9.2 Background on SAB 121
The SEC staff issued SAB 121 on March 31, 2022, in response to an increase in the
                number of entities that safeguard crypto assets, since there are unique
                technological, legal, and regulatory risks associated with safeguarding such assets.
                Before SAB 121, an entity generally did not record safeguarded crypto assets of its
                users on its balance sheet (with a corresponding liability to return those assets)
                unless the entity had control of those assets. SAB 121 resulted in a significant
                change to the accounting and financial reporting for these entities, since it
                required the fair value of the crypto assets being safeguarded to be recorded as a
                liability, with a corresponding asset, when an entity does not control the crypto
                assets. The corresponding safeguarding asset, recorded at the fair value of the
                crypto assets held, was required to factor in potential loss events (e.g., theft,
                loss of the private key, loss of the crypto asset, cybersecurity hacks) that could
                affect the asset’s measurement. The occurrence of such a loss event would result in
                a difference between the safeguarding asset and the safeguarding liability.
            In addition to the requirement related to balance sheet recognition, SAB 121 required
                entities to disclose detailed information about the nature and amount of crypto
                assets being safeguarded, as well as any vulnerabilities related to concentrations
                in crypto asset safeguarding. Such disclosures included information about who holds
                the cryptographic keys, who maintains internal recordkeeping, and who is obligated
                to secure the assets and protect them from loss or theft.
            SAB 121 did not define safeguarding, and entities were often required to use
                significant judgment in determining whether a transaction was within the scope of
                SAB 121. In addition, on-balance-sheet recognition posed challenges for certain
                regulated entities subject to regulatory requirements based on balance sheet metrics
                (e.g., capital or reserve requirements).
            For more information about the accounting for safeguarding obligations in accordance
                with SAB 121, see Appendix C.