4.1 Definition of Cash and Cash Equivalents
ASC Master Glossary
Cash
Consistent with common usage, cash includes not only currency on hand but demand deposits with banks or other financial institutions. Cash also includes other kinds of accounts that have the general characteristics of demand deposits in that the customer may deposit additional funds at any time and also effectively may withdraw funds at any time without prior notice or penalty. All charges and credits to those accounts are cash receipts or payments to both the entity owning the account and the bank holding it. For example, a bank’s granting of a loan by crediting the proceeds to a customer’s demand deposit account is a cash payment by the bank and a cash receipt of the customer when the entry is made.
While the definition of cash is fairly
straightforward, the determination of cash equivalents may not be as clear. The ASC master
glossary defines cash equivalents as follows:
ASC Master Glossary
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that have both of the following characteristics:
- Readily convertible to known amounts of cash
- So near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates.
Generally, only investments with original maturities of three months or less qualify under that definition. Original maturity means original maturity to the entity holding the investment. For example, both a three-month U.S. Treasury bill and a three-year U.S. Treasury note purchased three months from maturity qualify as cash equivalents. However, a Treasury note purchased three years ago does not become a cash equivalent when its remaining maturity is three months. Examples of items commonly considered to be cash equivalents are Treasury bills, commercial paper, money market funds, and federal funds sold (for an entity with banking operations).
Maturity is a critical component in the determination of whether short-term investments, such as certificates of deposit, time deposits, and other temporary investments, can be combined with cash and classified as cash equivalents or presented separately as short-term investments in an entity’s balance sheet and statement of cash flows.
Example 4-1
Entity A invests excess funds in short-term (less than three months) bank repurchase agreements. The underlying securities in the transaction may have maturities greater than three months. Entity A may classify these repurchase agreements as cash equivalents in its balance sheet and statement of cash flows. The investment (the repurchase agreement), in substance, meets the criteria in ASC 230. The critical factor is the maturity of the repurchase agreement itself, not the underlying securities that serve to secure the investment.
ASC 230-10
45-6 Not all investments that qualify are required to be treated as cash equivalents. An entity shall establish a policy concerning which short-term, highly liquid investments that satisfy the definition of cash equivalents are treated as cash equivalents. For example, an entity having banking operations might decide that all investments that qualify except for those purchased for its trading account will be treated as cash equivalents, while an entity whose operations consist largely of investing in short-term, highly liquid investments might decide that all those items will be treated as investments rather than cash equivalents.
In accordance with ASC 230-10-50-1, an entity should disclose its policy for
determining which items are treated as cash equivalents. Changes to an entity’s policy
represent changes in accounting principle for which preferability must be established in
accordance with ASC 250.
4.1.1 Restricted Cash
4.1.1.1 Balance Sheet Presentation of Restricted Cash
Cash available for general operations is distinguishable from cash restricted in accordance with third-party special-purpose agreements. When a cash account is restricted, the ability of the account’s owner to withdraw funds at any time is contractually or legally restricted. Since an entity cannot withdraw restricted cash without prior notice or penalty, the entity should not present such cash in cash and cash equivalents. While the terms “restricted cash” and “restricted cash equivalents” are not defined in U.S. GAAP, SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 5-02(1), requires registrants to separately disclose account balances whose withdrawal or usage is restricted. As a result, registrants typically present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents separately from cash and cash equivalents on their balance sheet, and many nonpublic entities elect similar balance sheet presentation. However, entities may include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in other balance sheet line items. Accordingly, an entity’s definition of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents is typically an accounting policy matter. Such a policy should be applied consistently and will need to take into account the nature of both the financial instruments and the restrictions.
Paragraph BC9 of ASU 2016-18 indicates that the Board’s clarifications related to presenting restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows were not intended to change an entity’s practice for identifying and reporting restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Specifically, paragraph BC9 states:
Although the Master Glossary does not include specific definitions of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents, some Task Force members believe that only those financial instruments that first meet the definition of cash or cash equivalents before considering the restrictions that exist in a separate provision outside those financial instruments should be included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period reconciliation of the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. Other Task Force members believe that the nature of the restrictions on cash or cash equivalents should be considered and that in certain cases the restrictions could be so severe that the financial instrument would not meet the definition of cash or cash equivalents, thereby preventing those balances from being included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period reconciliation of total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. The Task Force considered defining restricted cash; however, it ultimately decided that the issue resulting in diversity in practice is the presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. The Task Force’s intent is not to change practice for what an entity reports as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.
