2.3 Alternative Disclosure Requirements
If a registrant or one of its consolidated subsidiaries has issued
registered guaranteed debt securities, it is presumed that an investor in those
securities relies on the registrant‘s consolidated financial statements as the
primary source of information when making investment decisions. Therefore, under
Rule 13-01, a registrant is permitted to provide alternative disclosures in lieu of
separate financial statements for any subsidiary issuers and subsidiary guarantors
of the registered guaranteed debt securities. Such alternative disclosures, which
include both financial and nonfinancial disclosures about the issuer(s) and
guarantor(s) (discussed below), to the extent material, may be provided in the
registrant’s periodic filings (e.g., Forms 10-K and 10-Q) or registration statements
if the eligibility conditions discussed in Section 2.2 have been met. In conjunction with
the registrant’s consolidated financial statements, these alternative disclosures
are intended to give investors material information to evaluate the sufficiency of
the guarantees.
If a registrant or one of its consolidated subsidiaries has issued multiple debt
securities that have different issuers and guarantors, the registrant should
consider whether the alternative disclosures of the obligor group would be the same,
in all material respects, for each guaranteed debt security. If not, the registrant
may need to provide several different sets of alternative disclosures to reflect the
composition of the obligor group of each guaranteed debt security.
2.3.1 Alternative Nonfinancial Disclosures
A registrant that presents the alternative disclosures permitted by Rule 13-01
(see discussion in Section
2.3.2) must provide alternative nonfinancial disclosures, to the
extent material, to make the accompanying alternative financial disclosures
easier to interpret. Such nonfinancial disclosures must include a description
of:
- The issuer(s) and guarantor(s) of the guaranteed security.
- The terms and conditions of the guarantee(s) as well as how payments to holders of the guaranteed debt security may be affected by the composition of and the relationships among the issuer(s), guarantor(s), and subsidiaries of the parent company that are not issuers or guarantors of the guaranteed debt security. For example, when there is a guarantee, investors have a claim on the assets of the guarantor subsidiaries in the event of a default by the issuer(s). It is important for the investors to understand the factors that affect structural subordination (i.e., the priority on claims to the entity's cash flows) so that they can assess whether any individual subsidiary guarantor can make payment under the guarantee. Therefore, the registrant should disclose whether the guarantee is structurally subordinate to other liabilities of the guarantors. In addition, a subsidiary guarantee may include customary release provisions (e.g., a subsidiary may be released from a guarantee if it is sold or sells all of its assets or is declared “unrestricted” for covenant purposes). Such customary release provisions may warrant narrative disclosure.
- Other factors that may affect payments to holders of the guaranteed debt security, such as contractual or statutory restrictions on dividends, guarantee enforceability, and the rights of noncontrolling interest holders. For example, a guarantee may be limited by certain laws such as those pertaining to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance and transfer, reorganization, and moratorium.
Beyond the requirements outlined above, registrants must
disclose the specific facts and circumstances related to each issuer and
guarantor if such information would be material to investors and would help them
understand the sufficiency of the guarantee. Registrants must provide additional
information to ensure that their disclosures are not misleading.
An alternative nonfinancial disclosure may sometimes apply to
one or more, but not all, issuers and guarantors (e.g., if one subsidiary
guarantor has limitations or restrictions on the extent of its guarantee, but
others do not). In such cases, the registrant is required to provide separate
alternative financial disclosures (as discussed in Section 2.3.2) regarding the issuers and
guarantors to which the unique alternative nonfinancial disclosure applies.
However, in limited circumstances in which the separate financial information
related to those issuers or guarantors, or both, can be easily understood,
narrative disclosure may be provided in lieu of separate summarized financial
information (see Example
2-13).
Example 2-9
Registrant A issues $100 million in
registered debt securities that are guaranteed by three
subsidiaries. Subsidiary B’s guarantee is limited to $10
million, whereas Subsidiary C’s and Subsidiary D’s
guarantees are full and unconditional. In this scenario,
A may be required to disclose the limitations on B’s
guarantee and present (1) separate alternative financial
disclosures for B and (2) combined alternative financial
disclosures for A, C, and D.
