6.2 Significant Segment Expenses
ASC 280-10
Pending Content (Transition Guidance: ASC
280-10-65-1)
50-26A A public entity shall
disclose for each reportable segment the
significant expense categories and amounts that
are regularly provided to the chief operating
decision maker and included in reported segment
profit or loss. When determining the segment
expense categories and amounts that shall be
disclosed, a public entity shall first identify
the expenses from the segment level information
that is regularly provided to the chief operating
decision maker and then disclose those segment
expense categories and amounts that are
significant. A public entity shall consider
relevant qualitative and quantitative factors when
determining whether segment expense categories and
amounts are significant. When applying this
guidance, a public entity shall evaluate for
disclosure a segment expense that is regularly
provided to the chief operating decision maker as
well as a segment expense that is easily
computable from information that is regularly
provided to the chief operating decision maker.
Paragraphs 280-10-55-15A through 55-15B provide
additional guidance on determining whether segment
expense amounts can be easily computed for
purposes of applying the guidance in this
paragraph.
For each reportable segment, ASU
2023-07 requires entities to disclose, on an interim and annual basis, those
expenses that are (1) considered significant, including categories of expense and
amounts; (2) regularly provided to the CODM; and (3) included in each reported
measure of segment P&L.
The Board’s decision to introduce a requirement to disclose significant segment
expense information is the result of feedback provided by stakeholders, who have
requested more detailed expense information at the segment level. In addition, as
noted in paragraph BC21 of the ASU, the disclosure of “[a]dditional expense
information [will help] investors better assess financial trends, perform more
precise financial modeling when forecasting the components of an individual
segment’s profit or loss, [and make an overall evaluation of] an entity’s business
activities.” In addition, some investors noted “that understanding the composition
of an entity’s expenses at the segment level and how the related amounts vary over
time [may help them recognize] when major changes have occurred within the
business.” This is further indicative of the ASU’s main purpose, which is to provide
investors with additional segment information to (1) “better understand an entity’s
overall performance” and (2) help them assess “potential future cash flows.”
ASU 2023-07 defines significant segment expenses as expenses that are regularly
provided to the CODM and included within each reported measure of segment profit or
loss, collectively referred to as the ”significant expense principle.” For each
reportable segment, entities are required to disclose, on an annual and interim
basis, the significant expense categories and amounts for such expenses. The ASU
focuses on the disclosure of information that is regularly provided to the CODM,
even if it is not regularly reviewed by the CODM.
In a manner consistent with ASC 280, the identification of segment
expenses by reportable segment is based on the management approach and, therefore,
requires that the segment expenses be regularly provided to the CODM. Significant
segment expense amounts will not necessarily tie to or be the same as the expense
amounts and captions identified on the face of the income statement in accordance
with U.S. GAAP.
Connecting the Dots
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, which requires public
business entities to (1) disaggregate any relevant expense caption presented
on the face of the income statement within continuing operations into five
specified natural expense categories, as applicable, in disclosures within
the footnotes to the financial statements and (2) disclose selling expenses
and other items. ASU 2024-03 differs from ASC 280, which requires entities
to use a management approach. For more information about ASU 2024-03, see
Deloitte's November 8, 2024, Heads
Up.
Before the adoption of ASC 2023-07, ASC 280-10-50-22 only requires
entities to disclose certain expenses (e.g., interest expense and depreciation) if
they “are included in the measure of segment profit or loss [or] otherwise regularly
provided to the [CODM].” For example, even though selling expenses may have been
included in an entity’s measure of segment profit or loss, it is not required to
disclose selling expenses before adopting the ASU. After adopting the ASU, entities
are required to disclose selling expenses for a reportable segment if it is (1)
determined to be a significant segment expense that is regularly provided to the
CODM for a reportable segment and (2) included in the segment measure of profit or
loss. Reportable segments may have different categories of significant segment
expenses as a result of the nature of their operations.
We believe that the changes to segment information disclosures
introduced by ASU 2023-07 could lead to changes in an entity’s MD&A disclosures
upon adoption. In the absence of further interpretive guidance from the SEC,
registrants should consider consulting with their auditors and SEC counsel before
adopting the ASU to determine the impact it will have on the discussion of results
of operations in MD&A. See Section 7.3 for MD&A implications.
For additional considerations related to significant segment expenses, see (1)
Sections 6.2.1 through 6.2.4 and (2)
FAQs 19, 22, and 24 through 30 in
Appendix C.
