer: Disclosure of those
cybersecurity incidents may, depending on the particular facts and
circumstances, be required pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In these
circumstances, the registrant should consider whether any of those incidents
were related, and if so, determine whether those related incidents,
collectively, were material. The definition of “cybersecurity incident” under
Item 106(a) of Regulation S-K (which, as noted in Instruction 3 to Item 1.05, is
the definition that applies to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K) includes “a series of
related unauthorized occurrences.” In the adopting release for Item 1.05, the
Commission noted:
[W]hen a company finds that it has been
materially affected by what may appear as a series of related cyber
intrusions, Item 1.05 may be triggered even if the material impact or
reasonably likely material impact could be parceled among the multiple
intrusions to render each by itself immaterial. One example was provided in
the Proposing Release: the same malicious actor engages in a number of
smaller but continuous cyberattacks related in time and form against the
same company and collectively, they are either quantitatively or
qualitatively material. Another example is a series of related attacks from
multiple actors exploiting the same vulnerability and collectively impeding
the company’s business materially.
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident
Disclosure, Release Nos. 33-11216; 34-97989 (July 26, 2023) [88 FR
51896, 51910 (Aug. 4, 2023)]. [June 24, 2024]
Section 105. Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets
None
Section 106. Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Question 106.01
Question: Item 2.02 of Form 8-K
contains a conditional exemption from its requirement to furnish a Form 8-K
where earnings information is presented orally, telephonically, by webcast,
by broadcast or by similar means. Among other conditions, the company must
provide on its web site any financial and other statistical information
contained in the presentation, together with any information that would be
required by Regulation G. Would an audio file of the initial webcast satisfy
this condition to the exemption?
Answer: Yes, provided that: (1) the
audio file contains all material financial and other statistical information
included in the presentation that was not previously disclosed, and (2)
investors can access it and replay it through the company's web site.
Alternatively, slides or a similar presentation posted on the web site at
the time of the presentation containing the required, previously
undisclosed, material financial and other statistical information would
satisfy the condition. In each case, the company must provide all previously
undisclosed material financial and other statistical information, including
information provided in connection with any questions and answers.
Regulation FD also may impose disclosure requirements in these
circumstances. [Jan. 11, 2010]
Question 106.02
Question: A company issues its
earnings release after the close of the market and holds a properly noticed
conference call to discuss its earnings two hours later. That conference
call contains material, previously undisclosed, information of the type
described under Item 2.02 of Form 8-K. Because of this timing, the company
is unable to furnish its earnings release on a Form 8-K before its
conference call. Accordingly, the company cannot rely on the exemption from
the requirement to furnish the information in the conference call on a Form
8-K. What must the company file with regard to its conference call?
Answer: The company must furnish the
material, previously non-public, financial and other statistical information
required to be furnished on Item 2.02 of Form 8-K as an exhibit to a Form
8-K and satisfy the other requirements of Item 2.02 of Form 8-K. A
transcript of the portion of the conference call or slides or a similar
presentation including such information will satisfy this requirement. In
each case, all material, previously undisclosed, financial and other
statistical information, including that provided in connection with any
questions and answers, must be provided. [Jan. 11, 2010]
Question 106.03
Question: Item 2.02 of Form 8-K
contains a conditional exemption from its requirement to furnish a Form 8-K
where earnings information is presented orally, telephonically, by webcast,
by broadcast or by similar means. Among other conditions, the company must
provide on its web site any material financial and other statistical
information not previously disclosed and contained in the presentation,
together with any information that would be required by Regulation G. When
must all of this information appear on the company's web site?
Answer: The required information must
appear on the company's web site at the time the oral presentation is made.
In the case of information that is not provided in a presentation itself
but, rather, is disclosed unexpectedly in connection with the question and
answer session that was part of that oral presentation, the information must
be posted on the company's web site promptly after it is disclosed. Any
requirements of Regulation FD also must be satisfied. A webcast of the oral
presentation would be sufficient to meet this requirement. [Jan. 11, 2010]
Question 106.04
Question: Company X files its
quarterly earnings release as an exhibit to its Form 10-Q on Wednesday
morning, prior to holding its earnings conference call Wednesday afternoon.
Assuming that all of the other conditions of Item 2.02(b) are met, may the
company rely on the exemption for its conference call even if it does not
also furnish the earnings release in an Item 2.02 Form 8-K?
Answer: Yes. Company X's filing of the
earnings release as an exhibit to its Form 10-Q, rather than in an Item 2.02
Form 8-K, before the conference call takes place, would not preclude
reliance on the exemption for the conference call. [Jan. 11, 2010]
Question 106.05
Question: Does a company's failure to
furnish to the Commission the Form 8-K required by Item 2.02 in a timely
manner affect the company's eligibility to use Form S-3?
Answer: No. Form S-3 requires the
company to have filed in "a timely manner all reports required to be
filed in twelve calendar months and any portion of a month immediately
preceding the filing of the registration statement." Because an Item
2.02 Form 8-K is furnished to the Commission, rather than filed with the
Commission, failure to furnish such a Form 8-K in a timely manner would not
affect a company's eligibility to use Form S-3. While not affecting a
company's Form S-3 eligibility, failure to comply with Item 2.02 of Form 8-K
would, of course, be a violation of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and
the rules thereunder. [Jan. 11, 2010]
Question 106.06
Question: Company A issues a press
release announcing its results of operations for a just-completed fiscal
quarter, including its expected adjusted earnings (a non-GAAP financial
measure) for the fiscal period. Would this press release be subject to Item
2.02 of Form 8-K?
Answer: Yes, because it contains
material, non-public information regarding its results of operations for a
completed fiscal period. The adjusted earnings range presented would be
subject to the requirements of Item 2.02 applicable to non-GAAP financial
measures. [Jan. 11, 2010]
Question 106.07
Question: A registrant reports
“preliminary” earnings and results of operations for a completed quarterly
period, and some of these amounts may even be estimates. In issuing this
preliminary earnings release, must the registrant comply with all of the
requirements of, and instructions to, Item 2.02 of Form 8-K?
