On the Radar
Business Combinations
Entities engage in acquisitions for various reasons. For example,
they may be looking to grow in size, diversify their product offerings, or expand
into new markets or geographies.
The accounting for acquisitions can be complex and begins with a determination of
whether an acquisition should be accounted for as a business combination. ASC
805-10, ASC 805-20, and ASC 805-30 address the accounting for a business
combination, which is defined in the ASC master glossary as “[a] transaction or
other event in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses.”
Typically, a business combination occurs when an entity purchases the equity
interests or the net assets of one or more businesses in exchange for cash, equity
interests of the acquirer, or other consideration. However, the definition of a
business combination applies to more than just purchase transactions; it
incorporates all transactions or events in which an entity or individual obtains
control of a business.
If the acquisition does not meet the definition of a business combination, the entity
must determine whether it should be accounted for as an asset acquisition under ASC
805-50. Distinguishing between the acquisition of a business and the acquisition of
an asset or a group of assets is important because there are many differences
between the accounting for each. Alternatively, if the assets acquired consist of
primarily cash or investments, the substance of the transaction may be a capital
transaction (a recapitalization) rather than a business combination or an asset
acquisition.
Determining Whether an Acquisition Is a Business Combination or an Asset Acquisition
To determine whether an acquisition should be accounted for as a business
combination, an entity must evaluate whether the acquired set of assets and
activities together meet the definition of a business in ASC 805.
An entity first uses a “screen” to assess whether substantially all of the fair
value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable
asset or group of similar identifiable assets. If the screen is not met, the
entity must apply a “framework” for determining whether the acquired set
includes, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together
significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. If so, the acquired
set is a business.
The decision tree below
illustrates how to determine whether an acquisition represents a business
combination or an asset acquisition.
SEC registrants are required to use the definition of
a business in SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 11-01(d),
when evaluating the requirements of SEC Regulation
S-X, Rule 3-05, and SEC Regulation S-X, Article 11.
The definition of a business in Rule 11-01(d) is
different from the definition of a business in ASC
805-10.
Business Combinations
ASC 805 requires an entity to account for a
business combination by using the acquisition method of accounting. Application
of the acquisition method requires the following steps:
The first step of applying the acquisition method is identifying
the acquirer. ASC 805-10-25-4 requires entities to identify an acquirer in every
business combination. Before adoption of ASU 2025-03, the ASC master glossary
defines an acquirer as follows:
The entity that obtains
control of the acquiree. However, in a business combination in which a
variable interest entity (VIE) is acquired, the primary beneficiary of that
entity always is the acquirer.
The entity identified as the acquirer for accounting purposes
usually is the entity that transfers the consideration (e.g., cash, other
assets, or its equity interests) to effect the acquisition. However, when a
business combination is effected primarily by exchanging equity interests, the
determination of which entity is the acquirer requires careful evaluation of the
relevant facts and circumstances. In some cases, the entity that issues its
equity interests (the “legal acquirer”) is determined for accounting purposes to
be the acquiree (also called the “accounting acquiree”), while the entity whose
equity interests are acquired (the “legal acquiree”) is for accounting purposes
the acquirer (also called the “accounting acquirer”). Such transactions are
commonly called reverse acquisitions
If the entity identified as the accounting acquiree meets the
definition of a business, the accounting acquirer accounts for the acquisition
as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805. However, if the entity
identified as the accounting acquiree has no substantive assets other than cash
and investments, the nature of the transaction may be a reverse
recapitalization.
Changing Lanes
On May 12, 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, which revises the guidance in ASC 805
on identifying the accounting acquirer in a business combination in
which the legal acquiree is a VIE. The ASU is intended to improve
comparability between business combinations that involve VIEs and those
that do not.
