6.2 Financing Activities
ASC 230-10-20 defines financing activities as follows:
Financing activities include obtaining resources from owners and providing them with a return on, and a return of, their investment; receiving restricted resources that by donor stipulation must be used for long-term purposes; borrowing money and repaying amounts borrowed, or otherwise settling the obligation; and obtaining and paying for other resources obtained from creditors on long-term credit.
ASC 230-10
45-14 All of the following
are cash inflows from financing activities:
-
Proceeds from issuing equity instruments
-
Proceeds from issuing bonds, mortgages, notes, and from other short- or long-term borrowing
-
Receipts from contributions and investment income that by donor stipulation are restricted for the purposes of acquiring, constructing, or improving property, plant, equipment, or other long-lived assets or establishing or increasing a donor-restricted endowment fund
-
Proceeds received from derivative instruments that include financing elements at inception, whether the proceeds were received at inception or over the term of the derivative instrument, other than a financing element inherently included in an at-the-market derivative instrument with no prepayments
-
Subparagraph superseded by Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09.
45-15 All of the following
are cash outflows for financing activities:
-
Payments of dividends or other distributions to owners, including outlays to reacquire the entity’s equity instruments. Cash paid to a tax authority by a grantor when withholding shares from a grantee’s award for tax-withholding purposes shall be considered an outlay to reacquire the entity’s equity instruments.
-
Repayments of amounts borrowed, including the portion of the repayments made to settle zero-coupon debt instruments that is attributable to the principal or the portion of the repayments made to settle other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing that is attributable to the principal.
-
Other principal payments to creditors who have extended long-term credit. See paragraph 230-10-45-13(c), which indicates that most principal payments on seller-financed debt directly related to a purchase of property, plant, and equipment or other productive assets are financing cash outflows.
-
Distributions to counterparties of derivative instruments that include financing elements at inception, other than a financing element inherently included in an at-the-market derivative instrument with no prepayments. The distributions may be either at inception or over the term of the derivative instrument.
-
Payments for debt issue costs.
-
Payments, or the portion of the payments, not made soon after the acquisition date of a business combination by an acquirer to settle a contingent consideration liability up to the amount of the contingent consideration liability recognized at the acquisition date, including measurement-period adjustments, less any amounts paid soon after the acquisition date to settle the contingent consideration liability. See also paragraph 230-10-45-17(ee).
-
Payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, including third-party costs, premiums paid, and other fees paid to lenders that are directly related to the debt prepayment or debt extinguishment, excluding accrued interest.
The next sections discuss certain types of financing cash flows.
6.2.1 Debt Extinguishments and Modifications
If a borrower settles a debt financing arrangement before the maturity date, a lender may include a prepayment penalty in the financing agreement, often on the basis of a number of factors, such as an approximation of remaining interest that will not be paid given the early extinguishment.
ASC 230-10-45-15(g) specifies that cash outflows for financing activities
include “[p]ayments for debt prepayment or debt
extinguishment costs, including third-party costs,
premiums paid, and other fees paid to lenders that
are directly related to the debt prepayment or
debt extinguishment, excluding accrued interest.”
Further, paragraph BC7 of ASU 2016-15 specifies
that the EITF concluded that debt extinguishment
costs “should include all costs for the prepayment
or extinguishment of debt (that is, third-party
costs, premiums paid to repurchase debt in an
open-market transaction, and other fees paid to
lenders).”
Although ASC 230 does not address debt modifications,1 we believe that when debt is restructured
and is accounted for as a modification rather than
as an extinguishment, an entity should follow the
principles in ASC 230 and classify the fees paid
to the creditor on the modification date as a
financing cash outflow. Our view is based on the
fact that, in accordance with ASC 470-50-40-17(b),
fees paid to the creditor on the modification date
are “associated with the . . . modified debt
instrument” and (1) capitalized on the balance
sheet as a reduction to the modified debt and (2)
“amortized as an adjustment of interest expense
over the remaining term of the . . . modified debt
instrument using the interest method.” Since the
fees paid to the creditor to modify the debt
reduce the liability on the balance sheet, such
fees are akin to the payment of principal (or a
debt discount, which, on the balance sheet, is
netted against the proceeds from the debt issued);
accordingly, such payments would be presented as
financing cash outflows in the statement of cash
flows.
Further, we believe that any fees paid to a third party other than the creditor
in connection with a debt modification, including
those incurred in connection with a troubled debt
restructuring (TDR), should generally be
classified as operating cash outflows because, in
accordance with ASC 470-50-40-18(b), the payment
must be expensed. Therefore, since such fees enter
into the determination of net income, they would
be presented as operating activities. See
Section 6.3 for further discussion of
operating activities.
6.2.1.1 Troubled Debt Restructurings
As part of a TDR, an entity may recognize a
gain because the carrying amount of the debt is
greater than the total future cash payments
specified by the modified terms. In such a case,
the entity should present cash payments made after
the TDR as financing cash outflows, including
interest payments. In accordance with ASC
470-60-35-5, all payments are treated as
reductions to the carrying value of the debt
instead of interest expense for accounting
purposes.
