4.1 Classification
4.1.1 Overview
ASC
480-10 — Glossary
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial
Instrument
Any of various
financial instruments issued in the form of shares that
embody an unconditional obligation requiring the issuer
to redeem the instrument by transferring its assets at a
specified or determinable date (or dates) or upon an
event that is certain to occur.
ASC
480-10
25-4 A mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument shall be classified as a liability
unless the redemption is required to occur only upon the
liquidation or termination of the reporting
entity.
25-6 In determining if an
instrument is mandatorily redeemable, all terms within a
redeemable instrument shall be considered. The following
items do not affect the classification of a mandatorily
redeemable financial instrument as a liability:
- A term extension option
- A provision that defers redemption until a specified liquidity level is reached
- A similar provision that may delay or accelerate the timing of a mandatory redemption.
25-7 If a financial
instrument will be redeemed only upon the occurrence of
a conditional event, redemption of that instrument is
conditional and, therefore, the instrument does not meet
the definition of mandatorily redeemable financial
instrument in this Subtopic. . . .
55-3
Various financial instruments issued in the form of
shares embody unconditional obligations of the issuer to
redeem the instruments by transferring its assets at a
specified or determinable date or dates or upon an event
that is certain to occur.
55-4 This Section presents two
examples of mandatorily redeemable financial
instruments:
- Certain forms of trust-preferred securities (those that are required to be redeemed at specified or determinable dates)
- Stock that must be redeemed upon the death or termination of the individual who holds it, which is an event that is certain to occur.
55-5 Although some mandatorily
redeemable instruments are issued in the form of shares,
those instruments are classified as liabilities under
this Subtopic because of the embodied obligation on the
part of the issuer to transfer its assets.
To meet ASC 480’s definition of a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument, the instrument must have all of the following
characteristics:
-
Its legal form must be a share (see Section 4.1.2).
-
It must embody an unconditional obligation of the issuer to redeem the instrument at a specified or determinable date (or dates) or upon an event that is certain to occur (i.e., redemption is certain to occur in the absence of a breach of the instrument’s contractual terms — see Section 4.1.3).
-
The issuer must be required to satisfy the obligation by transferring its assets (see Section 4.1.4).
There are several exceptions in ASC 480 to the requirement to
classify instruments that meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument as liabilities. See the discussion in Section 4.1.5.
4.1.2 Legal Form of a Share
ASC
480-10 — Glossary
Shares
Shares includes various forms of ownership that may not
take the legal form of securities (for example,
partnership interests), as well as other interests,
including those that are liabilities in substance but
not in form. (Business entities have interest holders
that are commonly known by specialized names, such as
stockholders, partners, and proprietors, and by more
general names, such as investors, but all are
encompassed by the descriptive term owners. Equity of
business entities is, thus, commonly known by several
names, such as owners’ equity, stockholders’ equity,
ownership, equity capital, partners’ capital, and
proprietorship. Some entities [for example, mutual
organizations] do not have stockholders, partners, or
proprietors in the usual sense of those terms but do
have participants whose interests are essentially
ownership interests, residual interests, or
both.)
The term “mandatorily redeemable financial instrument” is
limited to financial instruments “in the form of shares.” In this context,
shares include not just equity securities (including both common and preferred
stock). Rather, the term applies broadly to ownership interests in various
forms, including shares of stock not in the form of securities, partnership
interests (including general partnership interests and limited partnership
interests), membership interests (or units) in limited liability companies or
cooperative entities, and policyholder interests in mutual insurance companies.
However, financial instruments in the legal form of debt are outside the scope
of ASC 480 (see Section
2.2.4).
The following table lists
examples of instruments that, unless a legal analysis of their form suggests
otherwise, would and would not be considered shares under ASC 480:
Share | Not a
Share |
---|---|
|
|
4.1.3 Unconditional Redemption Obligation
To meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial
instrument, the instrument must embody an unconditional redemption obligation.