In addition, the identity of the issuer(s) and guarantor(s) must
also be listed in an exhibit to the registration statement, Form 10-K, or Form
10-Q. If the entities that are required to be disclosed are the same as those
disclosed in the previous period, the registrant can add a hyperlink to the
exhibit in an earlier filing rather than filing the exhibit again.
Example 2-10
Company A, a domestic registrant, may
provide an exhibit such as the following:
Exhibit 22
List of Issuers and Guarantors
The following consolidated subsidiaries
of Company A are issuers or guarantors of registered
debentures that bear interest at 5 percent and mature in
20X4:
Entity
|
Role
|
---|---|
Company A
|
Guarantor
|
Subsidiary B
|
Issuer
|
Subsidiary C
|
Guarantor
|
Subsidiary D
|
Guarantor
|
Subsidiary E
|
Guarantor
|
Subsidiary F
|
Guarantor
|
2.3.2 Alternative Financial Disclosures
The alternative disclosures required by Rule 13-01 include
alternative financial disclosures about the issuer(s) and guarantor(s) that will
help investors in registered offerings make informed investment decisions about
registered guaranteed debt securities. However, as discussed in Section 2.3.3, in certain
circumstances, alternative financial disclosures may be omitted.
2.3.2.1 Level of Detail
If a registrant qualifies for the alternative disclosures,
it must include certain financial disclosures in its filing about each
issuer and guarantor of the debt security. Such disclosures should focus on
the financial information that is most likely to be material to an
investment decision. Rule 13-01(a)(4) requires the registrant to disclose
the summarized financial information specified in Regulation S-X, Rule
1-02(bb)(1), and provide an accompanying note that briefly describes the
basis of presentation (see Section 2.3.2.2). At a minimum, the summarized financial
information must include the following items, subject to appropriate
variation to conform to the nature of the registrant’s business:
- Current and noncurrent assets.1
- Current and noncurrent liabilities.2
- Redeemable preferred stock (if applicable).
- Noncontrolling interests (if applicable).
- Net sales or gross revenues.3
- Gross profit (or costs and expenses related to net sales or gross revenues).4
- Income (loss) from continuing operations.
- Net income (loss).
- Net income (loss) attributable to the entity.
Rule 13-01(a)(4) also requires registrants to present
separate line items for “amounts due from, amounts due to, and transactions
with [nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries].” Similarly, balances and
transactions with other related parties (i.e., related party transactions
reported in the registrant’s consolidated financial statements) should also
be presented separately from balances and transactions with (1) third
parties and (2) nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries. Registrants are not
required to disclose supplemental cash flow information about subsidiary
issuers or guarantors.
Further, to comply with Rule 13-01(a)(6), registrants must
present additional line items to disclose any other financial information
about a guarantor that “would be material for investors to evaluate the
sufficiency of the guarantee.” Moreover, in accordance with Rule
13-01(a)(7), registrants should provide any additional disclosures necessary
to ensure that the alternative financial disclosures presented are not
misleading.
Example 2-11
Registrant A issues a registered
debt security that is guaranteed by Subsidiary B.
Substantially all of the noncurrent assets of A (the
issuer) and B (the guarantor) consist of goodwill.
Registrant A will need to present goodwill
separately from other noncurrent assets if such
disclosure would be material to the investors’
evaluation of the sufficiency of the guarantees
(e.g., if current assets would not be sufficient to
satisfy the guarantee).
2.3.2.2 Basis of Presentation
The alternative financial disclosures of issuers and
guarantors, which should exclude the financial information of nonissuer and
nonguarantor subsidiaries, may be presented in a registrant’s periodic
filings or registration statement (see the previous section) on a combined
basis, with balances and transactions between the issuer(s) and guarantor(s)
(hereafter referred to as the “obligor group”) eliminated in combination.
