4.10 Valuation of Awards With Graded Vesting Schedule
ASC 718-20
55-26 The choice of attribution method for awards with graded vesting schedules is a policy decision that is not
dependent on an entity’s choice of valuation technique. In addition, the choice of attribution method applies to
awards with only service conditions.
Some share-based payment awards may have a graded vesting schedule (i.e., awards
that are split into multiple tranches in which each tranche legally vests
separately). For example, an entity may grant an employee 1,000 stock options that
vest over four years in increments of 25 percent each year. As discussed in
Section 4.9.2.2,
vesting indirectly affects the fair-value-based measure of a stock option by
affecting the expected-term assumption. For options and similar instruments with
graded vesting, an entity can either estimate separate fair-value-based measures for
each vesting tranche, each with a different expected term, or estimate the
fair-value-based measure of the entire award by using a single weighted-average
expected term. Regardless of the valuation approach, for employee awards with graded
vesting and only service conditions, an entity can still make a policy decision to
recognize compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the total requisite
service period of the entire award (see Section 3.6.5).