1.6 Scope
ASC 280-10
15-2 The guidance in the Segment Reporting Topic applies to all public entities, with certain exceptions noted
below. Entities other than public entities are also encouraged to provide the disclosures described in this
Subtopic.
15-3 The guidance in this Subtopic does not apply to the following entities:
- Parent entities, subsidiaries, joint ventures, or investees accounted for by the equity method if those entities’ separate company statements also are consolidated or combined in a complete set of financial statements and both the separate company statements and the consolidated or combined statements are included in the same financial report. However, this Subtopic does apply to those entities if they are public entities and their financial statements are issued separately.
- Not-for-profit entities (regardless of whether the entity meets the definition of a public entity as defined above).
- Nonpublic entities.
ASC 280-10-20 defines a public entity as follows:
A business entity or a not-for-profit entity that meets any
of the following conditions:
-
It has issued debt or equity securities or is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets).
-
It is required to file financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
-
It provides financial statements for the purpose of issuing any class of securities in a public market.
Throughout this Roadmap, the terms “entities” and “public entities” are used
interchangeably to refer to public entities that are within the scope of ASC 280,
including entities that are preparing for the sale of securities in a public market,
such as in an initial public offering (see Section 1.3 of Deloitte’s Roadmap Initial Public
Offerings), and broker-dealers.
While only public entities as defined in ASC 280 must provide the segment
disclosures required by ASC 280, nonpublic and not-for-profit entities are not
precluded from providing them; in fact, ASC 280-10-15-2 states that all entities are
encouraged to do so. In addition, as discussed in Section 1.6.5, entities with recognized goodwill
may need to consider certain elements of ASC 280 when testing goodwill for
impairment under ASC 350.
1.6.1 Financial Statements of Entities With Publicly Traded Debt Only or Conduit Bond Obligors
The requirement to provide segment disclosures is not limited to entities with
publicly traded equity securities. ASC 280-10-15-2 notes that the guidance in
ASC 280 applies to all public entities, which ASC 280-10-20 defines in part as
those entities that have “issued debt or equity securities or [are] conduit bond
obligor[s] for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market.”
Therefore, such entities would need to consider the segment disclosure
requirements in ASC 280.
Example 1-2
Company A is a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of a Japan-domiciled entity. Company A does not have any public
equity that is traded in a public market. However, A has medium-term notes that are traded on the New York
Stock Exchange. Because A has debt securities that are traded in a public market, A is required to present
segment information in accordance with ASC 280 when preparing financial statements that comply with U.S.
GAAP.
1.6.2 Segment Disclosures in Financial Statements of Businesses Acquired or to Be Acquired
ASC 280-10-15-2 limits the requirement to disclose segment information to
“public entities” as that term is defined in ASC 280. Financial statements that
are furnished in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-05 or Rule 3-14, are
not required to include segment information unless the business itself is a
public entity.
Example 1-3
Company C has no publicly traded equity or debt securities and is not providing
financial statements to issue any class of securities in
a public market. In addition, C is not required to file
its financial statements with the SEC. Company C has
been acquired by Company D, which is required to file
financial statements with the SEC because its equity
securities are publicly traded. Company C meets the
significance tests in Regulation S-X, Rule 3-05;
therefore, D is required to include C’s financial
statements in D’s Form 8-K to report the
acquisition.
Because C does not meet the definition of a public entity, it is not required
under ASC 280 to provide segment disclosures in the
financial statements included in D’s Form 8-K.
1.6.3 Separate Financial Statements Included in an SEC Filing
ASC 280-10-15-3 excludes “[p]arent entities, subsidiaries, joint ventures, or
investees accounted for by the equity method if those entities’ separate company
statements also are consolidated or combined in a complete set of financial
statements and both the separate company statements and the consolidated or
combined statements are included in the same financial report.” Accordingly,
equity method investees whose financial statements are included in a
registrant’s filing under SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-09, are not required to
include segment information in the filing unless the equity method investee
itself is a public entity.
Example 1-4
Company E has a nonpublic equity method
investee, Company F, which is significant under
Regulation S-X, Rule 3-09, and is not an SEC filer.
Company F’s financial statements are included in E’s
annual report only because of its significance under
Regulation S-X, Rule 3-09.
Because F does not meet the definition of a public
entity, it is not required under ASC 280 to provide
segment disclosures in its financial statements that are
included in E’s annual report.
1.6.4 Competitive Harm
While some respondents to the exposure draft of FASB Statement 131 noted the
potential for competitive harm as a result of disclosing segment information,
the Board decided that a competitive harm exemption was inappropriate “because
it would provide a means for broad noncompliance.” Accordingly, all provisions
of ASC 280 apply to entities that are within its scope. Observations about the
absence of any competitive harm considerations in ASC 280 were made at the 2015
AICPA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments by Wesley R. Bricker,
then deputy chief accountant in the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA),
whose prepared remarks stated the following:
Some registrants have contended in their consultations,
including on segment reporting, that they should not be required to apply a
GAAP standard because the result would be “competitively harmful” or
“misleading.” These arguments are troubling, since they disregard the
thoughtful balance taken by the accounting standard setters in crafting
reporting standards that provide transparent, useful information to
investors. A better approach starts with identifying what information is
useful to investors, why, and how that information can be appropriately
reported.
1.6.5 Considerations for Entities That Are Not Within the Scope of ASC 280
Entities that are not within the scope of ASC 280 but have
goodwill balances that must be tested for impairment will need to consider the
portions of ASC 280 related to the identification of operating segments unless
the entities (1) are eligible for and have elected the alternative accounting
for the subsequent measurement of goodwill outlined in ASC 350-20-35-62 through
35-82 and (2) elect an accounting policy to test goodwill for impairment at the
entity level, as discussed in ASC 350-20-35-65. See Chapter 3 of Deloitte’s Roadmap Goodwill for a
discussion of goodwill accounting alternatives for private companies and
not-for-profit entities.