7.15 Digital Assets
Other than the guidance in ASU 2023-08 (discussed below), there is no explicit U.S. GAAP
                guidance on accounting for digital assets, including how an entity classifies its
                receipts of and payments for such assets in the statement of cash flows. As a
                result, an entity must apply judgment when classifying the cash flows associated
                with transactions involving such assets.
            Changing Lanes
                    In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-08, which
                        addresses the accounting and disclosure requirements for certain crypto
                        assets. The new guidance provides guidance on, among other topics, cash flow
                        presentation related to the sale of crypto assets received as noncash
                        consideration in the ordinary course of business. The amendments require
                        entities to present, as operating cash inflows, the cash receipts from the
                        nearly immediate sale of crypto assets that were “received as noncash
                        consideration in the ordinary course of business (for example, in exchange
                        for goods and services transferred to a customer).” In this situation, an
                        entity would, in the normal course of business, receive crypto assets as
                        noncash consideration for a revenue-generating activity (e.g., mining).
                        According to ASC 230-10-45-27A, the phrase “nearly immediately” means “a
                        short period of time that is expected to be within hours or a few days,
                        rather than weeks.”
                    For all entities, the ASU’s amendments are effective for fiscal years
                        beginning after December 15, 2024, including interim periods within those
                        fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. If an entity adopts the
                        amendments in an interim period, it must adopt them as of the beginning of
                        the fiscal year that includes that interim period. 
                7.15.1 Purchases and Sales of Crypto Assets
We generally believe that because crypto assets are classified
                    as intangible assets, an entity should classify cash flows resulting from the
                    purchases or sales of such assets as investing activities in accordance with ASC
                    230-10-45-13(c) and ASC 230-10-45-12(c), respectively. However, ASU 2023-08
                    amends certain cash flow presentation guidance related to crypto assets within
                    its scope. ASC 230-10-45-27A (added by ASU 2023-08) states that “[i]f crypto
                    assets accounted for in accordance with Subtopic 350-60 are received as noncash
                    consideration in the ordinary course of business (for example, in exchange for
                    goods and services transferred to a customer) and converted nearly
                        immediately into cash, the cash received shall be classified as
                    operating activities. In this context, the term nearly immediately refers to a
                    short period of time that is expected to be within hours or a few days, rather
                    than weeks.” Entities that plan to classify the cash flow activity from this
                    type of arrangement within operating activities are encouraged to consult with
                    their accounting and financial advisers.
                In some cases, an entity may purchase goods or pay for services by using crypto
                    assets that are classified as intangible assets. In a manner consistent with the
                    principles discussed in Chapter 5, a
                    payment made for a good or service by using a crypto asset would be presented as
                    a noncash reconciling item in the reconciliation of net income to net cash flows
                    from operating activities. A payment made for PP&E or another productive
                    asset would be disclosed as a noncash investing activity.
            7.15.2 Safeguarding Requirements
In March 2022, the SEC issued SAB 121, in which the SEC staff provided
                    its view that an entity that has an obligation to safeguard crypto assets should
                    record a liability and corresponding asset on its balance sheet at the fair
                    value of the crypto assets. See Deloitte’s Roadmap Digital Assets for more information about SAB
                    121.
                Since the initial recognition of a safeguarding liability and
                    safeguarding asset is a noncash transaction whose nature is generally
                    categorized as operating (e.g., cash flows resulting from custodial services
                    provided by an asset manager enter into the determination of the asset manager’s
                    net income), such recognition would not be presented in the statement of cash
                    flows or disclosed in accordance with ASC 230. If, in subsequent periods, a
                    difference arises between the remeasurement of the safeguarding liability and
                    the safeguarding asset (e.g., because of a loss event9), we believe that it is acceptable for an entity to present this
                    difference on a net basis as a reconciling item within its net cash flows from
                    operating activities.
                Example 7-24
            
                                    Entity A is a broker-dealer that is required to record a
                                            safeguarding liability and safeguarding asset on its
                                            balance sheet in accordance with SAB 121. At initial
                                            recognition, the safeguarding liability and safeguarding
                                            asset were both $100 million. Since they are both part
                                            of A’s operations, A would not present their initial
                                            recognition in its statement of cash flows.
                                        In year 2, A remeasured the safeguarding liability and
                                            safeguarding asset. As a result of a loss event, the
                                            safeguarding asset was remeasured at $80 million while
                                            the safeguarding liability remained at $100 million. The
                                            $20 million loss would be presented as a reconciling
                                            item within the reconciliation of net income to net cash
                                            flows from operating activities in year 2.
            