If an entity does not
recognize a gain as part of a TDR because the
carrying amount of the debt is equal to or lower
than the total future cash payments specified by
the modified terms, the entity should present any
debt payments made after the TDR in a manner
consistent with the presentation of payments made
on nontroubled debt. Consequently, an entity
should present interest payments as operating
outflows in accordance with ASC 230-10-45-17(d)
and principal repayments as financing outflows in
accordance with ASC 230-10-45-15(b).
For additional discussion of TDRs, see
Chapter 11
of Deloitte’s Roadmap Issuer’s Accounting for
Debt.
6.2.2 Transactions With Noncontrolling Interest Holders
ASC 810-10-45-23 indicates that “[c]hanges in a parent’s ownership interest
while the parent retains its controlling financial
interest in its subsidiary shall be accounted for
as equity transactions (investments by owners and
distributions to owners acting in their capacity
as owners).” Accordingly, payments to acquire
noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary, or those
associated with the sale of noncontrolling
interests in a subsidiary, should be classified as
financing activities in the statement of cash
flows.
Direct costs of purchasing or selling noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary,
when control is maintained, should generally be
recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in
capital (APIC) and be classified as financing cash
outflows in the statement of cash flows. However,
indirect costs of purchasing or selling
noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary, when
control is maintained, should generally be
reflected as an expense in the income statement
and should be classified as operating cash
outflows in the statement of cash flows. These
conclusions are supported by analogies to ASC 810,
SAB Topic
5.A, and the nonauthoritative
guidance in AICPA Technical Q&As Section
4110.09.
SAB Topic 5.A provides guidance on accounting for costs related to the issuance of equity securities,
stating that “[s]pecific incremental costs directly attributable to a proposed or actual offering of
securities may properly be deferred and charged against the gross proceeds of the offering.” Therefore, direct costs of issuing equity securities are generally reflected as a reduction of the amount that would
have otherwise been recorded in APIC. SAB Topic 5.A further states that “management salaries or other
general and administrative expenses may not be allocated as costs of the offering and deferred costs of
an aborted offering may not be deferred and charged against proceeds of a subsequent offering.” These
indirect costs are generally reflected as an expense in the income statement.
In addition, the nonauthoritative guidance in AICPA Technical Q&As Section
4110.09 states that although there is no
authoritative literature on costs entities incur
to acquire their own stock, some “believe that
costs associated with the acquisition of treasury
stock should be treated in a manner similar to
stock issue costs.” Under SAB Topic 5.A, direct
costs associated with the acquisition of treasury
stock may be added to the cost of the treasury
stock.
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders (in their capacity as equity
holders) are considered equity transactions and
should be reflected as cash outflows for financing
activities in accordance with ASC 230-10-45-15.
Entities that determine that it is appropriate to
classify the cash outflows associated with these
distributions outside of financing activities in
the statement of cash flows are encouraged to
consult with their accounting advisers.
6.2.3 Debt Issue Costs
ASC 230-10-45-15(e) notes that
cash outflows for financing activities include
“[p]ayments for debt issue costs.” To the extent
that debt issue costs are paid to the lender, they
should be presented net in the statement of cash
flows, since such a transaction effectively
represents a reduction of borrowed amounts.
However, any debt issue costs paid to other
parties should be presented separately in the
statement of cash flows and should not be
presented net against the proceeds received. In
other words, such fees should be presented
separately as financing activities (i.e., on a
gross basis), regardless of whether the borrower
pays the debt issue costs to the other party
directly or the lender retains the borrowing costs
from the debt proceeds and remits them to the
other party. Importantly, the balance sheet
classification of debt issue costs (as a reduction
of the related debt liability rather than as an
asset) does not depend on the party to whom the
debt issue costs are paid and therefore does not
change if the fees are paid to the lender or to
other parties. For additional considerations
related to debt extinguishments and modifications,
see Section
6.2.1.
6.2.4 Advance Payments Received From Customers or Other Third Parties
When a supplier receives
up-front payments from a customer (i.e., the
payment represents consideration for the goods or
services that the supplier provides to the
customer), the receipt of such advance payments
should be presented as operating cash inflows in
accordance with ASC 230-10-45-16(a). In addition,
refunds of customer deposits represent operating
cash outflows in accordance with ASC
230-10-45-17(f).
When an entity receives
advance payments from a third party in an agency
relationship, which must be refunded to that same
party or another third party, the cash receipts in
these situations are akin to borrowings rather
than for the provision of goods or services.
Therefore the cash receipts should generally be
presented as financing cash inflows, with the
subsequent repayments classified as financing cash
outflows.
Example 6-4
Company M is a payroll processor that
receives funds from clients in advance before it
remits those funds to the client’s employees. The
cash flows from the funds received from, and paid
on behalf of, M’s clients are reported as
financing activities in the statement of cash
flows.
Footnotes
1
While ASU 2016-15 clarified
the presentation of certain payments related to
debt extinguishments in the statement of cash
flows, it did not address the cash flow
presentation related to fees a debtor pays to the
creditor when the debt is modified in accordance
with ASC 470-50.