1.6 Reviews by Filing Status and Revenue
1.6.1 Reviews by Filing Status
The SEC classifies registrants by filing status (i.e.,
nonaccelerated filer, accelerated filer, or large accelerated filer) primarily
on the basis of their public float, which is a measure of market capitalization
excluding shares held by affiliates. The chart below depicts the percentage of
reviews with comment letters, and the percentage of Form 10-K filings,
attributable to registrants in review year 2025 on the basis of their filing
status.
It is interesting to consider the filing status of registrants
in the evaluation of comment letter trends and statistics. That information,
however, is more meaningful when considered in relation to the percentage of
registrants within each filing status classification. For example, large
accelerated filers continue to be subject to a disproportionately higher number
of reviews, whereas nonaccelerated filers are subject to disproportionately
fewer reviews. More specifically, in review year 2025, 51 percent of the reviews
with comment letters were for large accelerated filers, although large
accelerated filers accounted for only 32 percent of the Forms 10-K filed in that
review year. Conversely, whereas 34 percent of the reviews with comment letters
were for nonaccelerated filers in review year 2025, nonaccelerated filers
accounted for 58 percent of the Forms 10-K filed in that review year.
One factor that may be contributing to the trend of subjecting
large accelerated filers to a disproportionately high number of reviews is that
while the SEC is required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to review registrants at
least once every three years, it is also required under that Act to consider
“issuers with the largest market capitalization” in scheduling its reviews.
Since registrants that have larger market caps make up a larger share of the
capital markets than smaller companies, the SEC may take a risk-based approach
and select larger companies for a filing review more frequently than smaller
companies, in a manner consistent with the factors identified in the Act.
1.6.2 Reviews by Revenue
The chart below depicts the percentage of reviews with comment
letters, and the percentage of Form 10-K filings, attributable to registrants in
review year 2025 on the basis of their annual revenue.
As discussed in Section 1.6.1, the SEC is required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to
consider “issuers with the largest market capitalization” in scheduling its
reviews. Since such issuers (i.e., companies with larger public floats)
generally produce more revenue, it is no surprise that companies that generate
more revenue have historically been subject to a disproportionately higher
number of reviews with comment letters than companies that generate less
revenue. In review year 2025, registrants generating $1 billion or more in
revenue accounted for 41 percent of the reviews with comment letters and 26
percent of the Form 10-K filings. Conversely, registrants generating less than
$500 million in revenue accounted for 48 percent of the reviews with comment
letters and 67 percent of the Form 10-K filings in review year 2025.