Thus, the registrant does not need to provide the information in separate
columns for each issuer and guarantor or to show associated eliminations; it
only needs to disclose the combined amounts for the obligor group as a
whole. While presentation on a combined basis is permitted, there could be
circumstances in which separate financial disclosures about certain issuers
and guarantors are required. For example, if factors that may affect payment
to investors in the guaranteed debt securities are different for certain
issuers or guarantors, registrants may need to present alternative financial
disclosures for those issuers and guarantors separately. This may also be
the case if some guarantees are not full and unconditional but others
are.
Example 2-12
Registrant A issues $100 million in
registered debt securities that are guaranteed by
three consolidated subsidiaries. Subsidiary B’s
guarantee is limited to $10 million, whereas
Subsidiary C’s and Subsidiary D’s guarantees are
full and unconditional. In this scenario, Registrant
A may be required to disclose the limitations on B’s
guarantee and provide (1) separate alternative
financial disclosures for B and (2) combined
alternative financial disclosures for A, C, and
D.
Rule 13-01 allows registrants to provide narrative
disclosures rather than the alternative financial disclosures of the
issuer(s) and guarantor(s) that have unique fact patterns (e.g., Subsidiary
B in the example above) when the narrative disclosures about such entities
“can be easily explained and understood.” For example, if the entities with
unique fact patterns represent a similar percentage of each line item,
narrative disclosure may be appropriate. However, if such entities
constitute varying proportions of each line item, narrative disclosure is
unlikely to be sufficient.
Example 2-13
Registrant A has contractual (or
statutory) restrictions that apply to Subsidiary B,
one of its subsidiary guarantors. Subsidiary B
represents roughly the same percentage of every line
item in the combined alternative financial
disclosures of the obligor group. In this situation,
instead of presenting separate alternative financial
disclosures for B, A may describe the restrictions
that apply to B and disclose that B represents
approximately 5 percent of each line item presented
in the combined alternative financial
disclosures.
As mentioned above, when presenting the alternative
financial disclosures, a registrant should exclude the financial information
of nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries because (1) such subsidiaries are
not obligated to make payments related to guaranteed debt securities and (2)
the obligor group’s equity investment in nonissuer and nonguarantor
subsidiaries may be subordinate to other obligations of those subsidiaries.
Thus, the alternative financial disclosures of the obligor group should
exclude investments in nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries (i.e.,
investments in subsidiaries and equity in the earnings of subsidiaries and
related tax effects). However, as discussed in Section 2.3.2.1, the registrant would
separately disclose the obligor group’s transactions and balances with the
nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries if such transactions are unrelated
to the group’s investment in the nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries, as
shown in the example below.
In addition, as shown above, dividends that are declared and
receivable from a nonissuer or nonguarantor subsidiary should be included in
the alternative financial disclosure as outlined in paragraph 2520.1
of the FRM. The financial information should reflect an obligor group’s
investment in nonconsolidated entities, such as investments accounted for at
fair value or in accordance with the equity method.
In certain instances, a registrant may choose or be required
to present itself and other obligors in separate columns rather than on a
combined basis (e.g., if the extent of guarantees for certain obligors is
limited). In these circumstances, the registrant would present in each
column the payable and receivable balances between the entities. However,
the financial information should exclude the equity investment and equity in
earnings from interests in entities presented in other columns (see
paragraph
2520.2 of the FRM).
Example 2-13A
Registrant X, which is eligible to
present alternative financial information, issues a
registered debt security that is guaranteed by two
subsidiaries. If X uses three columns to present its
financial information (one for itself and one for
each of the guarantors) rather than presenting it on
a combined basis (i.e., in a single column), the
columns for X and the two subsidiary guarantors
would reflect payables and receivables with one
another. However, X’s column would exclude its
equity investment in the guarantors as well as its
equity in earnings of the guarantors.
As previously mentioned, registrants that qualify for alternative disclosures
must include a brief description of the basis of presentation associated
with each of the required financial disclosures. Such a description should
include the form and content of the disclosures and enhance the
understandability of the financial information provided. Among other items,
the description of the basis of presentation should disclose that:
- The alternative financial disclosures include information about the issuer(s) and guarantor(s).
- The alternative financial disclosures are presented on a combined basis, with balances and transactions between the issuer(s) and guarantor(s) eliminated.
