On the Radar
Income Taxes
The accounting for income taxes under ASC 740 can be extremely complex. The amount of
income tax expense an entity must record in each period does not simply equal the amount
of income tax payable in each period. Rather, ASC 740 requires an entity to record
income tax expense in each period as if there were no differences between (1) the timing
of the recognition of events in income before tax for U.S. GAAP purposes and (2) the
timing of the recognition of those events in taxable income.
In accordance with ASC 740-10-10-1, an entity’s overall objectives in
accounting for income taxes are to (1) “recognize the amount of taxes payable or
refundable for the current year” (i.e., current tax expense or benefit) and (2)
“recognize deferred tax liabilities [DTLs] and assets [DTAs] for the future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or
tax returns” (resulting in deferred tax expense or benefit). An entity’s total
tax expense is generally the sum of these two components and can be expressed as the
following formula:
To apply the guidance in ASC
740, entities must understand not only the standard’s
accounting requirements but also the tax codes under various
jurisdictions. Accordingly, coordination between the
accounting and tax departments is generally
required.
Legislative and Economic Setting
In 2017, we saw sweeping tax reform unfold in the United States.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Act”) introduced a host of new concepts,
including a one-time transition tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings, along
with a new tax on global intangible low-tax income (GILTI) inclusions, the base
erosion anti-abuse tax (BEAT), and more restrictive interest limitations under
IRC Section 163(j). In some respects, however, the 2017 Act simplified the
accounting under ASC 740 because assertions entities needed to make to avoid
recording DTLs for unremitted foreign earnings now primarily apply only to
ancillary taxes (i.e., withholding and state).
Then, in 2022, two pieces of legislation with significant
tax-related provisions were enacted. The CHIPS Act of 2022 (H.R. 4346), signed into law on August 9,
2022, established an advanced manufacturing investment credit under new IRC
Section 48D. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (H.R. 5376), signed into law on August 16,
2022, included (1) a 15 percent book minimum tax (corporate alternative minimum
tax [AMT]) on the adjusted financial statement income of applicable
corporations; (2) a plethora of clean-energy tax incentives in the form of tax
credits, some of which have a direct-pay option or transferability provision;
and (3) a 1 percent excise tax on certain corporate stock buybacks.
The provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act went into effect
this year, and while the ASC 740 ramifications of the corporate AMT were
relatively minor, the direct-pay and transferability provisions of the new tax
credits have provided (and continue to provide) a host of new challenges.
In addition, the global economy has started to prepare for the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD’s) Pillar 2 tax
regime, which is intended to introduce a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15
percent. To implement the global minimum tax, individual countries are
responsible for establishing laws and regulations in line with the framework
provided by the OECD. The framework is set to go into effect as early as January
2024, subject to the enactment of tax laws in accordance with the framework on a
jurisdictional basis. Generally, we expect these new taxes to be accounted for
in a manner similar to AMTs, but the accounting impacts of each new law will
need to be separately evaluated in each jurisdiction.
Standard-Setting Activity
The FASB has completed (or is about to complete) projects
related to income tax disclosures and the accounting for investments in tax
credit structures. The status of these projects is discussed below.
Disclosure Requirements
On March 15, 2023, the FASB issued a proposed ASU to
improve the transparency and decision-usefulness of income tax disclosures. The
project’s scope concentrates on disclosures related to income taxes paid and the
rate reconciliation table. Comments were due May 30, 2023. At its meeting on
August 30, 2023, the FASB discussed feedback on the proposed ASU. In general,
the Board affirmed most of the proposal’s income tax disclosure amendments1 and instructed the FASB staff to draft for the Board’s approval a final
ASU, which is expected to be issued by December 31, 2023.
Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures
In March 2023, the FASB issued ASU
2023-02, which expands the use of the proportional
amortization method to other investment tax credits besides low-income
housing tax credit investments provided that the other investments meet
certain revised criteria in ASC 323-740-25-1. The ASU is intended to improve
the accounting and disclosures for investments in tax credit structures.
For additional details about tax credit structures, see
Appendixes
C and D of Deloitte’s Roadmap Equity Method Investments and Joint
Ventures.
For a comprehensive discussion of
the income tax accounting guidance in ASC 740, see
Deloitte’s Roadmap Income
Taxes.
Contacts
|
Matt
Himmelman
Audit &
Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 714 436
7277
|
|
Mark Crowley
Audit & Assurance
Managing Director
Deloitte & Touche LLP
+1 203 563 2518
|
For information about Deloitte’s service offerings related to
the accounting for income taxes, please contact:
|
Steve Barta
Audit &
Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 415 783
6392
|
Footnotes
1
All FASB decisions are tentative until a final ASU is
issued.