6.2.1 Significance Threshold and Regularly Provided Information
After the adoption of ASU 2023-07, an entity needs to identify the segment
expenses that are regularly provided to the CODM and then evaluate whether those
expenses are significant to determine which require further disaggregated
disclosure. As indicated in ASC 280-10-50-26A (added by the ASU), an entity
should “consider relevant qualitative and quantitative factors when determining
whether segment expense categories and amounts are significant” and should
identify segment expenses on the basis of “amounts that are regularly provided
to the [CODM] and included in reported segment profit or loss.” Paragraph BC59
of the ASU notes that “segment information that if omitted would change a user’s
understanding about a segment to such a degree that it would change the user’s
capital allocation decisions about an entity as a whole is significant even
though an item of a similar magnitude might not be considered significant if it
were omitted from the consolidated financial statements.”
Paragraph 78 of the Background Information and Basis for Conclusions of FASB Statement 131 notes the following:
Paragraph 125 of Concepts Statement 2 states that “. . . magnitude by
itself, without regard to the nature of the item and the circumstances
in which the judgment has to be made, will not generally be a sufficient
basis for a materiality judgment.” That guidance applies to segment
information. An understanding of the material segments of an enterprise
is important for understanding the enterprise as a whole, and individual
items of segment information are important for understanding the
segments. Thus, an item of segment information that, if omitted, would
change a user’s decision about that segment so significantly that it
would change the user’s decision about the enterprise as a whole is
material even though an item of a similar magnitude might not be
considered material if it were omitted from the consolidated financial
statements. Therefore, enterprises are encouraged to report information
about segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds if
management believes that it is material. Those who are familiar with the
particular circumstances of each enterprise must decide what constitutes
material.
As a result, we believe that the magnitude of a segment expense
item does not conclusively establish its significance. Rather, an entity may
determine that an expense item needs to be disclosed as a significant segment
expense even if, upon evaluation of other qualitative factors, another expense
item of similar magnitude is not considered significant. Significant expenses
may vary between reportable segments within an entity, between entities in the
same industry, or across different industries and should provide insight into
how an entity manages its segments. However, we believe that the more
quantitatively material an expense category, the more difficult it will be for
entities to avoid disclosure by assessing qualitative factors.
ASU 2023-07 does not define the terms “significant” or
“regularly provided” or specify how entities may interpret their meaning. We
believe that entities should use judgment when determining whether certain
segment items and amounts provided to the CODM should be disclosed. In doing so,
they should keep in mind the principle that if an expense is important to the
understanding of segment performance or would change an investor or financial
statement user’s decision about that segment or the entity as a whole, the
expense should generally be disclosed.
At the 2023 AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB
Developments, the SEC discussed the frequency at which financial
information is provided to a CODM and indicated that information that is
provided quarterly would generally meet the criteria to be considered
“regularly provided” and “regularly reviewed.” As noted in Section 2.3.1, in
general, we believe that for most public entities, a regular review would be
held at least quarterly; similarly, we believe that information provided at
least quarterly would be considered regularly provided. Entities should consider
their own facts and circumstances in determining which segment expenses are
regularly provided to the CODM.
Paragraph BC39 of ASU 2023-07 clarifies that the identification of significant
segment expenses should be based on the information that is regularly provided
to the CODM rather than the information that is regularly reviewed by the CODM.
The Board believes that “basing the significant expense principle on regularly
provided information better aligns with the segment expense information that is
already being prepared and communicated within internal management reports.”
Upon transition and for each reporting period, entities should review all
available financial information (e.g., CODM packages and other published
information, such as earnings releases, investor presentations, and the
financial information on the entity’s Web site) and evaluate such information
for significant expenses. In addition, entities should continue to monitor
changes that occur between periods and consider the recasting requirements
related to significant segment expenses.
If certain qualitative factors exist, an entity might be able to overcome the
expectation that disclosure is required for significant segment expenses that
are regularly provided to the CODM; however, we believe that the SEC staff could
challenge these qualitative factors given that investors should have access to
expense information that is regularly provided to the CODM and would be useful
to them.
6.2.2 Easily Computable Segment Expenses
ASC 280-10
Pending Content (Transition Guidance: ASC
280-10-65-1)
55-15A The
information that is regularly provided to the
chief operating decision maker may include segment
expense information that is expressed in a form
other than actual amounts, for example, as a ratio
or an expense as a percentage of revenue. The
requirements in paragraph 280-10-50-26A apply to
expense amounts that can be easily computed from
the information that is regularly provided to the
chief operating decision maker.
