4.9 Inventories
ASC 830-10
55-8 The guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory in Subtopic 330-10 requires special
application when the books of record are not kept in the functional currency. Inventories carried at cost in
the books of record in another currency should be first remeasured to cost in the functional currency using
historical exchange rates. Then, historical cost in the functional currency should be evaluated for impairment
under the subsequent measurement guidance using the functional currency. Application of the subsequent
measurement guidance in functional currency may require a write-down in the functional currency statements
even though no write-down has been made in the books of record maintained in another currency. Likewise, a
write-down in the books of record may need to be reversed if the application of the subsequent measurement
guidance in the functional currency does not require a write-down. If inventory has been written down in the
functional currency statements, that functional currency amount shall continue to be the carrying amount in
the functional currency financial statements until the inventory is sold or a further write-down is necessary.
An asset other than inventory may sometimes be written down from historical cost. Although different
measurement guidance may be used to determine that write-down, the approach described in this paragraph
might be appropriate. That is, a write-down may be required in the functional currency statements even though
not required in the books of record, and a write-down in the books of record may need to be reversed before
remeasurement to prevent the remeasured amount from exceeding functional currency historical cost.
ASC 830-10-45-18 states that inventory carried at cost is a nonmonetary asset.
Therefore, when an entity maintains its books and records in a foreign currency,
inventory must be remeasured in the functional currency at the historical exchange
rate (i.e., the rate that was in effect when the inventory was purchased). ASC
830-10-55-8 further requires that an entity apply the subsequent-measurement
guidance in ASC 330 to its functional currency.
Therefore, in certain instances, an entity may determine that it is required to
write down its inventory in its functional currency even though it is not required
to do so in the foreign currency. This situation typically arises when an entity
sells inventory in a foreign currency and the foreign currency has weakened against
the functional currency since the time the inventory was acquired. The example below
illustrates this concept.
Example 4-7
Subsequent Measurement When Books and Records Are
Maintained in a Foreign Currency
Parent Co, a U.S. registrant whose
functional and reporting currency is the USD, has a
subsidiary, Sub Co, that operates in Mexico. Assume that Sub
Co is a distinct and separable operation and that its
functional currency is the reporting currency (USD). Sub Co
maintains its books and records in MXN, the local
currency.
Assume that the following facts exist on
December 31, 20X6:
-
Sub Co uses the FIFO method for determining inventory cost.
-
Sub Co’s inventory balance is $50,000, which is equal to the local currency amount of MXN 500,000 translated at the historical exchange rate of MXN 1 = $0.10.
-
Sub Co determines that the net realizable value (NRV) of the inventory on December 31, 20X6, under ASC 330-10-35 is $30,000, computed on the basis of the 600,000 MXN and an exchange rate of 1 MXN = $0.05.
As a result, Sub Co recognizes a
subsequent-measurement adjustment of $20,000 on December 31,
20X6. The inventory will be carried in Sub Co’s financial
statements at $30,000 until it is disposed of or
subsequently written down as a result of a further decline
in its market value.
In this example, Sub Co is required to
recognize a subsequent-measurement adjustment in its
functional currency even though no write-down in the local
currency would have been required. That is, the NRV of the
inventory in the local currency is MXN 600,000, which is
greater than its carrying value of MXN 500,000. A
subsequent-measurement adjustment is required because of the
devaluation of the MXN against the USD since the inventory
was acquired.