2.6 Form and Content of Acquiree Financial Statements
A registrant generally prepares preacquisition financial statements
of the acquiree on the same basis as if the acquiree were a registrant, except that
it uses the acquiree’s level of significance to determine the number of years of
audited financial statements to present. Although the determination of such periods
is based on significance, the form and content of the acquiree’s financial
statements must adhere to the relevant requirements of Regulation S-X and SAB topics
(e.g., classification of equity that is subject to mandatory redemption requirements
or whose redemption is outside the control of the registrant under Regulation S-X, Rule 5-02.27) as well as the
guidance in U.S. GAAP (or, if the acquiree is a foreign entity, IFRS Accounting
Standards; see Section
2.11). Supplemental schedules required by Regulation S-X, Article 5,
are not required for acquiree financial statements.
2.6.1 Accounting Standards, Disclosures, and Adoption Dates
As emphasized in paragraph
2935.19 of the FRM, certain disclosures may be omitted on
the basis of the scope or applicability to the acquiree as set forth in the
specific FASB standard. For example, disclosures about the following would not
be required in certain circumstances:
-
Segment information if the acquiree does not meet the definition of a public entity under ASC 280-10-15-3.
-
Certain information about employers’ pensions and other postretirement benefits (see ASC 715-20-50-5) if the acquiree meets the definition of a nonpublic entity under ASC 715-20-20.
-
Earnings per share if the acquiree does not have “publicly held common stock or potential common stock” in accordance with ASC 260-10-05-1 and as further described in ASC 260-10-15-2.
Acquiree financial statements that are included in a filing
under Rule 3-05
meet the definition of a public business entity (PBE) in U.S. GAAP.7 As stated in the ASC master glossary, a business entity is a PBE if it is
required by the SEC “to file or furnish financial statements, or does file or
furnish financial statements (including voluntary filers), with the SEC (including other entities whose financial statements or
financial information are required to be or are included in a filing)”
(emphasis added). Accordingly, such acquiree financial statements must adhere to
the PBE requirements in U.S. GAAP.
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, entities that meet the definition
of a PBE are not eligible to elect certain accounting and reporting alternatives
in U.S. GAAP, including those developed by the Private Company Council and
subsequently endorsed by the FASB. Therefore, the effects of any previously
elected private-company accounting alternatives cannot be applied in the
acquiree financial statements under Rule 3-05 and would have to be eliminated
from them.
In addition, companies that are not PBEs are permitted to use
certain practical expedients. For example, a non-PBE may use the risk-free rate
as its discount rate when applying ASC 842. At the October 2020 CAQ SEC
Regulations Committee joint meeting with the SEC staff, the SEC staff discussed
a situation in which (1) an acquired company has adopted ASC 842 by using the
risk-free-rate practical expedient and (2) a registrant must evaluate the
acquired company for significance and, in some cases, provide this company’s
separate financial statements. The SEC staff indicated that it would not object
if a registrant uses financial statements that reflect the risk-free-rate
practical expedient to measure significance, since doing so would result in
greater ROU assets and, thus, would yield a higher measure of significance when
the asset test is performed. The staff noted that the risk-free-rate practical
expedient should be “the only difference between those financial statements and
a PBE set of financial statements” but clarified that financial statements
provided in accordance with Rule 3-05 are PBE financial statements and thus may
not reflect this expedient. Therefore, before providing such financial
statements in accordance with Rule 3-05, a registrant would need to assess
whether an adjustment to the PBE rate is material and must be revised.
Further, in certain accounting standards, the adoption dates and
disclosure requirements for PBEs differ from those for non-PBEs. If a standard
defines a public entity as a PBE with respect to the application of that
standard’s transition requirements, the acquiree’s financial statements that
must be provided under Rule 3-05 are required to conform to the PBE adoption
dates and disclosure requirements. Therefore, an acquiree that does not
otherwise meet the definition of a PBE (except for its requirement to include
its financial statements or financial information in another entity’s filings
with the SEC) may have to adopt certain accounting standards earlier than
planned and provide the incremental disclosures required for PBEs. However, in
November 2019, the FASB issued ASU
2019-10, which introduced a “two-bucket” framework for
staggering the effective dates of certain major ASUs. Under this framework, the
application of adoption dates is grouped as follows:
-
Bucket 1 — PBEs that are SEC filers (as defined in U.S. GAAP), excluding SRCs (as defined by the SEC).