55-15B For
example, if the information that is regularly
provided to the chief operating decision maker
includes a segment revenue amount and a segment
gross margin amount, segment cost of sales can be
easily computed from this information. Therefore,
if cost of sales is significant, an entity should
disclose the category and amount in accordance
with paragraph 280-10-50-26A. As another example,
the information that is regularly provided to the
chief operating decision maker may include a
segment revenue amount and segment warranty
expense expressed as a percentage of segment
revenue. In this example, segment warranty expense
can be easily computed from this information.
Therefore, if warranty expense is significant, the
entity should disclose the category and amount in
accordance with paragraph 280-10-50-26A.
Under ASC 280-10-50-26A (added by ASU 2023-07), entities are
required to disclose significant segment expenses that are “easily computable
from information that is regularly provided to the [CODM].” Although the term
“easily computable” is not defined in ASC 280, paragraph BC44 of ASU 2023-07
notes that entities should use judgment in determining whether such expense
amounts can be easily computed on the basis of other metrics or information that
is regularly provided to the CODM. Such information may be in a form other than
an actual amount or a caption, such as a ratio, as described in paragraph BC43
of the ASU:
The Board concluded that the significant expense
principle should be based on the substance of the segment information
that is regularly provided to the CODM rather than on its form.
Additionally, the Board observed that it is useful to include an easily
computable concept as part of the amendments in this Update to ensure
that the objective of the disclosure is met and that investors receive
relevant information about significant segment expenses.
Similarly, for interest expense, Paragraph BC76 of the ASU notes that the
guidance regarding easily computable information would require an entity to
disclose interest expense in cases in which a CODM is regularly provided with
information about interest revenue and net interest margin. As a result,
entities should disclose interest expense separately from interest income and
not disclose net interest in these circumstances.
Examples of easily computable information could include the following:
- If the CODM is regularly provided a segment revenue amount and a segment gross margin amount, the segment cost of sales could be easily computed from this information and, if significant, would need to be disclosed as a significant segment expense.
- If the CODM is regularly provided a segment revenue amount and segment warranty expense is expressed as a percentage of segment revenue, segment warranty expense could be easily computed from this information and, if significant, would need to be disclosed as a significant segment expense.
- If bad-debt expense or marketing expense as a percentage of revenue is part of the measure of segment profit or loss and is considered significant, such expense would need to be disclosed as a significant segment expense.
Entities will need to use judgment to determine which expenses are easily
computable and apply those concepts consistently to identify the segment expense
categories provided to the CODM.
Example 6-1
Company A has identified the following reportable
segments: United States and Europe. The CODM uses GAAP
operating income to assess segment performance and
allocate resources.
- Gross profit and gross margin percentages are regularly provided to the CODM for each reportable segment.
- Marketing expenses are based on the cost per click for each ad. Both cost per click and the number of ad runs are regularly provided to the CODM for each reportable segment.
- Research and development costs as a percentage of segment revenue are regularly provided to the CODM for each reportable segment.
An
extract of the financial information that is regularly
provided to the CODM is listed below:
The
calculations for the required significant segment
expenses would be as follows:
Cost of sales, marketing expenses, and
research and development costs are determined to be
significant segment expenses that are (1) easily
computable, (2) significant, and (3) included in the
segment measure of profit or loss.
The
table below shows the proposed significant expense
disclosure for each reportable segment.
6.2.3 Corporate Overhead Expense
ASC 280-10
Pending Content (Transition Guidance: ASC
280-10-65-1)
55-15C If the
information regularly provided to the chief
operating decision maker contains a category and
amount for allocated corporate overhead expenses
by segment that is included in reported segment
profit or loss, a public entity should assess that
category and amount for disclosure in accordance
with paragraph 280-10-50-26A. For example, an
entity would disclose allocated corporate overhead
if it is a significant segment expense in
accordance with paragraph 280-10-50-26A.
Paragraph BC45 of ASU 2023-07 notes that “allocated overhead may be included
within the measure of segment profit or loss and presented as a standalone
segment expense category and amount in the management reports that are regularly
provided to the CODM.” Although those allocated overhead expenses may be
quantitatively large, entities may not consider them significant if the CODM
does not allocate resources or assess performance on the basis of those
expenses. However, the Board indicates that entities should treat corporate
overhead amounts allocated to segments in a manner similar to any other expense
item when assessing whether such items are significant, easily computable, and
therefore not exempt from the significant expense principle. Paragraph BC46 of
the ASU notes that “it would be contradictory to the significant expense
principle for allocated overhead by segment to be treated differently than all
other segment expenses that are regularly provided to the CODM and included the
measure of segment profit or loss.”
