13.7 Refinancing Arrangements
13.7.1 Background
Under ASC 470-10-45-14, short-term obligations are classified as noncurrent if
the debtor has the intent and ability to refinance the obligation on a long-term
basis. To demonstrate that it has such an intent and ability, a debtor must (1)
refinance the obligation on a long-term basis (see Section
13.7.3) after the balance sheet date, but before the financial
statements are issued or available to be issued, or (2) have a financing
agreement that clearly permits it to refinance the obligation on a long-term
basis (see Section 13.7.4) before the financial statements
are issued or available to be issued.
13.7.2 Scope
13.7.2.1 Background
ASC 470-10-45-14 applies to certain short-term obligations
(see Section
13.3.4.2) of a debtor that has the intent and ability to
refinance on a long-term basis (see the next section). It does not apply to
certain short-term obligations incurred as part of an entity’s operating
cycle (see Section
13.7.2.3). Further, the post-balance-sheet-date refinancing
or financing agreement must be in place before the financial statements are
issued or available to be issued (see Section 13.3.4.9).
13.7.2.2 Refinancing a Short-Term Obligation on a Long-Term Basis
ASC 470-10
45-12A Some short-term
obligations are expected to be refinanced on a
long-term basis and, therefore, are not expected to
require the use of working capital during the
ensuing fiscal year. Examples include commercial
paper, construction loans, and the currently
maturing portion of long-term debt.
45-12B Refinancing a
short-term obligation on a long-term basis means
either replacing it with a long-term obligation or
with equity securities or renewing, extending, or
replacing it with short-term obligations for an
uninterrupted period extending beyond one year (or
the operating cycle, if applicable) from the date of
an entity’s balance sheet.
45-13 . . . A short-term
obligation shall be excluded from current
liabilities only if the conditions in the following
paragraph are met. Funds obtained on a long-term
basis before the balance sheet date would be
excluded from current assets if the obligation to be
liquidated is excluded from current liabilities.
45-14 A short-term
obligation shall be excluded from current
liabilities if the entity intends to refinance the
obligation on a long-term basis (see paragraph
470-10-45-12B) and the intent to refinance the
short-term obligation on a long-term basis is
supported by an ability to consummate the
refinancing demonstrated in either of the following
ways:
-
Post-balance-sheet-date issuance of a long-term obligation or equity securities. . . .
-
Financing agreement. . . .
45-21 Replacement of a
short-term obligation with another short-term
obligation after the date of the balance sheet but
before the balance sheet is issued or is available
to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) is
not, by itself, sufficient to demonstrate an
entity’s ability to refinance the short-term
obligation on a long-term basis. If, for example,
the replacement is made under the terms of a
revolving credit agreement that provides for renewal
or extension of the short-term obligation for an
uninterrupted period extending beyond one year (or
operating cycle) from the date of the balance sheet,
the revolving credit agreement must meet the
conditions in paragraph 470-10-45-14(b) to justify
excluding the short-term obligation from current
liabilities. Similarly, if the replacement is a
rollover of commercial paper accompanied by a
standby credit agreement, the standby agreement must
meet the conditions in that paragraph to justify
excluding the short-term obligation from current
liabilities.
As discussed in Section 13.7.1, ASC
470-10-45-14 applies when a debtor has the intent and ability to refinance a
short-term obligation on a long-term basis. ASC 470-10-45-12B clarifies that
refinancing a short-term obligation on a long-term basis includes:
-
Issuing a long-term obligation that replaces the short-term obligation.
-
Issuing equity securities that replace the short-term obligation.
-
Renewing or extending a short-term obligation for a period of more than one year (or the operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date. (Note that provisions that permit the successive renewal or extension of short-term obligations generally should be evaluated under the guidance on financing agreements [see Section 13.7.4] and not under the requirements for post-balance-sheet-date issuance of long-term obligations or equity securities [see Section 13.7.3] since they do not represent long-term obligations.)
A debtor does not have the intent and ability to refinance a short-term
obligation on a long-term basis if:
-
It issues another short-term obligation that matures within one year (or the operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date.
-
It extends or renews a short-term obligation for a period of less than one year (or the operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date.
-
The short-term financing agreement expires within one year (or the operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date.
13.7.2.3 Short-Term Obligations Related to the Operating Cycle
ASC 470-10
45-13 Short-term
obligations arising from transactions in the normal
course of business that are due in customary terms
shall be classified as current liabilities. . .
.
ASC 470-10-45-14 does not apply to short-term obligations that are classified
as current liabilities under ASC 210-10-45-8 and the first sentence of ASC
470-10-45-13 (see Section 13.3.3.4).
That is, “[s]hort-term obligations arising from transactions in the normal
course of business that are due in customary terms,” such as payables for
goods and services and accruals for wages, salaries, commissions, rentals,
and royalties, cannot be classified as noncurrent on the basis of the
guidance on refinancing arrangements. However, as noted in paragraph 20 of the Basis for Conclusions of FASB Statement 6, the guidance does apply to
short-term obligations “arising from the acquisition or construction of
noncurrent assets” or “not directly related to the operating cycle,” such as
a “note given to a supplier to replace an account payable that originally
arose in the normal course of business and had been due in customary
terms.”
13.7.3 Post-Balance-Sheet-Date Issuance of Long-Term Debt or Equity
13.7.3.1 General
ASC 470-10
45-14 A short-term
obligation shall be excluded from current
liabilities if the entity intends to refinance the
obligation on a long-term basis (see paragraph
470-10-45-12B) and the intent to refinance the
short-term obligation on a long-term basis is
supported by an ability to consummate the
refinancing demonstrated in either of the following
ways:
-
Post-balance-sheet-date issuance of a long-term obligation or equity securities. After the date of an entity’s balance sheet but before that balance sheet is issued or is available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25), a long-term obligation or equity securities have been issued for the purpose of refinancing the short-term obligation on a long-term basis. If equity securities have been issued, the short-term obligation, although excluded from current liabilities, shall not be included in owners’ equity. . . .
