On the Radar
SEC Comment Letter Considerations, Including
Industry Insights
The global business landscape continues to evolve at a rapid pace.
After years of increasing interest rates and inflation, these trends have begun to
moderate. However, other factors such as global trade tensions and the
transformative effects of generative artificial intelligence (AI) are dominating
headlines and influencing world markets. At the same time, with the change of
presidential administration, the SEC is charting a new course for rulemaking and
priorities. The SEC’s current regulatory agenda (the “RegFlex Agenda”), which is part of the
Spring 2025
Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions issued by
the Office of Management and Budget’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
provides insights into where the SEC might focus. The agenda’s areas of focus
include facilitating capital formation and reducing compliance burden, establishing
a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto assets, and revisiting actions of
the prior administration.
To help the SEC meet its responsibilities under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) continues to
selectively review documents filed by registrants under the Securities Act of 1933
and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the Division’s filing review process,
the Division performs some level of review of each registrant at least once every
three years and may issue comments to such registrants. The analysis herein
summarizes the comments the Division issued during its reviews of periodic filings
of public companies.
Top 10 Topics in Reviews
The table below summarizes comment letter trends by topic in the
12-month period ended July 31, 2025 (“review year 2025” or the “current
year”).
The topics that constitute the current year’s top 10 list are
largely consistent with the prior year’s list. However, the topics of debt, EPS,
and signatures, exhibits, and agreements have joined the top 10 list, while the
topics of income taxes (ranked 15th in the current year), internal control over
financial reporting (ranked 11th in the current year), and fair value (ranked
13th in the current year) have dropped out of the top 10. The volume of reviews
with a comment on MD&A as a percentage of all reviews with comment letters
has continued to increase, whereas the volume of reviews with a comment on
non-GAAP measures as a percentage of all reviews with comment letters decreased
slightly. These two topics are still the two most significant sources of SEC
comments by a wide margin since the SEC staff remains laser-focused on them.
Given the SEC staff’s focus on ensuring that disclosures provide decision-useful
information from management’s perspective, we expect the volume of comments on
MD&A to remain high. While segment reporting remained in 3rd place, the
volume of reviews with a comment on this topic increased from 16 percent of all
reviews with comment letters to 23 percent of all such reviews, with the
increase largely attributable to the staff’s comments on the implementation of
the new disclosures required by ASU 2023-07, including significant
segment expense disclosures. We also observed an increased number of comments
related to signatures, exhibits, and agreements, which rose from 16th place in
review year 2024 to 7th place in review year 2025 because of an increase in
comments related to potentially missing or incorrect exhibits and
certifications. In addition, both debt and EPS moved up into the top 10 list
this year, indicating an increase in SEC comments related to the accounting for
and disclosure of financial instruments.
A number of the aforementioned trends are likely to continue in
years to come since comment letter topics have been largely consistent year over
year. While it is difficult to predict what new comment letter trends are on the
horizon, the SEC staff has historically focused on emerging issues such as
macroeconomic issues as well as new accounting standards and regulations.
Accordingly, we might expect a focus on AI and global trade issues as well as
new income tax disclosures that go into effect this year. It remains to be seen
how the recent change in SEC leadership and the corresponding changes in the
SEC’s priorities will affect the Division’s filing reviews and resulting comment
letters, if at all.
Long-Term Review Trends
The charts below show, for each
of the review years 2021 through 2025, (1) the number of reviews with comment
letters and (2) the total number of SEC comment letters issued.
As the charts above illustrate, while there was a notable
increase in the number of reviews with comment letters and the number of comment
letters issued on Forms 10-K and 10-Q from the beginning of review year 2021
through the end of review year 2023, the trend started to reverse in review year
2024, with a decrease in (1) review year 2024 (8 percent year-over-year decrease
in both the number of reviews with comment letters and the number of comment
letters issued) and (2) review year 2025 (11 percent year-over-year decrease in
the number of reviews with comment letters, 10 percent year-over-year decrease
in the number of comment letters issued). This overall trend is most likely
attributable to capital markets activity. Throughout calendar years 2020 and
2021, the volume of traditional initial public offerings (IPOs) and
special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) transactions reached record levels,
with more than 800 companies going public during this time frame. During that
period, SEC staff most likely focused on registration statements for IPOs and
SPAC transactions and reduced discretionary reviews of annual reports. In 2022,
the capital markets slowed, but the earlier activity led to an increase in the
number of Forms 10-K filed by public companies, which are subject to recurring
SEC staff review. With more public companies subject to review and lower levels
of capital markets activity, we saw elevated levels of comment letters in review
years 2023 and 2024, although the number of comment letters declined in review
year 2024 from its peak in review year 2023. In review year 2025, we observed a
more significant year-over-year decrease that is most likely attributable to
increased capital markets activity as well as to ongoing changes to staffing
levels at the SEC (similar to changes in staffing levels at other federal
agencies). We believe that this reversal may continue into next year and that we
may see further changes as the new director of the Division establishes the
Division’s priorities for the disclosure review program.
Although the number of reviews with comment letters remains
elevated, the vast majority of reviews conducted by the SEC staff do not result
in a comment letter. For example, in the SEC’s fiscal year ended September 30,
2024, the SEC staff reviewed approximately 3,400 companies as part of the annual
review process. However, only about a quarter of the reviews of those companies
resulted in a comment letter.
Priorities on the Horizon
Broader SEC priorities often
influence comment letter trends. As registrants start to prepare for the 2025
annual reporting cycle, they may find it helpful to consider the following SEC
priorities:
For a comprehensive discussion of
comment letter trends affecting SEC filers, see
Deloitte’s Roadmap SEC Comment Letter
Considerations, Including Industry
Insights.
Contacts
|
|
John Wilde
Audit & Assurance
Partner
Deloitte & Touche
LLP
+1 415 783 6613
|
If you are interested in Deloitte’s SEC reporting
offerings, please contact:
![]() |
Will Braeutigam
Audit & Assurance
Partner
Deloitte & Touche
LLP
+1 713 982 3436
|