Before adoption of ASU 2025-03, ASC 805-10-25-5 states that in a business
combination in which a VIE is acquired, the primary beneficiary of the
legal acquiree is always the accounting acquirer. Conversely, for a
business combination in which the acquired entity is determined not to
be a VIE and it is not clear which of the combining entities is the
acquirer after applying the voting interest entity (VOE) model, a
reporting entity is required to consider the factors in ASC 805-10-55-11
through 55-15 when determining which legal entity is the accounting
acquirer. As a result, in an acquisition transaction effected primarily
by exchanging equity interests, a reporting entity may reach different
conclusions related to determining the accounting acquirer in a business
combination involving a legal acquiree that is a VIE than in a
combination in which the legal acquiree is a VOE. That is, having
considered the factors in ASC 805-10-55-12 through 55-15, a reporting
entity might not identify the primary beneficiary of the legal acquiree
that is a VIE as the accounting acquirer of the combining entities.
The identification of the accounting acquirer establishes which entity in
the business combination will have its assets and liabilities remeasured
in accordance with ASC 805-20 (generally at fair value) and creates a
new basis of accounting. Accordingly, the comparability of similar
transactions under existing GAAP can be greatly affected by the
structure of the legal acquiree and whether such entity qualifies as a
VIE or a VOE.
ASU 2025-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early
adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2025-03 must be applied
prospectively to any business combination that occurs after the initial
adoption date.
The second step of applying the acquisition method is determining the acquisition
date. The acquisition date is the date on which control of the business
transfers to the acquirer and generally coincides with the date on which the
acquirer legally transfers the consideration to the seller, receives the assets,
and incurs or assumes the liabilities (i.e., the closing date). However, in
unusual circumstances, the acquisition date can be before or after the closing
date.
Determining the acquisition date is important because on this date:
- The consideration transferred is measured at fair value as the sum of (1) the assets transferred by the acquirer, (2) the liabilities incurred by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree (e.g., contingent consideration), and (3) the equity interests issued by the acquirer.
- The assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests are identified and measured.
- The acquirer begins consolidating the acquiree, if required.
The third step of applying the acquisition method is recognizing and measuring
the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interests in the acquiree. Step three is based on two key principles, which ASC
805 calls the recognition principle and the measurement principle. Under the
recognition principle in ASC 805-20-25-1, an acquirer must “recognize,
separately from goodwill, the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree.” As a result of
applying the recognition principle, an acquirer may recognize certain assets and
liabilities that were not previously recognized in the acquiree’s financial
statements, such as certain intangible assets.
Under the measurement principle in ASC 805-20-30-1, an acquirer is required to
measure “the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their acquisition-date fair values.”
Thus, most assets and liabilities and items of consideration are measured at
fair value in accordance with the principles of ASC 820.
ASC 805 does include exceptions to its recognition and fair
value measurement principles, such as for deferred taxes, employee benefits,
share-based payments, and assets held for sale. Such exceptions are recognized
and measured in accordance with other applicable GAAP rather than the general
principles discussed in ASC 805.
The fourth and final step in applying the acquisition method is
recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase. The ASC
master glossary, as amended by ASU 2023-05, defines goodwill as “[a]n asset
representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in
a business combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity,
or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are not individually
identified and separately recognized.” Because goodwill is not a separately
identifiable asset, it cannot be measured directly. It is therefore measured as
a residual and calculated as the excess of the sum of the following items over
the net of the acquisition-date values of the identifiable assets acquired and
the liabilities assumed: (1) the consideration transferred, (2) the fair value
of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree if a less than 100 percent
interest in the acquiree is acquired, and (3) the fair value of the acquirer’s
previously held equity interest in the acquiree if the acquirer had a
noncontrolling equity interest in the acquiree before the acquisition.
Occasionally, the sum of (1) through (3) above is less than the net of the
acquisition-date fair values of the identifiable assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed. In such a case, the acquirer recognizes a gain, referred to
as a bargain purchase gain, in earnings on the acquisition date.
Because it may take time for an entity to obtain the information
necessary to recognize and measure all the items exchanged in a business
combination, the acquirer is allowed a period in which to complete its
accounting for the acquisition. That period — referred to as the measurement
period — ends as soon as the acquirer (1) receives the information it had been
seeking about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date or
(2) learns that it cannot obtain further information. However, the measurement
period cannot be more than one year after the acquisition date. During the
measurement period, the acquirer recognizes provisional amounts for the items
for which the accounting is incomplete.