45-16 If an entity’s
ability to consummate an intended refinancing of a
short-term obligation on a long-term basis is
demonstrated by post-balance-sheet-date issuance of
a long-term obligation or equity securities (see
paragraph 470-10-45-14(a)), the amount of the
short-term obligation to be excluded from current
liabilities shall not exceed the proceeds of the new
long-term obligation or the equity securities
issued.
One way a debtor can demonstrate its intent and ability to refinance a
short-term obligation on a long-term basis is to repay the short-term
obligation by using the proceeds from the issuance of a long-term obligation
or equity securities. Such refinancing must occur before the financial
statements are issued or available to be issued (see Section 13.3.4.9). The amount of the
short-term obligation that is classified as noncurrent cannot exceed the
amount of the proceeds received from issuing the new long-term obligation or
equity securities and that are used to repay the short-term obligation.
The issuance of a new debt instrument or equity security that contains a put
option or other provision that permits the holder to demand repayment within
one year (or the operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date
does not demonstrate the debtor’s ability to refinance on a long-term basis
(see Section 13.4.2). A debtor that
has violated a credit-related covenant in the new debt obligation before the
financial statements are issued or available to be issued should consider
the guidance on covenant violations (see Section
13.5). If a new long-term debt obligation contains a SAC, the
debtor should assess the likelihood that the holder will accelerate the
debt’s due date under that clause since it can affect whether noncurrent
classification is appropriate (see Section
13.6).
ASC 470-10-55-15 through 55-24 contain an example of a
post-balance-sheet-date refinancing that would be evaluated under ASC
470-10-45-14(a) (see Section 13.7.6.3).
13.7.3.2 Repayment of Short-Term Obligation Before Long-Term Refinancing
ASC 470-10
45-15 Repayment of a
short-term obligation before funds are obtained
through a long-term refinancing requires the use of
current assets. Therefore, if a short-term
obligation is repaid after the balance sheet date
and subsequently a long-term obligation or equity
securities are issued whose proceeds are used to
replenish current assets before the balance sheet is
issued or is available to be issued (as discussed in
Section 855-10-25), the short-term obligation shall
not be excluded from current liabilities at the
balance sheet date. See Example 5 (paragraph
470-10-55-33) for an illustration of this
guidance.
If a debtor repays a short-term obligation after the balance sheet date by
using current assets (e.g., excess cash), that obligation must be classified
as current as of the balance sheet date even if the debtor subsequently
issues a new long-term obligation or equity securities before the financial
statements are issued or available to be issued. This is because the
repayment of the short-term obligation required the use of current assets.
ASC 470-10-55-33 through 55-36 contain an example of a short-term obligation
that is repaid after the balance sheet date and subsequently replaced by
long-term debt before the balance sheet is issued (see Section
13.7.6.3).
13.7.4 Financing Agreement
13.7.4.1 Background
A debtor can demonstrate that it is able to refinance a
short-term obligation on a long-term basis by having a financing agreement
(e.g., a term loan commitment, a line of credit, a revolving-debt
arrangement, an equity facility, or a forward sale of debt or equity
securities) that permits such refinancing and meets certain criteria (see
the next section). Further, the guidance on financing agreements applies to
scenarios in which the debtor renews or extends the short-term obligation
(see ASC 470-10-45-12B).
ASC 470-10 limits the amount of the short-term obligation that can be
classified as noncurrent (see Section 13.7.4.3).
Generally, a debtor is not precluded from using a stand-by financing
agreement, although its terms cannot be unreasonable (see Section
13.7.4.4). However, a best-efforts agreement cannot be used
to demonstrate an ability to refinance a short-term obligation on a
long-term basis (see Section 13.7.4.5). In certain
circumstances, a subsidiary might be able to use a parent’s financing
agreement to demonstrate such ability (see Section
13.7.4.6).
13.7.4.2 Financing Agreement Criteria
ASC 470-10
45-14 A short-term
obligation shall be excluded from current
liabilities if the entity intends to refinance the
obligation on a long-term basis (see paragraph
470-10-45-12B) and the intent to refinance the
short-term obligation on a long-term basis is
supported by an ability to consummate the
refinancing demonstrated in either of the following
ways: . . .
b. Financing agreement. Before the balance
sheet is issued or is available to be issued (as
discussed in Section 855-10-25), the entity has
entered into a financing agreement that clearly
permits the entity to refinance the short-term
obligation on a long-term basis on terms that are
readily determinable, and all of the following
conditions are met:
1. The agreement does
not expire within one year (or operating cycle)
from the date of the entity’s balance sheet and
during that period the agreement is not cancelable
by the lender or the prospective lender or
investor (and obligations incurred under the
agreement are not callable during that period)
except for violation of a provision with which
compliance is objectively determinable or
measurable. For purposes of this Subtopic,
violation of a provision means failure to meet a
condition set forth in the agreement or breach or
violation of a provision such as a restrictive
covenant, representation, or warranty, whether or
not a grace period is allowed or the lender is
required to give notice. Financing agreements
cancelable for violation of a provision that can
be evaluated differently by the parties to the
agreement (such as a material adverse change or
failure to maintain satisfactory operations) do
not comply with this condition.
2. No violation of any
provision in the financing agreement exists at the
balance sheet date and no available information
indicates that a violation has occurred thereafter
but before the balance sheet is issued or is
available to be issued (as discussed in Section
855-10-25), or, if one exists at the balance sheet
date or has occurred thereafter, a waiver has been
obtained.
