9.7 Presentation
ASC 718-10
35-1B If fully vested,
nonforfeitable equity instruments are granted at the date
the grantor and nonemployee enter into an agreement for
goods or services (no specific performance is required by
the nonemployee to retain those equity instruments), then,
because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of
the nonemployee to earn the equity instruments, a grantor
shall recognize the equity instruments when they are granted
(in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether
the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid
asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as
contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph
718-10-45-3) depends on the specific facts and
circumstances.
45-3 As discussed in paragraph
718-10-35-1B, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other
than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for
fully vested, nonforfeitable, nonemployee share-based
payment awards that are issued at the date the grantor and
nonemployee enter into an agreement for goods or services
(and no specific performance is required by the nonemployee
to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not
be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the award.
The transferability (or lack thereof) of the awards shall
not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This
guidance is limited to transactions in which awards are
transferred to nonemployees in exchange for goods or
services.
If an entity receives a recourse note for the issuance of a share-based payment
award, that note would generally be presented as contra-equity (see Section 12.1.1). However, if
an entity receives an asset that is not a note or a receivable from a nonemployee
supplier or service provider (e.g., an asset received in return for fully vested,
nonforfeitable equity instruments), that asset should not be presented as
contra-equity.
In addition, in an SEC staff announcement regarding ASC 505-50, the
staff indicated that unvested, forfeitable instruments should be treated as unissued
for accounting purposes until the future services are received. Although the SEC
staff rescinded that announcement at the March 24, 2022, EITF meeting as a result of
the FASB’s issuance of ASU 2018-07, we believe that the underlying principle remains
applicable for unvested, forfeitable instruments issued for goods and services.