6.6 Changes in Auditors
When planning for an IPO, an entity often considers whether its independent auditors have the
requisite qualifications and experience to assist the entity with the IPO process. In addition to seeking
an independent registered public accounting firm that has extensive experience with IPOs and public
companies, an entity that has (or is interested in developing) international operations often wishes to
engage an independent registered public accounting firm with a network of affiliated international firms
around the globe.
In certain cases, the entity may be required to change its independent auditor to move forward with its
IPO process because the prior auditor may be unable to be associated with the IPO. This could be the
case because, for example, the audit firm is not registered with the PCAOB or is not in compliance with
the SEC’s independence rules for its audits of the years for which financial statements will be included
in the registration statement. A successor auditor will need to gain an understanding of the business,
perform audits of one or more years, and coordinate with the predecessor auditor.
Connecting the Dots
If an entity changes to a new audit firm shortly before it
commences an IPO process, the previous audit firm would be required to
consent to the use of its previously issued auditor’s report(s) on
prior-year financial statements that are included in the SEC filing. If the
prior auditor is not able to or willing to consent to the use of its
auditor’s report(s), the new auditor may need to reaudit previously issued
financial statements.
An entity that changes auditors during the two most recent fiscal years or
any subsequent interim period must provide certain disclosures under
Regulation S-K, Item
304. For an existing public company, these disclosures are
typically provided on a Form 8-K; however, the required disclosures for an
IPO must be provided in the IPO registration statement.
6.6.1 Considerations Related to Dividing Responsibility for an Audit
Both AICPA and PCAOB standards allow an audit firm to divide
responsibility for an audit with another auditor, although it is not common for
audit firms to do so. Under SEC rules, if an independent public accounting firm
divides responsibility with another audit firm because another independent
auditor audits a component of the entity (e.g., a discrete business), the other
auditor’s report must be filed with the SEC and this report must refer to PCAOB
standards. The other independent auditor would also need to consent to the use
of its auditor’s report in the registration statement. (See Section 6.8 for more
information about consents.)
Even if an auditor previously divided responsibility with
another auditor in its AICPA auditor’s report, it may not be appropriate to
divide responsibility in the PCAOB auditor’s report if the other auditor is not
in a position to reissue its auditor’s report on the component it audited and
refer to PCAOB standards. In addition, paragraph 4140.1 of the FRM states that
“[g]enerally, the principal auditor is expected to have audited or assumed
responsibility for reporting on at least 50% of the assets and revenues of the
consolidated entity.” As a result, if an auditor previously divided
responsibility with another auditor in a prior AICPA audit, the auditor would be
required to reevaluate the appropriateness of that conclusion given the SEC’s
position on this matter.