3. The lender or the
prospective lender or investor with which the
entity has entered into the financing agreement is
expected to be financially capable of honoring the
agreement.
55-1 Under paragraph
470-10-45-2, the lender has already loaned money on
a long-term basis. To continue long-term
classification requires a judgment about the
likelihood of acceleration of the due date.
Paragraphs 470-10-45-13 through 45-20 cover
circumstances in which the obligation is by its
terms short-term. For such an obligation to be
excluded from current liabilities, the lender must
advance new funds or refinance the short-term
obligation on a long-term basis based on conditions
existing on the date of the new loan or refinancing.
Therefore, to classify an obligation as long-term,
paragraphs 470-10-45-13 through 45-20 require a
higher standard for a financing agreement that
permits an entity to refinance a short-term
obligation on a long-term basis than paragraph
470-10-50-2 requires for an existing long-term loan
for which early repayment might be requested.
For debt to be classified as noncurrent on the basis of a financing
agreement, all of the following conditions must be met:
-
The financing agreement must clearly permit the debtor to refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis on terms that are readily determinable.The terms of the financing commitment must be unambiguous about whether the debtor is able to refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis. For example, the agreement might state that “[b]orrowings are available at [the debtor’s] request for such purposes as it deems appropriate and will mature three years from the date of borrowing” (see ASC 470-10-55-16(a) and ASC 470-10-55-17 in Section 13.7.6.4). Further, the debtor cannot be subject to any legal or contractual restrictions that prevent it from accessing funds that otherwise would be available under the financing agreement (e.g., transfer restrictions) (see Section 13.7.4.3). If the amount available under the financing agreement fluctuates, only the minimum amount that is expected to be available can be used to support a conclusion that noncurrent classification is appropriate for a short-term obligation. If the amount available under the financing agreement fluctuates and no reasonable estimate of the minimum amount that is expected to be available can be made, the financing agreement does not allow the debtor to refinance a short-term obligation on a long-term basis (see Section 13.7.4.3).In addition, the agreement must bind the potential creditor or investor to extend credit on a long-term basis or purchase the debtor’s equity securities. If the potential creditor or investor has a right to cancel the agreement in its sole discretion without any penalty or damages, the agreement would not meet this condition. For example, a letter of intent or memorandum of understanding would generally not be sufficient to meet this condition even if the potential investor or creditor is expected to honor its stated intent. Further, ASC 470-10-55-8 implies that the existence of a best-efforts remarketing agreement is not sufficient to demonstrate an intent and ability to refinance a short-term obligation on a long-term basis under ASC 470-10-45-14(b) (see Section 13.7.4.5). However, there is no requirement that the financing agreement be contractually linked to the short-term obligation.The fact that a debtor is considering other more advantageous sources of financing does not necessarily preclude it from asserting an intent to use a financing agreement to refinance a short-term obligation on a long-term basis under ASC 470-10-45-14(b) (see Section 13.7.4.4). However, the debtor must intend to use the financing agreement if no other source of financing becomes available (see ASC 470-10-45-20).
-
The financing agreement must be in place as of the date the financial statements are issued or available to be issued.There is no requirement that the debtor enter into the financing agreement as of the balance sheet date. ASC 470-10-45-14(b) requires the financing agreement to have been executed by the time the financial statements are issued or available to be issued.
-
The financing agreement cannot expire within one year (or the debtor’s operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date except for the violation of an objective covenant.ASC 470-10-45-14(b)(1) requires the potential creditor’s or investor’s commitment under the financing agreement to be for at least one year (or the operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date. During that period, the potential creditor or investor cannot have a right to cancel the agreement unless the debtor violates a provision (e.g., a restrictive covenant, representation, or warranty) with which compliance is objectively determinable or measurable (see item 5 below and Section 13.3.4.6).
-
The obligations or equity securities that would be issued under the financing agreement cannot be repayable on demand or within one year (or the operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date.ASC 470-10-45-14(b)(1) indicates that any obligation incurred or equity securities issued under the financing agreement cannot be repayable on demand or within one year (or the debtor’s operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date. Obligations that are repayable on demand or within one year (or the debtor’s operating cycle, if longer) after the balance sheet date are considered short-term obligations (see Section 13.4). Similarly, the renewal or extension of a short-term obligation for a period of more than one year would not meet this condition if the obligation contains a put option or other provision that permits the holder to demand repayment within one year after the balance sheet date.
-
The financing agreement and any obligations that would be issued under the financing agreement cannot contain a SAC.ASC 470-10-45-14(b)(1) indicates that the financing agreement cannot contain a SAC (see Section 13.3.4.6). For example, a liquidity facility with a material adverse change clause that permits the potential creditor or investor to terminate the facility would not qualify under this condition.Note that a long-term financing arrangement might not meet the conditions in ASC 470-10-45-14(b) for classification of a short-term obligation as noncurrent even if the debt that would be issued under the financing agreement would qualify as noncurrent once issued (see ASC 470-10-55-1). Long-term obligations with SACs often qualify as noncurrent under ASC 470-10-45-2 (see Section 13.6). However, a financing agreement can only be used as the basis for excluding a short-term obligation from current liabilities if the financing cannot be canceled by the lender on the basis of a SAC. The FASB believes that the circumstances addressed in the guidance on refinancing agreements in ASC 470-10-45-13 through 45-20 are different from those addressed in the guidance on SACs in long-term obligations in ASC 470-10-45-2. That is, the guidance on SACs in long-term obligations requires an entity to use judgment in determining the likelihood of acceleration of the due date of the long-term obligation, whereas the guidance on refinancing arrangements in ASC 470-10-45-14 requires the creditor to advance new funds or refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis.