An obligation involves a duty or responsibility to perform (see Section 2.2.1). A
redemption obligation is unconditional if redemption is certain to occur in the
absence of a violation of the contractual terms. Neither the issuer nor the
holder can have the unilateral discretion to avoid redemption except by both
parties’ consent (i.e., they mutually agree to modify the terms). Accordingly, a
share that is redeemable at the option of either the issuer or the holder, or
whose redemption is contingent upon the occurrence or nonoccurrence of an
uncertain future event, does not meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument before the option is exercised or the event occurs, because
such an obligation is conditional. Likewise, a share that could be redeemed at
the option of the holder or upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is
outside the control of the issuer or holder does not meet the definition of a
mandatorily redeemable financial instrument.
As discussed in Section 6.2.6, an outstanding share that
embodies an unconditional obligation should be evaluated as a variable-share
obligation under ASC 480-10-25-14 rather than as a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument under ASC 480-10-25-4 if the issuer has a choice of
settling the obligation by either transferring assets or delivering a variable
number of nonredeemable shares of equal value.
If an instrument with a mandatory redemption date contains
contractual features that have the effect of making redemption conditional, the
instrument would not meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial
instrument in ASC 480-10-20 because redemption is not certain to occur.
Example 4-1
Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Shares
An equity share with a fixed redemption date includes an embedded option that
permits the holder to convert the entire instrument into
a fixed number of equity shares before the stated
redemption date. The conversion feature is substantive.
Because the holder may elect to convert the instrument
into equity shares rather than hold it until redemption,
redemption is conditional on the holder’s not
converting.
Accordingly, a fixed-term instrument that is convertible into
the issuer’s shares of stock would not meet the definition of a mandatorily
redeemable financial instrument in ASC 480-10-20 unless (1) the conversion
option has expired, (2) the conversion option is nonsubstantive (see Section 3.2), (3) the
shares that would be delivered upon conversion contain an unconditional
redemption obligation, or (4) the issuer is required to settle all or part of
the instrument in cash or other assets upon conversion (e.g., it must settle the
stated amount, or par, in cash).
In evaluating whether an instrument meets the definition of a
mandatorily redeemable financial instrument, the issuer does not consider
redemption obligations accounted for as freestanding instruments that are
separate from the instrument being evaluated. For example, a perpetual share
that is issued along with a forward contract that requires the issuer to
repurchase a similar share for cash on a specified date would not be viewed as
embodying a redemption obligation as long as the contracts are two separate
freestanding financial instruments (see Section 3.3).
A redemption obligation does not have to be for a fixed amount
to qualify as unconditional. For example, the amount of the redemption
obligation might be for the current fair value of the share or a participating
interest in the issuer’s net assets, or it may vary on the basis of a specified
underlying (e.g., the S&P 500). Further, the timing of redemption does not
have to be fixed if redemption is certain to occur at some point (e.g., upon an
event that is certain to occur at an unknown time).
In determining whether a redemption obligation is unconditional,
an entity does not consider the likelihood of redemption (although the
likelihood that a term will be triggered might affect an evaluation of whether
the term is substantive; see Section 3.2). For example, a high probability that the issuer
will be unable to satisfy a contractually unconditional redemption obligation
(e.g., because of a lack of funds) does not make that obligation conditional.
Conversely, a high probability that an instrument will be redeemed (e.g.,
because of an economic incentive to redeem the instrument) does not make a
conditional redemption obligation unconditional (see Section 2.2.1).
The following table contains
examples of terms and conditions that would be considered unconditional
redemption obligations and those that would not:
Unconditional Redemption Obligations | Not
Unconditional Redemption Obligations |
---|---|
|
|
If the redemption obligation in an outstanding share is
conditional, an issuer that applies SEC guidance should consider whether it must
classify the instrument in temporary equity (see Chapter 9).
4.1.4 Transfer of Cash or Other Assets
As defined, mandatorily redeemable financial instruments are
limited to instruments that the issuer must settle in its assets (e.g., cash or
investments in debt or equity securities issued by third parties). An instrument
that does not involve a future transfer of assets (e.g., a prepaid obligation)
does not meet this definition. Further, an instrument that the issuer must
settle by providing services (e.g., an obligation to repurchase shares in
exchange for services) would not meet the definition and would be outside the
scope of ASC 480 (see Section
2.2.2).
