D.5 MD&A — Critical Accounting Estimates1
Sample Disclosure
Our income tax expense, DTAs and DTLs, and
liabilities for UTBs reflect management’s best estimate of
current and future taxes to be paid. We are subject to income
taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgments and estimates are required in the
determination of the consolidated income tax expense.
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will
result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. In
evaluating our ability to recover our DTAs in the jurisdiction
from which they arise, we consider all available positive and
negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of DTLs,
projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and
results of recent operations. In projecting future taxable
income, we begin with historical results adjusted for the
results of discontinued operations and incorporate assumptions
about the amount of future state, federal, and foreign pretax
operating income adjusted for items that do not have tax
consequences. The assumptions about future taxable income
require the use of significant judgment and are consistent with
the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying
businesses. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical
results provide, we consider three years of cumulative operating
income (loss).
As of December 31, 20X3, we have federal and
state income tax NOL carryforwards of $XXX and $XXX, which will
expire on various dates from 20X4 through 20Y8 as follows:
We believe that it is more likely than not that
the benefit from certain state NOL carryforwards will not be
realized. In recognition of this risk, we have provided a
valuation allowance of $XX on the DTAs related to these state
NOL carryforwards. If our assumptions change and we determine
that we will be able to realize these NOLs, the tax benefits
related to any reversal of the valuation allowance on DTAs as of
December 31, 20X3, will be accounted for as follows:
Approximately $XXX will be recognized as a reduction of income
tax expense and $XXX will be recorded as an increase in
equity.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves
dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax
laws and regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our
global operations. ASC 740 states that a tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained upon examination,
including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation
processes, on the basis of the technical merits.
We (1) record UTBs as liabilities in accordance
with ASC 740 and (2) adjust these liabilities when our judgment
changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not
previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment
that is materially different from our current estimate of the
UTB liabilities. These differences will be reflected as
increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in
which new information is available.
We believe that it is reasonably possible that
an increase of up to $XX in UTBs related to state exposures may
be necessary within the coming year. In addition, we believe
that it is reasonably possible that approximately $XX of our
currently remaining UTBs, each of which is individually
insignificant, may be recognized by the end of 20X4 as a result
of a lapse of the statute of limitations.
We consider the earnings of certain non-U.S.
subsidiaries to be indefinitely invested outside the United
States on the basis of estimates that future domestic cash
generation will be sufficient to meet future domestic cash needs
and our specific plans for reinvestment of those subsidiary
earnings. We have not recorded a DTL related to the U.S. federal
and state income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on
approximately $XX of undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries indefinitely invested outside the United States. If
we decide to repatriate the foreign earnings, we would need to
adjust our income tax provision in the period we determined that
the earnings will no longer be indefinitely invested outside the
United States.
For more information, see SEC Interpretation Release Nos.
33-8350, 34-48960, and FR-72 as well as Regulation S-K, Item
303(b)(3).
At the 2023 AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB
Developments, the SEC staff noted that critical accounting estimates are intended to
provide the quantitative and qualitative information investors need to understand
estimation uncertainty and the impact an estimate has had or is reasonably likely to
have on a registrant’s financial condition or results of operations. The SEC staff
further highlighted several questions a registrant should consider when preparing its
critical accounting estimate disclosures, including:
- Can the investor understand from the disclosure why that particular estimate is critical?
- Does the critical accounting estimate include both qualitative and quantitative information?
- Is it likely that an investor would find it difficult to understand the estimation uncertainty in the absence of any quantification?
- Does the disclosure adequately provide information incremental to the registrant’s accounting policy disclosures in footnotes?
See Deloitte’s December 10, 2023, Heads Up on the conference for additional
interpretive guidance.
Footnotes
1
At the 2013 AICPA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB
Developments (the “AICPA Conference”), in remarks related to disclosures about
valuation allowances on DTAs, the SEC staff discouraged registrants from
providing “boilerplate” information and instead recommended that they discuss
registrant-specific factors (e.g., limitations on their ability to use NOLs and
FTCs). The SEC staff also stated that it has asked registrants to disclose the
effect of each source of taxable income on their ability to realize a DTA,
including the relative magnitude of each source of taxable income. In addition,
the staff recommended that registrants consider disclosing the material negative
evidence they evaluated, since such disclosures could provide investors with
information about uncertainties related to a registrant’s ability to recover a
DTA. For additional information, see Deloitte’s December 16, 2013, Heads Up on
the AICPA Conference.