-
If the debtor has violated a provision in the financing agreement, it has obtained a waiver.Under ASC 470-10-45-14(b)(2), the debtor must not be in violation of any provision in the financing agreement on the balance sheet date or when the financial statements are issued or available to be issued or, if a violation has occurred, the other party must have granted a waiver. Waivers should be evaluated under the guidance in ASC 470-10 on waivers (see Sections 13.5.3.2 and 13.5.3.3).
-
The potential creditor or investor must be expected to be financially capable of honoring the agreement.Under ASC 470-10-45-14(b)(3), the potential creditor or investor must be “expected to be financially capable of honoring the [financing] agreement.” If substantial doubt exists about the potential creditor’s or investor’s capacity to honor its commitment, this condition is not met.
-
The terms of the financing agreement cannot be unreasonable to the debtor.If the terms of a financing agreement are unreasonable to the debtor (e.g., with respect to interest rates or collateral requirements), the debtor would not be able to assert an intent to refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis under that agreement. Although a debtor is permitted to seek alternative sources of financing (see Section 13.7.4.4), it must intend to use the existing financing agreement if another source of financing does not become available.
13.7.4.3 Limit on the Amount That Can Be Classified as Noncurrent
ASC 470-10
45-17 If ability to
refinance is demonstrated by the existence of a
financing agreement (see paragraph 470-10-45-14(b)),
the amount of the short-term obligation to be
excluded from current liabilities shall be reduced
to the amount available for refinancing under the
agreement if the amount available is less than the
amount of the short-term obligation.
45-18 The amount to be
excluded shall be reduced further if information
(such as restrictions in other agreements or
restrictions as to transferability of funds)
indicates that funds obtainable under the agreement
will not be available to liquidate the short-term
obligation.
45-19 Further, if amounts
that could be obtained under the financing agreement
fluctuate (for example, in relation to the entity’s
needs, in proportion to the value of collateral, or
in accordance with other terms of the agreement),
the amount to be excluded from current liabilities
shall be limited to a reasonable estimate of the
minimum amount expected to be available at any date
from the scheduled maturity of the short-term
obligation to the end of the fiscal year (or
operating cycle). If no reasonable estimate can be
made, the entire outstanding short-term obligation
shall be included in current liabilities.
The amount of a short-term obligation that can be classified as noncurrent
cannot exceed the amount that the debtor is able to access under the
financing agreement and should take into account any limitations on the
debtor’s ability to access the amount committed under the financing
agreement. For example, the debtor may be subject to legal or contractual
restrictions that prevent it from using some or all of the amount committed
under the financing agreement to repay its short-term obligation. ASC
470-10-55-20 and 55-21 (see Section 13.7.6.4) include
an example of a scenario in which the transfer of funds between a parent and
subsidiary is legally restricted so that the parent is unable to access
funds that are available under the subsidiary’s financing agreement.
If the amount obtainable under a financing agreement fluctuates (e.g., on the
basis of collateral value of the debtor’s trade receivables), the debtor
should make a reasonable estimate of the minimum amount expected to be
available on any date during the period from the scheduled maturity of the
short-term obligation to the end of the fiscal year (or the entity’s
operating cycle, if longer). If a reasonable estimate cannot be made, the
financing agreement cannot be used to support a decision to exclude the
short-term obligation from current liabilities. ASC 470-10-55-27 through
55-29 (see Section 13.7.6.4) contain an example of a
financing agreement that meets the conditions in ASC 470-10-45-14(b) and
limits the amount that the debtor can borrow under the agreement to the
amount of its inventory.
13.7.4.4 Standby Financing Agreement
ASC 470-10
45-20 The entity may
intend to seek an alternative source of financing
rather than to exercise its rights under the
existing agreement when the short-term obligation
becomes due. The entity must intend to exercise its
rights under the existing agreement, however, if
that other source does not become available. The
intent to exercise may not be present if the terms
of the agreement contain conditions or permit the
prospective lender or investor to establish
conditions, such as interest rates or collateral
requirements, that are unreasonable to the
entity.
A financing agreement can qualify under ASC 470-10-45-14(b) even if a debtor
is seeking an alternative source of financing (e.g., one that is more
advantageous). Although a debtor is required to demonstrate an intent to
refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis, such an intent can
be present even if the financing agreement serves as a fallback or standby
source of financing. It is sufficient that the debtor intends to use the
financing agreement to refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term
basis if it does not find another source of financing. However, the debtor
should evaluate whether the terms of the financing agreement are reasonable.
If the terms are unreasonable to the debtor (e.g., the interest rate is in
excess of what the debtor is ready and willing to pay), it would be unable
to assert an intent to use that financing agreement if another source of
financing is not available.
Example 13-9
Lack of Intent to Refinance Short-Term Obligation
on a Long-Term Basis
A debtor is evaluating whether it can classify a
short-term obligation as a noncurrent liability
under ASC 470-10-45-14(b). It has a long-term line
of credit that clearly permits it to refinance the
short-term obligation on a long-term basis at 15
percent per annum. Because that interest rate is
significantly in excess of the interest rate the
debtor expects it would have to pay if it were to
enter into a similar line of credit arrangement that
reflects current market interest rates, it is
exploring whether to renegotiate the line of credit.
However, if it is unable to obtain a reduction in
the interest rate on the line of credit, the debtor
expects to pay off the short-term obligation by
using excess cash. In this scenario, the debtor
would not be able to assert an intent to refinance
the short-term obligation on a long-term basis under
the line of credit because it expects to use current
assets rather than the existing financing agreement
to repay the short-term obligation if it is unable
to renegotiate the financing agreement’s terms.
