1.2 Top 10 Topics in Reviews
The table below summarizes comment letter trends by topic in the 12-month
periods ended July 31, 2024 (“review year 2024” or the “current year”), and July 31,
2023 (“review year 2023” or the “prior year”).3
The topics that constitute the current year’s top 10 list are
largely consistent with the prior year’s list. However, the topic of income taxes
and that of intangible assets and goodwill have joined the top 10 list, while the
topic of signatures, exhibits, and agreements and that of debt have dropped out of
the top 10.4 Comments on MD&A and non-GAAP measure disclosures continue to increase in
number, and these topics are still the two most significant sources of SEC comments
by a wide margin since the staff remains laser-focused on them. Given the SEC
staff’s focus on ensuring that disclosures provide decision-useful information from
management’s perspective, we expect the volume of comments on MD&A to remain
high. We also observed an increased number of comments related to intangible assets
and goodwill, which rose from 11th place in 2023 to 6th place in 2024 because of an
increase in comments asking for expanded “early-warning” disclosures about potential
impairments. In addition, income taxes moved up five spots to 10th place because of
an increase in comments on tax-related disclosures required by ASC 740.
Further, although not identified as a separate top 10 topic, the
impacts of higher interest rates, inflation, and supply-chain issues remained a
source of SEC comments over the past year. Such comments have focused on disclosures
related to the effects of these macroeconomic and geopolitical challenges on a
registrant’s (1) risk factors, (2) MD&A, (3) market risk disclosures, (4)
early-warning disclosures about impairments, and (5) adjustments to non-GAAP
measures. At a recent conference, the SEC staff advised registrants that as
inflation and interest rates moderate, it is equally important to provide
transparent, company-specific disclosures about such trends so that investors can
understand how and when companies are affected by these changing macroeconomic
factors.
The top 10 topics in reviews with comment letters issued in review
year 2024 are as follows:
-
MD&A — The fact that MD&A remains a leading source of SEC comments reflects the SEC staff’s continuing emphasis on the objective of MD&A, which, as stated in the SEC’s November 19, 2020, final rule, is “to better allow investors to view the registrant from management’s perspective.” While the staff’s comments have addressed various topics of MD&A, the comments have continued to focus on greater transparency in registrants’ disclosures about (1) the underlying factors causing changes in financial statement line items, particularly when multiple or offsetting factors affect line items (including the need for quantitative disclosure of how much of a change in a financial statement line item is attributable to each underlying factor, on which the staff has increased its focus5); (2) material trends and uncertainties that affect results of operations, including quantification of the impact of such trends and uncertainties; (3) liquidity and capital resources, including material cash requirements; and (4) critical accounting estimates.
-
Non-GAAP measures — The number of reviews with comments on this topic increased slightly year over year (265 in review year 2023 compared with 276 in review year 2024). However, the issues raised by the SEC staff in the current year are largely consistent with those raised in the prior year. In December 2022, the Division issued new and updated C&DIs on non-GAAP measures, which codified interpretations previously expressed by the SEC staff in comment letters instead of establishing new positions or prohibitions. While many of the comments in the current year refer to the new and updated C&DIs, they do not represent new or different positions on the use of non-GAAP measures. Accordingly, the staff’s comments on this topic continue to focus on (1) whether there is undue prominence of non-GAAP measures, (2) whether certain adjustments are potentially misleading (e.g., the removal of normal, recurring cash operating costs could represent tailored accounting), (3) enhancing the disclosure related to the purpose and use of non-GAAP measures, (4) identification and clear labeling of non-GAAP measures, (5) whether measures are appropriately characterized as liquidity or performance measures, (6) reconciliation requirements, (7) the presentation of the income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments, and (8) disclosures related to certain financial or operating metrics. Further, the SEC staff has publicly spoken about the importance of registrants’ implementation of appropriate controls related to the disclosure of such measures.
-
Segment reporting — Segment reporting remains a significant source of SEC comments in review year 2024. Like comments on segment reporting issued in previous years, recent comments have specifically addressed (1) the identification and aggregation of operating segments, (2) changes in reportable segments, (3) reporting considerations for entities with a single reportable segment, (4) entity-wide disclosures, and (5) the use of multiple measures of segment performance.
