On the Radar
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Including
the Fair Value Option)
Most entities have amounts that are recognized at fair value in their financial
statements. ASC 820 defines fair value, sets out a framework for measuring it, and
establishes fair value disclosure requirements. However, ASC 820 does not specify
when an entity is required or permitted to measure assets, liabilities, equity
instruments, or transactions at fair value; this requirement is addressed in other
U.S. GAAP.
An entity must consider the
following issues in applying the fair value measurement framework in ASC 820:
Common Misconception
A fair value measurement is a market-based measurement based
on an exit price notion and is not entity-specific.
Therefore, a fair value measurement must be determined on
the basis of the assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing an item, regardless of whether those
assumptions are observable or unobservable. A measurement
based on “true value,” “economic value,” or management’s
perception of value is not consistent with a fair value
measurement. The fair value hierarchy in ASC 820 serves as a
basis for considering market-participant assumptions and
distinguishes between (1) market-participant assumptions
developed on the basis of market data that are independent
of the entity (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own
assumptions about market-participant assumptions developed
on the basis of the best information available in the
particular circumstances, including assumptions about the
risks inherent in inputs or valuation techniques.
Fair Value Measurement Framework
The fair value measurement guidance was
originally issued in September 2006. Although it has been subsequently amended
since its original issuance, the general framework has not changed and
significant future changes are not expected. An entity needs to perform various
steps to (1) prepare a fair value measurement that complies with the measurement
principles in ASC 820 and (2) meet the disclosure requirements in ASC 820. An
entity may apply the following step-by-step approach to measure and disclose
fair value when the initial or subsequent measurement of an asset, liability, or
equity instrument at fair value is required or permitted by other U.S. GAAP:
Fair Value
Measurement Application Framework
-
Step 1: Identify the unit of account — The unit of account represents the level of aggregation or disaggregation of individual assets, liabilities, or equity instruments for recognition in the financial statements and, with the exception of items for which there are quoted prices in an active market, is determined on the basis of other U.S. GAAP.
-
Step 2: Identify the unit of valuation — The unit of valuation is often consistent with the unit of account, but there are exceptions. The unit of valuation for nonfinancial assets (other than nonfinancial derivative assets) is the asset’s highest and best use. In addition, the unit of valuation for certain groups of financial assets, financial liabilities, and nonfinancial items accounted for as derivatives may represent a portfolio of items with offsetting risk positions.
-
Step 3: Identify the principal or most advantageous market — Under ASC 820, it is assumed that an entity will transact in its principal market or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market. This determination is important because exit prices are not the same in different markets. In most situations, there will be a principal market, which represents the market with the greatest volume and level of activity for the item. The market in which the entity normally transacts is generally the principal (or most advantageous) market.
-
Step 4: Develop assumptions that market participants would use to measure fair value — To meet the “exit price” measurement objective, an entity must develop assumptions that market participants would use to determine the price of an asset, liability, or equity instrument in an orderly transaction as of the measurement date, even if those assumptions are based on unobservable information. An entity may not substitute the assumptions of market participants with its own assumptions that differ from those of market participants.
-
Step 5: Measure fair value on the basis of available inputs and appropriate valuation techniques — The initial fair value measurement of an item will often be equal to its transaction price. However, in certain situations, the transaction price does not equal an exit price on initial recognition. In subsequently measuring items at fair value, an entity must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Entities must use valuation techniques that are consistent with the techniques that market participants would use to determine an exit price. Since a quoted market price for an identical item in an active market (i.e., a Level 1 input) constitutes the most reliable evidence of fair value, this price must be used to measure fair value when available. Although a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in relation to normal market activity may affect the entity’s selection of techniques or inputs, it does not change the fair value measurement objective. Entities cannot incorporate measurements that are inconsistent with fair value on the basis that (1) an entire market is functioning in a disorderly manner or (2) an entity would not enter into a transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the current market price.
-
Step 6: Allocate fair value measurement to individual units of account (if necessary) — An entity may be required to allocate a fair value measurement when the unit of account for the item measured at fair value differs from the unit of valuation. In some cases, an allocation will be required even when the unit of account and unit of valuation are the same. Such allocations are performed in accordance with other U.S. GAAP.
-
Step 7: Classify the fair value measurement within the fair value hierarchy and prepare disclosures — Under ASC 820, inputs used in fair value measurements are categorized into a three-level fair value hierarchy. In addition to requiring the disclosure of items measured at fair value within this hierarchy (i.e., Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3), ASC 820 requires entities to provide numerous quantitative and qualitative disclosures about fair value measurements.
As is evident in its comment letters
on registrants’ filings, the SEC staff closely
scrutinizes the fair value disclosures provided by
entities, focusing on missing or confusing
disclosures. The staff often will request entities
to modify or supplement disclosures.
Items Required or Eligible to Be Measured at Fair Value
With certain exceptions, the measurement guidance in ASC 820 applies whenever
another Codification topic uses the phrase “fair value” to describe how an
entity is required or permitted to measure financial and nonfinancial assets and
liabilities, instruments classified in a reporting entity’s stockholders’
equity, or specific transactions, regardless of whether this measurement
pertains to initial or subsequent recognition or to disclosure. Therefore,
before applying the fair value measurement framework in ASC 820, entities must
determine whether fair value measurement under ASC 820 is required or permitted
by other U.S. GAAP.
In addition, certain Codification topics permit, but do not require, an entity to
measure an asset or liability at fair value. Most notably, ASC 825 permits
entities to elect the fair value option to account for certain financial assets
and financial liabilities at fair value. Entities may also elect to account for
certain assets or liabilities, including nonfinancial items, at fair value
according to other Codification topics (e.g., ASC 860-50 permits entities to
recognize servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value). Any
measurement of an item at fair value must be performed in accordance with ASC
820 unless the use of another measurement approach is specifically required by
U.S. GAAP.
Deloitte’s Roadmap Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Including the
Fair Value Option) comprehensively
discusses the scope, measurement, and disclosure
guidance in ASC 820 and other U.S. GAAP.
Contacts
|
Jonathan Howard
Audit & Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 203 761
3235
|
If you are interested in Deloitte’s fair value
service offerings, please contact:
|
Jamie Davis
Audit & Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 312 486
0303
|