- The information related to the equity investments of the issuer(s) and guarantor(s) in nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries has been excluded.
- The balances and transactions with nonissuer and nonguarantor subsidiaries have been separately presented.
- The balances and transactions with other related parties have been separately presented.
For periodic filings, a registrant must assess the issuer
and guarantor structure as of each reporting date (i.e., annual and interim
periods) to determine whether any changes in the structures (e.g., the
addition or removal of guarantor subsidiaries) affect the alternative
financial disclosures presented (see Section 2.3.2.4 for further
information). The SEC staff has informally indicated that for an initial
registration statement (e.g., an IPO filed on Form S-1) or a registration
statement filed by an existing SEC reporting entity that was not previously
required to present alternative financial disclosures (e.g., an entity
registering debt securities on Form S-4 or S-3), the registrant should
evaluate the issuer and guarantor structure as of the initial filing date of
the registration statement to determine the requirements. See Section 2.3.2.3.3 for
further discussion of information to be included in a registration
statement.
2.3.2.3 Periods to Present
A registrant is only required to present alternative
financial disclosures for the most recent annual period and the most recent
year-to-date interim period, as applicable, included in the registrant's
consolidated financial statements. In no circumstance would a registrant be
required to provide comparative prior-year income statement information or
quarter-to-date income statement information (i.e., to match the income
statement presentation in Form 10-Q for the second or third quarter).
2.3.2.3.1 Annual Reports
Alternative financial disclosures must be presented in
annual reports on Form 10-K as follows:
- Balance sheet information — As of the most recent year-end.
- Income statement information — For the most recent year.
For example, a registrant with a December 31 fiscal
year-end is required to include balance sheet information as of December
31, 20X1, and income statement information for the year ended December
31, 20X1, in its December 31, 20X1, Form 10-K. Comparative prior-year
periods are not required.
2.3.2.3.2 Quarterly Reports
Alternative financial disclosures must be presented in quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q as follows:
- Balance sheet information — As of the most recent interim period and the prior year-end, which is consistent with the periods presented in the parent company’s consolidated balance sheet.
- Income statement information — For the current year-to-date interim period. Comparative prior-year and quarter-to-date interim periods are not required.
For example, a registrant with a December 31 fiscal
year-end is required to include balance sheet information as of June 30,
20X1, and December 31, 20X0, and income statement information for the
six months ended June 30, 20X1, in its June 30, 20X1, Form 10-Q.
2.3.2.3.3 Registration Statements
Alternative financial disclosures must be presented in
an entity’s registration statement for the issuance of guaranteed debt
securities as follows:
- Balance sheet information — As of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year-end and interim period included in the registration statement.
- Income statement information — For the most recently completed year and the current year-to-date interim period included in the filing. Comparative prior-year annual and interim periods are not required.
For example, if a registrant with a December 31 fiscal
year-end files a registration statement after the June 30, 20X1, Form
10-Q has been filed, it is required to include (1) balance sheet
information as of June 30, 20X1, and December 31, 20X0, and (2) income
statement information for the six months ended June 30, 20X1, and the
year ended December 31, 20X0.
2.3.2.4 Changes to the Obligor Group’s Alternative Financial Disclosures
The alternative financial disclosures of the obligor group
may need to be adjusted for retrospective changes that affect the
registrant’s financial statements (e.g., the adoption of new accounting
standards or the reporting of discontinued operations) or changes in the
guarantor structure. The need for retrospective adjustment depends on the
periods presented:
- Annual reports — Since annual reports only include disclosure of the most recent year, prior periods are not presented and thus do not need to be retrospectively adjusted.
- Quarterly reports — Since quarterly reports only include disclosure of income statement information for the most recent year-to-date interim period, prior periods do not have to be retrospectively adjusted. However, since quarterly reports require disclosure of balance sheet information as of the most recent interim period-end and the most recent year-end, a registrant may need to retrospectively adjust the most recent year-end balances.