Although the issuer’s equity shares are assets of its
shareholders, they are not the issuer’s assets. Accordingly, an instrument that
the issuer must or may settle in its equity shares would not qualify as a
mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. However, an entity should evaluate
whether ASC 480-20-25-14 requires such an instrument to be classified outside of
equity (see Chapter
6). For example, under that guidance, an issuer would classify as
a liability a share that it must settle in a variable number of its equity
shares worth a fixed monetary amount known at inception (e.g., a preferred share
that is mandatorily convertible in a variable number of common shares worth a
fixed monetary amount). A share that the issuer must “redeem” on a specified
date by delivering a fixed number of the issuer’s equity shares would not meet
the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument because the
transfer of cash or other assets is not involved. Further, because the delivery
of a variable number of shares is not involved, the issuer would not be required
to classify the share as a liability under ASC 480-10-25-14.
Regardless of their classification in the subsidiary’s separate
financial statements, shares issued by a parent and held by its subsidiary would
be considered assets in the evaluation of whether ASC 480 applies in the
subsidiary’s separate financial statements.
Example 4-2
Shares Issued by a Subsidiary That Are Mandatorily
Convertible Into Parent Shares
Subsidiary S issues a preferred share that is mandatorily convertible into a
fixed number of common shares issued by its parent on a
specified date. In its separate financial statements, S
would treat any held shares issued by Parent P as assets
when applying ASC 480. Therefore, in S’s separate
financial statements, the mandatorily convertible
preferred shares may meet the definition of a
mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. In P’s
consolidated financial statements, however, common
shares issued by P are not assets but are considered the
issuer’s equity shares. Therefore, in P’s consolidated
financial statements, the mandatorily convertible
preferred share issued by S is outside the scope of ASC
480.
Although the guidance in ASC 480-10-S99-3A on temporary equity
classification contains an exception for certain contracts for which redemption
will be funded by an insurance policy (see Section 9.4.3), there is no similar
exception from the liability classification guidance in ASC 480 for such
contracts. An instrument that must be redeemed for cash or other assets upon the
death of the holder must be classified as a liability even if the issuer has an
insurance contract to cover the cost of redemption (see ASC 480-10-55-64).
The following table contains
examples of obligations to transfer cash or other assets:
Future Transfer of Cash or Other Assets | Not a
Future Transfer of Cash or Other Assets |
---|---|
|
|
4.1.5 Exceptions
4.1.5.1 Overview
There are several exceptions to the liability classification
requirement for instruments that meet the definition of a mandatorily
redeemable financial instrument. Those exceptions apply to:
- Shares that are mandatorily redeemable only upon the liquidation or termination of the reporting entity (see Section 4.1.5.2).
- Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests that are redeemable only upon the liquidation or termination of the subsidiary (see Section 4.1.5.3). (For other mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests that were issued before November 5, 2003, the classification provisions in ASC 480 apply, but not the measurement provisions.)
- Mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities that are not SEC registrants unless they are mandatorily redeemable on fixed dates for amounts that are either fixed or are determined by reference to an external index (e.g., an interest rate index or currency index) (see Section 4.1.5.4).