Further, paragraph BC19 of ASU 2016-18 notes that (1) an entity should apply the
guidance on a change in an accounting principle in ASC 250 “if [the] entity is
considering changing its accounting policy for determining restricted cash and
restricted cash equivalents” and (2) “[s]uch evaluation would be separate from adoption
of the amendments in this Update [ASU 2016-18].”
In addition, in accordance with ASC 230-10-50-7, an entity should “disclose
information about the nature of restrictions on its cash, cash equivalents, and amounts
generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.” Further, when
cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted
cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item in the statement of financial
position, an entity should also apply the requirements in ASC 230-10-50-8, as discussed
below.
4.1.1.2 Presentation of Restricted Cash in the Statement of Cash Flows
ASC 230-10
45-4 A statement of cash
flows shall explain the change during the period
in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and
amounts generally described as restricted cash or
restricted cash equivalents. The statement shall
use descriptive terms such as cash or cash and
cash equivalents rather than ambiguous terms such
as funds. When cash, cash equivalents, and amounts
generally described as restricted cash or
restricted cash equivalents are presented in more
than one line item within the statement of
financial position, an entity shall provide the
disclosures required in paragraph 230-10-50-8.
45-5 Cash purchases and sales of items commonly
considered to be cash equivalents generally are part of the entity’s cash
management activities rather than part of its operating, investing, and
financing activities, and details of those transactions need not be reported
in a statement of cash flows. In addition, transfers between cash, cash
equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or
restricted cash equivalents are not part of the entity’s operating,
investing, and financing activities, and details of those transfers are not
reported as cash flow activities in the statement of cash flows.
50-8 When cash, cash equivalents, and amounts
generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents are
presented in more than one line item within the statement of financial
position, an entity shall, for each period that a statement of financial
position is presented, present on the face of the statement of cash flows or
disclose in the notes to the financial statements, the line items and
amounts of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as
restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents reported within the statement
of financial position. The amounts, disaggregated by the line item in which
they appear within the statement of financial position, shall sum to the
total amount of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as
restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents at the end of the
corresponding period shown in the statement of cash flows. This disclosure
may be provided in either a narrative or a tabular format . . . .
In a manner consistent with the guidance in ASC
230-10-45-4, an entity should include in the beginning and ending cash and
cash-equivalent balances of the statement of cash flows those amounts that
are generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents,
regardless of where such amounts may be included on an entity’s balance
sheet (e.g., cash, restricted cash, other assets, collections from
servicing). The concept of reconciling “total cash” in the statement of cash
flows is discussed in paragraph BC5 of ASU 2016-18, which states:
The Task Force reached a consensus that a statement of
cash flows should explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally
described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. That
is, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash
equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when
reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown
on the statement of cash flows under the amendments in this Update. The
Task Force recognizes that some entities present cash and cash equivalents
with restrictions in multiple line items on the statement of financial
position and that in some cases those line items are titled something
other than restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents; therefore, the
phrase amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted
cash equivalents is used throughout this Update. This consensus
requires that those amounts also be included in the beginning-of-period
and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.
[Emphasis added] |
Example 4-2
Entity A is a mortgage servicer that collects mortgage payments from
debtors and remits the mortgage payments (net of authorized service fees) to
a creditor. Before remitting net mortgage payments to the creditor, A
classifies cash, which it has control over, under the caption “collections
from servicing” on its balance sheet. Because the amounts included in the
balance sheet under this caption represent cash, A presents these amounts in
the beginning-of-period and end-of-period cash, cash equivalents, and
restricted cash in the statement of cash flows rather than as part of the
cash flow activities reported for the period.
Changes in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents that result from
transfers between cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and restricted cash
equivalents should not be presented as cash flow activities in an entity’s statement of
cash flows. This stipulation is consistent with paragraph BC8 of ASU 2016-18, which
states, in part:
The Task Force believes that internal transfers
between cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or
restricted cash equivalents do not represent a cash inflow or outflow of the entity
because there is no cash receipt or cash payment with a source outside of the entity
that affects the sum of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as
restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.
Example 4-3
Company A enters into an agreement with Company B under which A will operate and maintain a desalination
plant owned by B. In accordance with the contract:
- Company B will transfer a fixed amount of cash into an account in A’s name at the beginning of every month to fund the cost of repairing and maintaining the plant.
- The account is segregated from A’s general operating account.
- Company A obtains approval from B before performing any repair and maintenance work, and available account funds cannot be withdrawn without B’s approval.
- Any funds remaining upon the expiration or termination of the agreement will be returned to B.
Because of the contractual restrictions associated with the use of the cash deposited into A’s account,
whenever B funds the account, A immediately recognizes restricted cash and a contract liability (i.e., deferred
revenue).