Answer: Yes. [April 24, 2009]
Section 107. Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant
Question 107.01
Question: Instruction 2 to Item 2.03
states that if the registrant is not a party to the transaction creating the
contingent obligation arising under the off-balance sheet arrangement, the
four business day period begins on the “earlier of” (1) the fourth business
day after the contingent obligation is created or arises, and (2) the day on
which an executive officer becomes aware. How can a registrant disclose
something of which it is not aware?
Answer: A registrant must maintain
disclosure and internal controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it
files under the Exchange Act, including Current Reports on Form 8-K, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time
frames. Instruction 2 to Item 2.03 provides for an additional four business
days as a “grace” period given the nature of the requirement. [April 2,
2008]
Question 107.02
Question: If a registrant has a
long-term debt issuance in a private placement that is coming due, and
replaces it or refunds it with another long term debt issuance of the same
principal amount and with similar terms in another private placement, is a
Form 8-K required to be filed under Item 2.03?
Answer: Item 2.03 requires disclosure
of a direct financial obligation that is material to the registrant.
Materiality is a facts and circumstances determination. Whether the
financial obligation is a refinancing on similar terms is one such fact; the
amount of the obligation is another. Depending on other facts and
circumstances (including but not limited to factors such as current impact
on covenants, liquidity and debt capacity and other debt requirements), a
registrant may be able to conclude that a financial obligation in this
situation is not material. [April 2, 2008]
Section 108. Item 2.04 Triggering Events That Accelerate or Increase a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
Question 108.01
Question: Is an Item 2.04 Form 8-K
required if all conditions necessary to an event triggering acceleration or
an increase in a direct financial obligation under an agreement have
occurred but the counterparty has not declared, or provided notice of, a
default?
Answer: It depends on how the
agreement is written. If, as is often the case, such declaration or notice
is necessary prior to the increase or the acceleration of the obligation,
then Item 2.04 is not triggered. If no such declaration or notice is
necessary and the increase or acceleration is triggered automatically on the
occurrence of an event without declaration or notice and the consequences of
the event are material to the registrant, then disclosure is required under
Item 2.04. [April 2, 2008]
Section 109. Item 2.05 Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities
Question 109.01
Question: Are costs associated with an
exit activity limited to those addressed in FASB Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities (SFAS 146)?
Answer: No. SFAS 146 addresses certain
costs associated with an exit activity. Paragraph 2 of SFAS 146 states that
such costs include, but are not limited to, those costs addressed by the
SFAS. Other costs that may need to be disclosed pursuant to Item 2.05 of
Form 8-K are addressed by FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
Nos. 87, 88, 106 and 112. [April 2, 2008]
Question 109.02
Question: If a registrant, in
connection with an exit activity, is terminating employees, must it file the
Form 8-K when the registrant commits to the plan, or can it wait until it
has informed its employees?
Answer: Item 2.05 was intended to be
generally consistent with SFAS 146. SFAS 146 states that, if a registrant is
terminating employees as part of a plan to exit an activity, it need not
disclose the commitment to the plan until it has informed affected
employees. Similarly, a Form 8-K need not be filed until those employees
have been informed. See paragraphs 8, 20 and 21 of SFAS 146. [April 2,
2008]
Section 110. Item 2.06 Material Impairments
Question 110.01
Question: The Instruction to Item
2.06 of Form 8-K indicates that a filing is not required if an impairment
conclusion is made “in connection with” the preparation, review or audit of
financial statements required to be included in the next periodic report due
to be filed under the Exchange Act, the periodic report is filed on a timely
basis and such conclusion is disclosed in the report. If an impairment
conclusion is made at a time that coincides with, but is not in connection
with, the preparation, review or audit of financial statements required to
be included in the next periodic report due to be filed under the Exchange
Act, is an Item 2.06 Form 8-K required?
Answer: No. If the impairment
conclusion coincides with the preparation, review or audit of financial
statements required to be included in the next periodic report due to be
filed under the Exchange Act and the other conditions of the Instruction to
Item 2.06 are satisfied, a filing would not be required under Item
2.06. [May 16, 2013]
Question 110.02
Question: Does the re-measurement of
a deferred tax asset ("DTA") to incorporate the effects of newly
enacted tax rates or other provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
("Act") trigger an obligation to file under Item 2.06 of Form 8-K?
Answer: No, the re-measurement of a
DTA to reflect the impact of a change in tax rate or tax laws is not an
impairment under ASC Topic 740. However, the enactment of new tax rates or
tax laws could have implications for a registrant’s financial statements,
including whether it is more likely than not that the DTA will be realized.
As discussed in Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (Dec. 22, 2017), a registrant that
has not yet completed its accounting for certain income tax effects of the
Act by the time the registrant issues its financial statements for the
period that includes December 22, 2017 (the date of the Act’s enactment) may
apply a "measurement period" approach to complying with ASC Topic
740. Registrants employing the "measurement period" approach as
contemplated by SAB 118 that conclude that an impairment has occurred due to
changes resulting from the enactment of the Act may rely on the Instruction
to Item 2.06 and disclose the impairment, or a provisional amount with
respect to that possible impairment, in its next periodic report. [December
22, 2017]
Section 111. Item 3.01 Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing
None
Section 112. Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
Question 112.01
Question: Does the grant of stock
options pursuant to an employee stock option plan require disclosure under
Item 3.02 of Form 8-K?
Answer: If a grant of stock options
pursuant to an employee stock option plan does not constitute a “sale” or
“offer to sell” under Securities Act Section 2(a)(3), the grant need not be
reported under Item 3.02 of Form 8-K. See, e.g., Millennium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (May 21, 1998). [April 2, 2008]
Question 112.02
Question: If a registrant sells, in an
unregistered transaction, shares of a class of equity securities that is not
currently outstanding, would the volume threshold under Item 3.02 of Form
8-K be exceeded by such sale?
Answer: Yes. As such, in these
circumstances, an Item 3.02 Form 8-K filing requirement would be triggered.
[April 2, 2008]
Section 113. Item 3.03 Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders
None
Section 114. Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant
Question 114.01
Question: If a principal accountant
resigns, declines to stand for re-election or is dismissed because its
registration with the PCAOB has been revoked, should the registrant disclose
this fact when filing an Item 4.01 Form 8-K to report a change in certifying
accountant?
Answer: Yes. Disclosure of the
revocation of the accountant's PCAOB registration is necessary to
understanding the required disclosure with respect to whether the former
accountant resigned, declined to stand for re-election or was dismissed.
