D.4 MD&A — Results of Operations
Sample Disclosure
Results of
Operations
Our ETR for fiscal years 20X3, 20X2, and 20X1
was XX percent, XX percent, and XX percent, respectively. Our
tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in
foreign jurisdictions and the relative amounts of income we earn
in those jurisdictions, which we expect to be fairly consistent
in the near term. It is also affected by discrete items that may
occur in any given year but are not consistent from year to
year. In addition to state income taxes, the following items had
the most significant impact on the difference between our
statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of XX percent and our
ETR:
20X3
- A $XXX (XX percent) reduction resulting from changes in UTBs for tax positions taken in prior periods, related primarily to favorable developments in an IRS position. Note that a detailed explanation of the change and the amount previously recorded as a UTB would be expected.
- A $XXX (XX percent) increase resulting from multiple unfavorable foreign audit assessments. Note that a detailed explanation of the change and the amount previously recorded as a UTB would be expected.
- A $XXX (XX percent) reduction resulting from rate differences between U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions. No taxes were provided for those undistributed foreign earnings that are indefinitely reinvested. Note that a discussion of the countries significantly affecting the overall effective rate would be expected.
- A $XXX (XX percent) increase from noncash impairment charges for goodwill that is nondeductible for tax purposes.
20X2
The notes accompanying the 20X3 items above also
apply to the 20X2 items listed below.
- A $XXX (XX percent) increase resulting from the resolution of U.S. state audits.
- A $XXX (XX percent) increase resulting from a European Commission penalty, which was not tax deductible.
- A $XXX (XX percent) reduction resulting from rate differences between U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions.
20X1
The notes accompanying the 20X3 items above also
apply to the 20X1 items listed below.
- A $XXX (XX percent) reduction resulting from the reversal of previously accrued taxes from an IRS settlement.
- A $XXX (XX percent) reduction resulting from rate differences between U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions.
For more information, see SEC Regulation
S-K, Item 303.
SEC Regulation S-K, Item
303(b)(2)(ii), requires registrants to “[d]escribe any known trends
or uncertainties that have had or that are reasonably likely to have a material
favorable or unfavorable impact on net sales or revenues or income from continuing
operations.” The sample disclosures below present various descriptions registrants might
provide under this requirement.
Sample Disclosure
Early Warning of Possible
Valuation Allowance Recognition in Future Periods
As of December 31, 20X1, we had approximately
$XX million in net DTAs. These DTAs include approximately $XX
million related to NOL carryforwards that can be used to offset
taxable income in future periods and reduce our income taxes
payable in those future periods. Many of these NOL carryforwards
will expire if they are not used within certain periods. At this
time, we consider it more likely than not that we will have
sufficient taxable income in the future that will allow us to
realize these DTAs. However, it is possible that some or all of
these NOL carryforwards could ultimately expire unused,
especially if our Component X restructuring initiative is not
successful. Therefore, unless we are able to generate sufficient
taxable income from our Component Y operations, a substantial
valuation allowance to reduce our U.S. DTAs may be required,
which would materially increase our expenses in the period the
allowance is recognized and materially adversely affect our
results of operations and statement of financial condition.
Sample Disclosure
Early Warning of Possible
Valuation Allowance Reversal in Future Periods
We recorded a valuation allowance against all of
our DTAs as of both December 31, 20X2, and December 31, 20X1. We
intend to continue maintaining a full valuation allowance on our
DTAs until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal
of all or some portion of these allowances. However, given our
current earnings and anticipated future earnings, we believe
that there is a reasonable possibility that within the next 12
months, sufficient positive evidence may become available to
allow us to reach a conclusion that a significant portion of the
valuation allowance will no longer be needed. Release of the
valuation allowance would result in the recognition of certain
DTAs and a decrease to income tax expense for the period the
release is recorded. However, the exact timing and amount of the
valuation allowance release are subject to change on the basis
of the level of profitability that we are able to actually
achieve.
Connecting the Dots
Companies should specify the positive and negative evidence they
evaluated, the jurisdiction, and the potential amount of valuation allowance
that may be recorded or reversed.
Sample Disclosure
Change in Tax Laws Affecting
Future Periods
Changes in tax laws and rates may affect
recorded DTAs and DTLs and our ETR in the future. In January
20X4, Country X made significant changes to its tax laws,
including certain changes that were retroactive to our 20X3 tax
year. Because a change in tax law is accounted for in the period
of enactment, the retroactive effects cannot be recognized in
our 20X3 financial results and instead will be reflected in our
20X4 financial results. We estimate that a benefit of
approximately $XXX will be accounted for as a discrete item in
our tax provision for the first quarter of 20X4. In addition, we
expect this tax law change to favorably affect our estimated
AETR for 20X4 by approximately X percentage points as compared
to 20X3.
Sample Disclosure
Global Minimum Corporate Tax
Rate
On October 8, 2021, the OECD announced that
members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and
Profit Shifting (the “Inclusive Framework”) agreed to a
two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges associated
with the digitalization of the economy. On December 20, 2021,
the OECD released the Pillar Two model rules, which define the
global minimum tax and call for the taxation of large
corporations at a minimum rate of 15 percent. The OECD has since
issued commentary and additional administrative guidance related
to the Inclusive Framework agreement.
Certain jurisdictions in which the Company
operates, have enacted Pillar Two legislation that became
effective on January 1, 2024. While the Company is in scope of
the enacted legislation, we do not expect Pillar Two to have a
material impact on our current year financial results. Although
we are unable to predict when and how the Inclusive Framework
agreement will be enacted into law in other jurisdictions, it is
possible that its implementation could have a material effect on
the liability for corporate taxes and consolidated ETR in the
United States. We will continue to monitor regulatory
developments to assess potential impacts on our consolidated
financial statements as additional guidance is released.