In accordance with ASC 230-10-45-4, A includes the restricted cash balance with cash and cash equivalents
in the reconciliation of beginning and ending cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash
equivalents, instead of separate cash flows (for each period for which the cash amounts are restricted).
4.1.1.3 Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Amounts Generally Described as Restricted Cash or Restricted Cash Equivalents for an Interim Reporting Period
ASC 230 requires the
reconciliation of (1) the ending cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described
as restricted cash or the restricted cash equivalents balance presented in the statement
of cash flows to (2) the statement of financial position when such amounts are presented
in more than one line item in the statement of financial position. Such information must
be provided on the face of the statement of cash flows or disclosed in the notes to the
financial statements and can be in narrative or tabular form. However, ASC 230 does not
specify how to apply this requirement to comparative periods when interim periods
presented in the statement of cash flows do not correspond to the periods presented in
the statement of financial position. Specifically, while ASC 230-10-50-8 states, in
part, that the reconciliation is required for “each period that a statement of financial position is presented” (e.g., as of March 31, 20X1, and
December 31, 20X0), ASC 230-10-50-8 then goes on to indicate that those amounts “shall
sum to the total amount of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as
restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents at the end of the corresponding period
shown in the statement of cash flows” (e.g., March 31, 20X1, and
March 31, 20X0). [Emphasis added]
The lack of specific guidance
on this matter has led to diversity in how entities have applied this reporting
requirement for interim reporting periods. We believe that it is acceptable for an
entity to use one of the following alternatives to meet ASC 230’s reconciliation
requirement for interim reporting periods (for illustrative purposes, we have assumed
that in the interim financial statements, the statements of financial position are as of
March 31, 20X1, and December 31, 20X0, and the three months ended March 31, 20X1, and
March 31, 20X0, for the statement of cash flows):
- Provide the reconciliation for each period presented in the statement of financial position (e.g., March 31, 20X1, and December 31, 20X0).
- Provide the reconciliation for each period presented in the statement of cash flows (e.g., March 31, 20X1, and March 31, 20X0).
- Provide the reconciliation for each period presented in the statement of financial position as well as each period presented in the statement of cash flows (e.g., March 31, 20X1; December 31, 20X0; and March 31, 20X0).
See Appendix D for other SEC interim reporting
considerations related to the statement of cash flows.
4.1.2 Classification of Interest Earned on Restricted Funds
As noted in Section 4.1.1, entities must include in their cash and cash-equivalent balances in the statement of cash flows those amounts that are generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. Entities must also provide certain disclosures about the amounts and nature of restricted cash included in their cash and cash-equivalent balances. Under ASC 230, an entity should classify interest earned on restricted funds in the statement of cash flows in a manner consistent with cash and cash equivalents that are not restricted and should also include such amounts in disclosures about restricted cash.
4.1.3 Funds Held for Others
In certain situations, an entity may arrange for the transfer of cash on behalf of others
(e.g., an entity that provides payroll tax filing, payment processing services, or
escrow-related activities). Questions have arisen regarding when such an entity should
report — as its asset on the balance sheet and the associated cash flows in the cash flows
statement — the cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash and restricted cash
equivalents held with financial institutions for the benefit of its clients (the
“Funds”).
We believe that the entity’s determination of whether to report the
Funds held on behalf of others as its own cash, or restricted cash in its balance sheet,
should be based on whether the entity controls the Funds. This stipulation is consistent
with the nonauthoritative guidance in AICPA Technical
Q&As Section 1100.08, which states, in part, that “[t]he balance
sheet caption ‘cash’ should represent an amount that is within the control of the
reporting enterprise.”
The determination of whether the entity controls the Funds held on the behalf of others
can be complex. Criteria an entity should consider in making this determination may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Whether the entity has legal ownership over or title to the Funds.
- Whether the entity has the right to use the Funds before performing under the terms of the arrangement (e.g., whether the entity has the right to invest the Funds before disbursement).
- In the event of bankruptcy, whether the Funds would be considered part of the bankruptcy state of the entity, the client, or both.
- What happens if the entity fails to perform (e.g., whether the entity would be obligated to make payments using its own cash if it failed to make payroll-related payments to a client’s employees).
If the entity determines that it controls the Funds held on behalf of
others, it should report the Funds as cash or restricted cash in its balance sheet.
However, if an entity concludes that it does not control the Funds, it should not present
the Funds as assets on the balance sheet or present those transactions in the statement of
cash flows. We believe that an operating classification may also be acceptable. See
Section 6.2.4 for further discussion of reporting
cash flows related to advance payments received from customers or other third parties.
We believe that entities that participate in such arrangements should
consider disclosing the criteria and judgments they used when determining whether they
control the Funds held on behalf of others.