On the Radar
Initial Public Offerings
After a record-breaking year for initial public offerings (IPOs) and
special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) in 2021, the market has remained slow
for several years amid various challenges, including volatile markets; geopolitical
conflicts; interest rate increases; inflation; and supply chain issues. However,
interest rates and inflation have been moderating, and private companies are
continuing to evaluate the methods used to go public. Such methods include (1)
“traditional” IPOs, in which private companies sell their equity in a public
underwritten offering, and (2) nontraditional IPOs, which have become more popular
over the past several years. Nontraditional IPOs include those in which private
operating companies choose to merge with SPACs to raise capital or use other
financing alternatives, such as direct listings. Companies can also go public by
registering debt securities, distributing shares in a spin-off transaction, or
registering securities issued by real estate investment trusts (REITs).
Before a company commences a public offering of securities, it must
file a registration statement with the SEC under the applicable securities laws.
Both the form used to file the registration statement and the filing and review
process will depend on the nature of the offering. Companies undertaking a
traditional IPO can voluntarily submit a draft registration statement to the SEC
staff for confidential, nonpublic review. The ability to submit confidentially is a
significant benefit because it allows companies to keep potentially sensitive
information from customers or competitors until later in the IPO process.
Confidential initial submissions are subsequently filed publicly no later than 15
days before (1) a roadshow or (2) the requested effective date of the registration
statement if no roadshow is planned.
Once submitted to or filed with the SEC, a registration statement is
reviewed by the staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”),
which will generally complete its initial review and furnish its first set of
comments within 27 calendar days. The company then responds to each of the staff’s
comments and reflects edits to the draft registration statement in an amended
filing, which the staff will also review. A company can expect several rounds of
comment letters containing follow-up questions on responses to original comments as
well as additional comments on new information included in the amended registration
statement. After the initial review, subsequent comments are typically furnished
within two weeks. For more information about typical SEC staff comments, see
Deloitte’s Roadmap SEC Comment
Letter Considerations, Including Industry Insights.
Identifying the Required Financial Statements
A company must determine what financial statements are required in the
registration statement. While this determination may appear straightforward,
additional complexities may arise because a company may first need to determine
the legal entity that will become the SEC registrant. For example:
- A company may succeed to substantially all of the business of another entity (or the “predecessor”) for which financial statements are required.
- A company may be a carved-out entity that previously existed only as a subset of a larger parent entity or may be a combination of individual entities joined to form a larger public company.
- A company, a subsidiary, or a subset of subsidiaries may issue securities, guarantee securities, or otherwise have dividend restrictions that trigger requirements for the inclusion of separate financial statements or financial statement schedules in the IPO registration statement.
Further, a registrant may need to consider whether separate
financial statements or pro forma financial information is required for
“significant” business acquisitions, dispositions, or equity method
investments.
The financial statement periods to be included in the IPO registration statement
depend on the company’s characteristics and the timing of the document’s
submission. Smaller reporting companies (SRCs) and emerging growth companies
(EGCs) generally have the option of presenting only two years of audited annual
financial statements in a traditional IPO, while all other entities must present
three years. Further, under SEC regulations, the financial statements in an IPO
must meet certain age requirements as of each registration-statement filing date
as well as when the registration is declared effective; otherwise, the financial
statements will be considered “stale.” In general, the financial statements in
an IPO filing must not be more than 134 days old (i.e., the gap between the date
of filing or effectiveness and the date of the latest balance sheet cannot be
more than 134 days). However, third-quarter financial statements are considered
timely through the 45th day after the most recent fiscal year-end, after which
the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year are required.
Thus, a company that fails to file a registration statement before one of these
critical cut-off dates will be required to include additional financial
statement periods in the registration statement; in such cases, there may be a
significant delay in the company’s preferred IPO timeline.
A Public Entity’s Application of U.S. GAAP and SEC Regulations
Certain provisions of U.S. GAAP for public entities differ from those for
nonpublic entities. Notably, public business entities (PBEs) are generally
required to adopt new accounting standards before private companies. Although
companies that meet the EGC criteria can elect to use private-company adoption
dates for new accounting standards, other entities (i.e., non-EGCs) undertaking
an IPO typically must use public-company adoption dates for all accounting
standards.
In addition, a company undertaking an IPO must present financial
statements that are consistent with public-entity accounting principles and must
comply with the disclosure requirements for public entities for all periods
presented. The following are examples (not all-inclusive) of topics for which
the accounting principles or disclosures may apply to public entities but do not
apply to nonpublic entities:
-
Earnings per share.
-
Segment reporting, including disclosures about significant segment expenses in accordance with recent amendments.
-
Temporary equity classification of redeemable securities.
-
Certain income-tax-related disclosures.