- Registration statements for guaranteed debt securities — Since registration statements require the disclosure of (1) balance sheet information as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year-end and interim period and (2) income statement information for the most recently completed year and the current year-to-date interim period, the year-end balance sheet information and annual income statement information may need to be retrospectively adjusted.
2.3.2.4.1 Retrospective Changes Affecting the Registrant’s Financial Statements
A registrant may retrospectively adjust its consolidated financial
statements for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, the
adoption of new accounting standards or the reporting of discontinued
operations. When such an adjustment occurs, the registrant must consider
the effect of such changes on the alternative financial disclosures of
the obligor group. If the retrospective adjustment affects the obligor
group’s balances, the registrant should reflect the retrospective
changes in the alternative financial disclosures at the same time that
it reflects such changes in the consolidated financial statements.
Example 2-14
Company A, an Exchange Act
reporting company with a calendar year-end,
guarantees the registered debt security of
Subsidiary Issuer B. The issuer and guarantor
structure qualifies for alternative disclosures in
lieu of B’s full financial statements (see
Section 2.2). In A’s Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 20X8, A provides
alternative financial disclosures for itself and B
on a combined basis (the obligor group) as of and
for the quarter ended March 31, 20X8, and as of
December 31, 20X7. During the quarter ended March
31, 20X8, A adopts a new accounting standard
retrospectively, which results in adjustments to
net income, total assets, and equity for the
current and prior periods. The alternative
financial disclosures of the obligor group
included in Form 10-Q should reflect the adoption
of the new accounting standard as of and for the
quarter ended March 31, 20X8. In addition, the
summarized balance sheet information as of
December 31, 20X7, which was previously reported
in A’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
20X7, should be retrospectively revised for the
impact of the new accounting standard. Further, if
A files a new or amended registration statement
after filing the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 20X8, but before filing its Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 20X8, it would
also present the alternative financial disclosures
for the year ended December 31, 20X7,
retrospectively adjusted for the adoption of the
new accounting standard.
2.3.2.4.2 Change in Issuer and Guarantor Structure
When a change in the issuer and guarantor structure
occurs (e.g., a guarantor subsidiary is released from its obligation and
becomes a nonguarantor), a registrant must determine whether and how
that change affects its disclosures. We believe that changes made before
the most recent balance sheet date should be reflected in the
alternative financial disclosures of the obligor group for all periods
for which such disclosures are presented. Although the alternative
financial disclosures are not required to reflect changes that occur
after the most recent balance sheet date, a registrant should consider
disclosing such changes. In addition, the changes to the guarantor
structure must be reflected in subsequent periodic filings that include
financial information for the period in which the change occurred.
Example 2-15
Registrant A, an Exchange Act
reporting company with a calendar year-end,
guarantees the registered debt security of
Subsidiary Issuer B as of December 31, 20X7. No
other subsidiaries guarantee B’s debt security as
of that date, and the issuer and guarantor
structure qualifies for alternative disclosures in
lieu of B’s full financial statements (see
Section 2.2). Subsidiary C, a
preexisting subsidiary owned and consolidated for
all periods presented, is added to the guarantor
structure as a subsidiary guarantor on July 21,
20X8. The new guarantor structure also meets the
conditions for providing alternative disclosures
(and thus A may omit the full financial statements
of B and C). In its alternative financial
disclosures in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 20X8, A would reflect its own information
with that of B on a combined basis; it would not
include C’s information since C became a guarantor
after the balance sheet date. However, Registrant
A should consider disclosing the addition of C as
a guarantor. Registrant A’s subsequent periodic
reports and other applicable filings should
retrospectively present the alternative financial
disclosures (and alternative nonfinancial
disclosures) in accordance with the new guarantor
structure. Therefore, A would reflect in its
alternative financial disclosure in its Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 20X8, its own
information combined with that of B and C for all
periods presented, including the balance sheet
information as of December 31, 20X7.