-
Bucket 2 — All other entities, including SRCs, other PBEs that are not SEC filers, private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and employee benefit plans.
Entities that include or are required to include financial statements or
financial information in other entities’ filings (e.g., financial statements or
financial information that must be provided under Rule 3-05) are examples of
“PBEs that are not SEC filers.” Therefore, the Bucket 2 adoption dates would be
used for the financial statements of an acquiree. See Deloitte’s November 19,
2019, Heads Up for more information
about ASU 2019-10 and the two-bucket framework.
Management should be mindful of other accounting standards in
which the adoption dates for PBEs and non-PBEs differ. While EGCs may not be
required to adopt certain accounting standards by using the PBE effective
dates,8 this accommodation does not apply to acquiree financial statements under
Rule 3-05.
Changing Lanes
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, which establishes new
income tax disclosure requirements in addition to modifying and
eliminating certain existing requirements. The ASU replaces the term
“public entity” throughout ASC 740 with the term “public business
entity” as defined in the ASC master glossary. Thus, the enhanced
disclosure requirements set forth by the ASU are applicable for acquiree
financial statements provided under Rule 3-05. The ASU’s amendments are
effective for PBEs for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024.
See Deloitte’s May 20, 2025, Heads Up for more
information about the disclosure requirements established by ASU
2023-09.
Also, when preparing pro forma financial statements under
Article 11, a
registrant must conform the acquiree’s date and method of adoption of new
accounting standards to those of its own. See paragraph 3250.3 of the FRM and see
Chapter 4 for
additional information regarding the pro forma requirements.
In the evaluation of adoption dates of new standards for a
nonpublic target that is an accounting acquirer in a reverse merger with a
public operating company, the use of non-PBE adoption dates for premerger
financial statements of the target included in a related Form S-4, proxy
statement, or Form 8-K will vary depending on the facts and circumstances. If
the registrant, target, and combined entity after the merger all qualify as EGCs
and the legal acquirer elected to defer adoption, the target may continue with
non-PBE adoption dates in the related filings. If the target would not qualify
as an EGC, if the postmerger entity would not qualify as an EGC, or if both
scenarios apply, non-PBE adoption dates would also be permitted in the Form S-4
or proxy. However, PBE adoption dates would have to be used in the target’s
financial statements that must be filed in the amended Form 8-K that is due 71
calendar days after the initial Form 8-K has to be filed. This is because the
financial statements of the target become those of the registrant (predecessor
financial statements) upon consummation of the merger.
Connecting the Dots
Registrants that apply the non-PBE adoption dates for the financial
statements included in the Form S-4 but would be required to apply PBE
adoption dates in the amended Form 8-K must ensure that they have
provided robust and comprehensive transition disclosures under
SAB Topic 11.M (SAB
74) in the footnotes to their financial statements and MD&A to
disclose the expected effects of the new standard on their financial
statements in the period of adoption.
See the highlights of the March 2021 and March 2022 CAQ SEC
Regulations Committee joint meetings with the SEC staff. Also see Section 2.4.4.2 and
Section 2.4.5.2
for a discussion of audit requirements in this circumstance.
2.6.2 Audit Requirements
As shown in the table in paragraph 4110.5 of the FRM, when audited financial
statements of an acquiree are provided under Rule 3-05, the audit may be
performed in accordance with AICPA standards (the public accounting firm does not need to be registered with the PCAOB). However,
compliance with PCAOB standards is required when an acquired company is
identified as a predecessor (e.g., an accounting acquirer in a reverse
acquisition [see Section
2.4.4.2 and Section 2.4.5.2] or a target in a SPAC transaction [see
Section
2.4.6]).
2.6.3 Interim Financial Statements
A registrant that must provide an acquiree’s interim financial
statements under Rule 3-05 should ensure that the
statements adhere to the form and content requirements in Article 10. While
under SEC regulations, a registrant does not have to audit or review such
interim financial statements, the registrant should consider whether there are
other reasons to do so, such as in circumstances in which an underwriter
requires an independent auditor to review the interim information for
due-diligence or comfort-letter purposes.