[Jan. 14, 2011]
Question 114.02
Question: A registrant engages a new
principal accountant that is related in some manner to the former principal
accountant (e.g., the firms are affiliates or are member firms of the same
network), but the new principal accountant is a separate legal entity and is
separately registered with the PCAOB. Should the registrant file an Item
4.01 Form 8-K to report a change in certifying accountant?
Answer: Yes. Because the new principal
accountant is a different legal entity from the former principal accountant
and is separately registered with the PCAOB, there is a change in certifying
accountant, which must be reported on Item 4.01 Form 8 K. [Jan. 14, 2011]
Question 114.03
Question: If a registrant's principal
accountant enters into a business combination with another accounting firm,
should the registrant file an Item 4.01 Form 8-K to report a change in
certifying accountant?
Answer: Whether an Item 4.01 Form 8-K
is required will depend on how the combination is structured and on other
facts and circumstances. Accounting firms that enter into business
combinations are encouraged to discuss their transactions with the
Division's Office of Chief Accountant. [Jan. 14, 2011]
Section 115. Item 4.02 Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements or a Related Audit Report or Completed Interim Review
Question 115.01
Question: If a registrant has taken
appropriate action to prevent reliance on the financial statements and also
has filed a Form 8-K under Item 4.02(a), must the registrant file a second
Form 8-K under Item 4.02(b) if it is separately advised by, or receives
notice from, its auditor that the auditor has reached the same
conclusion?
Answer: No. If the registrant has
reported that reliance should not be placed on previously issued financial
statements because of an error in such financial statements, the issuer does
not need to file a second Form 8-K to indicate that the auditor also has
concluded that future reliance should not be placed on its audit report,
unless the auditor’s conclusion relates to an error or matter different from
that which triggered the registrant’s filing under Item 4.02(a). [April 2,
2008]
Question 115.02
Question: Does the Item 4.02
requirement to file a Form 8-K if a company concludes that any previously
issued financial statements should no longer be relied upon because of an
error in such financial statements, as addressed in FASB Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections, apply to pro forma financial information?
Answer: No. The Item 4.02 requirement
does not apply to pro forma financial information. If an error is detected
in pro forma financial information, an amendment to the form containing such
information may be required to correct the error. [April 2, 2008]
Question 115.03
Question: Must a filer provide
disclosures under Item 4.02(a) of Form 8-K when it discovers a material
error in its Interactive Data File while the financial statements upon which
they are based do not contain an error and may continue to be relied on?
Answer: No. Item 4.02(a) requires a
Form 8-K only when the filer determines that previously issued financial
statements should no longer be relied upon because of an error in those
financial statements. If a filer wants to voluntarily provide non-reliance
disclosure similar to Item 4.02(a) that pertains only to the interactive
data, it can do so under either Item 7.01 or Item 8.01 of Form 8-K. In any
event, if a filer finds a material error in its Interactive Data File, it
must file an amendment to correct the error. In addition, once a filer
becomes aware of the error in its Interactive Data File, it must correct the
error promptly in order for the Interactive Data File to be eligible for the
modified treatment under the federal securities laws provided by Rule 406T
of Regulation S-T. [May 29, 2009]
Section 116. Item 5.01 Changes in Control of Registrant
None
Section 117. Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
Question 117.01
Question: When is the obligation to
report an event specified in Item 5.02(b) of Form 8-K triggered? Must the
Form 8-K filed to report an Item 5.02(b) event disclose the effective date
of the resignation or other event?
Answer: With respect to any
resignation, retirement or refusal to stand for re-election reportable under
Item 5.02(b), other than in the corporate governance policy situations
addressed in Question 117.15, the Form 8-K reporting obligation is triggered
by a notice of a decision to resign, retire or refuse to stand for
re-election provided by the director, whether or not such notice is written,
and regardless of whether the resignation, retirement or refusal to stand
for re-election is conditional or subject to acceptance. The disclosure
shall specify the effective date of the resignation or retirement. In the
case of a refusal to stand for re-election, the registrant must disclose
when the election in question will occur, for example, at the registrant’s
next annual meeting. No disclosure is required solely by reason of Item
5.02(b) of discussions or consideration of resignation, retirement or
refusal to stand for re-election. Whether communications represent
discussion or consideration, on the one hand, or notice of a decision, on
the other hand, is a facts and circumstances determination. A registrant
should ensure that it has appropriate disclosure controls and procedures in
place – for example, a board policy that all directors must provide any such
notice directly to the corporate secretary – to determine when a notice of
resignation, retirement or refusal has been communicated to the registrant.
[June 26, 2008]
Question 117.02
Question: Item 5.02(b) of Form 8-K
requires current disclosure when any named executive officer retires,
resigns or is terminated from that position. Since status as a named
executive officer is determined based on the level of total compensation
under Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, does this mean that disclosure on
Form 8-K is triggered when the person is no longer required to be included
in the Summary Compensation Table because of the executive officer’s level
of total compensation?
Answer: No. Under Instruction 4 to
Item 5.02, the term “named executive officer” refers to those executive
officers for whom disclosure under Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K was
required in the most recent Commission filing. A Form 8-K is triggered under
Item 5.02(b) when one of those officers retires, resigns or is terminated
from the position that the executive officer is listed as holding in the
most recent filing including executive compensation disclosure under Item
402(c) of Regulation S-K. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.03
Question: A registrant’s principal
operating officer has his duties and responsibilities as principal operating
officer removed and reassigned to other personnel in the organization;
however, the person remains employed by the registrant, and the person’s
title remains the same. Is the registrant required to file a Form 8-K under
Item 5.02 to report the principal operating officer’s termination?
Answer: Yes. The term “termination”
includes situations where an officer identified in Item 5.02 has been
demoted or has had his or her duties and responsibilities removed such that
he or she no longer functions in the position of that officer. [April 2,
2008]
Question 117.04
Question: If a registrant decides not
to nominate a director for re-election at its next annual meeting, is a Form
8-K required?