The table below summarizes
the various exceptions to the requirement to apply the guidance in ASC 480
to instruments that meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument:
Affected Entities
|
Affected Instruments
|
Guidance in ASC 480 That Does Not
Apply
|
Guidance in ASC 480 That Applies
|
---|---|---|---|
All entities | Shares that are mandatorily redeemable only upon
the liquidation or termination of the reporting
entity |
|
|
Parents preparing consolidated
financial statements | Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests
that are redeemable only upon the liquidation or
termination of the subsidiary |
|
|
Other mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling
interests that were issued before November 5,
2003 |
|
| |
Subsidiaries preparing stand-alone financial
statements | Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests
that were issued before November 5, 2003 |
|
|
Nonpublic entities that are not SEC
registrants | Mandatorily redeemable financial instruments other
than those that are mandatorily redeemable on fixed
dates for amounts that are either fixed or
determined by reference to an interest rate index,
currency index, or another external
index |
|
|
If a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument qualifies
for one of the exceptions in ASC 480, the issuer should consider the
applicability of ASC 480-10-S99-3A to that instrument. That guidance
requires SEC registrants to classify certain redeemable securities in
temporary equity (see Chapter 9). In prepared remarks at the 2003 AICPA Conference on
Current SEC Developments, then SEC Professional Accounting Fellow Gregory
Faucette stated the following:
Entities with instruments that qualify for [the
scope exceptions in ASC 480-10-15-7A through 15-15F] should refer to
[ASC 480-10-S99-3A] for guidance related to classification and/or
measurement, as applicable, for those securities that . . . will not
be fully accounted for in accordance with [ASC 480]. In other words,
if both the classification and measurement guidance in [ASC 480 is
inapplicable] for an instrument, look to [ASC 480-10-S99-3A] for
both classification and measurement guidance. If only the
measurement guidance in [ASC 480 is inapplicable] for an instrument,
look to [ASC 480-10-S99-3A] for continued measurement guidance.
4.1.5.2 Only-Upon-Liquidation Exception
ASC 480-10
25-4 A mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument shall be classified as a
liability unless the redemption is required to occur
only upon the liquidation or termination of the
reporting entity.
Certain entities such as partnerships, limited liability
companies, or trusts that are set up for a specific project or purpose may
have a finite life. Their governing documents (e.g., partnership agreement
or articles of organization) may specify a date (e.g., December 31, 2199) on
which they will be terminated and on which their assets will be liquidated,
their liabilities will be settled, and any remaining cash will be
distributed to holders of their equity interests. When such entities issue
equity interests, redemption is certain to occur. Therefore, while those
interests meet the definition in ASC 480-10-20 of a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument, they do not require classification as liabilities in
accordance with ASC 480-10-25-4.
In consolidated financial statements, a similar exception
applies to instruments that are mandatorily redeemable upon the liquidation
or termination of a subsidiary. In accordance with ASC 480-10-15-7E, such
instruments are not classified as liabilities under ASC 480 even if they
meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument.
If a finite-life entity issues an instrument that is
mandatorily redeemable either upon the scheduled liquidation or termination
of the reporting entity or upon an event that is certain to occur (e.g., the
holder’s death), the only-upon-liquidation exception to liability
classification is available if the event that would trigger redemption is
not certain to occur before the entity’s scheduled liquidation or
termination. In such a scenario, the potential requirement to redeem before
the entity’s liquidation or dissolution represents a conditional obligation
because the event that triggers it is not certain to occur before the
entity’s scheduled liquidation or dissolution. Even though the instrument is
certain to be redeemed, it is possible that redemption will be required only
upon the entity’s liquidation or dissolution, in which case the
only-upon-liquidation exception is available.
4.1.5.3 Noncontrolling Interest Exception
ASC 480-10
15-7E The guidance in this
Subtopic does not apply to mandatorily redeemable
noncontrolling interests (of all entities, public
and nonpublic) as follows:
- The classification and measurement provisions of this Subtopic do not apply to mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests that would not have to be classified as liabilities by the subsidiary, under the only upon liquidation exception in paragraphs 480-10-25-4 and 480-10-25-6, but would be classified as liabilities by the parent in consolidated financial statements.
- The measurement provisions of this Subtopic do not apply to other mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests that were issued before November 5, 2003, both for the parent in consolidated financial statements and for the subsidiary that issued the instruments that result in the mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interest. For those instruments, the measurement guidance for redeemable shares and noncontrolling interests in other predecessor literature (for example, in paragraph 480-10-S99-3A) continues to apply.