One notable exception to the retrospective treatment
discussed above involves the disposal of a guarantor subsidiary that is
released from its guarantee upon disposal. The highlights of the March 2013 CAQ
SEC Regulations Committee joint meeting with the SEC staff state that a
registrant can apply either of the following two presentation
alternatives when changes to the group of subsidiary guarantors occur as
a result of a disposal:
- The alternative financial disclosures of the obligor group reflect the guarantor structure as of the most recent balance sheet date included in the filing — “[A]ny subsidiary already disposed of and no longer designated as a guarantor at the most recent balance sheet date should be retrospectively [excluded from the alternative financial disclosures of the obligor group]. A guarantor subsidiary not disposed of but that qualifies for discontinued operations treatment and that is still designated as a guarantor at the balance sheet date should remain in the [alternative financial disclosures of the obligor group] until the date of disposal . . . at which point the subsidiary would be retrospectively” excluded from the obligor group’s alternative financial disclosures.
- The disposed subsidiary remains in the alternative financial disclosures of the obligor group through the date of disposal — The loss of guarantor status is not retrospectively applied “in order to portray the operational history of the guarantor(s).”
The meeting highlights further indicate that the “staff
will accept either approach [but] [r]egistrants should carefully
consider which presentation is most appropriate in their facts and
circumstances.” These presentation alternatives apply solely to the
disposition of a guarantor and should not be applied to other changes in
guarantor structure. We believe that the guidance, which precedes the
issuance of Rule 13-01, is still applicable since Rule 13-01 did not
specifically address the disposal of a guarantor subsidiary.
2.3.3 Omission of Alternative Financial Disclosures
Alternative disclosures are required to include the alternative
financial disclosures to the extent material, which is highly dependent on the
applicable facts and circumstances and not defined by any numerical thresholds.
For example, a registrant can omit the alternative financial disclosures of the
obligor group if such financial disclosures do not differ in any material
respects from the consolidated financial statements of the parent company.
Rule 13-01(a)(4)(vi) outlines four scenarios; a registrant may
omit summarized financial information if any one of those scenarios are “true
and disclosed.” The four scenarios are as follows:
- The alternative financial disclosures are not materially different from the consolidated financial statements of the registrant (i.e., nonissuers and nonguarantors are insignificant).
- The amounts presented in the alternative financial
disclosures (which excludes investments in nonissuers and nonguarantors)
are not material (i.e., the issuer(s) and guarantor(s) do not have
material assets, liabilities, or operations).Connecting the DotsSince the obligor group would report, at a minimum, the registered guaranteed debt security and related interest expense, registrants may not be able to assert that the obligor group has no material assets, liabilities, or operations. We believe that, alternatively, a registrant could narratively disclose the amount of the registered guaranteed debt security and related interest expense along with a statement that the obligor group has no other material assets, liabilities, or operations. In addition, as outlined in paragraph 2520.3 of the FRM, this disclosure should indicate the amounts of the debt security that are current or noncurrent.
- A finance subsidiary5 issues a debt security that is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the parent company, and the debt security is not guaranteed by any other subsidiaries.
- A finance subsidiary co-issues a debt security with the parent company on a joint and several basis, and the debt security is not guaranteed by any other subsidiaries.
However, registrants that do not meet any of the criteria in
these four nonexclusive scenarios may nonetheless conclude, on the basis of
their specific facts and circumstances, that disclosure of part or all of the
alternative financial disclosures is not material. We encourage registrants that
intend to omit part or all of the alternative financial disclosures on the basis
of materiality, rather than the four nonexclusive scenarios above, to consult
with their legal and accounting advisers.
A registrant that omits such alternative financial disclosures
must evaluate the appropriateness of this determination as of each reporting
date. If circumstances change, the registrant may be required to provide the
obligor group’s alternative financial disclosures. For example, if a registrant
relies on the fact that nonissuers and nonguarantor subsidiaries are
insignificant as its basis for omitting the alternative financial disclosures
and it subsequently acquires a material nonguarantor subsidiary, the registrant
must reassess its conclusion, and it may need to begin providing alternative
financial disclosures about the obligor group.
2.3.4 Where Disclosure Is Required
For periodic reporting on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, a registrant may
provide the required alternative disclosures in either its MD&A or financial
statements.
For registration statements (i.e., Form S-1, Form S-3, Form S-4,
or Form S-11) for the sale or registration of guaranteed debt securities, the
alternative disclosures may be presented in one of the following:
- MD&A.
