4.3 Loss Recovery and Gain Contingency Models
In determining whether an asset can be recognized for expected
proceeds (e.g., proceeds from an insurance policy), an entity must first consider
the amount of the expected proceeds in comparison to the related previously
recognized loss, if any. This comparison is illustrated below in the context of the
loss recovery and gain contingency models.
Although not codified, paragraph 16 of EITF Issue 01-10 notes that a
gain is “a recovery of a loss not yet recognized in the financial statements or an
amount recovered in excess of a loss recognized in the financial statements.”
Consequently, a loss recovery could be defined as the inverse: recovery proceeds up
to the amount of the financial statement loss incurred. The recognition threshold
for a loss recovery is that it is probable, as indicated by ASC 410-30-35-8, which
states that “an asset relating to the recovery shall be recognized only when
realization of the claim for recovery is deemed probable.”
An asset related to a recovery should be recognized for a previously
recognized financial statement loss when the recovery is probable. The amount
greater than the previously recognized loss or a recovery of a loss not yet
recognized in the financial statements should be treated as a gain contingency.
ASC 410-30 addresses the accounting for recovery proceeds related to
environmental remediation liabilities. Although that guidance is specific to
environmental matters, an entity should apply the recognition and measurement
principles in ASC 410-30-35-8 and 35-9 when determining the appropriate recognition
of other loss recoveries unrelated to environmental matters.
ASC 410-30
35-8 . . . The amount of an
environmental remediation liability should be determined
independently from any potential claim for recovery, and an
asset relating to the recovery shall be recognized only when
realization of the claim for recovery is deemed probable.
The term probable is used in this Subtopic with the
specific technical meaning in paragraph 450-20-25-1.
35-9 If the
claim is the subject of litigation, a rebuttable presumption
exists that realization of the claim is not probable.
An entity that incurs a loss attributable to impairment of an asset
or incurrence of a liability and expects to recover all or a portion of that loss by
filing a claim with an insurance carrier or a claim against other third parties
should record an asset for the amount for which the recovery from the claim (not to
exceed the amount of the total losses recognized) is considered probable. Amounts
greater than an amount for which recovery from the claim was initially considered
probable should be subsequently recognized only to the extent that they do not
exceed actual additional covered losses or direct, incremental costs incurred to
obtain the recovery. Any expected recovery that is greater than covered losses or
direct, incremental costs incurred represents a gain contingency; therefore, a
higher recognition threshold is required for such a recovery, as described
throughout Chapter
3.
Example 4-2
Determining the
Probability of a Noninsurance Recovery
Company S discovers that its CFO has
perpetrated a fraud by drawing down on a corporate line of
credit of $20 million into her personal bank account.
Company S’s outside counsel meets with the bank to discuss
the fraud and advises S that it will be obligated to repay
to the bank the money withdrawn by the CFO. A forensic
investigation of the CFO’s personal accounts and holdings
uncovers approximately $8 million in assets that could be
liquidated (subject to court approval) and applied toward
the $20 million obligation.
Company S recognizes a loss of $20 million
upon discovery of the CFO’s fraud and receipt of the bank’s
communication that S will be responsible for full payment of
the $20 million. Although the $8 million is not an insurance
policy, the considerations S needs to take into account to
determine whether to recognize the $8 million of the CFO’s
assets as a recovery asset for the previously incurred $20
million loss are similar to the considerations S would need
to take into account to determine whether to recognize
insurance proceeds as a recovery asset.
Because S has recognized the full $20
million loss in its financial statements, it should apply
the loss recovery model to the $8 million possible recovery
and determine whether recovery is probable. If S can
conclude that recovery is probable after considering all
factors, it may recognize an asset for this expected
recovery. If S cannot conclude that recovery is probable, it
should not recognize an asset related to recovery unless and
until such recovery becomes probable.
A conclusion that a potential recovery is probable may involve
significant judgment and should be based on all relevant facts and circumstances.