15-7F All public entities as
well as nonpublic entities that are SEC registrants
with mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests
subject to the classification and measurement scope
exception in paragraph 480-10-15-7E are required to
follow the disclosure requirements in paragraphs
480-10-50-1 through 50-3 as well as disclosures
required by other applicable guidance.
480-10 — Glossary
Noncontrolling
Interest
The portion of equity (net assets)
in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or
indirectly, to a parent. A noncontrolling interest
is sometimes called a minority interest.
In consolidated financial statements, instruments that are
mandatorily redeemable only upon the liquidation or termination of a
subsidiary (e.g., noncontrolling interests in limited-life subsidiaries) are
not required to be classified as liabilities, even if they meet the
definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Further, such
instruments are exempt from the measurement guidance in ASC 480, although
its disclosure requirements apply. In evaluating whether the scope exception
in ASC 480-10-15-7E applies to situations in which the subsidiary does not
meet the definition of a business, an entity should carefully consider the
substance of the arrangement. If the subsidiary is not a substantive entity,
the scope exception does not apply. This conclusion is consistent with
analogous guidance in ASC 815-40-15-5C (see Section 2.6.1 of Deloitte’s Roadmap
Contracts on an
Entity’s Own Equity) as well as ASC 810-10-40-3A. For
example, a subsidiary would not be considered a substantive entity if it was
structured to circumvent the mandatorily redeemable guidance in ASC 480.
If a noncontrolling interest in an entity that does not have
a limited life qualifies as a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument
under ASC 480, the entity is subject to all of the requirements of ASC 480
unless the nonpublic entity exception applies or the interest is
grandfathered. Under ASC 480-10-15-7E(b), mandatorily redeemable
noncontrolling interests are grandfathered out of ASC 480’s measurement
provisions if the interests were issued before November 5, 2003. This
applies both in the parent’s consolidated financial statements and in the
financial statements of the subsidiary that issued the instrument. The
classification and disclosure provisions of ASC 480 apply to such
instruments.
4.1.5.4 Exception for Certain Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities
ASC 480-10
15-7A The classification,
measurement, and disclosure guidance in this
Subtopic does not apply to mandatorily redeemable
financial instruments that meet both of the
following:
- They are issued by nonpublic entities that are not Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registrants.
- They are mandatorily redeemable, but not on fixed dates or not for amounts that either are fixed or are determined by reference to an interest rate index, currency index, or another external index.
15-7B Mandatorily redeemable
financial instruments issued by an SEC registrant
are not eligible for the scope exception in
paragraph 480-10-15-7A, even if the entity meets the
definition of a nonpublic entity.
15-7C Some entities have
issued shares that are required to be redeemed under
related agreements. If the shares are issued with a
redemption agreement and the required redemption
relates to those specific underlying shares, the
shares are mandatorily redeemable. If an entity with
such shares and redemption agreement is a nonpublic
entity that is not an SEC registrant, those
mandatorily redeemable shares meet the scope
exception in paragraph 480-10-15-7A if they meet the
conditions specified in that paragraph.
15-7D Although the disclosure
requirements of this Subtopic do not apply for those
mandatorily redeemable instruments of certain
nonpublic companies that meet the scope exception in
paragraph 480-10-15-7A, the requirements of Subtopic
505-10 still apply. In particular, paragraph
505-10-50-3 requires information about the pertinent
rights and privileges of the various securities
outstanding, which includes mandatory redemption
requirements. Paragraph 505-10-50-11 also requires
disclosure of the amount of redemption requirements
for all issues of stock that are redeemable at fixed
or determinable prices on fixed or determinable
dates in each of the next five years.
ASC 480-10 — Glossary
Securities and Exchange
Commission Registrant
An entity (or an entity that is controlled by an
entity) that meets any of the following criteria:
- It has issued or will issue debt or equity securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets).
- It is required to file financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
- It provides financial statements for the purpose of issuing any class of securities in a public market.
ASC Master Glossary
Nonpublic Entity
Any entity other than one that
meets any of the following criteria:
- Has equity securities that trade in a public market either on a stock exchange (domestic or foreign) or in an over-the-counter market, including securities quoted only locally or regionally
- Makes a filing with a regulatory agency in preparation for the sale of any class of equity securities in a public market
- Is controlled by an entity covered by the preceding criteria.
