The New Revenue Standard — Adoption and Transition Observations (January 14, 2016)
The New Revenue Standard —
Adoption and Transition
Heads Up | Volume 23, Issue 2
January 14, 2016
by Joe DiLeo and Eric Knachel, Deloitte & Touche LLP
Download the PDF version
Since the May 2014 release of the FASB’s and IASB’s new revenue standard (issued as ASU 2014-091 by the FASB and IFRS 152 by the IASB), the boards have been working to identify issues related to the standard’s implementation. The boards’ joint revenue transition resource group (TRG), which was formed to provide feedback on the standard’s implementation, has held six meetings thus far. These meetings have resulted in a one-year deferral of the standard’s effective date3 and certain other proposed clarifications to the new guidance.
The standard replaces almost all current revenue guidance (including industry-specific guidance), greatly enhances the related disclosure requirements, and requires entities to use significant judgment (e.g., in determining variable consideration in a contract with a customer or whether collectibility from a customer is probable). Therefore, entities will need to establish appropriate processes, systems, and internal controls to account for contracts with their customers under the new standard. These activities are expected to require significant time and effort.
While the deferral gives entities more time to implement the new standard, for many entities — particularly public entities that will adopt the standard on a full retrospective basis — the first annual period to which they will need to apply the standard is fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2016.
The following are some key takeaways related to implementing the new revenue standard:
We understand that many companies have decided to implement (or continue to consider implementing) the new standard by using the full retrospective transition method.
Many investment analysts have expressed their belief that the new standard should be adopted on a full retrospective basis, contributing to companies’ thinking about whether to use that basis to adopt the new standard.
Most companies are in the early phases of assessing the effects of the new standard on revenue contracts with their customers, and many companies have not begun a formal assessment process — in part because of recent clarifications to the new standard that have not been finalized.
Regardless of whether additional clarifications are made to the new revenue standard, companies will most likely be expected to provide information to investors, analysts, regulators, and other stakeholders about expected impacts related to their implementation efforts. Therefore, entities will need to track such information.
It will take time for companies to develop and test appropriate changes to their systems, processes, and internal controls related to accounting for contracts with customers and tracking information. Complexities due to an entity’s size, the number of geographical regions in which it operates, and the nature of its revenue streams could add considerable time to these efforts.
For public entities (or nonpublic entities that may elect early adoption) that elect to implement the new revenue standard on a full retrospective basis, the annual period beginning on January 1, 2016, is the first reporting period for which revenue will need to be reported under the new standard.
We believe that implementation of the new revenue standard should be a priority for companies in 2016.
Editor’s Note: At the 2015 AICPA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, Wesley Bricker, deputy chief accountant in the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA), highlighted the importance of the revenue metric to investors and suggested that a successful implementation of the new revenue standard is critical for the financial reporting system. He shared some recent survey results suggesting, however, that implementation efforts are lagging (i.e., a significant majority of responding companies had not completed their initial impact assessment and, of those, a third had not begun at all). In addition, informal polling results at the conference indicated that the majority of respondents were either still educating themselves about the standard or still performing their initial assessment, while a minority had completed their initial assessment or were making process and system changes necessary to implement the standard. For additional information about the 2015 AICPA Conference, see Deloitte’s December 15, 2015, Heads Up.
This Heads Up discusses certain considerations related to implementing the new revenue standard and includes data from an informal Deloitte-sponsored survey.
Implementation Considerations and Challenges
>Transition Methods and Timing of Adoption
The new revenue standard gives entities the option of using either a full retrospective transition method or a modified retrospective transition method and allows entities to apply certain optional practical expedients at their discretion. As a result, entities will need to review contracts that commenced several years before the new standard’s effective date. In addition, entities will most likely be required to perform dual tracking of revenue balances during the retrospective period given the potential difficulty of retroactively recalculating revenue balances when the new revenue standard becomes effective.
Over the past few months, Deloitte has sponsored various seminars on the new revenue standard and obtained feedback from participants through questionnaires.4 Figure 1 shows survey respondents’ “thoughts” regarding the transition method they may adopt:
Figure 1 — Which Method Will You Use to Adopt the New Revenue Standard?
Only 14 percent of respondents indicated an affirmative decision on a method of adoption, with 10 percent noting they would adopt the new revenue standard on a full retrospective basis. Overwhelmingly, respondents had not reached a definitive conclusion regarding selection of a transition method. Of the 86 percent that had not affirmatively responded on which method they would use for adoption, 49 percent indicated a “preliminary leaning” to one of the new revenue standard’s transition methods.
Editor’s Note: Like Deloitte’s above survey results, informal polling during the 2015 AICPA Conference indicated that most preparers had still not decided which transition method to use and that the percentages of those with a preliminary leaning toward the full retrospective method and those with a preliminary leaning toward the modified retrospective method were now relatively even.
In deciding which transition method to use, companies should confer with key stakeholders and gain an understanding of the methods used by peer companies. The greater the differences expected between a company’s legacy revenue accounting and accounting for revenue under the new standard, the more the company may want to consider using the full retrospective transition method. Under this method, the company would reflect revenue consistently for all years presented in its financial statements rather than for only the latest year presented, as is permitted under the modified transition method.
In addition, entities are permitted to early adopt the new revenue standard. (However, under U.S. GAAP, early adoption is limited to the effective date before the standard’s deferral.) As shown in Figure 2, nearly 60 percent of respondents to Deloitte’s survey do not plan to early adopt the new standard.
Figure 2 — Will You Early Adopt the New Revenue Standard?
Editor’s Note: At the 2015 AICPA Conference, members of a revenue panel noted that early adoption may be difficult given the current status of implementation efforts, continued diversity in practice, and the ongoing issuance of clarifying guidance by the FASB and IASB.