Answer: No. That situation is not
covered under the phrase “is removed.” However, if the director, upon
receiving notice from the registrant that it does not intend to nominate him
or her for re-election, then resigns his or her position as a director, then
a Form 8-K would be required pursuant to Item 5.02. If the director tells
the registrant that he or she refuses to stand for re-election, a Form 8-K
is required because the director has communicated a “refusal to stand for
re-election,” whether or not in response to an offer by the registrant to be
nominated. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.05
Question: If a registrant appoints a
new executive officer, it may delay disclosure until it makes a public
announcement of the event under the Instruction to Item 5.02(c). If the new
executive officer were simultaneously appointed to the board of directors of
the registrant, would the registrant have to disclose such appointment
pursuant to Item 5.02(d) within four business days following such
appointment, even if that date is before the public announcement of the
officer’s appointment?
Answer: No. In these circumstances,
disclosures under paragraph (d) of Item 5.02 may be delayed to the time of
public announcement consistent with Item 5.02(c). Similarly, any disclosure
required under paragraph (e) of Item 5.02 may be delayed to the time of
public announcement consistent with Item 5.02(c). [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.06
Question: If the registrant does not
consider its principal accounting officer an executive officer for purposes
of Items 401 or 404 of Regulation S-K, must the registrant make all of the
disclosures required by Item 5.02(c)(2) of Form 8-K?
Answer: Yes. All of the information
required by Item 5.02(c)(2) regarding specified newly appointed officers,
including a registrant’s principal accounting officer, is required to be
reported on Form 8-K even if the information was not required to be
disclosed in the Form 10-K because the position does not fall within the
definition of an executive officer for purposes of Items 401 or 404 of
Regulation S-K. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.07
Question: If a director is elected to
the board of directors other than by a vote of security holders at a
meeting, but the director’s term will begin on a later date, when is the
reporting requirement under Item 5.02(d) of Form 8-K triggered?
Answer: The reporting requirement is
triggered as of the date of the director’s election to the board. The Item
5.02(d) Form 8-K should disclose the date on which the director’s term
begins. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.08
Question: The board of directors of
the registrant adopts a material equity compensation plan in which named
executive officers are eligible to participate. No awards have been made
under the plan. Does board adoption of the plan trigger disclosure under
Item 5.02(e)? Does the fact that adoption of the plan is subject to
shareholder approval affect the timing of disclosure under Item 5.02(e)?
Answer: Adoption by the registrant’s
board of directors of a material equity compensation plan in which named
executive officers are eligible to participate requires current disclosure
pursuant to Item 5.02(e) of Form 8-K. Where the registrant’s board adopts a
compensation plan subject to shareholder approval, the obligation to file a
Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.02(e) is triggered upon receipt of shareholder
approval of the plan. Similarly, if a reportable plan amendment or stock
option grant is adopted subject to shareholder approval, the obligation to
file a Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.02 is triggered upon receipt of
shareholder approval of the plan amendment or grant. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.09
Question: The board of directors of
the registrant adopts a material cash bonus plan under which named executive
officers participate. No specific performance criteria, performance goals or
bonus opportunities have been communicated to plan participants. Does the
adoption of such a plan require disclosure pursuant to Item 5.02(e) of Form
8-K?
Answer: Yes. Moreover, if the plan is
adopted and is also subject to shareholder approval, the receipt of
shareholder approval – and not the plan’s adoption – triggers the obligation
to file a Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.02(e). [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.10
Question: After the adoption of a
material cash bonus plan has been disclosed in an Item 5.02(e) Form 8-K, the
board of directors sets specific performance goals and business criteria for
named executive officers during the performance period. Does this action
require disclosure pursuant to Item 5.02(e) of Form 8-K if the specific
performance goals and business criteria set for the performance period are
materially consistent with the previously disclosed terms of the plan?
Answer: No. In reliance on Instruction
2 to Item 5.02(e), the registrant is not required to file an Item 5.02(e)
Form 8-K to report this action if the specific performance goals and
business criteria set for the performance period are materially consistent
with the previously disclosed terms of the plan, for example if the specific
goals and criteria are among the previously disclosed performance goals and
business criteria (such as EBITDA, return on equity or other applicable
measure) that the plan may apply or has applied. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.11
Question: A registrant pays out a
material cash award pursuant to a cash bonus plan for which disclosure
previously was filed consistent with Exchange Act Form 8-K Questions 117.09
and 117.10. Does payment of the award require disclosure pursuant to Item
5.02(e) of Form 8-K?
Answer: Disclosure under Item 5.02(e)
depends on the circumstances relating to the payment of the cash award. If
the registrant pays out a cash award upon determining that the performance
criteria have been satisfied, pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 5.02(e), a
Form 8-K reporting such a payment would not be required under Item 5.02(e)
because the payment was materially consistent with the previously disclosed
terms of the plan. However, if the registrant exercised discretion to pay
the bonus even though the specified performance criteria were not satisfied,
a Form 8-K reporting such a payment would be required under Item 5.02(e)
because the payment was not materially consistent with the previously
disclosed terms of the plan, even if the plan provided for the exercise of
such discretion. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.12
Question: If an Item 5.02(e) Form 8-K
is filed to disclose an annual non-equity incentive plan award, does the
disclosure have to include the specific target levels?
Answer: The registrant is not required
to provide disclosure pursuant to Item 5.02(e) of target levels with respect
to specific quantitative or qualitative performance related-factors, or any
other factors or criteria involving confidential trade secrets or
confidential commercial or financial information, the disclosure of which
would result in competitive harm for the registrant. This position is
consistent with the treatment of similar information under Instruction 4 to
Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and Instruction 2 to Item 402(e)(1) of
Regulation S-K. [April 24, 2009]
Question 117.13
Question: If a previously-disclosed
employment agreement provides that the principal executive officer is
entitled to receive a cash bonus in an amount determined by the compensation
committee in its discretion, would an Item 5.02(e) Form 8-K be required when
the committee makes an ad hoc determination of the amount of the principal
executive officer’s bonus at the end of the first year that the contract is
in effect? Would an Item 5.02(e) Form 8-K be required if the committee makes
an ad hoc determination of the amount of the CEO’s bonus at the end of the
second year in which the contract is in effect?
Answer: No. In both cases, no Item
5.02(e) Form 8-K would be required to report the discretionary bonus amount.
Disclosure regarding material information about the bonus should be included
in the registrant’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related
disclosures under Item 402 of Regulation S-K. [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.14
Question: A registrant intends to
terminate an executive compensation plan. Item 5.02(e) requires that
material amendments or modifications of compensatory arrangements be
disclosed on Form 8-K. Does this item require disclosure of plan
terminations?