13.7.4.5 Best-Efforts Remarketing Agreements
ASC 470-10
Example 2: Classification by
the Issuer of Redeemable Instruments That Are
Subject to Remarketing Agreements
55-7 This Example
illustrates the guidance for the appropriate
classification by the issuer of debt if all of the
following conditions exist:
-
The debt has a long-term maturity (for example, 30 to 40 years).
-
The debt holder may redeem or put the bond on short notice (7 to 30 days).
-
The issuer has a remarketing agreement that states that the agent will make its best effort to remarket the bond when redeemed.
-
The debt is secured by a short-term letter of credit that provides protection to the debt holder in the event that the redeemed debt cannot be remarketed. (Amounts drawn against the letter of credit are payable back to the issuer of the letter of credit by the issuer of the redeemable debt instrument on the same day that the drawdown occurs.)
55-8 Debt agreements that
allow a debt holder to redeem (or put) a debt
instrument on demand (or within one year) should be
classified as short-term liabilities despite the
existence of a best-efforts remarketing agreement.
That is, unless the issuer of the redeemable debt
instrument has the ability and intent to refinance
the debt on a long-term basis as provided for in
paragraph 470-10-45-14, the debt should be
classified as a current liability.
55-9 In this Example, the
obligation would be classified by the issuer as
noncurrent only if the letter-of-credit arrangement
meets the requirements of paragraph
470-10-45-14(b).
ASC 470-10-55-7 through 55-9 include guidance on the classification of a
puttable debt obligation (such as a variable rate demand obligation) that is
subject to a best-efforts remarketing agreement and short-term letter of
credit. ASC 470-10-55-8 indicates that since a best-efforts remarketing
agreement is not binding, its existence is not sufficient evidence of a
debtor’s intent and ability to refinance a short-term obligation on a
long-term basis under ASC 470-10-45-14(b) (see Section 13.7.4.2).
13.7.4.6 Subsidiary’s Ability to Rely on Parent’s Financing Agreement
Rather than have multiple subsidiaries enter into individual long-term
financing agreements, a parent may enter into a single external arrangement
that allows it to provide intercompany financing to its subsidiaries for all
their short-term obligations to be refinanced on a long-term basis. Although
there may be no formal written agreement between the parent and its
individual subsidiaries that describes the terms of such a financing
arrangement, the parent’s intent and ability to provide long-term financing
to the subsidiary (through either an intercompany loan or an infusion of
capital) would enable the subsidiary to refinance its short-term obligations
on a long-term basis. The parent may provide such financing to the
subsidiary by either (1) using its own working capital or (2) drawing down
on the external financing agreement.
To exclude short-term obligations from current liabilities in its stand-alone
financial statements, a subsidiary may use an intercompany financing
arrangement with its parent to demonstrate its ability to refinance a
short-term obligation on a long-term basis if the criteria in ASC
470-15-45-14 are met (see Section
13.7.4.2). For the subsidiary to meet the criteria in ASC
470-15-45-14, there must be evidence that its parent has committed a portion
of its liquidity resources to servicing the subsidiary’s short-term
obligation on a long-term basis. That evidence should be documented in a
written intercompany financing agreement or in a confirmation of the details
of the arrangement with the parent. In either case, the evidence should
explicitly cover the criteria in ASC 470-10-45-14:
-
The parent must be committed to providing financing to the subsidiary on terms that would allow the subsidiary to refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis.
-
The parent must be committed to not canceling the agreement within one year (or the operating cycle) after the subsidiary’s balance sheet date for any reason that is not objectively determinable. To the extent that objectively determinable events may give rise to cancellation of the agreement, such events should be detailed in the confirmation obtained from the parent.
-
The parent must be financially capable of honoring the intercompany financing agreement after taking into account all of its other obligations, including the obligation to provide financing to other subsidiaries under similar agreements.
Although the parent is not required to have an external financing agreement
that meets the conditions in ASC 470-10-45-14 to demonstrate its financial
capabilities, in some circumstances establishing the parent’s ability to
refinance may be difficult in the absence of such agreement. In the
consolidated financial statements, a subsidiary’s obligations represent
obligations of the consolidated entity; therefore, the absence of an
external financing agreement (or post-balance-sheet issuance of a long-term
obligation or equity securities) that meets the conditions in ASC
470-10-45-14 would preclude a noncurrent classification of the subsidiary’s
short-term obligations on the parent’s consolidated balance sheet.
13.7.5 Disclosure
ASC 470-10
Short-Term Obligations Expected to Be
Refinanced
50-4 If a short-term
obligation is excluded from current liabilities pursuant
to the provisions of this Subtopic, the notes to
financial statements shall include a general description
of the financing agreement and the terms of any new
obligation incurred or expected to be incurred or equity
securities issued or expected to be issued as a result
of a refinancing.
When a debtor classifies a short-term obligation as a noncurrent liability under
ASC 470-10-45-14, it must include a general description of the
post-balance-sheet-date refinancing (see Section
13.7.3) or the financing agreement (see Section 13.7.4), as applicable.
13.7.6 Examples
13.7.6.1 Background
ASC 470-10
Example 4: Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt
and Notes Payable to Be Refinanced
55-13 The following Cases
illustrate various scenarios for refinancing the
current portion of long-term debt and notes payable
as discussed in paragraphs 470-10-45-13 through
45-20:
-
Entity refinances on long-term basis the current maturity of long-term debt and notes payable (Case A).
-
Laws prohibit the transfer of funds (Case B).
-
Entity issues debentures to liquidate the debt (Case C).
-
Entity negotiates a revolving credit agreement (Case D).
