2.7 Related Businesses
Rule
3-05 requires registrants to treat the acquisition or probable
acquisition of a group of related businesses (related acquirees) as a single
business acquisition.
2.7.1 Definition of Related Businesses
Under Rule 3-05(a)(3)(i)–(iii), businesses are
related if any of the following conditions apply:
- “They are under common control or management.”
- “The acquisition of one business is conditional on the acquisition of each other business.”
- “Each acquisition is conditioned on a single common event.”
2.7.1.1 “Under Common Control or Management”
While common control is defined in U.S. GAAP (see Section B.2 in
Deloitte’s Roadmap Business Combinations for guidance on when common
control exists), “common management” is not. The presence of common
management therefore depends on the relevant facts and circumstances.
Example 2-26
Registrant A acquires Companies X and Y when both
companies are wholly owned by Private Equity
Investor E. Companies X and Y are deemed to be
related businesses for SEC reporting purposes
because they were under common control immediately
before A acquired them.
Example 2-27
Companies E and F share the same members of their
respective boards of directors and the same top five
management executives when both companies are
acquired by Registrant T. Companies E and F are
deemed to be related businesses for SEC reporting
purposes because they had common management
immediately before T acquired them.
2.7.1.2 “Acquisition of One Business Is Conditional on the Acquisition of Each Other Business”
Example 2-28
Registrant A agrees to acquire Company B. However,
the purchase agreement between A and B states that A
will not consummate the acquisition of B unless it
is also able to consummate the acquisition of
Company X. Companies B and X are not under common
control and do not have any common management
immediately before A acquires them.
Registrant A consummates the acquisition of X and
also consummates the acquisition of B. Companies B
and X are deemed to be related businesses for SEC
reporting purposes because the acquisition of B and
X was “conditional on the acquisition of each
other.”
2.7.1.3 “Each Acquisition Is Conditioned on a Single Common Event”
Example 2-29
Registrant A agrees to acquire Companies H and J.
However, the purchase agreements between A and H and
between A and J state that A will not consummate the
acquisitions unless A is able to raise $10 million
via a public offering of its common stock.
Registrant A completes the public offering and then
consummates the acquisitions of H and J. Companies H
and J are deemed to be related businesses for SEC
reporting purposes because each acquisition was
“conditioned on a single common event.”
2.7.2 Performing the Significance Tests for Related Businesses and Other SEC Reporting Considerations
Once a registrant determines that a group of acquirees is
related, it is required under Rule 3-05(a)(3) to assess their significance by comparing their
preacquisition annual financial statements, on an aggregate basis, to the
registrant’s annual financial statements. Aggregating such financial statements
is required; it is not optional. When evaluating significance, registrants must
take into account all related business acquisitions that are probable or have
occurred after the latest fiscal year-end for which their audited financial
statements have been filed. If related businesses have different fiscal
year-ends, the registrant should not conform such year-ends when performing the
significance tests. In addition, a registrant that acquires multiple related
businesses over the course of a year must aggregate the financial information of
all related businesses as of each acquisition date to perform the tests of
significance for each acquisition.
The significance thresholds and respective financial statement presentation
requirements that apply to individual acquirees (see Section 2.3) are the same as those that apply to the aggregated
related businesses. If any of the results of the significance tests for the
group of related businesses exceed 20 percent, the registrant must present
financial statements for all of the related businesses, even if a related
business is individually insignificant. If, because of the cumulative
significance of the related businesses, a Form 8-K must be filed, financial
statements are required for all consummated related business that have not been
previously filed.
Similarly, the types of filings for which the financial statements of related
businesses are required are the same as those for which the financial statements
of individually significant acquirees are required (see Section 2.4). For example, the registrant may be
required to include the financial statements of acquired related businesses in a
registration statement, prospectus supplement, proxy statements, or Form 8-K if
such businesses are significant. In addition, if the acquisition of related
businesses is probable, the registrant may have to include the financial
statements of such businesses in a registration statement, prospectus
supplement, or proxy statement. Financial statements of significant acquired or
to be acquired related businesses are not required in annual or quarterly
reports filed on Form 10-K or 10-Q.