Answer: Yes. A termination should be
disclosed if it constitutes a material amendment or modification of the
executive compensation plan. Release No. 33-8732A stated that “[i]nstead of
being required to be disclosed based on the general requirements with regard
to material definitive agreements in Item 1.01 and Item 1.02 of Form 8-K,
employment compensation arrangements will now be covered under Item 5.02 of
Form 8-K, as amended.” [April 2, 2008]
Question 117.15
Question: If a company has a corporate
governance policy that requires a director to tender her resignation from
the board of directors upon the occurrence of an event — such as reaching
mandatory retirement age, changing jobs or failing to receive a majority of
votes cast for election of directors at the annual meeting of shareholders —
when must a company file a Form 8-K under Item 5.02(b)?
Answer: Under these circumstances, in
which a director tenders her resignation only because she is required to do
so in order to comply with a corporate governance policy, the company must
file a Form 8-K under Item 5.02(b) within four business days of the board's
decision to accept the director's tender of resignation. If the board does
not accept the director's tender of resignation — and thus, the director
remains on the board — the company should consider informing shareholders as
to whether and to what extent corporate governance policies are being
followed and enforced. [June 26, 2008]
Question 117.16
Question: A registrant appoints a new
director, triggering the obligation to file a Form 8-K pursuant to Item
5.02(d). The newly appointed director enters into the standard compensatory
and other agreements and arrangements that the company provides its
non-employee directors (e.g., an equity award, annual cash
compensation and an indemnification agreement). Pursuant to Item 5.02(d)(5),
must the Form 8-K describe these compensatory and other agreements and
arrangements?
Answer: Yes. Item 5.02(d)(5) requires
a brief description of the newly appointed director's compensatory and other
agreements and arrangements, even if they are consistent with the
registrant's previously disclosed standard agreements and arrangements for
non-employee directors. In lieu of describing any material plan, contract or
arrangement to which the director is a party or in which he or she
participates, (but not material amendments or grants or awards or
modifications thereto), the registrant may cross-reference the description
of such plan, contract or arrangement from the Item 402 disclosure in the
company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K or proxy statement. [May
29, 2009]
Section 118. Item 5.03 Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year
Question 118.01
Question: Does the restatement of a
registrant’s articles of incorporation, without any substantive amendments
to those articles or any requirement to be approved by security holders,
trigger a Form 8-K filing requirement?
Answer: No. An Item 5.03 Form 8-K is
not required to be filed when the registrant is merely restating its
articles of incorporation (e.g., a restatement that merely consolidates
previous amendments without any substantive changes to the articles of
incorporation). However, the Division staff recommends that a registrant
refile its complete articles of incorporation, if restated, in its next
periodic report for ease of reference by investors. [April 2, 2008]
Section 119. Item 5.04 Temporary Suspension of Trading Under Registrant's Employee Benefit Plans
Question 119.01
Question: Is a Form 8-K filing
required for the notice of any time period that constitutes a "blackout
period" for purposes of the notice requirements under ERISA, without
regard to whether it is also a "blackout period" for purposes of
Section 306(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Regulation BTR?
Answer: No. Item 5.04 applies only to
a notice of a "blackout period" under Section 306(a) of
Sarbanes-Oxley and Regulation BTR. [May 29, 2009]
Section 120. Item 5.05 Amendments to the Registrant's Code of Ethics, or Waiver of a Provision of the Code of Ethics
None
Section 121. Item 5.06 Change in Shell Company Status
None
Section 121A. Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Question 121A.01
Question: How should an issuer
calculate the four business day filing period for an Item 5.07 Form 8-K?
Answer: Pursuant to Instruction 1 to
Item 5.07, the date on which the shareholder meeting ends is the triggering
event for an Item 5.07 Form 8-K. Day one of the four-business day filing
period is the day after the date on which the shareholder meeting ends. For
example, if the meeting ends on Tuesday, day one would be Wednesday, and the
four-business day filing period would end on Monday. [Feb. 16, 2010]
Question 121A.02
Question: Does the Item 5.07(b)
requirement to report the number of shareholder votes cast for, against or
withheld with respect to a matter apply only to matters voted upon at a
meeting that involves the election of directors?
Answer: No. This reporting obligation
applies with respect to any matter submitted to a vote of security holders,
through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise. [June 4, 2010]
Question 121A.03
Question: Item 5.07(b) requires
disclosure of the number of votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as
the number of abstentions and broker non-votes, as to each matter submitted
to a vote of security holders. With respect to the advisory vote on the
frequency of shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation, Item
5.07(b) requires disclosure of the number of votes cast for each of the one,
two and three year frequency options, as well as the number of abstentions.
Are companies also required to state the number of broker non-votes with
respect to the frequency of shareholder advisory votes on executive
compensation?
Answer: No. Item 5.07(b) does not
require disclosure of the number of broker non-votes with respect to the
advisory vote on the frequency of shareholder advisory votes on executive
compensation. If a company believes this information would be useful for
investors, then it may disclose such information under Item 5.07(b). [July
8, 2011]
Question 121A.04
Question: May an issuer disclose its
decision as to how frequently it will include a shareholder advisory vote on
executive compensation in its proxy materials in a periodic report instead
of an Item 5.07 Form 8-K, pursuant to General Instruction B.3 to Form 8-K?
Answer: Yes. Pursuant to General
Instruction B.3, an issuer may report Item 5.07 Form 8-K information in a
periodic report that is filed on or before the date that an Item 5.07 Form
8-K would otherwise be due. If the issuer reports its annual meeting voting
results in a Form 10-Q or Form 10-K, it may file a new Item 5.07 Form 8-K,
rather than an amended Form 10-Q or Form 10-K, to report its decision as to
how frequently it will include a shareholder advisory vote on executive
compensation in its proxy materials. However, if the issuer reports its
annual meeting voting results in an Item 5.07(b) Form 8-K and also intends
to report its frequency decision in a Form 8-K, then, as required by Item
5.07(d), that Form 8-K must be filed as an amendment to the Item 5.07(b)
Form 8-K - using submission type 8-K/A - and not as a new Form 8-K. [July 8,
2011]
Section 122. Item 6.01 ABS Information and Computational Material
None
Section 123. Item 6.02 Change of Servicer or Trustee
None
Section 124. Item 6.03 Change in Credit Enhancement or Other External Support
None
Section 125. Item 6.04 Failure to Make a Required Distribution
None
Section 126. Item 6.05 Securities Act Updating Disclosure
None
Section 127. Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
None
Section 128. Item 8.01 Other Events
None
Section 129. Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
Question 129.01
Question: Is the automatic 71-day
extension of time in Item 9.01 of Form 8-K available with respect to
dispositions?