-
Entity negotiates a revolving credit agreement with borrowing limits (Case E).
-
Entity refinances commercial paper (Case F).
-
Case illustrates balance sheet presentation (Case G).
ASC 470-10-55 includes multiple cases illustrating whether
short-term obligations should be classified as current or noncurrent under
ASC 470-10-45-14 in various refinancing scenarios. The assumptions in most
of the cases are similar (see the next section). The cases address the
application of the guidance to:
-
Two post-balance-sheet-date refinancing scenarios (Case C of Example 4, and Example 5); see Section 13.7.6.3.
-
Various financing agreements (Cases A, B, D, and E of Example 4); see Section 13.7.6.4.
-
A financing agreement related to a long-term construction project (Case F of Example 4); see Section 13.7.6.5. (SAB Topic 6.H.2 also addresses this scenario.)
In addition, Case G in Example 4 illustrates balance sheet
presentation; see Section
13.7.6.6.
13.7.6.2 Shared Assumptions
ASC 470-10
Example 4: Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt
and Notes Payable to Be Refinanced
55-14 The Cases in this
Example do not comprehend all possible circumstances
and do not include all the disclosures that would
typically be made regarding long-term debt or
current liabilities.
55-15 Cases A through G
share all of the following assumptions:
-
Entity A’s fiscal year-end is December 31, 19X5.
-
The date of issuance of the December 31, 19X5, financial statements is March 31, 19X6; the Entity’s practice is to issue a classified balance sheet.
-
At December 31, 19X5, short-term obligations include $5,000,000 representing the portion of 6 percent long-term debt maturing in February 19X6 and $3,000,000 of 9 percent notes payable issued in November 19X5 and maturing in July 19X6.
-
The Entity intends to refinance on a long-term basis both the current maturity of long-term debt and the 9 percent notes payable.
-
Accounts other than the long-term debt maturing in February 19X6 and the notes payable maturing in July 19X6 are as follows.
-
Unless otherwise indicated, the Cases also assume that the lender or prospective lender is expected to be capable of honoring the agreement, that there is no evidence of a violation of any provision, and that the terms of borrowings available under the agreement are readily determinable.
ASC 470-10-55-14 and 55-15 contain assumptions that apply to
Cases A through G in Example 4 in ASC 470-10-55-16 through 55-32 (see the
next section and Section
13.7.6.4).
13.7.6.3 Post-Balance-Sheet-Date Refinancing
ASC 470-10
Example 4: Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt
and Notes Payable to Be Refinanced
Case C: Entity Issues Debentures to Liquidate the
Debt
55-21 In this Case, the
Entity issues $8,000,000 of 10-year debentures to
the public in January 19X6. The Entity intends to
use the proceeds to liquidate the $5,000,000 debt
maturing February 19X6 and the $3,000,000 of 9
percent notes payable maturing July 19X6. In
addition, assume the debt maturing February 19X6 is
paid before the issuance of the balance sheet, and
the remaining proceeds from the sale of debentures
are invested in a U.S. Treasury note maturing the
same day as the 9 percent notes payable.
55-22 Because the Entity
refinanced the long-term debt maturing in February
19X6 in a manner that meets the conditions set forth
in paragraph 470-10-45-14, that obligation would be
excluded from current liabilities. In addition, the
9 percent notes payable maturing in July 19X6 would
also be excluded because the Entity has obtained
funds expressly intended to be used to liquidate
those notes and not intended to be used in current
operations. In balance sheets after the date of sale
of the debentures and before the maturity date of
the notes payable, the Entity would exclude the
notes payable from current liabilities if the U.S.
Treasury note is excluded from current assets (see
paragraph 210-10-45-4).
55-23 If the debentures
had been sold before January 1, 19X6, the $8,000,000
of obligations to be paid would be excluded from
current liabilities in the balance sheet at that
date if the $8,000,000 in funds were excluded from
current assets.
55-24 If, instead of
issuing the 10-year debentures, the Entity had
issued $8,000,000 of equity securities and all other
facts in this Case remained unchanged, both the 6
percent debt due February 19X6 and the 9 percent
notes payable due July 19X6 would be classified as
liabilities other than current liabilities, such as
Indebtedness Due in 19X6 Refinanced in January
19X6.
Example 5: Classification of a Short-Term
Obligation Repaid Before Being Replaced by a
Long-Term Security
55-33
This Example illustrates the guidance in paragraph
470-10-45-15.
55-34 This Example has the
following assumptions:
-
An Entity has issued $3,000,000 of short-term commercial paper during the year to finance construction of a plant.
-
At June 30, 1976, the Entity’s fiscal year end, the Entity intends to refinance the commercial paper by issuing long-term debt. However, because the Entity temporarily has excess cash, in July 1976 it liquidates $1,000,000 of the commercial paper as the paper matures.
-
In August 1976, the Entity completes a $6,000,000 long-term debt offering.
-
Later during the month of August, it issues its June 30, 1976, financial statements.
-
The proceeds of the long-term debt offering are to be used to do all of the following:
-
Replenish $1,000,000 in working capital
-
Pay $2,000,000 of commercial paper as it matures in September 1976
-
Pay $3,000,000 of construction costs expected to be incurred later that year to complete the plant.
-
55-35 The $1,000,000 of
commercial paper liquidated in July would be
classified as a current liability in the Entity’s
balance sheet at June 30, 1976. The $2,000,000 of
commercial paper liquidated in September 1976 but
refinanced by the long-term debt offering in August
1976 would be excluded from current liabilities in
balance sheets at the end of June 1976, July 1976,
and August 1976. It should be noted that the
existence of a financing agreement at the date the
financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) rather
than a completed financing at that date would not
change these classifications.
