1.6 Reviews by Filing Status and Revenue
1.6.1 Reviews by Filing Status
The SEC classifies registrants by filing status (i.e.,
nonaccelerated filer, accelerated filer, or large accelerated filer) primarily
on the basis of their public float, which is a measure of market capitalization
excluding shares held by affiliates. The chart below depicts the percentage of
reviews with comment letters, and the percentage of Form 10-K filings,
attributable to registrants on the basis of their filing status.
It is interesting to consider the filing status of registrants
in the evaluation of comment letter trends and statistics. That information,
however, is more meaningful when considered in relation to the percentage of
registrants within each filing status classification. For example, large
accelerated filers continue to be subject to a disproportionately higher number
of reviews, whereas nonaccelerated filers are subject to disproportionately
fewer reviews. More specifically, in review year 2024, 51 percent of the reviews
with comment letters were for large accelerated filers, although large
accelerated filers accounted for only 30 percent of the Forms 10-K filed in
2024. Conversely, whereas 36 percent of the reviews with comment letters were
for nonaccelerated filers in review year 2024, nonaccelerated filers accounted
for 59 percent of the Forms 10-K filed in 2024.
One factor that may be contributing to the trend of subjecting
large accelerated filers to a disproportionately high number of reviews is that
while the SEC is required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to review registrants at
least once every three years, it is also required under that Act to consider
“issuers with the largest market capitalization” in scheduling its reviews.
Since registrants that have larger market caps make up a larger share of the
capital markets than smaller companies, the SEC may take a risk-based approach
and select larger companies for a filing review more frequently than smaller
companies, in a manner consistent with the factors identified in the Act.
1.6.2 Reviews by Revenue
The chart below depicts the percentage of reviews with comment
letters, and the percentage of Form 10-K filings, attributable to registrants on
the basis of their annual revenue.
As discussed in Section 1.6.1, the
SEC is required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to consider “issuers with the
largest market capitalization” in scheduling its reviews. Since such issuers
(i.e., companies with larger public floats) generally produce more revenue, it
is no surprise that companies that generate more revenue have historically been
subject to a disproportionately higher number of reviews with comment letters
than companies that generate less revenue. In review year 2024, registrants
generating $1 billion or more in revenue accounted for 39 percent of the reviews
with comment letters and 24 percent of the Form 10-K filings. Conversely,
registrants generating less than $500 million in revenue accounted for 51
percent of the reviews with comment letters and 69 percent of the Form 10-K
filings in review year 2024.