6.3 Determining the Primary Beneficiary of the Host Entity and Silo
Once it is determined that both the host entity and the silo(s) are VIEs, the
reporting entity must evaluate each of them
separately to determine which party, if any, is
the primary beneficiary of the host entity and
which party, if any, is the primary beneficiary of
the silo. In analyzing which party, if any, is the
primary beneficiary of the host entity, the
reporting entity should exclude the silo’s
expected losses and residual returns (and thus the
activities that give rise to these expected losses
and residual returns) to determine which party has
both (1) the power to direct the activities that
most significantly affect the economic performance
of the host entity and (2) the obligation to
absorb losses and the right to receive benefits
that could potentially be significant to the host
entity (see Chapter 7 for
identifying the primary beneficiary). That is,
only the host entity’s activities, benefits, and
losses should be used in the analysis. If a
related-party relationship exists such that the
related-party tiebreaker test would be
performed (see Section
7.4.2.4), the factors in that paragraph
should be applied only to the host entity.
Likewise, in analyzing which party is the primary beneficiary of the silo, the reporting entity should exclude the host entity’s expected losses and residual returns (and thus the activities that give rise to these expected losses and residual returns) in identifying which party has both (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the silo and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the silo.
A reporting entity that has a variable interest in a host entity should also
consider the guidance in ASC 810-10-25-57, which states, “If one reporting entity is
required to consolidate a discrete portion of a VIE, other variable interest holders
shall not consider that portion to be part of the larger VIE.” This guidance
precludes two parties from consolidating the same assets, liabilities, and equity of
a silo. Further, even if no party is identified as the primary beneficiary of a silo
when the host is a VIE, it would generally not be appropriate for the silo to be
added back to the host entity (i.e., the assets, liabilities, and equity of the silo
would not be consolidated by the primary beneficiary, if any, of the host
entity).