55-36 At the end of August
1976, $2,000,000 of cash would be excluded from
current assets or, if included in current assets, a
like amount of debt would be classified as a current
liability.
Case C in Example 4 in ASC 470-10-55-21 through 55-24 illustrates the
application of the guidance on post-balance-sheet-date refinancings in ASC
470-10-25-14(a) (see Section
13.7.3.1). Example 5 in ASC 470-10-55-33 through 55-36
illustrates the application of that guidance in a scenario in which the
short-term obligation is repaid before the post-balance-sheet-date
refinancing (see Section 13.7.3.2).
The assumptions in ASC 470-10-55-14 and 55-15 apply to Case C (see Section 13.7.6.2).
13.7.6.4 Financing Agreements
ASC 470-10
Example 4: Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt
and Notes Payable to Be Refinanced
Case A: Entity Refinances on Long-Term Basis the
Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt and Notes
Payable
55-16 The Entity
negotiates a financing agreement with a commercial
bank in December 19X5 for a maximum borrowing of
$8,000,000 at any time through 19X7 with the
following terms:
-
Borrowings are available at Entity A’s request for such purposes as it deems appropriate and will mature three years from the date of borrowing.
-
Amounts borrowed will bear interest at the bank’s prime rate.
-
An annual commitment fee of 1/2 of 1 percent is payable on the difference between the amount borrowed and $8,000,000.
-
The agreement is cancelable by the lender only if any of the following occur:
-
The Entity’s working capital, excluding borrowings under the agreement, falls below $10,000,000.
-
The Entity becomes obligated under lease agreements to pay an annual rental in excess of $1,000,000.
-
Treasury stock is acquired without the prior approval of the prospective lender.
-
The Entity guarantees indebtedness of unaffiliated persons in excess of $500,000.
-
55-17 The Entity’s
intention to refinance meets the condition specified
by paragraph 470-10-45-14. Compliance with the
provisions listed in (d) of the preceding paragraph
is objectively determinable or measurable;
therefore, the condition specified by paragraph
470-10-45-14(b)(1) is met. The proceeds of
borrowings under the agreement are clearly available
for the liquidation of the 9 percent notes payable
and the long-term debt maturing in February 19X6.
Both obligations, therefore, would be classified as
other than current liabilities.
55-18 Following are the
liability section of Entity A’s balance sheet at
December 31, 19X5, and the related note disclosures
required by this Subtopic, based on the information
in paragraphs 470-10-55-15 through 55-16. Because
the balance sheet is issued subsequent to the
February 19X6 maturity of the long-term debt, the
note describes the refinancing of that
obligation.
Note A
The Entity has entered into a financing agreement
with a commercial bank that permits the Entity to
borrow at any time through 19X7 up to $8,000,000 at
the bank’s prime rate of interest. The Entity must
pay an annual commitment fee of 1/2 of 1 percent of
the unused portion of the commitment. Borrowings
under the financing agreement mature three years
after the date of the loan. Among other things, the
agreement prohibits the acquisition of treasury
stock without prior approval by the bank, requires
maintenance of working capital of $10,000,000
exclusive of borrowings under the agreement, and
limits the annual rental under lease agreements to
$1,000,000. In February 19X6, the Entity borrowed
$5,000,000 at 8 percent and liquidated the 6 percent
long-term debt, and it intends to borrow additional
funds available under the agreement to refinance the
9 percent notes payable maturing in July 19X6.
Case B: Laws Prohibit the Transfer of Funds
55-19 A foreign subsidiary
of the Entity negotiates a financing agreement with
its local bank in December 19X5. Funds are available
to the subsidiary for its unrestricted use,
including loans to affiliated entities; other terms
are identical to those cited in Case A. Local laws
prohibit the transfer of funds outside the
country.
55-20 The requirement of
paragraph 470-10-45-14(b)(1) is met because
compliance with the provisions of the agreement is
objectively determinable or measurable. Because of
the laws prohibiting the transfer of funds, however,
the proceeds from borrowings under the agreement are
not available for liquidation of the debt maturing
in February and July 19X6. Accordingly, both the 6
percent debt maturing in February 19X6 and the 9
percent notes payable maturing in July 19X6 would be
classified as current liabilities.
Case D: Revolving Credit Agreement
55-25 In December 19X5 the
Entity negotiates a revolving credit agreement
providing for unrestricted borrowings up to
$10,000,000. Borrowings will bear interest at 1
percent over the prevailing prime rate of the bank
with which the agreement is arranged but in any
event not less than 8 percent, will have stated
maturities of 90 days, and will be continuously
renewable for 90-day periods at the Entity’s option
for 3 years provided there is compliance with the
terms of the agreement. Provisions of the agreement
are similar to those cited in paragraph
470-10-55-16(d). Further, the Entity intends to
renew obligations incurred under the agreement for a
period extending beyond one year from the balance
sheet date. There are no outstanding borrowings
under the agreement at December 31, 19X5.
55-26 In this instance,
the long-term debt maturing in February 19X6 and the
9 percent notes payable maturing in July 19X6 would
be excluded from current liabilities because the
Entity consummated a financing agreement meeting the
conditions set forth in paragraph 470-10-45-14(b)
before the issuance of the balance sheet.
Case E: Revolving Credit Agreement
With Borrowing Limits
55-27 Assume that the
agreement cited in Case D included an additional
provision limiting the amount to be borrowed by the
Entity to the amount of its inventory, which is
pledged as collateral and is expected to range
between a high of $8,000,000 during the second
quarter of 19X6 and a low of $4,000,000 during the
fourth quarter of 19X6.