Under ASC 805-10-55-16, the acquirer is required to recognize
any adjustments to the provisional amounts that were recognized during the
measurement period “in the reporting period the adjustments are determined.” The
adjustments are calculated as if the accounting had been completed on the
acquisition date. When an acquirer adjusts a provisional amount, the offsetting
entry generally increases or decreases goodwill but may also result in
adjustments to other assets and liabilities. Measurement-period adjustments may
also affect the income statement. In accordance with ASC 805-10-25-17, an
acquirer must recognize, in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts
are determined (rather than retrospectively), the “effect [on earnings] of
changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects . . . if any, as
a result of the change to the provisional amounts calculated as if the
accounting had been completed at the acquisition date.”
Other Related Issues
Pushdown Accounting
When an entity obtains control of a business, a new basis of accounting
is established in the acquirer’s financial statements for the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. ASC 805-10, ASC 805-20, and ASC 805-30
provide guidance on accounting for an acquisition of a business in the
acquirer’s consolidated financial statements. Sometimes the acquiree in
a business combination will prepare separate financial statements after
the acquisition. In such cases, the acquiree has the option of whether
to use the parent’s basis of accounting or the acquiree’s historical
carrying amounts for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in its
separate financial statements. Use of the acquirer’s basis of accounting
in the preparation of an acquiree’s separate financial statements is
called “pushdown accounting.”
An acquiree can elect to apply pushdown accounting in its separate
financial statements each time another entity or individual obtains
control of it. If it does not elect to apply pushdown accounting before
the financial statements are issued (SEC filer) or are available to be
issued (other entities), it may subsequently elect to apply pushdown
accounting to its most recent change-in-control event in a later
reporting period. However, such a later election would be a change in
accounting principle and the acquiree would be required to apply the
guidance on a change in accounting principle in ASC 250 in such
circumstances, including all relevant disclosure requirements.
ASC 250-10-45-5 requires that an entity
“report a change in accounting principle through
retrospective application . . . to all prior
periods” unless doing so would be impracticable.
We would expect entities that elect pushdown
accounting on a later date to apply it
retroactively to the acquisition date since the
parent generally would be expected to have
maintained the records for all prior periods.
Further, an SEC registrant that elects a voluntary
change in accounting principle must file a
preferability letter with the SEC.
While an entity can elect to apply pushdown accounting in a subsequent
reporting period, it cannot reverse the application of pushdown
accounting in financial statements that have been issued (SEC filer) or
are available to be issued (other entities).
Common-Control Transactions
A common-control transaction is typically a transfer of net assets or an
exchange of equity interests between entities under the control of the
same parent. While a common-control transaction is similar to a business
combination for the entity that receives the net assets or equity
interests, such a transaction does not meet the definition of a business
combination because there is no change in control over the net assets.
Therefore, the accounting and reporting for a transaction between
entities under common control is outside the scope of the business
combinations guidance in ASC 805-10, ASC 805-20, and ASC 805-30 and is
addressed in the “Transactions Between Entities Under Common Control“
subsections of ASC 805-50.
Since there is no change in control over the net assets
from the parent’s perspective in a common-control transaction, there is
no change in basis in the net assets. ASC 805-50 requires the receiving
entity to recognize the net assets received at their historical carrying
amounts, as reflected in the ultimate parent’s financial statements.
Entities
should also be aware that internal reorganizations
could trigger a requirement to apply pushdown
accounting. While common-control transactions are
generally accounted for at historical cost,
sometimes the carrying amounts of the transferred
assets and liabilities in the ultimate parent’s
consolidated financial statements differ from the
carrying amounts in the transferring entity’s
separate financial statements (e.g., if the
transferring entity had not applied pushdown
accounting). ASC 805-50-30-5 states that, in such
cases, the receiving entity’s financial statements
must “reflect the transferred assets and
liabilities at the historical cost of the parent
of the entities under common control.” We believe
that the historical cost of the parent refers to
the historical cost of the ultimate parent or
controlling shareholder. Therefore, while the
application of pushdown accounting is optional in
the acquiree’s separate financial statements, it
may be required in certain cases after an internal
reorganization.
