California Air Resources Board Hosts Workshop to Support Development of the California Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
March 26, 2026
On March 23, 2026, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) hosted a virtual public
workshop with stakeholders to support the development of California’s corporate
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reporting program established by the Climate Corporate Data Accountability
Act, as amended by SB 2191 (see Deloitte’s October 1, 2024, Heads
Up for more information about SB 219). The objectives of the
workshop were to (1) summarize initial regulations approved during the CARB board
hearing held on February 26, 2026;2 (2) cover the next stage in regulatory development; and (3) address proposed
staff concepts related to the development of GHG emissions reporting program
requirements. CARB outlined these key staff concepts, which are publicly available, and solicited
feedback on the staff concepts presented for GHG emission reporting and assurance,
as further detailed below.
CARB’s presentation largely focused on the requirement to report Scope 1, 2, and 3
emissions in 2027 (including obtaining limited assurance on Scope 1 and 2 emissions)
and annually thereafter. CARB stated that it is in the “pre-rulemaking” phase for
the following key GHG emission reporting items:
- Scope 1, 2, and 3 framework.
- Organizational boundaries.
- GHG accounting methods.
- Emissions factors.
- Scope 3 options.
- Assurance.
- Economic analysis.
Although CARB’s GHG emission reporting approach is largely aligned with definitions
and accounting methods in the GHG Protocol corporate standard and corporate value chain (Scope 3)
standard, the reporting template and phase-ins under
consideration (discussed below) may differ in many respects from the requirements of
the GHG Protocol. The sections below summarize CARB’s regulatory approach for GHG
accounting. CARB’s presentation contains more
detailed definitions.
Setting Organizational Boundaries
CARB’s proposed staff concepts related to setting organizational boundaries would
give entities the option of selecting either an equity share approach or a control
approach (i.e., financial control or operational control). Entities would not be
required to use a specific approach but would need to disclose the organizational
boundaries selected.
Classification of Emissions Into Scopes (1, 2, 3) and Mandatory Reporting
Template
CARB gave an overview of GHG emissions scopes, including the definitions of Scope 1,
2, and 3 emissions, and reminded participants of the October 2025 GHG emissions
reporting draft template released for
public feedback. Further, CARB noted that a revised draft reporting template for
Scope 1 and 2 emissions is expected to be released for public feedback by the summer
of 2026. Unlike the October 2025 template, the revised template would be
required for 2027 reporting and beyond.
Emission Accounting Methods
CARB’s staff concepts would allow flexibility in GHG emission calculation methods for
Scope 3 emissions. Entities would be able to use any of the following GHG accounting
methods: spend-based, activity-based, supplier-specific, or hybrid (mix of the
methods allowed). CARB indicated that entities would need to decide which method to
use by considering resourcing, available data, and objectives. Entities would be
required to disclose the method used but would not be required to obtain
direct supplier-specific data.
CARB discussed how emission factors3 are a key input in the measurement of GHG emissions and identified certain
publicly available data sets. In addition, CARB proposed the following sources for
potential emission factors for Scope 3 categories:
- The EPA’s Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID).
- The IPCC’s Emissions Factor Database.
- The EPA’s GHG Emissions Factor Hub.
- U.S. Environmentally-Extended Input-Output models.
2027 Scope 3 Reporting Options
SB 253 requires Scope 3 emissions reporting beginning in 2027 on prior-year
emissions. CARB introduced three staff concepts for regulatory adoption of Scope 3
emissions reporting. The first option, broad applicability, would require all
reporting entities to report all Scope 3 categories in 2027 but would give them the
flexibility not to report categories deemed “de minimis.” Under the second option,
sectoral phase-in, Scope 3 reporting would be required in 2027 only for the sectors
CARB has identified as responsible for the largest share of statewide emissions
(i.e., transportation and industrial sectors); other sectors would report in the
following years. The third option, category phase-in, would require all reporting
entities to report Scope 3 emissions in 2027, beginning with the most reported Scope
3 categories;4 the phase-in of other categories would occur in the following years.
Obtaining Limited Assurance (for Scopes 1 and 2)
To support initial implementation of SB 253 in 2026 on prior-year emissions, CARB has
issued an enforcement notice indicating
that it will exercise discretion for an entity’s first reports issued in 2026, and
such reports may be submitted regardless of whether the data have received limited
assurance. Starting in 2027, CARB has proposed the following staff concepts
associated with assurance standards that are accepted in other jurisdictions:
- AccountAbility’s AA1000 Assurance Standard (AA1000AS v3).
- AICPA standards (AT-C Section 2105 [limited assurance] or AT-C Section 2056 [reasonable assurance])
- ISAE 30007 (revised) and ISAE 34108 (until December 2026).
- ISSA 50009 (effective December 2026).
- ISO 14064-3:201910 (ISO 14065/ISO 14066 — provider qualifications).
CARB has specifically included AICPA standards to ensure “domestic CPA firms already
providing financial audit services to California reporting entities can perform GHG
assurance engagements without requiring entities to engage a separate provider
solely for SB 253 compliance.” This approach is consistent with other regulated GHG
disclosure regimes, such as the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Directive.
Economic Analysis
CARB is required to determine the economic impact of these regulations and proposed
staff concepts on estimating costs.
Next Steps
CARB has opened a public docket for stakeholders to
provide feedback on concepts covered, alternative methods CARB should consider, and
questions posed during this workshop. Comments are due by April 13, 2026.
For more information on the virtual workshop, see CARB’s Web site.
Footnotes
1
California Senate Bill No. 219, Greenhouse Gases: Climate Corporate
Accountability: Climate-Related Financial Risk.
2
For more information about this hearing, see Deloitte’s February 27, 2026,
DART news item.
3
The CARB workshop slide presentation defines “emissions factor” as the “value
that quantifies the amount of GHG emissions released per unit of activity
(e.g., emissions per unit of purchased electricity or per unit of sold
product).”
4
CARB listed the following as the most reported categories: business travel
(Category 6), purchased goods and services (Category 1), fuel and
energy-related activities (Category 3), employee commuting (Category 7), and
waste generated during operations (Category 5).
5
AICPA Professional Standards, AT-C Section 210, “Review
Engagements.”
6
AICPA Professional Standards, AT-C Section 205, “Examination
Engagements.”
7
International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000, Assurance
Engagements Other Than Audits or Reviews of Historical
Information.
8
International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3410, Assurance
Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements.
9
International Standard on Sustainability Assurance 5000, General
Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements.
10
International Organization for Standardization 14064-3:2019,
Greenhouse Gases — Part 3: Specification With Guidance for
the Verification and Validation of Greenhouse Gas
Statements.