-
Certain disclosures related to pensions and other postretirement benefits.
Once a company is considered a PBE (even if it qualifies as an
EGC and elects to use private-company adoption dates), it is no longer permitted
to apply private-company accounting alternatives, such as the amortization of
goodwill, or practical expedients permitted for non-PBEs, such as use of a
risk-free rate for leases. Therefore, any previously elected private-company
alternatives or non-PBE practical expedients would need to be retrospectively
eliminated from the company’s historical financial statements before such
statements can be included in its registration statement.
Further, public entities are subject to various SEC rules and regulations that
may affect the financial statements and related disclosures (e.g., the
additional disclosure requirements of Regulation S-X). Some of these
requirements are broadly applicable, and some apply only to entities in certain
industries. Therefore, a nonpublic entity’s previously issued financial
statements will typically need to be revised for all periods presented to
reflect the additional SEC disclosure requirements. However, an entity that
meets the SRC criteria may be eligible to apply scaled disclosure requirements.
SRCs generally do not have to apply the disclosure provisions of Regulation S-X
in their entirety except when specified.
Audit Considerations for Public Companies
Audits of private companies are subject to AICPA auditing standards. However,
auditors of issuers undertaking an IPO must apply PCAOB auditing standards and
will need to perform additional procedures and issue a new auditor’s report that
refers to these standards. Note that in a filing submitted for
confidential review to the SEC, the auditor’s report will typically
refer to both AICPA and PCAOB auditing standards.
Because the SEC’s and PCAOB’s independence rules are generally more restrictive
than the AICPA’s, both the auditor and management, with oversight from the audit
committee, need to determine whether (1) there is possible noncompliance with
the SEC’s and PCAOB’s independence rules or (2) there are conflicts of interest
before the entity undertakes an IPO.
Post-IPO Periodic Financial Reporting and Internal Control Requirements
After a registration statement is declared effective, a company
is required to file quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form
10-K. As a public company, a registrant must also file a current report on Form
8-K that discloses various material events that occur between its periodic
reports. Registrants will also need to comply with many recent SEC rules,
including those on executive compensation, clawback requirements,
pay-versus-performance disclosures, cybersecurity disclosures, and climate
disclosures.
A public company will need to address two types of controls and procedures in its
post-IPO filings with the SEC:
-
Internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) — ICFR refers to procedures a company performs to reasonably ensure compliance with its policies related to preparing financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and Regulation S-X. Management must annually file a report on the effectiveness of its ICFR. Moreover, non-EGC accelerated and large accelerated filers must generally include an auditor’s attestation report on the effectiveness of ICFR in their annual reports. However, all new public companies can apply a phase-in exception under which management’s report and the auditor’s attestation are not required before the second annual report (i.e., until a registrant has been required to file or has filed a Form 10-K for the prior fiscal year). Certain additional exceptions may also apply.
-
Disclosure controls and procedures (DCPs) — These are a broader set of controls that largely encompass ICFR and are designed to provide assurance that information that the registrant must disclose in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act” or “1934 Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified.
Companies also must continue to comply, on a quarterly basis,
with reporting requirements related to material changes to ICFR and DCPs. In
addition, in quarterly and annual reports, the registrant’s principal executive
and principal financial officer (typically the CEO and CFO) must file
certifications prescribed by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act” or “Sarbanes-Oxley”).
SPAC Transactions
After increasing significantly in recent years, SPAC
transactions have slowed down as well. If contemplating use of a SPAC
transaction to go public, management should be aware of the differences between
a traditional IPO and a SPAC transaction from a financial reporting and auditing
perspective, as well as the impact of the SEC’s recent final rule amending the disclosure
requirements for SPAC transactions, which took effect on July 1, 2024. The table
below outlines the areas of potential differences between the two types of
transactions.
Key Differences Between Traditional IPOs and SPAC
Transactions
|
---|
The ability to confidentially submit the registration
statement/proxy statement
|
The requirement to include pro forma information
|
The potential requirement to include prospective
financial information
|
The timing of the initial periodic reporting obligation
after the IPO or SPAC transaction
|
The reporting requirements related to ICFR
|
Deloitte’s Roadmap Initial
Public Offerings addresses
financial reporting, accounting, and auditing
considerations to help companies navigate challenges
related to preparing an IPO or de-SPAC registration
statement and ultimately going public.
Contacts
|
John Wilde
Audit &
Assurance
Partner
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 415 783
6613
|
For information about Deloitte’s service
offerings related to initial public offerings, please contact:
|
Previn Waas
Audit &
Assurance
U.S. IPO Services Co-Leader
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 408 704
4083
|
|
Barrett
Daniels
Audit &
Assurance
U.S. IPO Services
Co-Leader
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
+1 408 704
4176
|