Asset Acquisitions
The term “asset acquisition” is used to describe an acquisition of an
asset, or a group of assets, that does not meet the definition of a
business in ASC 805. An asset acquisition is accounted for in accordance
with the “Acquisition of Assets Rather Than a Business” subsections of
ASC 805-50 by using a cost accumulation model. In such a model, the cost
of the acquisition, including certain transaction costs, is allocated to
the assets acquired on a relative fair value basis and no goodwill is
recognized. By contrast, in a business combination, the assets acquired
are recognized generally at fair value and goodwill is recognized. As a
result, there are significant differences between the accounting for an
asset acquisition and the accounting for a business combination.
Joint Venture Formations
In August 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-05,
under which an entity that qualifies as either a joint venture or a
corporate joint venture as defined in the ASC master glossary is required to
apply a new basis of accounting upon the formation of the joint venture.
Under ASU 2023-05 (codified in ASC 805-60), the formation of a joint venture
or a corporate joint venture (collectively, “joint ventures”) results in the
“creation of a new reporting entity,” and no accounting acquirer is
identified under ASC 805. Accordingly, a new basis of accounting would be
established upon the formation date. A joint venture must initially measure
its assets and liabilities at fair value on the formation date, which the
ASU defines as “the date on which an entity initially meets the definition
of a joint venture.” Further, the excess of the fair value of a joint
venture as a whole over the net assets of the joint venture is recognized as
goodwill.
The amendments in ASU 2023-05 are effective for all joint
ventures within the ASU’s scope that are formed on or after January 1, 2025,
and early adoption is permitted. Joint ventures formed on or after the
effective date of ASU 2023-05 will be required to apply the new guidance
prospectively. Joint ventures formed before the ASU’s effective date are
permitted to apply the new guidance (1) retrospectively, if they have
“sufficient information” to do so, or (2) prospectively, if financial
statements have not yet been issued (or made available for issuance). If
retrospective application is elected, transition disclosures must be
provided in accordance with ASC 250.
Purchased Financial Assets
In June 2023, the FASB issued a proposed ASU
that would amend the guidance in ASU 2016-13 regarding the
accounting upon the acquisition of financial assets acquired in (1) a
business combination, (2) an asset acquisition, or (3) the consolidation
of a VIE that is not a business. The proposed ASU would broaden the
population of financial assets that are within the scope of the gross-up
approach under ASC 326 by requiring an acquirer to apply the gross-up
approach in accordance with ASC 805 to all financial assets acquired in
a business combination rather than only to purchased financial assets
with credit deterioration. For financial assets acquired as a result of
an asset acquisition or through consolidation of a VIE that is not a
business, the asset acquirer would apply the gross-up approach to
seasoned assets, which are acquired assets unless the asset is deemed
akin to an in-substance origination. A seasoned asset is an asset (1)
that is acquired more than 90 days after origination and (2) for which
the acquirer was not involved with the origination.
On April 30, 2025, the Board decided to revise the project objective to
improve the accounting for the acquisition of purchased financial
assets, other than PCD assets, through narrow amendments. Under this
revised project objective, the current accounting for PCD assets would
be retained, and seasoned loan receivables, excluding credit cards,
would be subject to the amendments to the final ASU. The Board directed
the staff to draft a final Accounting Standards Update for vote by
written ballot.
SEC Reporting Requirements
To ensure that investors receive relevant financial information about a
company’s significant activities, the SEC requires registrants to report
financial information about significant acquired or to be acquired
businesses or the acquisition of real estate operations (the acquiree) in
certain filings under Regulation S-X, Rules 3-05 and 3-14, respectively.
See Deloitte’s Roadmap SEC Reporting Considerations for Business
Acquisitions for more information.
Deloitte’s Roadmap Business Combinations provides
Deloitte’s insights into and interpretations of the
guidance in ASC 805 on business combinations,
pushdown accounting, common-control transactions,
and asset acquisitions as well as an overview of
related SEC reporting requirements.
Contacts
|
|
Matt Himmelman
Audit &
Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 714 436
7277
|
|
Aaron Shaw
Audit &
Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 202 220
2122
|
For information about Deloitte’s
service offerings related to business combinations, please contact:
|
|
Will Braeutigam
Audit &
Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 713 982
3436
|