We believe that significant expenses could include any expenses incurred by the
segment (e.g., direct expenses, shared expenses, allocated corporate overhead,
or interest expense) that are included in each segment measure of P&L. We
also believe that if a segment expense is significant for the current periods
presented, it should be disclosed for all prior periods presented for
comparability purposes, even if it was not significant for prior periods.
Connecting the Dots
As discussed in Section 2.2.1, an
operating segment can be a component that does not recognize external or
internal revenues but for which the CODM is making resource allocation
decisions and assessing performance on the basis of expenses. Similarly,
this also applies to a single operating and reportable segment that does
not have any external or internal revenue. Although such an entity may
not currently be profitable or have commercial revenue streams, it will
still need to comply with the requirements of ASU 2023-07 to report
segment information, including disclosure of significant segment
expenses.
Example 6-2
Company
A has identified two operating and reportable segments:
Segment B and Segment C. Company A’s CODM regularly
reviews adjusted EBITDA, which is the segment measure of
profit or loss that is most consistent with GAAP
measurement principles. Below is an extract of the
financial information that is regularly provided to the
CODM:
Company A has concluded that on the
basis on the principles in ASC 280, the expenses below
require disclosure under the significant expense
principle for both B and C because they are significant,
regularly provided to the CODM, and included in each
reported measure of segment profit or loss.
The table
below shows the proposed significant expense disclosure
for each reportable segment.
Company A
is required to disclose expense information by segment
for depreciation and interest expense under ASC
280-10-50-22.
6.2.4. Disclosures When No Significant Expense Categories and Amounts Are Reported for a Reportable Segment
ASC 280-10
Pending Content (Transition Guidance: ASC
280-10-65-1)
55-15G The
chief operating decision maker may be regularly
provided with segment expense categories and
amounts for one segment and no segment expense
categories and amounts for another segment.
Alternatively, the chief operating decision maker
may not be regularly provided with expense
information for any of a public entity’s segments.
Paragraphs 280-10-50-26A through 50-26C apply to
each reportable segment. When no significant
expense categories and amounts are disclosed for a
reportable segment, a public entity should report
an amount and a description of the composition of
other segment items in accordance with paragraph
280-10-50-26B and describe the expense information
that the chief operating decision maker uses to
manage the operations of that segment in
accordance with paragraph 280-10-50-26C. For
example, when no significant expenses are
disclosed for a reportable segment, the public
entity may disclose that the chief operating
decision maker is regularly provided with only
budgeted or forecasted expense information for
that segment or uses consolidated expense
information. The explanation of the expense
information that the chief operating decision
maker uses to manage operations is not required
when significant expense categories and amounts
are disclosed for a reportable segment.
50-26C An
amount and qualitative description of the
composition of other segment items shall be
disclosed for each reportable segment even when a
public entity does not separately report
significant segment expense categories and amounts
in accordance with paragraph 280-10-50-26A for one
or more of its reportable segments. Additionally,
if a public entity does not disclose significant
expense categories and amounts for one or more of
its reportable segments, it shall explain the
nature of the expense information the chief
operating decision maker uses to manage operations
(see paragraph 280-10-55-15G).
If an entity does not separately disclose an expense under the significant
expense principle, it is required to disclose the nature of the expense
information used by the CODM to manage the segment’s operations. For example,
the CODM may use consolidated expense information or only use budgeted or
forecasted expense information for each reportable segment. We expect it to be
rare for an entity not to disclose any significant segment expenses by
reportable segment and to use budgeted or forecasted expenses for its reportable
segments.
Connecting the Dots
As discussed in Section 2.5, some entities,
particularly those organizations structured as a matrix, may provide
discrete financial information to the CODM in more than one way, and
this may also be the case for the significant expense information. In
such instances, these entities may need to use judgment to determine
which significant segment expenses must be disclosed. We encourage these
types of entities to consider discussing with auditors and advisers the
significant expense information that would require separate
disclosure.
Example 6-3
Company B is a multinational investment
bank. It has identified two operating and reportable
segments: Domestic Banking and Global Banking. The CODM
regularly reviews GAAP net income as the segment measure
of profit or loss that is most consistent with GAAP
measurement principles. The CODM is only provided with a
provision for credit losses and income tax expense and
receives no details for other expenses on a segment
basis.
Below is an extract of the financial information that is
regularly provided to the CODM:
The table below shows the proposed significant expense
disclosure for each reportable segment.