- The financial statements.
- The prospectus, placed immediately after “Risk Factors,” if not otherwise included in the financial statements or MD&A. If there are no risk factors disclosed, the information may be presented immediately after the pricing information.
If a registrant chooses to include the alternative disclosures
in its financial statements, such disclosures would be subject to (1) audit (in
the case of Form 10-K) or review (in the case of Form 10-Q), (2) ICFR (and an
audit of ICFR in a Form 10-K if applicable), and (3) XBRL tagging. However, if
the registrant elects to include the alternative disclosures outside its
financial statements, the alternative disclosures would be subject to disclosure
controls and procedures but would not require XBRL tagging. While alternative
disclosures presented in MD&A or elsewhere in the registration statement
would not be subject to audit or review, the auditors may be asked to perform
certain procedures on these alternative disclosures in conjunction with
providing comfort letters to underwriters and certain other requesting parties
in a securities offering.
2.3.5 Recently Acquired Subsidiary Issuers or Guarantors
When filing a new registration statement in conjunction with the
offer and sale of new guaranteed debt securities, a registrant needs to consider
whether any information related to recently acquired businesses must be included
in the registration statement in addition to the alternative financial and
nonfinancial disclosures discussed in Sections
2.3.1 and 2.3.2.
If a registrant acquires a significant business6 after the most recent balance sheet date included in its consolidated
financial statements and such an acquired business, or one or more of the
acquired business’s subsidiaries, either issues or guarantees the debt
securities to be issued, the registrant must provide the preacquisition
alternative financial disclosures for the recently acquired subsidiaries in the
registration statement. A registrant is required to provide the preacquisition
alternative financial disclosures of the recently acquired issuer or guarantor
subsidiary as of and for the most recent annual and interim periods only, even
if preacquisition financial statements are required in accordance with
Regulation S-X, Rule 3-05, for more than one year. However, once the business
acquisition has been reflected in the registrant’s balance sheet, the
requirement for the preacquisition alternative financial disclosures of a
recently acquired issuer or guarantor subsidiary in a registration statement no
longer applies. Preacquisition alternative financial disclosures for recently
acquired subsidiary issuers or guarantors are not required in Form 10-K or Form
10-Q.
Example 2-16
On July 1, 20X1, Registrant A completes
the acquisition of a significant business that has a
December 31 fiscal year and plans to file a new
registration statement on Form S-3 on September 25,
20X1. The acquired business will guarantee the newly
registered debt. The registration statement includes (or
incorporates by reference) the preacquisition financial
statements of the acquired business under Rule 3-05.
Furthermore, to comply with Rule 13-01, the registration
statement must include preacquisition alternative
financial disclosures of the newly acquired subsidiary
(1) as of June 30, 20X1, and December 31, 20X0, (2) for
the six months ended June 30, 20X1, and (3) for the year
ended December 31, 20X0.
When a registrant is required to provide the preacquisition
alternative financial disclosures of a recently acquired subsidiary issuer or
guarantor, such disclosures must be consistent with the alternative financial
disclosures presented for existing issuers and guarantors (see Section 2.3.2) and should
reflect only the information of subsidiaries of the recently acquired business
that issue or guarantee the debt security. That is, while a registrant
determines the significance of a recently acquired business on the basis of the
financial information of the recently acquired business as a whole, the
alternative financial disclosures will only reflect those subsidiaries that
issue or guarantee the new debt security.
In certain circumstances, a registrant may be required to
provide alternative financial disclosures of the recently acquired issuer or
guarantor subsidiaries in accordance with Rule 13-01 before providing the
historical financial statements of the recently acquired business in accordance
with Rule 3-05. For example, paragraph
2530.4 of the FRM states that under Rule 3-05,
“pre-acquisition financial statements of an acquired business [may] be omitted
from a registration statement if significance does not exceed 50% and the
registration statement is declared effective no more than 74 calendar days after
consummation of the acquisition.” Because Rule 13-01 does not include a similar
provision for recent acquisitions, any registration statement filed after the
consummation of an acquisition of a significant business but before the
acquisition is reflected in the registrant’s financial statements must include
the alternative financial disclosures of the recently acquired issuer or
guarantor subsidiaries.
