#DeloitteESGnow — The ESG Regulatory Whirlwind: Accountability on the Horizon
Introduction
Expectations for consistent, comparable, and transparent climate-related and
other environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures continue to
increase — driven by investor demand, stakeholder pressures, and more recently,
regulatory attention. Climate change has been a central topic in U.S. policy
discussions in many government departments and agencies — from President Biden’s
day-one action to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, to SEC Commissioner (then Acting
Chair) Allison Herren Lee directing the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance to
enhance its focus on climate-related disclosures in public company filings, to
SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s recent statement that the SEC has the necessary
authority to move forward with rulemaking on climate, human capital, and other
ESG disclosures.1 In the forthcoming regulatory environment, it will be essential for
companies to improve the completeness, accuracy, and reliability of their
ESG-related disclosures by employing sound governance, oversight, and
data-management processes and controls. Companies may need to rapidly enhance
their existing disclosures if the oversight mechanisms the SEC applies to
climate-related and other ESG disclosures are similar to those for financial
reporting.
U.S. Climate and ESG Policy — Policy and Market Developments
U.S. Climate Commitments Announced at Biden Administration’s Climate Summit
On April 22, 2021, dozens of world leaders, climate activists, and business
stakeholders gathered virtually for a summit hosted by President Biden. The
summit brought together key parties and businesses from countries around the
world to discuss global climate challenges and to pledge their support for
taking steps to address climate change.
At the summit, President Biden unveiled an enhanced nationally determined
contribution (NDC2) for the United States, pledging to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 52
percent from 2005 levels by 2030. The U.S. NDC was developed by the National
Climate Task Force by using a whole-of-government approach that took into
account technology availability, current and future cost reductions, and the
role of enabling infrastructure. As communicated at the summit, the U.S. NDC
would be achieved through enhanced regulation of key industries and
aggressive action in key states. As a result, companies would be required to
comply with additional regulations and legislation that have yet to be
specifically identified.
In addition to the U.S. NDC, a commitment to double financing for climate aid
($5.7 billion) by 2024 was announced via the proposed U.S. International Climate Finance Plan. The
funds will be used to support climate adaptation efforts for countries most
exposed to the impacts of climate change. The United States was the only
country to pledge additional funds for climate aid at the summit.
Other U.S. Climate Policy Proposals Made by the Biden Administration
The new U.S. NDC was announced amid months of climate-related discussions and
recent policy proposals made by the Biden administration. President Biden
recently signed an executive order that directs all government agencies to
develop a strategy for identifying and disclosing climate-related financial
risks to government programs and assets within 120 days.
Other noteworthy U.S. policy proposals and executive orders from the Biden
administration to date include, but are not limited to, the following:
ESG and Climate-Related Developments From U.S.
Regulatory Bodies and Organizations
-
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CTFC) established a new climate risk unit.
-
The Federal Reserve created two committees to identify, address, and respond to climate-related risks to financial stability.
-
The FASB released a staff educational paper on intersection of ESG matters with financial accounting standards.
-
The SEC announced the formation of the Climate and ESG Task Force, requested input on whether current climate change disclosures adequately informed investors, issued a risk alert on ESG investing, and established a Web site to highlight actions and provide ESG investing information.
-
The House Financial Services Committee advanced the Climate Risk Disclosure Act, which would amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require disclosures related to climate change.
-
SEC Commissioner Allison Herren Lee gave a speech addressing her views on common misconceptions regarding materiality in the context of ESG disclosure.
For more information about these developments, see Deloitte’s March 22, 2021,
Heads Up and the May 2021 issue of Deloitte’s
digest Creating a Climate of Change.
Convergence of ESG Disclosure Standards
In addition to U.S. activity, substantial recent progress has been made to
establish climate-related and other ESG disclosure standards globally. In April
2021, the IFRS Foundation trustees indicated that they were moving forward with their proposal to create an
International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), as addressed in the
foundation’s September 2020 consultation paper. The ISSB will take into account the
work of other standard setters, such as the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, as
well as the prototype proposed last December by an alliance of five
standard setters for an approach to climate-related disclosures.
The proposed ISSB has received increasing support from other global and U.S.
organizations. The International Organization of Securities Commissions
announced the formation of a Technical Expert Group, co-led
by the SEC and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, to work with the
IFRS Foundation
as it establishes the ISSB. From a U.S. perspective, SEC Commissioner
Lee expressed support for the ISSB, as did U.S. Secretary of
the Treasury Janet
Yellen.