>>Accounting Processes and Internal Controls
Management will need to exercise significant judgment in applying certain aspects of the new revenue standard’s requirements, including those related to the identification of performance obligations and allocation of revenue to each performance obligation. Accordingly, to comply with the new revenue standard’s new accounting and disclosure requirements, entities will have to (1) document new or different judgments and (2) gather and track information that they may not have previously monitored. The systems and processes associated with such information may need to be modified to support the capture of additional data elements that may not currently be supported by legacy systems. Further, to ensure the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, management will want to assess whether it should revise existing or implement additional controls. In assessing the effect of applying the new revenue standard on systems, processes, and internal controls, entities may need to consider questions such as the following:
What processes should entities implement to identify all goods and services in a contract with a customer?
How will entities estimate the stand-alone selling price for contracts involving multiple goods or services?
How will entities ensure consistency of judgments in identifying performance obligations, estimating stand-alone selling prices, and progress toward completion?
What systems, processes, and controls are necessary to reliably estimate variable consideration and determine whether it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur?
Will entities need new processes and controls to identify and capitalize contract costs that would be considered incremental?
Will entities need to implement new processes and controls to periodically review contract costs and to test capitalized amounts for recoverability or impairment?
When should new policies and procedures be designed and implemented?
Despite the potential for significant changes to systems, processes, and internal controls, many respondents to Deloitte’s survey indicated the following about their current state of readiness to implement the new revenue standard:
Figure 3 — Have You Started to Implement the New Standard?
Figure 4 — Have You Established a Budget for Implementation?
Figure 5 — Do You Expect the New Standard to Have a Material Impact?
Only 25 percent of respondents believed that the new revenue standard would not have a material impact on their financial statements. In comparison, 75 percent of respondents indicated the standard would or could have a material impact on their financial statements. However, 43 percent of respondents have not started to implement the new revenue standard and of the respondents that have started, most indicated that they are in the very early phases of their implementation process. In addition, only 13 percent of respondents indicated that they have formally established a budget for implementing the new revenue standard.
Editor’s Note: At the 2015 AICPA Conference, Ashley Wright, a professional accounting fellow in the OCA, noted that all companies should expect some degree of change to their accounting, processes, controls, judgments, and disclosures as a result of implementing the new revenue standard. Ms. Wright thus suggested that companies take a fresh look at their accounting policies and practices and have candid discussions with their audit committees, executive management, and auditors about the status of implementation plans and impact assessments. A change-management project plan, including an assessment of resources needed to execute that plan, should be a priority of company management and audit committees.
>Implementation Resources Available to Preparers
The TRG has provided a public forum related to the new revenue standard and has addressed more than 50 implementation questions since its inception. (For more information about the TRG, see Deloitte’s TRG Snapshot newsletters.) In addition, the AICPA has 16 industry task forces that address implementation questions and plans to publish interpretive guidance that preparers can use to promote consistency.
>Other SEC Implementation Considerations
SAB Topic 11.M (SAB 74)5 indicates that a registrant should disclose the effects of recently issued ASUs and SABs that are not yet effective “unless the impact on [the registrant’s] financial position and results of operations is not expected to be material” (footnote omitted). These disclosures are meant to help financial statement users assess the effect that new standards will have once adopted. Members of the SEC staff have reiterated registrants’ need to disclose the impact of the new revenue standard as it becomes known. In addition, as the effective date of the new standard approaches, registrants are expected to include more detailed SAB 74 disclosures in their filings.
Editor’s Note: During a Q&A session at the 2015 AICPA Conference, Mr. Bricker reiterated that as companies perform assessments and develop their accounting policies under the new revenue standard, they may become aware of alternative views regarding their historical accounting under current U.S. GAAP. Mr. Bricker indicated that the OCA’s focus regarding the transition to the new revenue standard is on narrowing diversity in practice going forward rather than addressing it under existing revenue standards. In addition, with respect to interpretations under U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, Mr. Bricker indicated that the SEC staff’s interpretations will be the same on matters for which the standards are written the same or on matters for which the wording differs but the boards expect similar outcomes. When the wording differs under U.S. GAAP and IFRSs and the boards expected different outcomes, the SEC staff will respect those differences.
For many companies, the implementation of the new standard is time-sensitive. If they have not
already done so, entities should implement a change-management project plan that includes assessing
the effects of the new standard and developing policies and systems to facilitate its implementation.
In addition, entities should ensure that they identify appropriate leaders to oversee adoption efforts.
In doing so, project leadership should enable effective coordination between all key functions of the
company (e.g., solicitation and use of input from tax, human resources, contracting, sales, and investor
relations, in addition to feedback from technical accounting, external reporting, and internal audit).
An appropriate change-management project should also ensure that an entity’s audit committee or others charged with the entity’s governance activities are included as active participants in the project plan.
Editor’s Note: In an October 23, 2015, speech, James Schnurr, chief accountant in the OCA, outlined his views regarding implementation of the new standard. He reminded audit committees of their important role in the implementation of the new revenue recognition standard, encouraging them to “review and critically evaluate management’s detailed implementation plan.”
Unless early adoption is elected, public and nonpublic entities reporting under U.S. GAAP are required to implement the provisions of the new
revenue standard for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and December 15, 2018, respectively, and entities may use
either a full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. Along with the one-year deferral, entities reporting under U.S. GAAP are
permitted to early adopt the new revenue standard; however, such early adoption is limited to the original effective date (i.e., generally annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and December 15, 2017, for public and nonpublic entities, respectively).
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) Topic 11.M, “Disclosure of the Impact That Recently Issued Accounting Standards Will Have on the Financial
Statements of the Registrant When Adopted In a Future Period” (SAB 74).