2.6.4 Acquisition of a Portion of an Entity
A registrant sometimes acquires only certain parts of an entity. In accordance
with paragraph 2935.5 of the
FRM, if those parts represent substantially all of the entity, the registrant
can provide full audited financial statements of the entire entity. In these
circumstances, any of the assets, liabilities, and operations not acquired by
the registrant would be eliminated in the pro forma financial statements.
If the acquired parts of an entity do not represent
substantially all of the entity, financial statements of the entire entity may
not be useful. Paragraph 2935.6
of the FRM indicates that in this case, the audited financial statements should
represent only the acquired assets, liabilities, and revenues and expenses of
the entity and should exclude the operations retained by the seller. Such
financial statements — often referred to as carve-out financial statements —
include (1) balance sheets; (2) statements of operations, comprehensive income,
and cash flows and an analysis of changes in stockholders’ equity (which may be
in a note or separate statement) for the relevant periods; and (3) related
financial statement disclosures.
There may be circumstances in which a registrant may comply with
Rule 3-05 by
substituting abbreviated financial statements in lieu of full financial
statements or carve-out financial statements provided that certain qualifying
conditions (see Section
2.6.4.1) and presentation and disclosure requirements (see
Section
2.6.4.2) are met. In addition, as further discussed in Section 2.6.4.3,
Rule 3-05(f)
allows a registrant to provide a form of abbreviated financial statements for an
acquired or to be acquired business that includes significant oil- and
gas-producing activities.
See Deloitte’s Roadmap Carve-Out Financial Statements for
more information. For a discussion of the performance of the significance tests
when only abbreviated financial statements are available, see Section 2.3.5.3 of this
Roadmap.
2.6.4.1 Qualifying Conditions for Use of Abbreviated Financial Statements
Under Rule
3-05(e), registrants may file abbreviated financial
statements for an acquiree when all of the following conditions are met:
-
As of and for the most recently completed fiscal year, the assets and revenue (after intercompany eliminations) of the acquiree represent 20 percent or less of the assets and revenue of the seller.
-
The acquiree financial statements have not been previously prepared.
-
The acquiree was not a separate entity, subsidiary, operating segment, or division during the periods for which acquiree financial statements would be required.
-
The seller did not maintain the “distinct and separate accounts” that would be necessary for the registrant to present financial statements that include the omitted expenses, and the preparation of such financial statements would be impracticable.
In evaluating the “operating segment” condition above, a
registrant should consider the definition of that term in ASC 280 or IFRS 8,
as applicable. The operating segment condition for abbreviated financial
statements applies to all acquired businesses, whether public or private.
Accordingly, a company may have to evaluate whether the acquired entity
would qualify as an operating segment under ASC 280, if relevant.
There may be circumstances in which it is challenging for a
registrant to make the relevant allocations needed to provide carve-out
financial statements. If the qualifying conditions for abbreviated financial
statements have not been met but a registrant nevertheless believes that
such statements would provide sufficient disclosure for investors, the
registrant may request a waiver from the SEC staff under Rule 3-13.
Note also that while a registrant generally may not use
abbreviated financial statements for an acquiree that has been identified as
its predecessor, the SEC staff may consider requests under Rule 3-13 to
provide such statements (e.g., when full successor financial statements have
been presented in the initial registration statement for some periods). For
additional guidance on Rule 3-13 waivers and prefiling letter requests, see
Section 2.5 of Deloitte’s Roadmap
Initial Public
Offerings.
2.6.4.2 Presentation and Disclosure Requirements for Abbreviated Financial Statements
As discussed in paragraphs
2935.8 through 2935.10 of the FRM, abbreviated financial
statements typically consist of a statement of (1) revenues and expenses (in
lieu of a full statement of operations), (2) assets acquired and liabilities
assumed (in lieu of a full balance sheet), and (3) footnotes to the
abbreviated financial statements.