As next steps, the IFRS trustees aim to issue a proposal by the end of September
2021 and may announce the establishment of an ISSB at the 26th United Nations
Conference of the Parties (UN COP26) in November 2021. For more information, see
Deloitte’s May 4, 2021, IFRS in Focus.
While it remains to be seen how this activity will affect U.S. companies, the
flurry of recent U.S. climate policy and regulatory headlines indicates that the
focus on ESG performance and disclosures will almost certainly increase.
Implications for Issuers
Financial and Operational Impacts Associated With Climate-Related and Other ESG Events
Climate change creates risks and opportunities in the capital markets and can
have both financial and operational impacts on businesses. Increasingly
severe weather events and rising sea levels may lead to asset damage and
higher insurance premiums. Carbon taxes and reputational risks may increase
operating costs and create barriers to accessing capital or high-quality
talent. Investors and stakeholders are seeking reliable and comparable
information on these potential impacts so that they can better assess the
resiliency of corporate strategies to climate-related and other ESG events.
These events could affect a company’s financial accounting and reporting in
the context of the existing accounting guidance, the current regulatory
environment, and financial statement audits. For more information about
ESG-related accounting and financial reporting considerations, see
Deloitte’s May 26, 2021, Heads Up.
Increasing Demand for High-Quality Climate-Related and Other ESG Information
The passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 transformed the capital
markets, bringing to light the importance of strong systems of governance
and internal controls over financial reporting. In the first year after the
act’s passage, companies were tasked with adapting to the new requirements
and managing the costs and level of effort associated with enhancing systems
of internal controls. These enhancements ultimately led to more mature
systems of governance as well as improved data integrity and financial
accountability, providing additional confidence in the capital markets.
The Biden administration’s actions to address climate change, along with the
recent SEC discussions to mandate climate-related and other ESG disclosures
and the pending formation of an ISSB, indicate a trend toward
standardization and regulation of this information. Companies should begin
to prepare themselves for mandatory climate-related and other ESG
disclosures, since this regulated landscape for ESG disclosures will differ
significantly from the current landscape of voluntary reporting. To adapt to
disclosure standardization, companies will need to focus on improving data
integrity and reliability by enhancing management processes and controls.
Regulatory oversight will help drive ESG integration and transparency, which
are currently being demanded by investors and other stakeholders. As a
result, ESG reporting processes and controls may soon be expected to mature
to the level of financial reporting.
Internal controls have value beyond compliance and external financial
reporting. Effective internal controls can help organizations grow on a
sustained basis and can lead to confidence in all types of information. In
establishing effective internal controls to improve the integrity of
climate-related and other ESG disclosures, companies can leverage existing resources such as the Internal
Control — Integrated Framework of the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The Role of Assurance
As climate-related and other ESG disclosure guidance transitions from
voluntary to mandatory, the role of assurance will become critical to
achieving disclosure effectiveness. Currently, only 11 percent of
S&P 100 companies have received assurance from a
professional services assurance provider regarding some of their ESG
information. Assurance providers can support companies as they navigate the
regulatory developments and assess the current state of their internal
controls over climate-related and other ESG metrics and disclosures. As with
the processes associated with financial statement audits and internal
controls over financial reporting, assurance over climate-related and other
ESG information is intended to enhance the reliability of information
reported by companies.
As companies begin the to integrate climate-related and other ESG
considerations into their systems of internal control, as well as their
broader business decisions, they may consider asking the
following:
-
Is the company currently following a framework or a standard for disclosing this information?
-
How is climate-related and other ESG information captured in company systems? How is this information currently used?
-
What is the company’s governance and oversight over this information?
-
What additional controls and procedures will the company need to implement to subject climate-related and other ESG disclosures to the same level of internal controls as financial reporting?
-
What is the company’s current preparedness to receive assurance services over climate-related and other ESG information? How can the company enhance its preparedness?
With climate-related and other ESG regulations on the
horizon, companies can seek assurance readiness and third-party assurance
services to enhance the maturity of their systems, processes, controls, and
governance related to this information. Independent auditors are
well-positioned to deliver assurance services, since the profession is
steeped in bringing independent standards-aligned analysis, objectivity, and
accountability to the review of company-reported information. As a starting
point for improving the quality of climate-related and other ESG
disclosures, companies can look to their financial reporting processes and
control environment and begin to prepare for mandatory reporting
requirements and future assurance. For more information, see the Center for
Audit Quality’s ESG Reporting and Attestation: A Roadmap for Audit
Practitioners and The Role
of Auditors in Company Prepared ESG Information: Present and
Future.