Answer: No. The automatic 71-day
extension of time in Item 9.01 of Form 8-K is available only with respect to
acquisitions, not dispositions. The Division’s Office of the Chief
Accountant will continue to address questions regarding dispositions on a
case-by-case basis. [April 2, 2008]
INTERPRETIVE RESPONSES REGARDING PARTICULAR SITUATIONS
Section 201. Form 8-K – General Guidance
None
Section 202. Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
202.01 If an Item 1.01 Form 8-K filing
requirement is triggered in early April for a registrant with a calendar
year fiscal year (i.e., after the end of the registrant’s first quarter but
before the registrant is required to file its Form 10-Q for that quarter),
and the registrant timely files the Item 1.01 Form 8-K but does not file the
agreement (to which the Item 1.01 Form 8-K relates) as an exhibit to that
Form 8-K, the registrant is required to file the agreement as an exhibit to
its second quarter Form 10-Q. The disclosure requirement under Item 1.01 of
Form 8-K does not alter the existing requirements for the filing of exhibits
under Item 601 of Regulation S-K. [April 10, 2008]
Section 203. Item 1.02 Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement
None
Section 204. Item 1.03 Bankruptcy or Receivership
None
Section 205. Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets
205.01 Item 2.01 of Form 8-K, which
calls for disclosure of the acquisition or disposition of a significant
amount of assets, does not require disclosure of the execution of a contract
to acquire or dispose of the assets. Disclosure under Item 2.01 is
specifically required only when such an acquisition or disposition is
consummated. Nevertheless, the filing of a Form 8-K reporting the execution
of a contract for the acquisition or disposition of assets may be required
earlier by Item 1.01 of Form 8-K if the registrant has entered into a
material definitive agreement not made in the ordinary course of business of
the registrant (or an amendment of such agreement that is material). Even if
Item 1.01 and Item 2.01 do not require disclosure, if the registrant deems
the contract to be of importance to security holders, then the registrant
may voluntarily disclose it pursuant to Item 8.01. The financial statement
requirement of Item 9.01 is triggered by Item 2.01, but is not triggered by
Item 1.01 or 8.01. [April 2, 2008]
205.02 The purchase by a reporting
company of a minority stock interest in a business from an independent third
party (which is accounted for under the cost method) would not require the
filing of the financial statements of that business with any Form 8-K filed
to report the transaction, so long as that minority position did not result
in the reporting company’s control of the assets. [April 2, 2008]
205.03 A wholly-owned subsidiary
acquires a significant amount of assets from its parent. Both the subsidiary
and the parent are reporting companies. The term “any person” found in
Instruction 1 to Item 2.01 of Form 8-K refers to the company that has the
obligation to file the report. Therefore, while Instruction 1 would not
require a filing by the parent, the subsidiary would be required to file the
report. [April 2, 2008]
205.04 An indefinite closing of a
portion of a company’s restaurant facilities, coupled with a write-down of
its assets in excess of 10 percent, constitutes an “other disposition” for
purposes of Instruction 2 to Item 2.01 of Form 8-K, and thus requires the
filing of a Form 8-K report. [April 2, 2008]
205.05 Paragraph (iii) of Instruction
1 to Item 2.01 of Form 8-K indicates that a Form 8-K filing is not required
to report the redemption or acquisition of securities from the public, or
the sale or other disposition of securities to the public, by the issuer of
such securities or by a wholly-owned subsidiary of that issuer. This
instruction does not apply to the sale of a subsidiary’s equity, because the
subsidiary would not be wholly-owned after the transaction is completed.
[April 2, 2008]
Section 206. Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
206.01 Item 2.02(b) provides that a
Form 8-K is not required to report the disclosure of material nonpublic
information that is disclosed orally, telephonically, by webcast, broadcast
or similar means if, among other things, that presentation is complementary
to and initially occurs within 48 hours following a related written
announcement or release that has been furnished on an Item 2.02 Form 8-K.
This 48-hour safe harbor is construed literally and is not the equivalent of
two business or calendar days. [April 2, 2008]
Section 207. Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant
None
Section 208. Item 2.04 Triggering Events That Accelerate or Increase a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
208.01 A voluntary redemption of
convertible notes by a registrant is not a triggering event for purposes of
Item 2.04 of Form 8-K. [April 2, 2008]
208.02 A company disagrees with the
legitimacy of a notice of default and brings the matter to arbitration,
pursuant to its rights under the terms of the applicable loan agreement. The
matter is pending with an arbitrator. Notwithstanding its good faith belief
that no event of default has taken place and the fact that the arbitrator
has yet to rule on the legitimacy of the event of default, the notice of
default is a triggering event under Item 2.04. When the company files the
Form 8-K, it may include a discussion of the basis for its belief that no
event of default has occurred. [April 2, 2008]
Section 209. Item 2.05 Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities
209.01 An Item 2.05 Form 8-K filing
requirement is triggered when a registrant’s board or board committee, or
the registrant’s officer(s) authorized to take such action if board action
is not required, commits the registrant to a “plan of termination” that
meets the description of such a plan in paragraph 8 of SFAS No. 146, under
which material charges will be incurred under generally accepted accounting
principles applicable to the registrant under the plan. The “plan of
termination” need not fall within an “exit activity,” as defined in SFAS No.
