FASB Proposes Improvements to the Accounting for Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights
Overview
On September 23, 2026, the FASB issued a proposed ASU1 that would amend the guidance in ASC 860-502 on the measurement of residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) related
to “recapture” (i.e., the servicer’s ability to solicit the underlying borrower
for refinancing). The proposed amendments specify that recapture and the related
residential MSR would be treated as a single unit of account. That is, the fair
value measurement of residential MSRs would include all the servicer’s rights
and obligations associated with the contract, including the ability to solicit
the borrower for refinancing. The amendments are intended to align reported
measurements with market-participant pricing.
Comments on the proposed ASU are due by November 9, 2026.
Background
In September 2025, the Agenda Committee of the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
added a project to the EITF’s agenda to address the application of the guidance
in ASC 860-50 to residential MSRs. The project was added in response to comments
from stakeholders that there was diversity in practice related to how entities
reflect recapture in MSR measurements — particularly (1) whether recapture is
excluded entirely from valuation models and (2) when recapture is included,
whether it is explicitly or implicitly included in the valuation.
At its March 12, 2026, meeting, the EITF deliberated this issue and voted to
recommend that an MSR and recapture be treated as a single unit of account and
that the fair value measurement of an MSR therefore include the effects of
recapture. The EITF also voted to recommend that recapture not be defined and
that the proposed changes would only apply to residential MSRs. At its May 27,
2026, meeting, the FASB approved the addition of this project to
its technical agenda, made tentative decisions related to the EITF’s
recommendations, and instructed the staff to draft the proposed ASU.
Main Provisions of the Proposed ASU
A residential MSR is the contractual right to service an underlying residential
mortgage loan. ASC 860-50 currently requires entities to initially measure
servicing assets and liabilities at fair value and subsequently apply either the
fair value measurement method or the amortization method. MSRs that are not
subsequently measured at fair value are subject to impairment evaluations.
Under the proposed amendments, entities would be required to reflect in the fair
value measurement of residential MSRs — both at initial recognition and
thereafter, including for impairment testing — the value of all rights and
obligations associated with the MSR, such as recapture rights. The proposed
amendments do not supersede other guidance (e.g., ASC 860-50-25-6 through 25-7)
that requires entities to recognize other rights and obligations associated with
a mortgage servicing contract separately. The Board decided not to define
recapture, concluding that a definition would introduce unnecessary complexity
and would be inconsistent with ASC 820’s principles-based fair value framework,
which requires entities to apply judgment when selecting assumptions and
methods.
The other guidance in ASC 860-50 on recognition and measurement (including
subsequent measurement) would remain unchanged. For example, the proposed
amendments would not affect the existing amortization guidance in ASC
860-50-35-1(a). Thus, an entity would continue to exclude estimated future net
servicing income from a refinanced loan when determining the amortization of an
existing residential MSR (i.e., the proposal would affect the fair-value-based
impairment assessment but not the amortization period).
Scope
The proposed guidance would apply to all entities and to residential MSRs
recognized in accordance with ASC 860-50. It would not affect other
servicing assets or liabilities recognized under ASC 860-50.
Connecting the Dots
The proposed amendments could indirectly affect interest rate lock
commitments (IRLCs) that are measured at fair value under ASC 815 or
ASC 825. This is because the measurement guidance in ASC
815-10-S99-1 includes references to ASC 860-50. However, the
proposal does not explicitly address how IRLCs might be affected.
Disclosure
The proposed amendments would not introduce recurring disclosure requirements
specifically related to recapture. The Board concluded that the disclosures
required under ASC 860-50 and ASC 820 should provide sufficient information
about material valuation inputs and assumptions.
Effective Date and Transition
Effective Date
The Board will determine the effective date after considering stakeholder
feedback on the proposed ASU.
Early adoption would be permitted in an interim or annual reporting period
for which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available
for issuance. An entity that adopts the ASU’s guidance in an interim
reporting period would be required to apply it as of the beginning of the
annual reporting period that includes that interim period.
Transition
Entities would apply the proposed amendments by using a modified prospective
approach to all residential MSRs outstanding as of the beginning of the
annual reporting period of adoption. Any resulting cumulative-effect
adjustment to opening retained earnings would be recognized as of that
date.
At the beginning of the adoption period, entities would apply the proposed
amendments to determine the fair value of residential MSRs. For assets
subsequently measured under the fair value method, this amount would be used
to remeasure the assets. For assets subsequently measured under the
amortization method, this amount would be used to assess and measure
impairment.
Appendix — Questions for Respondents
The proposed ASU’s questions for respondents are reproduced below for reference.
Scope
Question 1: Is the scope of the amendments in this proposed Update
clear and operable? Do you anticipate any auditing challenges? Please
explain why or why not.
Question 2: Should the proposed amendments apply to other servicing
assets and liabilities within the scope of Subtopic 860-50 (for example,
servicing assets and liabilities related to commercial loans, credit card
receivables, automobile loans, and student loans)? Please explain why or why
not.
Question 3: The proposed amendments do not define a residential
mortgage loan. Is additional guidance needed to describe the types of
residential MSRs that would be within the scope of the proposed guidance?
For example, should a residential mortgage loan be defined as related to a
single-family residential mortgage only? Please explain why or why not.
Measurement of a Residential MSR
Question 4: Would the proposed amendments to include the value
attributable to recapture when measuring a residential MSR provide
decision-useful information and improve comparability? Are the proposed
amendments clear and operable? Do you anticipate any auditing challenges?
Please explain why or why not.
Transition and Effective Date
Question 5: Are the proposed transition requirements operable? If not,
why not, and what transition method would be more appropriate and why? Would
the proposed transition disclosures be decision useful? Please explain why
or why not.
Question 6: How much time would be needed to implement the proposed
amendments? Should the effective date for entities other than public
business entities be different from the effective date for public business
entities? Please explain why or why not. If so, how much additional time
would you recommend for entities other than public business entities?
Question 7: The proposed amendments would permit early adoption. Do
you agree that early adoption should be permitted at any time before the
effective date? Please explain why or why not.
Contacts
|
|
Andrew Pidgeon
Audit & Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 415 783
6426
|
|
Kyle Bab
Audit & Assurance
Managing
Director
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 773 368
9331
|
|
|
James King
Audit & Assurance
Senior Consultant
Deloitte & Touche LLP
+1 929 656 2331
|
Footnotes
1
FASB Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU),
Transfers and Servicing ― Servicing Assets and Liabilities
(Subtopic 860-50): Mortgage Servicing Rights — Recapture.
2
For titles of FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) references, see Deloitte’s “Titles of Topics and
Subtopics in the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification.”