An entity that has only
debt securities trading in a public market (or that
has made a filing with a regulatory agency in
preparation to trade only debt securities) is a
nonpublic entity.
For nonpublic entities that are not SEC registrants, ASC 480
does not apply to mandatorily redeemable financial instruments other than
those that are mandatorily redeemable on fixed dates for amounts that either
are fixed or are determined by reference to an interest rate index, currency
index, or another external index. For example, if a nonpublic entity has
outstanding shares that are mandatorily redeemable for cash upon the death
of the holder, those shares would not be accounted for as liabilities under
ASC 480, even if they meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument, because the redemption date is not fixed. Similarly,
if the shares of a nonpublic entity are mandatorily redeemable at the
appraised value or fair value of the holder’s interest in the net assets of
the entity, those shares would not be classified as liabilities under ASC
480, because the redemption amount is neither fixed nor determined on the
basis of an external index.
The following table
illustrates whether ASC 480 does or does not apply to a mandatorily
redeemable financial instrument issued by a nonpublic entity that is not an
SEC registrant:
Redemption Terms | Fixed Date | Variable Date |
---|---|---|
Fixed amount | Yes | No |
Amount determined by reference to an interest rate
index, currency index, or another external
index | Yes | No |
Other variable amounts | No | No |
ASC 480-10-15-7D notes that in accordance with ASC
505-10-50-3 and ASC 505-10-50-11, a nonpublic entity that is not an SEC
registrant that has issued securities to which the exception applies is
required to disclose (1) “information about the pertinent rights and
privileges of the various securities outstanding, which includes mandatory
redemption requirements” and (2) “the amount of redemption requirements for
all issues of stock that are redeemable at fixed or determinable prices on
fixed or determinable dates in each of the next five years.”
To be eligible for the exception in ASC 480-10-15-7A, the
issuer must be a nonpublic entity that is not an SEC registrant. In the
application of ASC 480, a nonpublic entity is an “entity that has only debt
securities trading in a public market (or that has made a filing with a
regulatory agency in preparation to trade only debt securities).” However,
according to ASC 480-10-20, an entity is an SEC registrant if it has debt
securities trading in a public market (or will issue such securities).
Therefore, an entity that has issued either debt or equity securities
trading in a public market, or is in the process of issuing such securities,
is not eligible for the exception.
Broker-dealers that are required to file financial
statements with the SEC are not eligible for the exception for nonpublic
entities that are not SEC registrants, even if they do not issue publicly
traded stock or debt. In prepared remarks at the 2003 AICPA Conference on Current SEC
Developments, Mr. Faucette stated the following:
[S]ome broker-dealers have asserted that they
should be eligible for the [exceptions] for mandatorily redeemable
financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities . . . . However,
certain nonpublic entities are defined as entities other than SEC
registrants. The definition of an SEC registrant . . . includes
entities that are required to file financial statements with the
SEC. Thus, the definition of an SEC registrant includes any
broker-dealer that is required to file financial statements with the
SEC, even if they do not issue publicly-traded stock or debt.
Therefore, we believe that any broker-dealer that files statements
with the SEC is not eligible for the additional
[exceptions].
If a nonpublic entity that is not an SEC registrant
subsequently becomes an SEC registrant, the entity applies ASC 480 as if it
were an SEC registrant for all periods presented. In such a scenario, the
exception to some of the requirements in ASC 480 for nonpublic entities is
not available for any period presented. The SEC staff communicated its view
on this matter at the AICPA SEC Regulations Committee meeting on April 8,
2004, which is described in the highlights of that meeting:
An entity is generally no longer eligible for the
nonpublic company treatment alternatives when it is in the process
of becoming a public entity. Such entities must comply with public
company treatment alternatives in the standard as of the date that
all public companies were required to adopt the standard, even if
that requires a company that is in the process of filing an IPO to
restate prior period financial statements.