146, or otherwise constitute an “exit or disposal plan” (or part of one), to
trigger an Item 2.05 Form 8-K filing requirement. [April 2, 2008]
Section 210. Item 2.06 Material Impairments
None
Section 211. Item 3.01 Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing
211.01 A registrant’s common stock is
traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, which is not an automated inter-dealer
quotation system of a registered national securities association, and is not
otherwise traded on an exchange. The registrant has applied to list its
common stock on the American Stock Exchange. In this instance, an Item 3.01
Form 8-K filing requirement is not triggered upon the registrant’s
application for listing on the American Stock Exchange, or upon the approval
of the application. [April 2, 2008]
Section 212. Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
212.01 An Item 3.02 Form 8-K filing
requirement is triggered when a registrant enters into an agreement
enforceable against the registrant to issue unregistered equity securities
to a third party in exchange for services and the applicable volume
threshold is exceeded. [April 2, 2008]
212.02 If an Exchange Act reporting,
wholly-owned subsidiary receives an additional equity investment from its
Exchange Act reporting parent and the volume threshold under Item 3.02 of
Form 8-K is exceeded, the wholly-owned subsidiary is required to file an
Item 3.02 Form 8-K to report the additional equity investment, regardless of
whether the wholly-owned subsidiary meets the conditions for the filing of
abbreviated periodic reports under General Instruction H of Form 10-Q and
General Instruction I of Form 10-K. [April 2, 2008]
212.03 An Item 3.02 Form 8-K filing
requirement is triggered upon an unregistered sale of warrants to purchase
equity securities (or an unregistered sale of options outside a stock option
plan), if the volume threshold under Item 3.02 is exceeded, or upon an
unregistered sale of convertible notes (convertible into equity securities),
if the volume threshold under Item 3.02 of the underlying equity security
issuable upon conversion is exceeded. Pursuant to Item 701(e) of Regulation
S-K, the registrant must disclose the terms of, as applicable, the exercise
of the warrants or the options or the conversion of the convertible notes in
the Item 3.02 Form 8-K. If the Item 3.02 Form 8-K that discloses the initial
sale of the warrants, the options, or the convertible notes also discloses
the maximum amount of the underlying securities that may be issued through,
as applicable, the exercise of the warrants or the options or the conversion
of the convertible notes, then a subsequent Item 3.02 Form 8-K filing
requirement is not triggered upon the exercise of the warrants or the
options or the conversion of the notes. [April 2, 2008]
Section 213. Item 3.03 Material Modifications to Rights of Security Holders
213.01 Upon adoption of a shareholder
rights plan, a registrant undertook to make a dividend of a preferred share
purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock. The Plan was
adopted by the board on August 9. The certificate of designation related to
the preferred share purchase right was filed with the state on August 25.
The dividend, not yet declared, will occur only upon certain change in
control events. Under Item 3.03(b) of Form 8-K, the triggering event related
to the plan occurs not upon adoption of the plan or upon filing of the
certificate of designation with the state, but rather upon the issuance of
the dividend. The rights of the holders of the registered common stock are
not materially limited or qualified until the issuance of, in this case, the
preferred share purchase rights. The preferred share purchase rights are not
issued until the dividend is declared and the rights are distributed.
Although the registrant is not required to file an Item 3.03 Form 8-K until
the issuance of the dividend, the registrant must file an Item 1.01 Form 8-K
when it enters into the shareholder rights plan if the plan constitutes a
material definitive agreement not made in the ordinary course of business.
[April 2, 2008]
Section 214. Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant
214.01 Item 4.01 of Form 8-K requires
an issuer to report a change in its certifying accountant. The item also
requires that the issuer request the former accountant to furnish a letter
stating whether the former accountant agrees with the issuer’s statements
concerning the reasons for the change. Where the former accountant declines
to provide such a letter, the issuer should indicate that fact in the Form
8-K. [April 2, 2008]
214.02 Item 4.01 of Form 8-K requires
a registrant to report changes in its certifying accountant. The company
must file the report on a Form 8-K and must file any required amendments to
the report on a Form 8-K/A. It is not sufficient to report the event in a
periodic report. See Exchange Act Form 8-K Question 101.01. [April 2,
2008]
Section 215. Item 4.02 Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements or a Related Audit Report or Completed Interim Review
215.01 Item 4.02 of Form 8-K requires
an issuer to report a decision that its past financial statements should no
longer be relied upon. The company must file the report on a Form 8-K and
file any required amendments on a Form 8-K/A. It is not sufficient to report
the event in a periodic report. See Exchange Act Form 8-K Question 101.01.
[April 2, 2008]
Section 216. Item 5.01 Changes in Control of Registrant
None
Section 217. Item 5.02 Departure of Certain Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
217.01 Item 5.02(a) of Form 8-K
requires registrants to describe the circumstances of a director’s
resignation when he or she resigned “because of a disagreement with the
registrant… on any matter related to the registrant’s operations, policies
or practices.” A disagreement with the process chosen by the Chairman and
other board members to address a director’s alleged violation of a company’s
policy regarding unauthorized public disclosures and the board’s related
decision to ask the director to resign is a disagreement on matters “related
to the registrant’s operations, policies or practices.” See In the Matter of
Hewlett Packard Company, Release 34-55801 (May 23, 2007). [April 2,
2008]
217.02 When a principal financial
officer temporarily turns his or her duties over to another person, a
company must file a Form 8-K under Item 5.02(b) to report that the original
principal financial officer has temporarily stepped down and under Item
5.02(c) to report that the replacement principal financial officer has been
appointed. If the original principal financial officer returns to the
position, then the company must file a Form 8-K under Item 5.02(b) to report
the departure of the temporary principal financial officer and under Item
5.02(c) to report the “re-appointment” of the original principal financial
officer. [April 2, 2008]
217.03 A director who is designated
by an issuer’s majority shareholder gives notice that he will resign if the
majority shareholder sells its entire holdings of issuer stock. This notice
triggers an obligation to file an Item 5.02(b) Form 8-K, which should state
clearly the nature of the contingency and the extent to which the resigning
director can control occurrence of the contingency. [April 2, 2008]
217.04 Item 5.02(b) of Form 8-K does
not require a registrant to report the death of a director or listed
officer. [April 2, 2008]
217.05 If, pursuant to a contractual
provision in a named executive officer’s employment contract or otherwise,
the registrant must notify the named executive officer of the termination of