The title of the statement of revenues and expenses must be
appropriately modified to indicate that it omits certain expenses. Further,
paragraph
2935.9 of the FRM notes that the statement of revenues
and expenses must include all revenues and direct expenses associated with
the revenue-producing activities of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. Typically, the only costs excluded are those not directly connected
to the revenue producing activity. For example, all related costs incurred
by or on behalf of the acquiree for the periods required to be presented
must include costs of sales or services, selling, distribution, and
marketing as well as general and administrative expenses, depreciation and
amortization, and R&D expenses. As noted in the response to
Question 2 of SAB
Topic 1.B, if the abbreviated financial statements
include a reasonable allocation of costs directly related to the revenue
producing activity incurred by the seller on behalf of the business sold,
the footnotes should contain management’s assertion that the method used to
allocate those costs is reasonable. However, the registrant may exclude
allocated corporate overhead expenses, certain interest expense (i.e.,
interest expense for debt that will not be assumed by the registrant), and
income tax expense (collectively, “omitted expenses”). The auditor’s report
on these financial statements would include an emphasis-of-matter paragraph
indicating the special purpose and incomplete nature of the presentation of
the results of operations, as discussed in AICPA SAS 122 (AU-C Section 805.24).
In accordance with Rule 3-05(e)(2)(iii), the footnotes to
the abbreviated financial statements should include the following
disclosures: (1) the nature of the omitted expenses and why they were
omitted, (2) an explanation of why it is impracticable to prepare financial
statements that include the omitted expenses, and (3) a statement that the
financial statements do not indicate the acquiree’s future financial
condition or operations because the omitted expenses have been excluded.
If a registrant presents abbreviated financial statements, it is not required
to provide a statement of cash flows. However, information (if available)
about the acquiree’s operating, investing, and financing cash flows must be
included in the footnotes to the financial statements.
2.6.4.3 Abbreviated Financial Statements for an Oil and Gas Acquiree
Rule
3-05(f) permits the financial statements of an acquired or to
be acquired business that includes significant oil- and gas-producing
activities (an “oil and gas acquiree”) to consist only of abbreviated
statements of revenues and expenses and to omit costs that are not
comparable to the proposed future operations. Such statements may therefore
exclude the omitted expenses described in Section 2.6.4.2 as well as
depreciation, depletion, and amortization.
As discussed in paragraph
2935.11 of the FRM and in a manner consistent with Rule
3-05(f), a registrant may present abbreviated financial statements if the
oil and gas acquiree generates substantially all of its revenues from oil-
and gas-producing activities as defined in Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10(a)(16),
and meets the qualifying conditions described in Section 2.6.4.1. Further, as noted in
paragraph 2935.12 of
the FRM, such statements must also include footnote disclosures (see
Section
2.6.4.2) as well as the industry-specific disclosures
required by ASC 932-235-50-3 through 50-11 and ASC 932-235-50-29 through
50-36. A registrant may provide the industry-specific disclosures as
unaudited supplemental information for each annual period it presents for
the oil and gas acquiree.
Note that the registrant does not have to provide an abbreviated statement of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Connecting the Dots
Before issuance of the SEC’s May 2020 final rule, an
oil and gas acquiree that met certain conditions outlined in
paragraph
2935.11 of the FRM was not required to obtain
preclearance from the SEC to present abbreviated financial
statements. However, the qualifying conditions under Rule 3-05(e)
(see Section
2.6.4.1 above) differ from the conditions in the FRM
and may be more difficult to satisfy (e.g., assets and revenue of
the oil and gas acquiree must represent 20
percent or less of the seller’s assets and revenue).
Therefore, preclearance from the SEC under Rule 3-13 to present
abbreviated financial statements for certain oil and gas acquirees
may now be necessary in accordance with Rule 3-05(f). For additional
guidance on Rule 3-13 waivers and prefiling letter requests, see
Section
2.5 of Deloitte’s Roadmap Initial Public
Offerings.
Footnotes
7
Also see Section 8.1 of Deloitte’s Roadmap
Business
Combinations and Section 3.2 of Deloitte’s Roadmap
Initial Public
Offerings.
8
EGCs should refer to Section 10230 of the FRM for
more information.