If the financial statements of related businesses are required,
a registrant may combine them if the businesses are under common control or
management and they meet the criteria for combination in ASC 810-10-55-1B.
However, the SEC staff may require the combined financial statements of acquired related businesses to be presented separately
from the combined financial statements of related businesses that are to be acquired. If related businesses were under common
control or management for only a portion of the required periods, a registrant
must present separate financial statements for each related business for such
portion during which the related businesses were not under common control or
management.
Under Rule 3-13, the SEC staff may consider
a registrant’s request to waive the financial statements of individual related
businesses that are not significant to the overall transaction. For more
information, see Section
1.5.
2.7.2.1 Investment and Asset Tests
The investment and asset tests should be performed
individually for each related business, and the significance of such
businesses will be determined on the basis of the sum of each result. In
many cases, the acquisition of related businesses may be announced or agreed
to on the same date. If, however, they are announced or agreed to on
different dates, a registrant may use a different AWMV (if applicable) for
each related business acquisition when performing the investment test. See
Sections
2.3.2 and 2.3.3 for broader discussions of the investment and asset
tests, respectively.
2.7.2.2 Income Test
For both the income and revenue component of the income
test, a registrant should treat related businesses as a single business
acquisition:
- Income component — A registrant aggregates pretax income or loss from continuing operations for all related acquired or to be acquired businesses. (Such treatment differs from the evaluation of individually insignificant acquirees, as discussed in Section 2.9.) That is, the individual businesses do not need to be separated on the basis of whether they reported income or loss.
- Revenue component — If both the registrant and the related businesses, as a group, have material revenues in each of the two most recently completed fiscal years, the combined revenue for the group of related businesses should be used for the revenue component of the income test. If either the registrant or the related businesses, as a group, did not have material revenue for the two most recently completed fiscal years, only the income component should be used in the test. In such cases, a registrant may be able to use its five-year average of pretax income for the income component when the revenue component is not applicable (see Section 2.3.4 for additional information). In certain situations, it may be appropriate for the registrant to use pro forma financial information filed for a previous significant acquisition when performing the significance tests for the related businesses (see Section 2.3.1.2 for additional information).
Example 2-30
Registrant A announced the planned acquisitions of
Companies B, C, and D on March 31, 20X4; April 30,
20X4; and May 30, 20X4, respectively. On July 31,
20X4, A consummated the acquisitions of B, C, and D,
which were deemed related businesses because they
were under common control since January 1, 20X1.
Registrant A and Companies B, C, and D all have a
December 31 year-end.
The table below summarizes the financial information
of A, B, C, and D as of and for the year ended
December 31, 20X3, as well as the calculation of the
combined significance of B, C, and D. Assume that A,
B, and C had material revenues for each of the two
most recent fiscal years, but D did not.
On the basis of the results of the
investment test, B, C, and D were determined, in the
aggregate, to be 38 percent significant to A. While
the income component of the income test exceeds 40
percent, the revenue component does not. The revenue
component of the income test applies because the
related businesses as a group had material revenue
for each of the two most recent fiscal years even
though D did not have material revenues on a
stand-alone basis.
Registrant A filed a Form 8-K
announcing the consummation of the acquisitions on
August 3, 20X4 (i.e., within four business days). On
the basis of significance level, A must file an
amended Form 8-K before October 13, 20X4 (i.e., 71
calendar days after it was required to file the
initial Form 8-K), as well as the required pro forma
financial information. In addition, in the amended
Form 8-K, A must present B’s, C’s, and D’s (1)
audited financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 20X3, and (2) unaudited balance
sheet as of March 31, 20X4, and unaudited statements
of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and
changes in stockholders’ equity for the quarter
ended March 31, 20X4. However, A may present
combined financial statements of B, C, and D because
those companies meet the combining criteria under
ASC 810-10-55-1B. Depending on when it files future
registration statements, A may need to update the
interim acquiree financial statements presented (see
Section 2.5.4.3).