his or her employment a specified number of days prior to the date on which
the named executive officer’s employment would end, an Item 5.02(b) Form 8-K
filing requirement is triggered on the date the registrant notifies the
named executive officer of his or her termination, not on the date the named
executive officer’s employment actually ends. [April 2, 2008]
217.06 A registrant appoints a new
principal accounting officer, which triggers an Item 5.02(c) Form 8-K filing
requirement. The registrant can decide to delay the filing of the Item
5.02(c) Form 8-K until it makes a public announcement of the appointment of
the new principal accounting officer, pursuant to the Instruction to
paragraph (c) of Item 5.02. The new principal accounting officer replaces
the old principal accounting officer, who retired, resigned, or was
terminated from that position. The retirement, resignation, or termination
of the old principal accounting officer triggers an Item 5.02(b) Form 8-K
filing requirement. The registrant may not delay the filing of the Item
5.02(b) Form 8-K until the filing of the Form 5.02(c) Form 8-K. Rather, the
Item 5.02(b) Form 8-K filing obligation is triggered by the old principal
accounting officer’s notice of a decision to retire or resign or by the
notice of termination, whether or not such notice is written. [April 2,
2008]
217.07 A director was appointed by
board vote and, at the same time, named to the audit committee. Both the
appointment of the director to the board and the committee assignment were
disclosed under Item 5.02(d) of Form 8-K. Three months later, the board
rotates committee assignments, and the new director is moved from the audit
committee to the compensation committee. No new Form 8-K or amendment to the
Item 5.02(d) Form 8-K is required by Instruction 2 to Item 5.02 in this
situation, provided that the change in committee assignment was not
contemplated at the time of the director’s initial election to the board and
appointment to the audit committee. [April 2, 2008]
217.08 In the past, a named executive
officer entered into an employment agreement that will, pursuant to its
terms, expire after two years. The employment agreement automatically
extends for an additional two-year term, unless the registrant or the named
executive officer affirmatively gives notice that it is not renewing the
agreement. The automatic renewal of the employment agreement (i.e., when the
original two-year term of the employment agreement expires and neither party
gives notice that it does not wish to renew the agreement) does not trigger
an Item 5.02(e) Form 8-K filing requirement. [April 2, 2008]
217.09 Foreign private issuers that
satisfy the Item 402 of Regulation S-K disclosure requirement by providing
compensation disclosure in accordance with Item 402(a)(1) should refer to
Instruction 4 to Item 5.02 to determine who is a “named executive officer.”
The named executive officers will be those individuals for whom disclosure
was provided in the last Securities Act or Exchange Act filing pursuant to
Item 6.B or 6.E.2 of Form 20-F. [April 2, 2008]
Section 218. Item 5.03 Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Changes in Fiscal Year
218.01 Release No. 34-26589, which
significantly amended Rule 15d-10, states that “[a] change from a fiscal
year ending as of the last day of the month to a 52-53 week fiscal year
commencing within seven days of the month end (or from a 52-53 week to a
month end) is not deemed a change in fiscal year for purposes of reporting
subject to Rule 13a-10 or 15d-10 if the new fiscal year commences with the
end of the old fiscal year. In such cases, a transition report would not be
required. Either the old or new fiscal year could, therefore, be as short as
359 days, or as long as 371 days (372 in a leap year).” While a transition
report would not be required in such a situation, an Item 5.03(b) Form 8-K
would have to be filed to report the change in fiscal year-end. [April 2,
2008]
Section 219. Item 5.04 Temporary Suspension of Trading Under Registrant's Employee Benefit Plans
None
Section 220. Item 5.05 Amendments to the Registrant's Code of Ethics, or Waiver of a Provision of the Code of Ethics
None
Section 221. Item 5.06 Change in Shell Company Status
None
Section 222. Item 6.01 ABS Information and Computational Material
None
Section 223. Item 6.02 Change of Servicer or Trustee
None
Section 224. Item 6.03 Change in Credit Enhancement or Other External Support
None
Section 225. Item 6.04 Failure to Make a Required Distribution
None
Section 226. Item 6.05 Securities Act Updating Disclosure
None
Section 227. Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
None
Section 228. Item 8.01 Other Events
None
Section 229. Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
229.01 Item 20.D. of Industry Guide 5
requires, inter alia, an undertaking to file every three months
post-effective amendments containing financial statements of acquired
properties. Even if the automatic 71-day extension of time to file the
financial statements for an acquired property is applicable to a Form 8-K,
this extension does not apply to the Guide 5 post-effective amendment.
Accordingly, the post-effective amendment must be filed when required by
Item 20 of Guide 5, and must contain the required financial statements. This
is the same position as that taken before the Form 8-K extensions were made
automatic. [April 2, 2008]
229.02 During the pendency of a
71-day extension applicable to a Form 8-K, Securities Act offerings may not
be made except as provided in the Instruction to Item 9.01 of Form 8-K. The
Division staff has been asked whether this provision applies to real estate
limited partnership offerings, thus prohibiting sales from being made until
financial statements for properties acquired during the offering period have
been filed (even when the quarterly post-effective amendment is not yet
due). The amendment to Form 8-K was not intended to change the procedure
established in Item 20.D. of Guide 5. Accordingly, when properties are
acquired during the offering period, the registrant may continue sales
activities notwithstanding the pendency of an 8-K extension, so long as the
quarterly post-effective amendments containing the financial statements are
filed when required. [April 2, 2008]
229.03 The Instruction to Item 9.01 of
Form 8-K addresses the status of transactions in securities registered under
the Securities Act and Rule 144 sales during the pendency of an extension,
but does not address the status of such sales after a denial of a request
for waiver of financial statements. This question will be dealt with on a
case-by-case basis. [April 2, 2008]
229.04 Item 17(b)(7) of Form S-4
states generally that the financial statements of acquired companies that
were not previously Exchange Act reporting companies need be audited only to
the extent practicable, unless the Form S-4 prospectus is to be used for
resales by any person deemed an underwriter within the meaning of Rule
145(c), in which case such financial statements must be audited. The
Division staff was asked whether a resale pursuant to Rule 145(d), in lieu
of the Form S-4 prospectus, would require the financial statements to be
audited. The Division staff noted that Rule 145(d) is not included in the
Instruction to Item 9.01 of Form 8-K regarding sales pursuant to Rule 144
during the 71-day extension period for filing financial statements. As the
audited financial statements for the acquired company would be required
pursuant to Item 9.01 of Form 8-K, a resale pursuant to Rule 145(d) would
not be permitted until they are filed. [April 2, 2008]