                                    Changing Lanes
                        On January 23, 2025, the SEC released SAB 122 to rescind the previous guidance in SAB
                            121. Accordingly, an entity should remove from its balance sheet any
                            safeguarding obligation and corresponding asset that it was previously
                            required to recognize under SAB 121. However, because the initial
                            recognition of the safeguarding obligation and corresponding asset under
                            SAB 121 is not presented in the statement of cash flows, we do not
                            believe that the rescission of SAB 121 will affect an entity’s statement
                            of cash flows. 
                        Full retrospective application of SAB 122 is required
                            for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, but entities are
                            permitted to early adopt SAB 122 in any interim or annual financial
                            statement period included in filings with the SEC on or after January
                            30, 2025. While there is a short period before entities are required to
                            formally adopt SAB 122, we have observed that most entities have chosen
                            early adoption. In certain instances, an entity may still be applying
                            SAB 121; however, such cases are expected to be rare. For more
                            information, see Deloitte’s Roadmap Digital Assets. 
                    7.15.3 Crypto Asset Lending
At the 2022 AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB
                        Developments,10 the SEC staff indicated that it generally believes that, in crypto asset
                    lending transactions, the lender transfers control of the crypto asset and
                    should therefore derecognize it if the transfer meets the requirements for
                        derecognition.11 In such situations, the lender would derecognize the crypto asset and
                    recognize an asset (i.e., loan receivable) that reflects its right to receive
                    the crypto asset from the borrower at the end of the loan period. The lender
                    would also recognize an allowance for credit losses related to the asset
                    recognized from the exchange at the inception of the loan and at the end of each
                    subsequent reporting period. In addition, the lender may earn a fee during the
                    loan period that is commonly paid in the form of crypto assets.
                We believe that it would be acceptable to present the exchange
                    of the loaned crypto asset for the loan receivable as a noncash investing
                    activity since it is analogous to making and collecting loans. Any gain or loss
                    on the exchange12 related to the recognized asset should be presented as a noncash
                    reconciling item in the reconciliation of net income to net cash flows from
                    operating activities. In addition, since lender fees received in the form of
                    crypto assets reflect noncash income, we believe that it is acceptable for a
                    lender to present the crypto assets received as a noncash reconciling item in
                    the reconciliation of net income to net cash flows from operating
                    activities.
                Example 7-25
            
                                    Entity A enters into an agreement with
                                            Entity B in which A will lend B 200 units of bitcoin
                                            that is due one year from the loan commencement date.
                                            Entity A concludes that it should derecognize the
                                            bitcoin assets from its financial statements. Upon such
                                            derecognition, A simultaneously recognizes a loan
                                            receivable that reflects the fair value of the bitcoin
                                            assets lent, adjusted by an allowance for credit losses,
                                            and presents this noncash exchange as a noncash
                                            investing activity.
                                        In connection with the loan, A charges B a fee of 2
                                            percent per month and requires B to pay A 4 units of
                                            bitcoin each month for the 12-month duration of the
                                            loan. The bitcoin received by A related to the fees
                                            earned on the loan represents noncash consideration
                                            received and may be presented as a noncash reconciling
                                            item in the reconciliation of net income to net cash
                                            flows from operating activities.
                                        In addition, A determines that the allowance for credit
                                            losses is $200,000. This allowance would be presented as
                                            a noncash reconciling item in the reconciliation of net
                                            income to net cash flows from operating activities.
            
                                    Footnotes
9
                        
The entity would factor in potential loss events (e.g.,
                            theft, loss of the private key, loss of the crypto asset, cybersecurity
                            hacks) that could affect the measurement of the safeguarding asset. The
                            occurrence of such a loss event could result in a difference between the
                            safeguarding asset and the safeguarding liability.
                    11
                        
Entities need to consider various indicators of control
                            and elements of asset derecognition when making this determination. For
                            more information, see Deloitte’s April 25, 2023, Heads
                            Up.
                    12
                        
A gain or loss may be recognized as a result of (1) the
                            difference between the carrying value of the lent assets and the fair
                            value of the crypto asset loan receivable or (2) the initial and
                            subsequent measurement of the allowance for credit losses on the crypto
                            asset loan receivable.