55-28 The terms of the
agreement comply with the conditions required by
this Subtopic; however, because the minimum amount
expected to be available from February to December
19X6 is $4,000,000, only that amount of short-term
obligations can be excluded from current liabilities
(see paragraphs 470-10-45-16 through 45-19). Whether
the obligation to be excluded is a portion of the
currently maturing long-term debt or some portions
of both it and the 9 percent notes payable depends
on the intended timing of the borrowing.
55-29 If the Entity
intended to refinance only the 9 percent notes
payable due July 19X6 and the amount of its
inventory is expected to reach a low of
approximately $2,000,000 during the second quarter
of 19X6 but be at least $3,000,000 in July 19X6 and
thereafter during 19X6, the $3,000,000 9 percent
notes payable would be excluded from current
liabilities at December 31, 19X5 (see paragraphs
470-10-45-16 through 45-19).
Cases A, B, D, and E in Example 4 in ASC 470-10-55-16 through 55-20 and ASC
470-10-55-25 through 55-29 illustrate the application of the guidance on
financing agreements in ASC 470-10-25-14(b) (see Section 13.7.4). The assumptions in ASC 470-10-55-14 and
55-15 (see Section 13.7.6.2) apply to these cases. Further, Cases B and
E illustrate the application of the guidance on the limits on the amount
that can be classified as noncurrent when the amount available under the
financing agreement is subject to transfer restrictions or fluctuates (see
Section 13.7.4.3).
13.7.6.5 Financing Agreements Related to Long-Term Construction Projects
ASC 470-10
Example 4: Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt
and Notes Payable to Be Refinanced
Case F: Commercial Paper Refinancing
55-30 In lieu of the facts
given in paragraph 470-10-55-15(c) through (d),
assume that during 19X5 the Entity entered into a
contract to have a warehouse built. The warehouse is
expected to be financed by issuance of the Entity’s
commercial paper. In addition, the Entity negotiated
a standby agreement with a commercial bank that
provides for maximum borrowings equal to the
expected cost of the warehouse, which will be
pledged as collateral. The agreement also requires
that the proceeds from the sale of commercial paper
be used to pay construction costs. Borrowings may be
made under the agreement only if the Entity is
unable to issue new commercial paper. The proceeds
of borrowings must be used to retire outstanding
commercial paper and to liquidate additional
liabilities incurred in the construction of the
warehouse. At December 31, 19X5, the Entity has
$7,000,000 of commercial paper outstanding and
$1,000,000 of unpaid construction costs resulting
from a progress billing through December 31.
55-31 Because the
commercial paper will be refinanced on a long-term
basis, either by uninterrupted renewal or, failing
that, by a borrowing under the agreement, the
commercial paper would be excluded from current
liabilities. The $1,000,000 liability for the unpaid
progress billing results from the construction of a
noncurrent asset and will be refinanced on the same
basis as the commercial paper and, therefore, it
would also be excluded from current liabilities (see
paragraph 470-10-45-13).
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins
SAB Topic 6.H.2, Classification of
Short-Term Obligations — Debt Related to Long-Term
Projects
[Reproduced in ASC
470-10-S99-3]
Facts: Companies engaging in
significant long-term construction programs
frequently arrange for revolving cover loans which
extend until the completion of long-term
construction projects. Such revolving cover loans
are typically arranged with substantial financial
institutions and typically have the following
characteristics:
-
A firm long-term mortgage commitment is obtained for each project.
-
Interest rates and terms are in line with the company’s normal borrowing arrangements.
-
Amounts are equal to the expected full mortgage amount of all projects.
-
The company may draw down funds at its option up to the maximum amount of the agreement.
-
The company uses short-term interim construction financing (commercial paper, bank loans, etc.) against the revolving cover loan. Such indebtedness is rolled over or drawn down on the revolving cover loan at the company’s option. The company typically has regular bank lines of credit, but these generally are not legally enforceable.
Question: Under FASB ASC
Subtopic 470-10, Debt — Overall, will the
classification of loans such as described above as
long-term be acceptable?
Interpretive Response: Where
such conditions exist providing for a firm
commitment throughout the construction program as
well as a firm commitment for permanent mortgage
financing, and where there are no contingencies
other than the completion of construction, the
guideline criteria are met and the borrowing under
such a program should be classified as long-term
with appropriate disclosure.
Case F in Example 4 in ASC 470-10-55-30 and 55-31 and SAB Topic 6.H.2
illustrate the application of the guidance on financing agreements in ASC
470-10-25-14(b) (see Section 13.7.4)
to scenarios that involve short-term interim financing to fund long-term
construction projects. The assumptions in ASC 470-10-55-14 and 55-15 (see
Section 13.7.6.2) apply to Case F
except as specified in ASC 470-10-55-30.
This guidance illustrates that a short-term interim financing (e.g.,
commercial paper, bank loans) can be classified as noncurrent if a financing
agreement (e.g., a firm, revolving long-term mortgage commitment for the
construction project) meets the conditions in ASC 470-10-45-14(b). The fact
that the financing agreement is contingent on the completion of construction
is not relevant.
13.7.6.6 Balance Sheet Presentation
ASC 470-10
Example 4: Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt
and Notes Payable to Be Refinanced
Case G: Balance Sheet Presentation
55-32 The following are
two methods of presenting liabilities in Entity A’s
balance sheet at December 31, 19X5, assuming the
Entity intends to refinance the 6 percent debt
maturing in February 19X6 and the 9 percent notes
payable maturing in July 19X6 but has not met the
conditions required by this Subtopic to exclude
those obligations from current liabilities.
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Case G in Example 4 in ASC 470-10-55-32 illustrates the appropriate balance
sheet presentation based on the assumptions in ASC 470-10-55-14 and 55-15
(see Section 13.7.6.2).