Paragraph 2530.4 also indicates that in other circumstances, an
FPI may be required to provide preacquisition summarized financial information
in accordance with Rule 13-01 but would not be required to provide
preacquisition financial statements of the acquired business under Rule 3-05.
For example, a parent company that is an FPI that acquires a significant
business after the date of the most recent balance sheet presented is required
to provide the preacquisition summarized financial information of a recently
acquired issuer or guarantor under Rule 13-01(a)(5). However, in accordance with
Rule 3-05(b)(4), the FPI would not be required to present the
preacquisition financial statements of the acquired business if (1) the
registration statement is filed or declared effective within 75 days after the
consummation of the acquisition and (2) the acquired business is greater than 20
percent but less than 50 percent significant. Further, if the registrant did not
file additional registration statements requiring the preacquisition financial
statements of the acquired business, it may never be required to provide such
disclosures because FPIs do not have a Form 8-K reporting obligation for
significant acquisitions. See Section 2.4.1 for the applicability of Rule 13-01 to FPIs.
2.3.6 Ongoing Reporting Obligation
“Subsidiary issuers and guarantors that are permitted by [Rule]
3-10 to omit separate financial statements are exempt from the periodic
reporting requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act [Exchange
Act Rule 12h-5],” as stated in paragraph 2540.1 of the FRM.
To remain eligible to omit the separate financial statements of
any subsidiary issuers or guarantors, or both, a registrant must continue to
provide the alternative disclosures for as long as the subsidiary issuers or
guarantors have a reporting obligation with respect to the guarantee or
guaranteed debt security. A registrant may cease providing the alternative
disclosures if such subsidiary issuers or guarantors no longer have a reporting
obligation or the obligation has been suspended. For example, Rule 12h-3 of the
Exchange Act allows for the automatic suspension of a company’s reporting
obligation if, as of the beginning of the fiscal year, the securities are “held
of record by [f]ewer than 300 persons, or in the case of a bank; a savings and
loan holding company . . . ; or a bank holding company . . . 1,200 persons; or
[f]ewer than 500 persons, where the total assets of the issuer have not exceeded
$10 million on the last day of each of the issuer’s three most recent fiscal
years.”
Note that if an issuer or guarantor of a guaranteed security has
a different class of securities that are registered under Section 12 of the
Exchange Act, the issuer cannot rely on the reporting relief provided by Rule
12h-5 of the Exchange Act until it deregisters the other class of securities
(see paragraph 2540.1 of the FRM and Interpretation 254.01 of the SEC’s
Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on the Exchange Act Rules).
Footnotes
1
Rule 1-02(bb) indicates that “[f]or
specialized industries in which classified balance sheets
are normally not presented, information shall be provided as
to the nature and amount of the majority components of
assets and liabilities.”
2
See footnote 1.
3
Rule 1-02(bb) indicates that “[f]or
specialized industries, other information may be substituted
for sales and related costs and expenses if necessary for a
more meaningful presentation.”
4
See footnote 3.
5
Rule 13-01(a)(4)(vi) states, in part, that a
“finance subsidiary” is a subsidiary that “has no assets or
operations other than those related to the issuance,
administration and repayment of the security being registered
and any other securities guaranteed by its parent company.”
6
A registrant determines whether a “business” has been
acquired in accordance with the guidance in Regulation S-X, Rule
11-01(d), and whether the acquisition of a “related” business is treated
as a single business acquisition in a manner consistent with Regulation
S-X, Rule 3-05(a)(3). An acquired business is deemed significant on the
basis of the same significance tests and thresholds used to determine
whether preacquisition financial statements are required for an acquired
business under Rule 3-05; in such a determination, 20 percent is
substituted for 10 percent any place it appears in Regulation S-X Rule
1-02(w). See Deloitte’s Roadmap SEC Reporting Considerations for Business
Acquisitions for further details on determining
whether an acquisition is a significant business.