-
Revenue recognition — After nearly seven years since public companies’ adoption of the revenue standard (ASC 606), the revenue-related themes have stabilized. These themes include (1) disclosure of significant judgments exercised in applying the standard, (2) accounting for performance obligations, (3) capitalization of contract costs, (4) disaggregation of revenue, (5) contract balances, and (6) remaining performance obligations. The largest volume of revenue-related comments focused on the disclosure of significant judgments exercised in applying the standard. Comments on such significant judgments address an array of revenue issues, including (1) the identification of performance obligations, (2) the determination and allocation of the transaction price, (3) the identification of a measure of progress, and (4) principal-versus-agent determinations. Broadly, the SEC staff cautioned against using boilerplate language in disclosures; rather, registrants should provide disclosures that faithfully depict their revenue recognition practices and related accounting policies in a tailored manner.
-
Inventory and cost of sales — Comments on inventory and cost of sales increased in review year 2024, reflecting a continued focus on inventory valuation and the completeness of cost of sales. Inventory comments are primarily related to accounting policy disclosures regarding inventory valuation, particularly the policies and estimates associated with the measurement of inventory. In addition, the SEC staff commonly asks registrants about their cost of sales and gross profit measures and requests disclosure of the types of expenses that are included in or excluded from such measures.
-
Intangible assets and goodwill — In the current year, the SEC staff issued a greater number of comments on disclosures about significant judgments and estimates associated with intangible assets and goodwill. Comments on these items are primarily related to disclosure of (1) methods and significant assumptions used in the quantitative impairment test; (2) the percentage by which estimated fair value exceeds carrying value for each reporting unit and the specific key assumptions used in the fair value determination; (3) the weighted-average amortization period for intangible assets subject to amortization in total and by major intangible asset class; (4) triggering events that require assessment; and (5) qualitative factors that were incorporated into the performance of a quantitative analysis, as well as the result of that analysis.
-
ICFR — Comments on ICFR in the current year primarily focused on registrants’ (1) evaluation of the severity of control deficiencies, including those related to immaterial misstatements; (2) evaluation of deficiencies identified in COSO components other than control activities; (3) disclosures of material changes in ICFR, including the impact and remediation of material weaknesses; (4) conclusions that ICFR remains effective after a restatement; (5) disclosures about the framework used to evaluate ICFR; and (6) incomplete or missing ICFR evaluations.
-
Fair value — The SEC staff continues to ask registrants about valuation techniques and inputs used in fair value measurements (including disclosure requirements for recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements). In addition, the staff frequently comments on fair value estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, goodwill impairment, and share-based payments.
-
Acquisitions, mergers, and business combinations — Comments on this topic are primarily related to (1) identification of the accounting acquirer, (2) questions about the allocation of the purchase price to identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed, (3) accounting for any contingent consideration, (4) bargain purchases, and (5) required public-company disclosures.
-
Income taxes — While the volume of comments on income taxes increased in the current year, the nature of such comments remained consistent year over year. Comments on this topic continue to focus on ASC 740 disclosures, primarily valuation allowances, tax effects of significant or unusual transactions, and noncompliance with disclosure requirements.
A number of the aforementioned trends are likely to continue in years to come
since comment letter topics have been largely consistent year over year. While it is
difficult to predict what new comment letter trends are on the horizon, we look to
the Commission’s priorities to help us predict topics of focus in the coming year.
The SEC staff has spoken extensively about disclosures related to AI, and we expect
the staff to comment on such disclosures in future reviews. Given that the staff
often focuses on compliance with new reporting requirements, we expect to see
comments on new disclosures required under U.S. GAAP about supplier finance programs
and segment reporting, as well as comments on new cybersecurity disclosures required
under SEC regulations. In addition, we expect the SEC staff to continue monitoring
the impacts of interest rates, inflation, geopolitical conflicts, and concerns about
the commercial real estate market, and perhaps focus future comments on accounting
and reporting related to these matters. These events, coupled with the staff’s focus
on ensuring that MD&A provides useful information to investors, mean that
comments on MD&A are likely to remain elevated.
Footnotes
3
Reviews that generated more than one comment letter are
counted only once in the statistics below.
4
The number of reviews with comment letters in review year
2024 may be subject to change as more comment letters from review year 2024
are posted to EDGAR.
5
More than 145 reviews in review year 2024 included comments on
this type of disclosure.