Claim proceeds that will result in a gain should be recognized at the earlier of
when the proceeds are realized or realizable. For example, insurance proceeds may be
considered realized when the insurance carrier settles the claim and no longer
contests payment. Payment alone does not mean that realization has occurred if such
payment is made but is being contested or is subject to refund. Recognition of the
proceeds may be appropriate after consideration of the conditions outlined in
Section 3.3.
Further, an entity should analyze proceeds accounted for as a loss recovery by
applying the “probable” criterion used to determine a loss contingency (whether an
asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred), as outlined in Section 2.3.1.1.
When recognizing potential loss recoveries from insurance carriers or other third
parties, entities should consider both internal and external evidence related to the
claim, including:
- Direct confirmation from the insurance carrier or other third parties that they would agree with the claim.
- In the absence of direct evidence from the insurance carrier or other third
parties that they would agree with the claim, an opinion from legal counsel
that it is “probable,” as that term is used in ASC 450, that:
- The claim under the policy is enforceable.
- Any loss events are covered.
Before recognizing a potential loss recovery, entities should consider the guidance
in ASC 410-30-35-9, which indicates that “[i]f the claim is the subject of
litigation, a rebuttable presumption exists that realization of the claim is not
probable.”
SEC Considerations
The guidance in ASC 410-30-35-9 is consistent with the SEC
staff’s interpretive guidance in Question 2 of SAB Topic 5.Y
(codified in ASC 450-20-S99-1). However, additional disclosure requirements
are included in footnote 49 of that guidance, which addresses uncertainties
regarding the legal sufficiency of claims filed against insurance carriers
or other third parties and the solvency of such insurance carriers and other
third parties:
The staff believes there is a rebuttable
presumption that no asset should be recognized for a claim for recovery
from a party that is asserting that it is not liable to indemnify the
registrant. Registrants that overcome that presumption should disclose
the amount of recorded recoveries that are being contested and discuss
the reasons for concluding that the amounts are probable of
recovery.
It is likely that in determining whether it is probable that an
entity will receive a recovery, the entity will need to understand, among other
factors, the solvency of the insurance carrier or other third parties and have
sufficient dialogue and historical experience with the insurance carrier or other
third parties related to the type of claim in question to assess the likelihood of
payment.
Example 4-3
Insurance Recovery of
Replacement Cost
A fire destroys Company H’s main operating
plant. Immediately after the fire, H recognizes a loss for
the net book value of the plant and meets with the insurance
adjuster to evaluate the loss and expedite the claim. Given
a similar fire loss three years earlier, both parties are
familiar with H’s plant and the process by which the
adjuster will determine H’s claim settlement amount.
Because H is constructing a similar plant, H
and the adjuster are also familiar with the replacement cost
of the plant. Accordingly, the adjuster is able to quickly
estimate the minimum property damage claim and implement
appropriate procedures to process the claim and establish a
schedule of reimbursements. The adjuster computes and the
insurance carrier approves (settles) a minimum reimbursement
for the cost of replacement; the amount is greater than the
net book value of the old plant. Company H appropriately
recognizes a gain for the excess of the minimum
reimbursement over the net book value of the property since
the amount was considered realized when the insurance
carrier settled the claim and no longer contested the
payment to be made to H. The recognition of the excess as a
gain is consistent with the guidance in ASC 610-30 on
involuntary conversions. It would not be appropriate for H
to recognize the excess as a reduction of the cost basis of
the replacement plant.
Connecting the Dots
Some incurred losses may be related to past events spanning
multiple years or decades, such as losses that arise from asbestos exposure
or environmental matters. In these situations, the losses may span periods
covered by several insurance carriers, some of which may no longer be
solvent, or various policies. Therefore, it may be challenging for an entity
to determine whether the incurred loss is a covered event, whether because
of vague language used in prior insurance policies or the number of policies
or insurance carriers that may have existed at any given time. The entity
should consider these potential limitations and factor them into its
calculation of the probability that it will receive an insurance recovery
for losses spanning multiple years.